The UN World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) enables governments to cooperate internationally in developing vehicle regulations concerning safety, environmental performance, and energy efficiency.
GlobalAutoRegs is a technical resource for members of the regulatory affairs community interested in this international collaboration.
| Considerations on the C3 Tyre Abrasion Test Method |
| Reference Number: TA-52-02 |
|
Document presents Japan’s heavy-duty vehicle market structure, C3 tyre classification and market share, and proposes concepts for vehicle and indoor drum test methods for C3 tyre abrasion testing. The vehicle test concept recommends establishing a single test method based on typical operating conditions using the WHVC mode, with the drive axle as reference. The indoor drum test method is proposed as preferable due to higher test accuracy and lower environmental impact compared to vehicle testing. Test conditions under consideration include input conditions based on WHVC with curve and slope running modes, inflation pressure and load aligned with vehicle specifications, drum diameter potentially increased from 3 m, and drum surface conditions based on C1 tyre definitions. |
| Submitted by: JASIC |
| Meeting Sessions: 52nd TA session (8-9 Oct) |
| Document date: 02 Oct 26 |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 186 | Tyre abrasion |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| ADS Mitigated Risk Conditions |
| Reference Number: ADS-22-18 |
|
Document identifies open questions regarding MRC definition, risk assessment, feature deactivation, and post-MRC obligations. Discusses reasons for MRC including collisions, faults, remote termination, ODD exits, and fallback user transition failures. Addresses post-MRC reporting and data recording under DSSAD and ISMR. Examines feature deactivation following MRC and ODD exit scenarios, with three possible solutions for ADSF-2 post-ODD exit recording. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 22nd ADS session (6-9 Oct) |
| Document date: 22 Sep 26 |
| Relevant to: WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems, GTR No. 26 | Automated Driving Systems, and UN Regulation No. 185 | Approval of vehicles with regard to their Automated Driving Systems |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| ADS: Explanation of proposals on user-safety amendments |
| Reference Number: ADS-22-15 |
|
Proposal to clarify that the ADS must respond to user requests to deactivate, require multimodal signals at the start of and during deactivation procedures that continue until completion or termination, require escalation of warnings for system-initiated deactivations if the user is not re-engaging as expected, require gradual reduction of ADS control action during deactivation while maintaining safe vehicle control, allow the ADS to retake full control if the vehicle is not being controlled safely, terminate the deactivation procedure if the user is not suitably engaged and the time available to transition has expired, replace the requirement for contact with the steering wheel with being in a physical position to operate the driving controls, suspend non-driving related activities at the start of the deactivation procedure, and modify the DDT section to require fallback to an MRC instead of a deactivation procedure if there is insufficient time for transition. |
| Submitted by: Canada, Finland, Netherlands, Norway, and ETSC |
| Meeting Sessions: 22nd ADS session (6-9 Oct) |
| Document date: 01 Oct 26 |
| Relevant to: WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems, UN Regulation No. 157 | Automated Lane-Keeping Systems (ALKS), GTR No. 26 | Automated Driving Systems, and UN Regulation No. 185 | Approval of vehicles with regard to their Automated Driving Systems |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| ADS: Proposal to clarify "suitably engaged" |
| Reference Number: ADS-22-13 |
|
Proposal to modify para. 4.2.2.3.8.1 to add a requirement that a user be in a physical position to operate the driving controls, to allow gaze to be directed to multiple driving task-relevant areas rather than a single area, and to add a requirement that the user have demonstrated an appropriate response to transition of control. |
| Submitted by: Canada, Finland, Netherlands, Norway, and ETSC |
| Meeting Sessions: 22nd ADS session (6-9 Oct) |
| Document date: 29 Sep 26 |
| Relevant to: WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems, GTR No. 26 | Automated Driving Systems, and UN Regulation No. 185 | Approval of vehicles with regard to their Automated Driving Systems |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| ADS remote support |
| Reference Number: ADS-22-17 |
|
Analysis of terminology related to remote support for automated driving systems, grouping terms into four categories: remote termination, remote fleet management, remote assistance, and remote driving. Remote termination disables ADS features until rescinded. Remote fleet management involves observation without performing the dynamic driving task. Remote assistance provides information while ADS continues the dynamic driving task. Remote driving involves a remote user performing the dynamic driving task. Document proposes agreeing on categories, determining definitions, developing a supplement without new requirements, and potentially developing proposals for new requirements covering ADS performance when expected remote support is not provided and further consideration of remote assistance. |
| Submitted by: UK |
| Meeting Sessions: 22nd ADS session (6-9 Oct) |
| Document date: 05 Oct 26 |
| Relevant to: WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems, GTR No. 26 | Automated Driving Systems, and UN Regulation No. 185 | Approval of vehicles with regard to their Automated Driving Systems |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| Approval of ADS as STU: Initial Considerations |
| Reference Number: ADS-22-16 |
|
Document presents initial considerations for approving Automated Driving Systems as Separate Technical Units under UN R185. It explains how component and STU approvals divide responsibility between suppliers and vehicle manufacturers, provides examples from other regulations such as lighting, tyres, glazing, and fuel systems, and discusses potential benefits and challenges specific to UN R185 application. Benefits include independent audits and avoiding repeated assessments for different vehicle types. Challenges include difficulty splitting requirements, potential information withholding, and unclear legal responsibility. Proposes flexible approaches with shared Safety Management System requirements and validation in vehicles. |
| Submitted by: UK and VCA |
| Meeting Sessions: 22nd ADS session (6-9 Oct) |
| Document date: 05 Oct 26 |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 34 | Prevention of Fire Risks and UN Regulation No. 185 | Approval of vehicles with regard to their Automated Driving Systems |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| ADS: Safety Performance Indicators |
| Reference Number: ADS-22-22 |
|
Document presents research on Safety Performance Indicators (SPIs) for continuous monitoring and evaluation of Automated Driving Systems safety. Leading indicators anticipate outcomes through metrics including time-based, distance-based, probability-based and deceleration-based measures; lagging indicators confirm outcomes after occurrence such as crashes and injuries. Analysis of 21 datasets identified SHRP2 as primary source with 1402 crashes and 5262 near-crashes. Performance evaluation using Distance Headway and Time-to-Collision achieved Area Under the Curve close to 0.9 distinguishing crashes and near-crashes from normal driving. Main bottleneck identified is data quality and scarcity of reliable safety event labels. |
| Submitted by: EC |
| Meeting Sessions: 22nd ADS session (6-9 Oct) |
| Document date: 05 Oct 26 |
| Relevant to: WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems, GTR No. 26 | Automated Driving Systems, and UN Regulation No. 185 | Approval of vehicles with regard to their Automated Driving Systems |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| Automated Driving Systems : Agenda for the 22nd (October 2026) session |
| Reference Number: ADS-22-02/Rev.1 |
|
Agenda for the 22nd session of the ADS informal working group and the 20th GRVA Workshop on ADS, to be held 6-9 October 2026 in Sydney. The session will address adoption of the agenda and previous session report, status of work on GTR 26, UN R185, and the GID, highlights from the 26th GRVA session, Interpretation H4 on electromagnetic compatibility, ADS Phase 2 context and programme, refinement and allocation of Phase 2 work items, integration into 2026-2029 strategy, ADS2 schedule and coordination with other groups, and various change requests to GTR, UNR, and GID. |
| Meeting Sessions: 22nd ADS session (6-9 Oct) |
| Document date: 05 Oct 26 |
| Relevant to: WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems, GTR No. 26 | Automated Driving Systems, and UN Regulation No. 185 | Approval of vehicles with regard to their Automated Driving Systems |
| Click here to view the full document file |