Draft agenda for the 54th session of TFTA on 9 November 2026. The meeting will address finalising C1 and C2 provisions for GRBP Working Document 85th session, the status of an ongoing test campaign, and a follow-up brainstorming session. Action items include requesting a French representative to join the next meeting and reviewing possibilities for further defining tyre types by grouping them and optimizing the number of physical tests through simulations and models. The agenda also covers funding and resource allocation for technical activities.

List of action items from the 22nd (4th under the old numbering) meeting of the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking System held in Tokyo, Japan. Ten action items assigned, including:

• Investigating lost footnotes in paragraphs 2.13. and 6.1.1.1.,
• Ensuring consistent spelling of ‘daytime’/‘nighttime’ in document AEBS-22-08,
• Explaining ambient illumination requirements of at least 15 lux in para. 5.2.4.4. (d),
• Preparing justification for testing only adult dummies at nighttime,
• Preparing lamp test setup diagrams,
• Checking and proposing definitions for revised paragraphs aligned with UN R48,
• Clarifying scenario optionality and modularity,
• Providing error bar formulas,
• Conducting testing on pedestrian detection with high reflective clothing.

Proposal to conduct safety analysis based on vehicle and system architecture to identify and decompose data and model-related safety requirements, and delete the requirement for maintenance or reassessment of assumptions as the system or environment changes.

Proposal to add principles and stages of risk-driven lifecycle approach to para. 4.2.1.1, replacing ‘risk informed lifecycle approaches explanation’ with ‘Risk-driven lifecycle approach explanation’ and adding explicit reference to principles of risk-driven lifecycle approach and stages of risk-driven lifecycle approach.

Change request to revise the driving function name from ‘Acceleration Control Pedal Error’ to ‘Acceleration Control for Pedal Error’ in Section 1.2.4, based on UNECE guidance that the original term is not a correct driving function name.

Proposal to add illustrative real-world application examples under Automated Driving Systems in Annex 1, items 1.2.4 and 1.3, covering low-speed unmanned delivery and sanitation vehicles in closed or semi-open areas and urban non-motorized lanes, robotaxi operation on urban roads, and autonomously-operated vehicles deployed within mining sites, ports and industrial parks.

Proposal to add to illustrative practices in para. 4.2.6.3 a reference to scenario coverage assessment based on ISO 34502 and test case generation based on ISO 34505 as sources of evidence for AI system assurance, and to add ISO 34501-34505 to Annex 4 A standards list.

Proposal to add a new risk item addressing compromised or unavailable infrastructure-sourced inputs in para. 3.2.9.5, add a corresponding extended description in Annex 2 (item 6.5), add a new table row in Annex 3, and add the term ‘Roadside Perception’ to Annex 5. AI systems that rely on roadside perception, map data, or remotely-delivered data may encounter communication outages, latency, or maliciously-altered incoming data, resulting in perception gaps or erroneous decisions.