Task Force 4 has completed revisions to GTR 24 concerning electro-mechanical calipers and proposes to include them in Amendment 3.

Task Force 3b addresses vehicles with limited speed by introducing a new Appendix 3 in Annex 4 to calculate adjusted cycles when vehicle maximum speed is lower than the WLTC-Brake cycle. The proposal modifies brake corner emissions family testing to allow vehicles with limited speed to be included in families with standard vehicles, with emission factors calculated from parent family factors or measured on adjusted cycles. Amendments address c-factor measurement, cycle-adjusted brake events, kinetic energy dissipation tolerances, and report file specifications.

TF 3c addressed brake emission of replacement parts. Proposed amendments include clarification that surface heat-treated discs fall under “other” category, refinement of “Brake Emissions Family Parent” definition, and addition of new appendix to UN Regulation No. 179 Annex 2. Data sharing agreement established: front-to-rear axle emission ratio, brake force distribution, and vehicle electrification type will be shared with aftermarket operators. Two approaches for aftermarket applicants: use vehicle-specific data through benchmarking or bilateral agreements, or apply default values from Tables 5.4 and 5.5. Testing revealed up to 30% variation within friction-couple families. Safety factor application when using actual c-factor values remains under discussion, with final decision expected before October.

Proposal to amend UN R179 following GRPE-94-15e:

• Include supplements on automated vehicle definitions and OICA proposals on family members with higher wheel load but lower wheel load times c-factor ratio,
• Clarify wheel load and vehicle mass definitions for different tests,
• Add wheel load distribution for light commercial vehicles with fully laden mass between 3.5 and 5 tonnes,
• Redefine brake assembly to allow brake calliper reuse if in technically suitable condition,
• Optionally omit cooling air adjustment if temperature requirements are fulfilled,
• Require three emission measurement sections instead of one for type approval with arithmetical average reported,
• Clarify energy calculation for vehicles with limited speed,
• Harmonize reporting requirements including units and decimals,
• Define normalized flows,
• Include transitional provisions stating that vehicle types with existing valid type approvals issued before entry into force of supplement 2 need not undergo new type approval testing.

Proposal to insert new paras. 3.3.29. to 3.3.33. defining “Semi-Metallic-Organic,” “Low-Steel-Organic,” “Non-Asbestos-Organic,” and “Low-Steel-Non-Organic” friction materials and “Pad area,” amend Annex 2 title to read “Annex 2 Communication,” insert a new footnote to Annex 2, and insert a new Annex 2 – Appendix containing a list of vehicle data for UN Regulation No. [XXX] approvals including vehicle type description, brake linings and discs specifications, vehicle test mass, maximum speed, tyre dimensions, brake circuit configuration, and brake specifications.

This document proposes a new UN Regulation on uniform provisions concerning approval of non-original and identical replacement brake parts regarding particulate emissions. The regulation applies to laboratory measurement of brake emissions from non-original replacement brake pads, linings, discs, and drums for vehicles of categories M₁, N₁, and N₂ originating from vehicles with type approval under Regulation No. 179. Approval requires emission factors to comply with specified limits based on vehicle category and powertrain technology. The regulation establishes brake emissions families based on characteristics including calliper type, vehicle axle location, friction material formulation, brake disc or drum material, disc surface form, friction material surface area, and drum diameter. Testing procedures, conformity of production requirements, marking and packaging specifications, and approval extension procedures are detailed.

Proposal to amend para. 6.5. to specify that a verification of reported virtual distance is only required if the manufacturer requests to apply the virtual distance option, to require a test with adequate and representative vehicle use in V2X or non-traction purposes to verify accuracy of reported virtual distance increase, and to permit the verification of Part C for vehicles in the same virtual distance family to be combined between different Contracting Parties with their agreement, with such Contracting Parties considered as a single authority for verification purposes.

Proposal to add two new definitions to para. 3.30., modify para. 5.1. to require manufacturers provide a procedure for achieving recent SOCE/SOCR monitor updates, modify Annex 1 to establish monitoring based on new parameters rather than the 50 per cent state-of-charge threshold, and add mandatory values to Annex 2 including State of Certified Energy Readiness Status, Energy Storage System Recent Depth of Discharge Counter, and Preconditions for Recent Battery Capacity Update, based on GRPE/2026/5 and EVE-97-04e.

