The AI IWG held four meetings between January and April 2026, with future meetings scheduled for June 2026. Co-Chairs are from the UK, Japan, and the U.S.; Co-Secretaries represent IEEE, CITA, and SAE. WP.29 approved an updated Terms of Reference in March 2026. The IWG has compiled literature on regulated automotive safety systems using AI (AI-08-03), created draft documents on Terms & Definitions (AI-06-03), use cases (AI-07-03), and guiding questions (AI-08-07). An initial consolidated draft document (AI-09-06) addresses what AI is and how it is used in the automotive sector, what benefits and risks it presents, and emergent practices for AI use and risk management. Initial outputs will be reported to WP.29 at the June 2026 meeting.

This initial consolidate draft reference document for artificial intelligence in regulated automotive safety systems, based on WP.29-195-20, AI-07-08, AI-07-11, AI-07-09, AI-07-10, and AI-07-12, establishes AI use cases and identifies potential risks across the AI lifecycle. The document addresses driving functions including perception, planning and motion control, and end-to-end systems, as well as non-driving functions such as driver assessment and occupant monitoring. It presents six major AI lifecycle risk categories: whole system risks including insufficient documentation and governance; specification risks such as improper definition of intended use; model and training risks including blackbox behaviour and lack of robustness; data management risks such as data poisoning and distribution shift; verification and validation risks including insufficient test coverage; and operational risks including concept drift and limited failure detection. Illustrative risk management practices drawn from standards, research, and regulations are provided for each identified risk to support manufacturers, suppliers, and approval authorities.

The IWG on AI will hold its 9th session on June 3–4, 2026 in London. The agenda includes adoption of the agenda and brief report of the 8th session (AI-09-01), consideration of AI use cases, literature review and terms & definitions proposals, guiding questions for WP.29 submission, and discussion of the consolidated draft reference document. The IWG will receive presentations from stakeholders on AI use in the automotive sector and discuss future meetings and work direction beyond the initial mandate.

The IWG will be informed on the status of identification of AI Use Cases, the revised draft Terms & Definitions Document, and the ongoing collection of proposals for the literature review. The IWG may wish to exchange views concerning guiding questions for AI in automotive, risks of the use of AI in automotive and their management and mitigation, and the consolidated draft for reference document. The 9th IWG on AI session is planned for June 3-4th, hybrid in London, UK and online.

The IWG on AI 7th session (March 12, 2026) adopted the agenda and 6th session report. The IWG secretariat presented updated AI use case document (AI-07-03) and consolidated literature review (AI-07-04). France presented additions to use cases (AI-07-13); China presented literature review proposals (AI-07-07, AI-07-08, AI-07-09, AI-07-10, AI-07-11, AI-07-12). The IWG expressed support for the guiding questions document (AI-07-05) and directed language amendments. Japan presented a draft reference document framework (AI-07-14); the prospective catalogue of risks (AI-07-06) received general support with requests for amendments addressing bias, risk management approaches, flexible non-exhaustive risk listing, and software update impacts. The secretariat was directed to compile a consolidated draft reference document for June WP.29 submission.

The Informal Working Group on Artificial Intelligence identified relevant literature for a literature review addressing existing standards, research, best practice, and regulations relating to artificial intelligence in automotive safety applications. Proposal to include IEEE standards on algorithmic bias, robustness testing, and organizational governance; risk assessment frameworks from IEEE and NIST; the EU AI Act; international instruments including the Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI and OECD AI Principles; and the G7 Hiroshima AI Process Code of Conduct. These sources address lifecycle phases and risk management relevant to the prospective catalogue of AI risks in automotive (AI-07-06) and consolidated draft documentation (AI-06-03).

This document provides a prospective catalogue of risks related to AI use in the automotive sector, organized across five AI lifecycle stages: AI & Use Case Specification, AI Model Architecture & Training Processes, Data Specification & Management, Verification & Validation, and Operation/In-Use Monitoring. For each of 23 identified risks, the document lists relevant ISO/PAS 8800, NIST AI RMF, EU AIA, and other standards or frameworks that address potential management and mitigation approaches. Extended descriptions explain how risks such as blackbox behaviour, data poisoning, distribution shift, insufficient test coverage, and concept drift may compromise safety in automotive AI systems.

This consolidated draft reference document, based on WP.29-195-20, addresses Artificial Intelligence in the automotive sector. It defines AI-based systems as connectionist systems trained using machine learning algorithms. The document identifies AI use cases for driving functions including perception, planning, motion control, and end-to-end systems, plus non-driving functions like driver assessment. It establishes prospective risks across five AI lifecycle stages: specification, model architecture and training, data management, verification and validation, and in-use monitoring. The document provides initial risk management approaches informed by literature review, noting that current regulatory provisions may require evaluation to address AI-specific testing and updating needs.

