2021 January 11 |
Headlamp aim discussion document | SLR-HL-11
|
2021-01-11 |
2021-01-11 20:05:02 UTC |
2020 December 9 |
MR1: BioRID-II status | GRSP-68-23
|
2020-12-09 |
2020-12-09 07:59:27 UTC |
2020 October 28 |
Comments on the VMAD Master Document | VMAD-14-08
|
2020-10-28 |
2020-10-28 10:59:19 UTC |
2020 September 22 |
UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/33 | GRVA-07-62
Document Title: UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/33
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-07-62
|
Submitted by: UK
|
Meeting Session: 7th GRVA session (21-25
Sep 2020)
|
Document date: 22 Sep 20 (Posted 22 Sep 20)
|
Document status: Formal GR review
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 157 | Automated Lane-Keeping Systems (ALKS).
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 7 | 21-25
Sep 2020
17. The expert from Germany presented GRVA-07-63, introducing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2020/32 with a proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. [157] (ALKS), aimed at increasing the maximum speed (from 60 km/h to 130 km/h) for ALKS. She also introduced a second proposal (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2020/33) aimed at introducing provisions for ALKS performing lane changes. The experts from Austria, China, Denmark, European Commission, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Republic or Korea, Sweden and UK were rather supportive. They provided ideas and technical comments to improve the proposals. The expert from Switzerland opposed to the proposed speed increase (up to 130 km/h), stating that it would be counterproductive and as Switzerland was reviewing traffic rules based on the adopted 60 km/h. The experts from Japan, Canada and USA did not support the proposals and referred to FDAV as the reference document guiding the work of GRVA on automation. The expert from SAFE stated the need for a clear roadmap, mentioned the challenges for the Technical Services and the Approval Authorities with regards to Level 3 technologies and supported the comments from the European Commission regarding the need for a Regulation addressing Automation on motorways.
18. It was recalled that the expert from UK was working on a proposal for provisions for lane change during the minimum risk manoeuvre.
19. The expert from OICA presented GRVA-07-26, introducing a proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. [157] (GRVA-07-31), aimed at extending the scope of the Regulation to heavy vehicles. They recalled that these vehicle categories were already in the scope of the activities of the former IWG on Automatically Commanded Steering Function (ACSF), which drafted UN Regulation No. [157].
20. GRVA noted that its work priorities on automation were defined by WP.29 in the FDAV. GRVA also noted that a number of Contracting Parties were willing to work on amendments to UN Regulation No. [157] and therefore decided to consult the Administrative Committee for the coordination of work (AC.2).
21. The expert from the Russian Federation introduced GRVA-07-07, highlighting some inconsistencies between the different parts of UN Regulation No. [157]. He mentioned discrepancies on the use of the term “system”. He questioned the need for Appendix 3 to Annex 4. He then introduced amendment proposal GRVA-07-06 on behalf of the European Commission and the Russian Federation. The expert from OICA responded to the proposal (GRVA-07-59). He also briefly introduced GRVA-07-30, proposing editorial changes to the Regulation and GRVA-07-21 with substantial amendments to the Regulations.
22. The Chair mentioned other informal documents (GRVA-07-27, GRVA-07-45, GRVA-07-56, GRVA-07-62 and GRVA-07-66), proposing amendments to UN Regulation No. [157] and invited the stakeholders to prepare a consolidated document with amendment proposals that could generate consensus at GRVA. Interested parties developed GRVA-07-69-Rev.1.
23. GRVA adopted the amendment proposals marked in green and yellow in GRVA-07-69-Rev.1 (see Annex III of the session report). GRVA requested the secretariat to correct the abbreviations, as appropriate, and to submit it without the text in read as supplement to UN Regulation No. [157], for consideration and vote by the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) its Administrative Committee for the 1958 Agreement (AC.1) at their March 2021 sessions.
