2021 April 13 |
UN R39: Proposal for amendment | GRSG-121-29
|
2021-04-13 |
2021-04-13 07:27:33 UTC |
2021 April 12 |
UN R79: Comments on document GRVA/2021/12 | ADAS-03-16
Document Title: UN R79: Comments on document GRVA/2021/12
|
Document Reference Number: ADAS-03-16
|
Description: Comments on the proposal to allow continuous movement of the driver as an alternative to the continuous actuation of the remote-control device as a means to assure driver attentiveness during remote-controlled parking.
|
Submitted by: UK
|
Meeting Session: 3rd ADAS session (12-13
Apr)
|
Document date: 12 Apr 21 (Posted 12 Apr 21)
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
|
2021-04-12 |
2021-04-12 09:06:05 UTC |
2021 March 19 |
UN R157: Proposal for detectable collisions and emergency vehicles | UNR157-03-11
|
2021-03-19 |
2021-03-19 11:06:00 UTC |
2021 March 15 |
Comments on scope and definitions for ADAS task force | ADAS-02-11
|
2021-03-15 |
2021-03-11 15:27:59 UTC |
2021 March 4 |
MR1: Proposal for Addendum 1 on BioRID-II ATD | GRSP-69-01
|
2021-03-04 |
2021-03-04 08:52:09 UTC |
2021 February 26 |
Comments on the draft EV battery durability GTR text | EVE-44-06
|
2021-02-26 |
2021-02-26 11:38:13 UTC |
2021 February 4 |
UN R156 and UN R157: Alternative proposal to document GRVA-09-09 | GRVA-09-40
|
2021-02-04 |
2021-02-04 14:34:52 UTC |
2021 February 2 |
UN R157: Considerations in the implementation of ALKS | GRVA-09-33
|
2021-02-02 |
2021-02-02 08:52:21 UTC |
2021 February 1 |
UN R157 special interest group: Notes from the 15 January 2021 meeting | GRVA-09-22
|
2021-02-01 |
2021-02-01 06:44:49 UTC |
2021 January 11 |
Headlamp aim discussion document | SLR-HL-11
|
2021-01-11 |
2021-01-11 20:05:02 UTC |
2020 December 22 |
Revised safety considerations for activities other than driving undertaken by the driver in a vehicle when its automated driving system is engaged | WP.1/2019/3/Rev.2
|
2020-12-22 |
2021-02-10 09:57:37 UTC |
2020 December 9 |
MR1: BioRID-II status | GRSP-68-23
Document Title: MR1: BioRID-II status
|
Document Reference Number: GRSP-68-23
|
Submitted by: UK
|
Meeting Session: 68th GRSP session (7-11
Dec 2020)
|
Document date: 07 Dec 20 (Posted 09 Dec 20)
|
This document concerns GTR No. 7 | Head Restraints and United Nations Agreement | Mutual Resolution No. 1: Management of Test Devices.
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Passive Safety | Session 68 | 7-11
Dec 2020
30. The expert from United Kingdom introduced GRSP-68-23, representing the development of Mutual Resolution No. 1, Addendum 1 and concerning the Biomechanical Rear Impact Dummy-II (BIORID-II) UN dummy as part of test tools in UN GTR No. 7 and UN Regulation No. 17 (10 series of amendments) for use in rear impact assessment. He recommended that consideration on this proposal would be made together with GRSP-54-05 (Draft addendum 1 to M.R.1), introduced at the fifty-fourth session of GRSP (see ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/54, para. 4). He recommended GRSP to provide comments on GRSP-68-23 and GRSP-54-05 before 31 January 2021 for consideration in the final document to be submitted to the May 2021 session of GRSP. It was noted that copyrights were expected to be removed from drawings when the proposal would be finally adopted by WP.29 and AC.3. GRSP agreed with the recommendation of the expert from the United Kingdom and agreed to resume discussion at its May 2021 session.
