IGLAD was initiated by Daimler AG, ACEA and different research institutes and announced as a working group at the FIA Mobility Group in October 2010. Supported by FIA and ACEA, the goal of the group is to define a common standardized accident data set as an effective foundation for developing and measuring road safety policy endorsements and interventions. This document excerpts IGLAD scenarios for consideration in the development of scenarios for use in assessing Automated Driving Systems.

Proposal to require electrically operated parking brake systems to automatically activate when the driver leaves the vehicle cabin and/or the motor is stopped.

Proposal to allow the use of manufacturer logos inside the illuminant surface of a signalling lamp.

Proposal to clarify the requirements for the installation of the foremost side-marker lamp of 3 m from the front, which cannot always be achieved in case of semi-trailers.

Introduces wording to clarify that the performance of protective helmets may be affected by using accessories not tested during the type approval procedure. Changes introduced by customers on helmets are not covered once the helmet has been type-approved.

Defines parameters to enable a reproducible measurement of the acute angle alpha (α) to decide if the vehicle is or is not in the scope of the regulation.

Report to WP.1 (UN Global Forum for Traffic Safety).

Revision 6 of the UN Regulation No. 46 modified the structure of the regulation and formulated separately the requirements for mirrors and Camera Monitor Systems (CMS). The proposal takes these changes into consideration.

Text as revised during the 10th BMFE informal group session.

The text in paragraphs 2.1.1. to 2.1.9. defines criteria that are relevant to determine which variations of a vehicle can be covered under a single vehicle type without having to apply for a separate approval for another type. The current text contains several sub-paragraphs, which explicitly mention that the differences will only cause a new type of vehicle if the differences effect or negatively affect the results of the impact test described in this regulation, while other sub-paragraphs do not. This proposal extends the condition of the necessity of an influence on the results of the impact test to all criteria described under paragraph 2.1. and at the same time makes the text more clear by deleting the word “negative” in front of “affect” which is mentioned in several paragraphs.

Proposal to establish requirements for automatic activation of the parking brake to address safety of drivers leaving the occupant cabin.

Document revised to reflect CLEPA review.

Proposal to allow the use of manufacturer logos inside the illuminant surface of a signalling lamp.

Proposal to clarify the conditions under which variations of a vehicle can be covered under a single vehicle type without having to apply for a separate approval for another type. The proposal amends certain current provisions that explicitly state that differences will only cause a new type of vehicle if the differences affect the results of the impact test and clarifies the application of this principle across the regulation.

Proposal to introduce an alternative test procedure without changing the requirements in the core text

Proposal to introduce an alternative test procedure without changing the requirements in the core text.

Proposal that retrofitted and distracting stylish and outside facing interior lighting should not be allowed through interpretation of the revised regulation.

Proposal also covers a Supplement to the 02 and 03 series of amendments . Proposal to delete Class A from the R 53. With the same intention Germany propose and to delete Class BS for motorcycles in Supplement to the 01 series of amendments

Proposal clarifies that other logos than the vehicle or body manufacturer logos are prohibited.