This presentation summarizes EU-Commission JRC contributions to the EVE IWG regarding light-duty vehicle data for minimum performance requirements based on EVE-30-12, EVE-34-16, EVE-41-03, EVE-96-06, EVE-32-13e, EVE-74-21, and EVE-88-22. It compares JRC TEMA ageing predictions with real-world field data from multiple sources including Geotab analysis of over 22,700 electric vehicles showing average annual degradation of 2.3%, Tesla data indicating approximately 1% degradation per 40,000 km, Nissan Leaf data from Flip The Fleet comprising 2,311 vehicles, and experimental data from Canada on Tesla Model S and truck batteries. Key findings include that high-power DC fast charging causes degradation rates up to twice that of low-power charging, hot climates increase degradation 0.4% annually, and high mileage vehicles demonstrate cumulative calendar and cycle ageing effects while generally meeting GTR 22 battery energy retention requirements of 80% at five years and 100,000 km.

This document, based on GRPE/2026/4, presents Amendment 3 to UN GTR 21 on determining system power of hybrid electric vehicles and pure electric vehicles with multiple propulsion energy converters. The GTR establishes two equivalent test procedures (TP1 and TP2) to measure system power comparable to traditional engine-based ratings. TP1 measures electrical power from the rechargeable electric energy storage system and estimated internal combustion engine power, applying electrical conversion efficiency factors. TP2 measures torque and speed at powered axle shafts or wheel hubs, applying mechanical conversion efficiency factors. The regulation requires manufacturers to provide hybrid power flow descriptions, energy conversion factors, and reference points for power measurement. Testing occurs on chassis dynamometers, hub dynamometers, or system bench facilities at fixed dynamometer speeds corresponding to maximum power conditions, with five repetitions conducted and results averaged. Applicability of each procedure depends on powertrain architecture and power flow characteristics. Amendment 3 introduces system bench testing as an alternative, strengthens measurement requirements, requires manufacturer-provided K factors rather than defaults, and establishes reference point concepts to ensure consistent results across different electrified powertrain architectures.

Proposal to establish harmonised methods for in-vehicle battery durability of electrified heavy-duty vehicles:

• Establish harmonised methods for determining in-vehicle battery durability of electrified heavy-duty vehicles (categories 1-2 and 2 with technically permissible maximum laden mass exceeding 3,855 kg) that are pure electric or off-vehicle charging hybrid electric vehicles,
• Require manufacturers to install and maintain State-of-Certified Energy (SOCE) monitors throughout vehicle lifetime at resolution of at least 1 part in 100, making values available via on-board diagnostics port and optionally over-the-air,
• For Contracting Parties electing to enforce minimum performance requirements from optional Annex 4, require manufacturers to ensure compliance through in-use verification comprising Part A (monitor accuracy verification through measured usable battery energy testing via driving on test track/road or bidirectional power supply system, with statistical pass/fail criteria) and Part B (battery durability verification through remote data collection from vehicle sample of minimum 500 vehicles annually, requiring at least 90 per cent of monitored values above applicable minimum performance requirement or declared performance requirement),
• Reserve Part C verification of virtual distance accuracy for future amendment,
• Specify minimum performance requirements with SOCE retention percentages (45–70 per cent) at defined time and distance combinations varying by vehicle category and mass, to be monitored during phase 1 for potential future revision based on energy throughput data.

Proposal to establish uniform provisions for approval of electric powertrain retrofit system installation on vehicles of categories M₁–M₃ and N₁–N₃:

• Add abbreviations section,
• Insert definitions of electric powertrain retrofit system, vehicle installation approval, approval of electric powertrain retrofit system, type of electric powertrain retrofit system, original vehicle, parent vehicle, and member of family,
• Modify scope to apply to electric powertrain retrofit systems and their installation on vehicles transformed,
• Delete prior scope provisions,
• Renumber paragraphs accordingly,
• Insert markings requirements for retrofit system installation plates,
• Add approval procedures and communication forms,
• Insert specific requirements regarding electric powertrain retrofit systems with compliance to applicable UN Regulations including UN R10, UN R13, UN R13H, UN R85, and UN R100,
• Insert application range provisions,
• Modify installer authorization requirements,
• Insert information requirements for retrofit system manufacturers to provide installers,
• Insert end-user manual requirements,
• Add provisions for periodic technical inspection including retrofit system identifiability and certification requirements,
• Insert conformity of production procedures,
• Modify procedures for extension and modification of approval,
• Modify penalties for non-conformity and withdrawal procedures,
• Insert introductory provisions explaining the Regulation’s purpose,
• Insert names and addresses reporting requirements for technical services and type approval authorities,
• Split Annexes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 into separate provisions for electric vehicles and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles,
• Insert Annex 5 specific requirements aligned with UNECE Regulations including electromagnetic compatibility, braking, electric drive train power measurement, rechargeable energy storage system compliance with phased timeline from date of entry into force to 1 September 2031 for UNECE Regulation 100 compliance, and other applicable regulations.