|
|
2020-12-09 |
2020-12-09 07:59:27 UTC |
2020 October 30 |
Comments on the draft Audit/In-Use Performance sections of the VMAD Master Document | VMAD-SG3-3.1-01
|
2020-10-30 |
2021-02-19 10:38:21 UTC |
2020 October 28 |
Comments on the VMAD Master Document | VMAD-14-08
|
2020-10-28 |
2020-10-28 10:59:19 UTC |
2020 September 22 |
UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/33 | GRVA-07-62
Document Title: UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/33
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-07-62
|
Submitted by: UK
|
Meeting Session: 7th GRVA session (21-25
Sep 2020)
|
Document date: 22 Sep 20 (Posted 22 Sep 20)
|
Document status: Formal GR review
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 157 | Automated Lane-Keeping Systems (ALKS).
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 7 | 21-25
Sep 2020
17. The expert from Germany presented GRVA-07-63, introducing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2020/32 with a proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. [157] (ALKS), aimed at increasing the maximum speed (from 60 km/h to 130 km/h) for ALKS. She also introduced a second proposal (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2020/33) aimed at introducing provisions for ALKS performing lane changes. The experts from Austria, China, Denmark, European Commission, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Republic or Korea, Sweden and UK were rather supportive. They provided ideas and technical comments to improve the proposals. The expert from Switzerland opposed to the proposed speed increase (up to 130 km/h), stating that it would be counterproductive and as Switzerland was reviewing traffic rules based on the adopted 60 km/h. The experts from Japan, Canada and USA did not support the proposals and referred to FDAV as the reference document guiding the work of GRVA on automation. The expert from SAFE stated the need for a clear roadmap, mentioned the challenges for the Technical Services and the Approval Authorities with regards to Level 3 technologies and supported the comments from the European Commission regarding the need for a Regulation addressing Automation on motorways.
18. It was recalled that the expert from UK was working on a proposal for provisions for lane change during the minimum risk manoeuvre.
19. The expert from OICA presented GRVA-07-26, introducing a proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. [157] (GRVA-07-31), aimed at extending the scope of the Regulation to heavy vehicles. They recalled that these vehicle categories were already in the scope of the activities of the former IWG on Automatically Commanded Steering Function (ACSF), which drafted UN Regulation No. [157].
20. GRVA noted that its work priorities on automation were defined by WP.29 in the FDAV. GRVA also noted that a number of Contracting Parties were willing to work on amendments to UN Regulation No. [157] and therefore decided to consult the Administrative Committee for the coordination of work (AC.2).
21. The expert from the Russian Federation introduced GRVA-07-07, highlighting some inconsistencies between the different parts of UN Regulation No. [157]. He mentioned discrepancies on the use of the term “system”. He questioned the need for Appendix 3 to Annex 4. He then introduced amendment proposal GRVA-07-06 on behalf of the European Commission and the Russian Federation. The expert from OICA responded to the proposal (GRVA-07-59). He also briefly introduced GRVA-07-30, proposing editorial changes to the Regulation and GRVA-07-21 with substantial amendments to the Regulations.
22. The Chair mentioned other informal documents (GRVA-07-27, GRVA-07-45, GRVA-07-56, GRVA-07-62 and GRVA-07-66), proposing amendments to UN Regulation No. [157] and invited the stakeholders to prepare a consolidated document with amendment proposals that could generate consensus at GRVA. Interested parties developed GRVA-07-69-Rev.1.
23. GRVA adopted the amendment proposals marked in green and yellow in GRVA-07-69-Rev.1 (see Annex III of the session report). GRVA requested the secretariat to correct the abbreviations, as appropriate, and to submit it without the text in read as supplement to UN Regulation No. [157], for consideration and vote by the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) its Administrative Committee for the 1958 Agreement (AC.1) at their March 2021 sessions.