24. Following the interpretation request by the expert from France (GRVA-07-39), GRVA agreed that ALKS should in principle detect “approaching emergency vehicles” as per traffic rules, noting that a definition of approaching emergency vehicles as well as other clarifications should be developed as soon as possible.
|
|
2020-09-22 |
2020-09-22 10:28:38 UTC |
2020 July 24 |
Cybersecurity: Proposal to amend the draft Interpretation Document | TFCS-ahID3-03
|
2020-07-24 |
2020-07-24 17:11:26 UTC |
2020 April 20 |
Cybersecurity: Proposal to amend document WP.29/2020/79 | WP.29/2020/97
Document Title: Cybersecurity: Proposal to amend document WP.29/2020/79
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2020/97
|
Description: Proposal agreed by interested Contracting Parties to resolve concerns regarding “peer review” of cybersecurity type approvals.
|
Submitted by: EC, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, Spain, and UK
|
Meeting Session: 181st WP.29 session (24 Jun 2020)
|
Document date: 02 Apr 20 (Posted 20 Apr 20)
|
Document status: Depositary Notification
This adopted proposal becomes binding on 22 Jan 2021.
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 155 | Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 7 | 21-25
Sep 2020
27. The expert from the Russian Federation presented GRVA-07-08, proposing a clarification of para. 5.3.5. of UN Regulation No. [155]. The expert from Japan explained that the proposed clarification should be carefully reviewed as it could lead to restrictions to the rights of Contracting Parties according to the 1958 Agreement. The author agreed and mentioned that ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2020/97 already provided some clarifications.
|
|
2020-04-20 |
2020-04-20 11:37:28 UTC |
2020 March 12 |
Automated vehicle terminology - Comparison between WP.1 and WP.29 | WP.29-180-26
|
2020-03-12 |
2020-03-12 09:34:00 UTC |
2020 March 2 |
Proposal for additional requirements to the ALKS Regulation (GRVA-06-02) | GRVA-06-11
Document Title: Proposal for additional requirements to the ALKS Regulation (GRVA-06-02)
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-06-11
|
Description: This document outlines the UK’s latest proposals to permit a lane change function during a minimum risk manoeuvre or emergency manoeuvre as part of the forthcoming ALKS Regulation.
|
Submitted by: UK
|
Meeting Session: 6th GRVA session (3-4
Mar 2020)
|
Document date: 02 Mar 20 (Posted 02 Mar 20)
|
Document status: Informal GR review
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 157 | Automated Lane-Keeping Systems (ALKS).
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 6 | 3-4
Mar 2020
12. The expert from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland recalled their position on the need to allow ALKS to perform a lane change if necessary, during an emergency manoeuvre. GRVA did not have the time to review in detail his proposal (GRVA-06-11) and agreed to resume this discussion at the GRVA session in September 2020.
24. The Chair regretted that GRVA did not have enough time for reviewing the proposal submitted by the expert from AVERE and also for the proposal submitted by the expert from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. GRVA agreed to consider these two items at its September 2020 session.
|
|
2020-03-02 |
2020-03-02 12:37:00 UTC |
2020 February 26 |
UN R0: 1958 Agreement Revision 3 Article 12 and transitional provisions consistency | IWVTA-32-07
|
2020-02-26 |
2020-02-26 12:58:41 UTC |
2020 February 24 |
UK comments on the draft RDE UN Regulation | RDE-09-07
|
2020-02-24 |
2020-02-24 12:20:16 UTC |
2020 February 13 |
UN R79: Proposal for amendment to the 03 series of amendments | GRVA-05-57
Document Title: UN R79: Proposal for amendment to the 03 series of amendments
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-05-57
|
Description: Proposal to allow ACSF-B lateral acceleration above the maximum limit value in cases where the lane position cannot be maintained by the vehicle (for example, on a tightening curve).
|
Submitted by: UK
|
Meeting Session: 5th GRVA session (10-14
Feb 2020)
|
Document date: 13 Feb 20 (Posted 13 Feb 20)
|
Document status: Informal GR review
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 5 | 10-14
Feb 2020
43. The expert from AVERE introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2020/7 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2020/8 (and their respective amendments in GRVA-05-08 and GRVA-05-24), proposing amendments to the ACSF provisions, resuming the discussion started in September 2019. He mentioned the support provided by the expert from the United Kingdom. The experts from Sweden and France provided comments. The experts from Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands and Norway expressed concerns. The expert from the Netherlands explained that the dynamics problems reported by the manufacturer, member of AVERE, were not due to the provisions in the Regulation but were due to design choices made by this manufacturer. The experts from the European Commission, Korea and United Kingdom and Northern Ireland supported the proposals; the expert from OICA, too. The expert from the Russian Federation proposed alternative proposals (GRVA-05-59) improving the text. The expert from the United Kingdom proposed GRVA-05-57 aimed at addressing the comments expressed by the expert from Sweden. GRVA reviewed all revised proposals produced by the expert from AVERE during the week but remained divided. GRVA agreed to review a revised proposal at the sixth session of GRVA, if time allows.
