AVSR-33-05 supports requirements for ADS marker lamps to improve social acceptance, facilitate traffic management and enforcement, and ensure smooth emergency vehicle passage. The proposal recommends installation at front and rear with optional side installation, visibility angles equivalent to direction-indicators, continuous illumination without flashing or luminous intensity variation except nighttime dimming, permitted combined use with direction-indicators when the marker lamp turns off on the side where the direction-indicator operates, and applicability to vehicle categories M₁–M₃, N₁–N₃, L₆, L₇, and O when towed by automated driving vehicles.

Based on AVSR-31-03_Rev.2 and GTBWGSL 7201, this work-in-progress draft proposes a new UN Regulation for ADS Marker Lamps. The proposal applies to vehicles of categories M, N, L₆, L₇, and O. It establishes approval procedures for ADS Marker Lamp components and vehicle installation requirements if fitted on a vehicle (the draft includes a tentative statement that nothing prevents prohibiting the use of ADS marker lamps). Key provisions include luminous intensity requirements with day-time and night-time levels for front (AMF), rear (AMR), and side (AMS) lamps; blue-green colour specifications; approval marking and labelling requirements; geometric visibility angles; electrical connections ensuring automatic activation when automated driving systems perform the dynamic driving task; and conformity of production procedures. Outstanding discussion items requiring guidance include vehicle category applicability, day-time and night-time condition definitions, reciprocal incorporation with direction indicators, alternative roof-mounted lamp options, and specification details for side marker lamp categories. Testing procedures for light sources and automatic switching conditions between day-time and night-time modes are included in annexes.

The Task Force Data Analysis meeting scheduled for 15 September 2026 will discuss database pilot documents covering amendments to factor x, reference acceleration, AVAS term considerations, simplified EV models, and RD-ASEP model slopes. The task force will prepare proposals based on draft UN R51.04 for items 13–19 from the Editing TF issues list and address a question regarding the phrase “but no more than 2.0 m/s” in paragraph 3.1.2.1.4.3 concerning acceleration values for vehicles with single gear ratios.

Proposal to:

• insert new paragraphs 2.71. to 2.78. defining
  • Position Code,
  • Turn Signal Switch Status,
  • Hazard Warning Signal Switch Status,
  • Hazard Warning Signal Lamp Status,
  • Turn Signal Lamp Status,
  • Gear Positions,
  • Seat-Track Position-1, and
  • Seat-Track Position-2,
• Delete existing data elements for Safety belt status by driver position, Frontal air bag deployment by driver and front passenger, Side air bag deployment by driver and front passenger, and Pretensioner deployment by driver and front passenger,
• Amend Table 1 to replace position-specific safety belt, frontal air bag, side air bag, knee airbag, far-side airbag, pretensioner, and occupant size classification entries with X-Y Position Code entries,
• Add Turn Signal Lamp status, Hazard Warning Signal Lamp Status, Turn Signal Switch Status, Hazard Warning Signal Switch Status, Gear Positions, and Seat-Track Position entries with recording intervals from -5.0 to 0 seconds or -1.0 seconds and sample rates of 2 samples per second.

The IWG is discussing the time interval from door lock to initial warning, with options of 15, 25, or 30 seconds as specified in para. 6.4.1. Investigation of door vibration effects during closing at three speeds (strong 3 m/s, medium 2 m/s, weak 1.2 m/s) on a medium SUV showed door vibration diminishes around 10 seconds. The system requires at least 3 times respiration cycles for accurate child detection judgment to reduce false-positive warnings in the field. A 25 seconds delay is recommended to allow appropriate time for accurate detection while accounting for vehicle vibration disturbance.

In-direct plus is a sensing system that, in addition to its indirect sensing functionality, has the ability to detect the presence of a live person inside the vehicle by means of sensing human attributes such as movement, temperature, sound, weight or any other sign of life. Direct sensing system detects the absolute presence of a human inside the vehicle by means of tracking heartbeat, respiration, movement, or any other sign of life. Indirect sensing system derives the potential presence of a subject or object inside the car based on logic using information such as door opening, pressure or capacitive sensing.

Proposal to insert a new introduction section defining application to vehicles of categories X and Y equipped with an Automated Driving System, to amend para. 6.1.5. to replace “driver assist systems” with “driver assistance systems”, to remove the non-exhaustive list “cameras, radar devices, etc.”, to replace “disoriented” with “misaligned”, and to add provisions clarifying that the exemption for sensor damage does not apply to automated driving systems unless the Automated Driving System performance of the Designed Driving Task is not affected.

Proposal to:

• insert a new paragraph 0 introducing the amendment to account for vehicles of categories X and Y, stating that the Regulation was originally drafted for vehicles with a driver and manual driving controls and is being extended to vehicles without a driver and without manual driving controls, that in manual driving mode no special provisions apply to vehicles equipped with an Automated Driving System other than vehicles of categories X and Y, and that vehicles of category Y are exempted based on front structure geometry rather than driver “R” point position
• amend paragraph 1.2 to provide that for vehicles of category X, the “R” point of the most forward passenger seat shall be taken instead of the R-point of the driver’s seat
• amend paragraph 1.3 to provide that for vehicles of category X, the “R” point of the most forward passenger seat shall be taken instead of the R-point of the driver’s seat
• amend paragraph 1.4 to delete the statement that this Regulation does not apply to vehicles of category Y and instead provide that vehicles of category N1Y where a specified equation is fulfilled are exempted
• amend paragraph 2.8 to revise the definition of “Bonnet rear reference line” and provide that for vehicles of category Y without a windscreen, the BRRL is defined as the geometric trace of the most rearward points of contact between the sphere and the front structure as it is traversed across the vehicle’s rearward edge
• amend paragraph 2.22 to provide that for vehicles of categories X and Y, automated driving sensors that are essential for the vehicle’s operation and cannot be stowed during driving should be considered part of the “Front structure”
• amend paragraph 2.29 to provide that for vehicles of category X, two passenger masses are placed on the front seats instead of driver and one passenger masses, and for vehicles of category Y, no occupant mass is added
• amend paragraph 2.32 to provide that for vehicles of category Y where A-pillars are non-existent, side reference lines also define the lateral limits for the total test area
• amend paragraph 2.44 to provide that for vehicles of category Y where a windscreen is non-existent, the windscreen test area is defined as the “Upper structure test area” with specified front, rear, and side boundaries
• amend paragraph 2.45 to provide that for vehicles of category Y where a windscreen is non-existent, the cowl monitoring area is bound in the rear by the front of the “Upper structure test area”
• amend paragraph 5.3.1.2 to provide that ARHSS shall automatically return to normal ride height while an ADS feature is active