The agenda for the Electric Vehicles and the Environment Informal Working Group 98th session scheduled for July 15, 2026, includes presentations on battery performance, discussions on UN GTR 21, UN GTR 22, and UN GTR 25 regulatory topics including minimum performance requirements, state of charge reference, readiness monitor and conditioning cycles, mutual recognition, fuel cell electric vehicles, highly integrated systems, energy throughput, normal usage indices, and battery replacement provisions. UN GTR 25 amendment 2 must be submitted to March 2027 GRPE with a December 2026 deadline.

UN GTR No. 22 on In-vehicle Battery Durability for Electrified Light Duty Vehicles establishes harmonized requirements for monitoring and verifying minimum battery durability performance of pure electric vehicles and off-vehicle charging hybrid electric vehicles of categories M₁ and M₂. Manufacturers must install State-of-Certified Energy (SOCE) and State-of-Certified Range (SOCR) monitors for the vehicle lifetime. Battery energy-based minimum performance requirements specify that vehicles of categories 1-1 and 1-2 must retain 80 per cent SOCE for 5 years or 100,000 km and 70 per cent for 8 years or 160,000 km; category 2 vehicles must retain 75 per cent and 65 per cent respectively. In-use verification comprises Part A verification of monitor accuracy using statistical methods, Part B verification of battery durability through remote data collection, and Part C verification of reported virtual distance. Manufacturers may declare higher performance requirements. Virtual distance may be reported for vehicles with Vehicle-to-Grid functionality or category 2 vehicles used for non-traction purposes.

Proposal to amend UN GTR No. 21 on system power determination:

• Establish a globally harmonized test procedure comparable to traditional engine power ratings for conventional vehicles,
• specify TP1 based on measured electrical power and estimated internal combustion engine power with electrical conversion efficiency factors,
• specify TP2 based on measured torque and speed at axle shafts or wheel hubs with mechanical conversion efficiency factors,
• require manufacturers to provide verifiable K conversion factors,
• remove dynamometer roller measurement options for TP2 in favor of torque and speed sensors or hub dynamometers,
• mandate fuel flow rate measurement for TP1,
• introduce the reference point concept to ensure comparable results across powertrain architectures,
• require five test repetitions with averaging of the last four,
• add applicability guidelines limiting TP1 or TP2 to specific architectures based on power flow characteristics,
• establish approval criteria for system bench facilities as alternatives to chassis or hub dynamometers in a new Annex 3.

UN GTR No. 25 on In-vehicle Battery Durability for Electrified Heavy Duty Vehicles provides harmonised methods to determine battery durability performance of HD-PEVs and HD-OVC-HEVs of categories M₁–M₃ and N₁–N₃ exceeding 3,855 kg MPLM. The regulation requires manufacturers to install State of Certified Energy (SOCE) monitors throughout vehicle lifetime. In-use verification consists of Part A verification of monitor accuracy through measured UBE testing using Methods 1a, 1b, Method 2 (bidirectional power supply), or an alternative HDV chassis dynamometer method, with statistical pass/fail criteria. Part B verification assesses battery durability against optional Minimum Performance Requirements (MPRs) through remote SOCE data collection from sample vehicles. Part C verification, reserved for future amendment, will address reported virtual distance accuracy for V2X, PTO and non-traction purpose applications. Optional Annex 4 specifies MPRs by vehicle category and mass, ranging from 45–70% SOCE retention across specified timeframes and distances. The GTR entered into force with Phase 1 covering core durability assessment and data collection to support future refinement of MPR thresholds based on in-service field data relating to HDVs, referencing WP.29-170-31 and GRPE/2026/3.

The Informal Working Group on Automotive Life Cycle Assessment decided not to submit the Working Document for the 95th GRPE session. The Mutual Resolution will not be submitted for adoption at the October 2026 GRPE session due to unresolved issues and lack of consensus. The leading team will prepare a status report for October 2026 GRPE describing progress, current status, remaining issues, and proposed way forward. A revised Terms of Reference extending the IWG mandate will be prepared. An additional meeting may be organized to determine the future work programme.

The 98th EVE IWG session held virtually on July 15, 2026, adopted the agenda and discussed Phase 4 priorities for UN GTR 22, including Minimum Performance Requirements, State of Certified Range, conditioning cycles, and mutual recognition. Japan proposed sharing Part C verification results with all Contracting Parties. The IWG reviewed UN GTR 21 and UN GTR 25 status, covering MPRs, energy throughput, virtual distance verification, and battery replacement provisions. OICA will present their MPR position at EVE 100 and share Part C verification results at EVE 99. Japan will consult on hosting 2027 meetings targeting the week of February 15th.