44. The Chair of GRVA noted the division of GRVA on this matter. He proposed that GRVA performs a general review of the Regulation at its September 2020 session.
|
|
2020-02-13 |
2020-02-13 09:41:08 UTC |
2020 January 29 |
Draft ALKS UN Regulation matrix of test procedures (version 3) | ACSF-25-22
|
2020-01-29 |
2020-01-24 12:32:05 UTC |
2020 January 29 |
ALKS: Communication form | ACSF-25-24
|
2020-01-29 |
2020-01-29 16:06:47 UTC |
2020 January 14 |
SR.1 Vehicle Category Definitions | FRAV-02-03/Rev.1
|
2020-01-14 |
2019-12-05 18:31:10 UTC |
2019 November 7 |
Cybersecurity draft regulation: UK amendment | TFCS-16-15
|
2019-11-07 |
2019-10-25 16:53:23 UTC |
2019 November 7 |
Template for cybersecurity regulation Declaration of Compliance | TFCS-16-26
|
2019-11-07 |
2019-11-11 14:31:34 UTC |
2019 November 2 |
Interpretation of the 1958 Agreement Revision 3 Article 12 | IWVTA-31-06
|
2019-11-02 |
2019-12-04 21:38:30 UTC |
2019 September 24 |
UN R79: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2019/21 | GRVA-04-19
Document Title: UN R79: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2019/21
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-04-19
|
Description: Updated remote-controlled maneuvering proposal with editorial Improvements, clarification that the actuator of the function is to be included as part of the assessment along with the hardware and software on the vehicle, and to add requirements on the security of the connection between the remote-control device and the vehicle.
|
Submitted by: UK
|
Meeting Session: 4th GRVA session (24-27
Sep 2019)
|
Document date: 20 Sep 19 (Posted 24 Sep 19)
|
Document status: Superseded
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 4 | 24-27
Sep 2019
41. The expert from UK introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/21 with provisions on Remote Control Manoeuvring. GRVA recalled that it had already adopted provisions on a majority basis during its second session but had agreed to review them at this session to seek full consensus. The expert introduced GRVA-04-19 with further amendments introducing clarifications.
42. The expert from Germany requested that the session report reflect their statement: “Germany does not see the necessity to regulate this function at UNECE level”. Other experts mentioned that similar provisions could be developed for heavy duty vehicles, too.
43. GRVA agreed to work on similar provisions for other vehicle categories. GRVA also agreed with the amendments to the submitted proposal, reproduced in GRVA-04-19. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit the latest version of the proposal to WP.29 and AC.1 for review and vote at their November 2019 session.
|
|
2019-09-24 |
2019-09-24 13:28:06 UTC |
2019 August 6 |
Proposal for answer to GRVA Cybersecurity/Software Updates tasks and questions | TFCS-15-22
|
2019-08-06 |
2019-08-07 10:31:17 UTC |
2019 July 17 |
UN R79: Proposal for amendments | GRVA/2019/20
Document Title: UN R79: Proposal for amendments
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA/2019/20
|
Description: Proposal to update and clarify Annex 6 on requirements for documentation, fault strategy and verification of the safety of electronic systems and complex electronic vehicle control systems related to vehicle steering. The assessment particularly addresses driver assistance and automated steering.
|
Submitted by: UK
|
Meeting Session: 4th GRVA session (24-27
Sep 2019)
|
Document date: 16 Jul 19 (Posted 17 Jul 19)
|
Document status: Superseded
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 4 | 24-27
Sep 2019
40. The expert from UK introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/20, proposing amendments to Annex 6. He referred to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/4 and reported on the progress made since then. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-04-29 with amendment proposals to the official document. GRVA discussed and then adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/20, amended by Annex V, as a draft supplement to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their March 2020 sessions.
