| Electric Vehicles and the Environment: Agenda for the 98th (July 2026) session |
| Reference Number: EVE-98-01/Rev.2 |
|
The agenda for the Electric Vehicles and the Environment Informal Working Group 98th session scheduled for July 15, 2026, includes presentations on battery performance, discussions on UN GTR 21, UN GTR 22, and UN GTR 25 regulatory topics including minimum performance requirements, state of charge reference, readiness monitor and conditioning cycles, mutual recognition, fuel cell electric vehicles, highly integrated systems, energy throughput, normal usage indices, and battery replacement provisions. UN GTR 25 amendment 2 must be submitted to March 2027 GRPE with a December 2026 deadline. |
| Meeting Sessions: 98th EVE session (15 Jul) |
| Document date: 29 Jul 26 |
| Relevant to: WP.29 Discussion Topic | Electric Vehicle Environmental Performance, GTR No. 21 | Electric Vehicle System Power Determination, GTR No. 22 | Electrified Vehicle Battery Durability, and GTR No. 25 | Heavy-Duty Electric Vehicle Battery Durability |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| Battery guards for electric and hybrid vehicles |
| Reference Number: EVE-98-02 |
|
EV Guard Oy manufactures battery guards for hybrid and electric vehicles using 3 mm marine aluminum and 8 mm recycled PET composite to protect battery packs, liquid-cooling systems, and electrical connectors. The guards distribute impact force, reduce temperature fluctuations, improve energy efficiency, and are 100% recyclable. The company supplies guards to authorized repair shops. No valid regulation currently applies to aftermarket battery shields; UN R100 does not cover this product, representing a structural gap in regulation. |
| Submitted by: EV Guard |
| Meeting Sessions: 98th EVE session (15 Jul) |
| Document date: 08 Jul 26 |
| Relevant to: WP.29 Discussion Topic | Electric Vehicle Environmental Performance |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| GTR 22: Proposal for acceptance of Part C verification results |
| Reference Number: EVE-98-03 |
|
Proposal to amend para. 6.5. to specify that a verification of reported virtual distance is only required if the manufacturer requests to apply the virtual distance option, to require a test with adequate and representative vehicle use in V2X or non-traction purposes to verify accuracy of reported virtual distance increase, and to permit the verification of Part C for vehicles in the same virtual distance family to be combined between different Contracting Parties with their agreement, with such Contracting Parties considered as a single authority for verification purposes. |
| Submitted by: Japan |
| Meeting Sessions: 98th EVE session (15 Jul) |
| Document date: 14 Jul 26 |
| Relevant to: GTR No. 22 | Electrified Vehicle Battery Durability |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| GTR 25: Working draft for Amendment 2 |
| Reference Number: EVE-98-04 |
|
Proposal to establish harmonised methods for in-vehicle battery durability of electrified heavy-duty vehicles:
|
| Meeting Sessions: 98th EVE session (15 Jul) |
| Document date: 14 Jul 26 |
| Relevant to: GTR No. 25 | Heavy-Duty Electric Vehicle Battery Durability |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| GTR 22: Working draft for Amendment 2 |
| Reference Number: EVE-98-05 |
|
Proposal to add two new definitions to para. 3.30., modify para. 5.1. to require manufacturers provide a procedure for achieving recent SOCE/SOCR monitor updates, modify Annex 1 to establish monitoring based on new parameters rather than the 50 per cent state-of-charge threshold, and add mandatory values to Annex 2 including State of Certified Energy Readiness Status, Energy Storage System Recent Depth of Discharge Counter, and Preconditions for Recent Battery Capacity Update, based on GRPE/2026/5 and EVE-97-04e. |
| Meeting Sessions: 98th EVE session (15 Jul) |
| Document date: 14 Jul 26 |
| Relevant to: GTR No. 22 | Electrified Vehicle Battery Durability |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| GTR 21: Working draft for Amendment 3 |
| Reference Number: EVE-98-06 |
|
This document, based on GRPE/2026/4, presents Amendment 3 to UN GTR 21 on determining system power of hybrid electric vehicles and pure electric vehicles with multiple propulsion energy converters. The GTR establishes two equivalent test procedures (TP1 and TP2) to measure system power comparable to traditional engine-based ratings. TP1 measures electrical power from the rechargeable electric energy storage system and estimated internal combustion engine power, applying electrical conversion efficiency factors. TP2 measures torque and speed at powered axle shafts or wheel hubs, applying mechanical conversion efficiency factors. The regulation requires manufacturers to provide hybrid power flow descriptions, energy conversion factors, and reference points for power measurement. Testing occurs on chassis dynamometers, hub dynamometers, or system bench facilities at fixed dynamometer speeds corresponding to maximum power conditions, with five repetitions conducted and results averaged. Applicability of each procedure depends on powertrain architecture and power flow characteristics. Amendment 3 introduces system bench testing as an alternative, strengthens measurement requirements, requires manufacturer-provided K factors rather than defaults, and establishes reference point concepts to ensure consistent results across different electrified powertrain architectures. |
| Meeting Sessions: 98th EVE session (15 Jul) |
| Document date: 14 Jul 26 |
| Relevant to: GTR No. 21 | Electric Vehicle System Power Determination |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| GTR 22: Light-duty vehicle data and minimum performance requirements |
| Reference Number: EVE-98-07 |
|
This presentation summarizes EU-Commission JRC contributions to the EVE IWG regarding light-duty vehicle data for minimum performance requirements based on EVE-30-12, EVE-34-16, EVE-41-03, EVE-96-06, EVE-32-13e, EVE-74-21, and EVE-88-22. It compares JRC TEMA ageing predictions with real-world field data from multiple sources including Geotab analysis of over 22,700 electric vehicles showing average annual degradation of 2.3%, Tesla data indicating approximately 1% degradation per 40,000 km, Nissan Leaf data from Flip The Fleet comprising 2,311 vehicles, and experimental data from Canada on Tesla Model S and truck batteries. Key findings include that high-power DC fast charging causes degradation rates up to twice that of low-power charging, hot climates increase degradation 0.4% annually, and high mileage vehicles demonstrate cumulative calendar and cycle ageing effects while generally meeting GTR 22 battery energy retention requirements of 80% at five years and 100,000 km. |
| Submitted by: JRC |
| Meeting Sessions: 98th EVE session (15 Jul) |
| Document date: 14 Jul 26 |
| Relevant to: GTR No. 22 | Electrified Vehicle Battery Durability |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| GTR 25: Next step- electric bus and coach minimum performance requirements, lifetime and metric revision |
| Reference Number: EVE-98-08 |
| Submitted by: JRC |
| Meeting Sessions: 98th EVE session (15 Jul) |
| Document date: 14 Jul 26 |
| Relevant to: GTR No. 25 | Heavy-Duty Electric Vehicle Battery Durability |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| EVE informal group: Logistical information for the 99th session in Tianjin |
| Reference Number: EVE-98-09 |
| Meeting Sessions: 98th EVE session (15 Jul) |
| Document date: 29 Jul 26 |
| Relevant to: GTR No. 21 | Electric Vehicle System Power Determination, GTR No. 22 | Electrified Vehicle Battery Durability, and GTR No. 25 | Heavy-Duty Electric Vehicle Battery Durability |
| Click here to view the full document file |
No matching documents.
No matching documents.