Proposal to add a new section on Cross-Cutting Organisational and Assurance Risks to AI-07-06. Six risks are proposed: insufficient organisational governance for AI safety management; inadequate definition of roles, responsibilities, and competencies; lack of independence between development and verification activities; degradation of AI safety processes over time; ineffective change management for AI-related artefacts and processes; and inadequate management of AI supply-chain risks. Each risk addresses factors across the lifecycle that can influence the effectiveness of technical AI risk mitigations.

Consolidated comments on table 1 of AI-06-07 from AI-08-05, AI-08-06, AI-08-09, AI-08-11, AI-08-12, and AI-08-13. The document provides a prospective catalogue of risks related to the use of AI in the automotive sector, organized according to AI lifecycle stages: AI & Use Case Specification; AI Model Architecture & Training Processes; Data Specification & Management; Verification & Validation; and Operation/In-Use Monitoring. For each identified risk, high-level and sub-level descriptions, brief risk descriptions, and potential management and mitigation approaches are provided.

This document contributes to consolidated text and a risk catalogue for artificial intelligence in the automotive sector. It defines AI as a field of computer science focused on creating systems capable of performing tasks requiring human intelligence, including learning, reasoning, problem-solving, natural language processing, and decision-making. High-priority AI use cases include perception, planning, and motion-control driving functions, as well as driver assessment systems. The document identifies 14 risks organized across five lifecycle stages: AI and use case specification, model architecture and training processes, data specification and management, verification and validation, and operation and in-use monitoring. It provides detailed risk descriptions and references emergent practices for managing these risks, including ISO/PAS 8800, NIST AI RMF, and EU AIA approaches. Lower-priority use cases referenced include AI-06-09 for periodic technical inspection and AI-06-12 for cybersecurity threat detection.

At the third IWG on AI session, experts agreed that a robust review supporting tasks specified in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1186, para. 6 was needed as a precursor to drafting a reference document. The IWG on AI agreed that three guiding questions provide the basis for common understanding of artificial intelligence in the automotive sector, including emergent practices, risks, and how AI is currently being used to promote safety. The three questions address where and how AI is used and its benefits, what risks AI presents, and what emergent practices exist for AI use and risk mitigation.

This document provides a consolidated list of contributions from the IWG on AI experts to a literature review activity on Artificial Intelligence. References are organized by type and listed alphabetically, including standards such as ISO 21448:2022, ISO 23894, ISO 26262, ISO 22989, ISO 39003:2023, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC TR 5469, ISO/PAS 8800:2024, ISO/SAE 21434:2021, ISO/TS 5083:2025, SAE J3016, SAE J3298, SAE J3312, and UL4600. Policy papers and research articles address trustworthy AI, autonomous vehicles, and safety.

The document presents a non-exhaustive list of automotive use cases of AI aligned with WP.29/1182, incorporating contributions from AI-02-04 and AI-02-05. It focuses on use cases regarding the use of artificial intelligence in regulated automotive safety systems. The list is split between driving functions (perception, planning and motion-control) and non-driving functions (driver occupant monitoring systems and monitoring systems for vehicle components or functions), following a risk-based approach.

Contribution for the AI literature review.

Contribution for the AI literature review.

This document provides considerations on Artificial Intelligence in the context of road vehicles, adopted by WP.29 in June 2024 based on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2024/34/Rev.1 as amended by Annex VI of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1179. It includes definitions of AI-based systems used in automotive products, an overview of AI use cases provided by Industry, and interactions of AI-related principles with the New Assessment Test Methods. The document recommends that AI-based algorithms be implemented considering safety, security, environmental performance and societal impacts; that software updates from AI functionality shall not significantly modify certified functions without resuming certification; that AI systems be validated and assessed before deployment; and that data protection regulations be respected.

This document proposes a draft resolution with guidance on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the context of road vehicles. It includes definitions addressing specific aspects of AI-based systems used in automotive products, a review of use cases in vehicles provided by Industry and an overview of the interactions of AI related principles with the pillars of the New Assessment/Test Method for automated driving.

GRVA worked on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the context of automotive products and of vehicle regulations, as requested by AC.2. It organized two dedicated workshops, reviewed relevant definitions reproduced below in Annex 1, reviewed use cases in automotive products, discussed the Impact of AI on the New Assessment Test Methods (NATM) and identified the potential need to add considerations on data management. GRVA drafted a draft resolution with guidance in the context of road vehicles. GRVA is reporting on its activities on AI thought this document and invites WP.29 to confirm if such document should be finalized and submitted to WP.29 for endorsement.

Comments on GRVA-11-03

Note by the secretariat to support GRVA discussions on this subject.

List of decisions subject to the special “silence procedure” whereby parties may signal any reservations concerning the decisions following the session proper. This procedure was adopted due to the shortened and virtual sessions necessitated by current health and travel restrictions.