|
|
2019-07-17 |
2019-07-17 12:36:45 UTC |
2019 July 17 |
UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement | GRVA/2019/21
Document Title: UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA/2019/21
|
Description: Proposal to introduce provisions for the approval of Remote Control Manoeuvring (RCM) systems.
|
Submitted by: UK
|
Meeting Session: 4th GRVA session (24-27
Sep 2019)
|
Document date: 12 Jul 19 (Posted 17 Jul 19)
|
Document status: Formal GR review
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 4 | 24-27
Sep 2019
41. The expert from UK introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/21 with provisions on Remote Control Manoeuvring. GRVA recalled that it had already adopted provisions on a majority basis during its second session but had agreed to review them at this session to seek full consensus. The expert introduced GRVA-04-19 with further amendments introducing clarifications.
42. The expert from Germany requested that the session report reflect their statement: “Germany does not see the necessity to regulate this function at UNECE level”. Other experts mentioned that similar provisions could be developed for heavy duty vehicles, too.
43. GRVA agreed to work on similar provisions for other vehicle categories. GRVA also agreed with the amendments to the submitted proposal, reproduced in GRVA-04-19. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit the latest version of the proposal to WP.29 and AC.1 for review and vote at their November 2019 session.
|
|
2019-07-17 |
2019-07-17 12:50:53 UTC |
2019 July 4 |
Multi-User Scenario Catalogue for CAVs (MUSICC) | WP.29-178-29
Document Title: Multi-User Scenario Catalogue for CAVs (MUSICC)
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29-178-29
|
Submitted by: DfT and UK
|
Meeting Session: 178th WP.29 session (24-28
Jun 2019)
|
Document date: 03 Jul 19 (Posted 04 Jul 19)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems.
|
Meeting Reports
|
World Forum for the Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations | Session 178 | 24-28
Jun 2019
36. The representative of United Kingdom recalled the challenge of assuring the safety of these new vehicles as well as the ideas proposed by the industry (multi-pillar approach) and IWG on VMAD. He mentioned several activities related to scenario databases around the world and highlighted that industry were developing their own databases for research and product development purposes. He proposed that WP29 should consider the need for a separate independent database for regulators with the direct oversight of the contracting parties and the ECE. An expert from the United Kingdom introduced WP.29-178-29 which presents their work on a Multi-User Scenario Catalogue for Connected and automated vehicles (MUSICC). He explained what was to be understood as a scenario and presented the vision proposed by United Kingdom: a scenario-based certification process, and proposed that the scenario catalogue would be stored at ECE, for the purpose of simulated tests, physical tests and other processes leading to the certification of a vehicle. He raised the question whether this vision was shared.
37. The representative of France supported the proposal made by the representative of United Kingdom. He welcomed the effort made to develop a common language for descripting and parametrizing scenarios that could be classified according to their criticality. He mentioned WP.29-178-20, prepared by the representative of OICA, providing information on a number of activities in various countries and encouraged them to continue this compilation work.
38. The representative of Japan, Co-Chair of the IWG on VMAD, confirmed that this vision is shared by WP.29 because the framework document adopted at this session of WP.29 included it and allocated it to VMAD IWG. He recalled the current IWG activities and invited the experts of MUSICC to contribute to IWG on VMAD.
39. The representative of Germany expressed interest in this matter and agreed to investigate. He recalled that establishing a database was difficult and that such activities could build on the electronic database for the exchange of type approval documentation (DETA) to be hosted at ECE.
|
|
2019-07-04 |
2019-06-25 08:23:46 UTC |
2019 June 24 |
UK information on off-road collisions | VRU-Proxi-10-10
|
2019-06-24 |
2019-06-24 10:23:40 UTC |
2019 June 11 |
Cybersecurity regulation interpretation document-combined comments | TFCS-TPahCS2-07
|
2019-06-11 |
2019-06-11 08:08:30 UTC |
2019 June 11 |
Software updates: Consolidated interpretation document, including CLEPA and UK comments | TFCS-TPahSU3-07
|
2019-06-11 |
2019-06-11 11:57:03 UTC |