24. Following the interpretation request by the expert from France (GRVA-07-39), GRVA agreed that ALKS should in principle detect “approaching emergency vehicles” as per traffic rules, noting that a definition of approaching emergency vehicles as well as other clarifications should be developed as soon as possible.
|
|
2020-09-22 |
2020-09-22 10:28:38 UTC |
2020 July 24 |
Cybersecurity: Proposal to amend the draft Interpretation Document | TFCS-ahID3-03
|
2020-07-24 |
2020-07-24 17:11:26 UTC |
2020 April 20 |
Cybersecurity: Proposal to amend document WP.29/2020/79 | WP.29/2020/97
Document Title: Cybersecurity: Proposal to amend document WP.29/2020/79
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2020/97
|
Description: Proposal agreed by interested Contracting Parties to resolve concerns regarding “peer review” of cybersecurity type approvals.
|
Submitted by: EC, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, Spain, and UK
|
Meeting Session: 181st WP.29 session (24 Jun 2020)
|
Document date: 02 Apr 20 (Posted 20 Apr 20)
|
Document status: Adopted text published
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 155 | Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 7 | 21-25
Sep 2020
27. The expert from the Russian Federation presented GRVA-07-08, proposing a clarification of para. 5.3.5. of UN Regulation No. [155]. The expert from Japan explained that the proposed clarification should be carefully reviewed as it could lead to restrictions to the rights of Contracting Parties according to the 1958 Agreement. The author agreed and mentioned that ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2020/97 already provided some clarifications.
|
|
2020-04-20 |
2020-04-20 11:37:28 UTC |
2020 March 12 |
Automated vehicle terminology - Comparison between WP.1 and WP.29 | WP.29-180-26
|
2020-03-12 |
2020-03-12 09:34:00 UTC |
2020 March 2 |
Proposal for additional requirements to the ALKS Regulation (GRVA-06-02) | GRVA-06-11
Document Title: Proposal for additional requirements to the ALKS Regulation (GRVA-06-02)
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-06-11
|
Description: This document outlines the UK’s latest proposals to permit a lane change function during a minimum risk manoeuvre or emergency manoeuvre as part of the forthcoming ALKS Regulation.
|
Submitted by: UK
|
Meeting Session: 6th GRVA session (3-4
Mar 2020)
|
Document date: 02 Mar 20 (Posted 02 Mar 20)
|
Document status: Informal GR review
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 157 | Automated Lane-Keeping Systems (ALKS).
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 6 | 3-4
Mar 2020
12. The expert from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland recalled their position on the need to allow ALKS to perform a lane change if necessary, during an emergency manoeuvre. GRVA did not have the time to review in detail his proposal (GRVA-06-11) and agreed to resume this discussion at the GRVA session in September 2020.
24. The Chair regretted that GRVA did not have enough time for reviewing the proposal submitted by the expert from AVERE and also for the proposal submitted by the expert from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. GRVA agreed to consider these two items at its September 2020 session.
|
|
2020-03-02 |
2020-03-02 12:37:00 UTC |
2020 February 26 |
UN R0: 1958 Agreement Revision 3 Article 12 and transitional provisions consistency | IWVTA-32-07
|
2020-02-26 |
2020-02-26 12:58:41 UTC |
2020 February 24 |
UK comments on the draft RDE UN Regulation | RDE-09-07
|
2020-02-24 |
2020-02-24 12:20:16 UTC |
2020 February 13 |
UN R79: Proposal for amendment to the 03 series of amendments | GRVA-05-57
Document Title: UN R79: Proposal for amendment to the 03 series of amendments
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-05-57
|
Description: Proposal to allow ACSF-B lateral acceleration above the maximum limit value in cases where the lane position cannot be maintained by the vehicle (for example, on a tightening curve).
|
Submitted by: UK
|
Meeting Session: 5th GRVA session (10-14
Feb 2020)
|
Document date: 13 Feb 20 (Posted 13 Feb 20)
|
Document status: Informal GR review
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 5 | 10-14
Feb 2020
43. The expert from AVERE introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2020/7 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2020/8 (and their respective amendments in GRVA-05-08 and GRVA-05-24), proposing amendments to the ACSF provisions, resuming the discussion started in September 2019. He mentioned the support provided by the expert from the United Kingdom. The experts from Sweden and France provided comments. The experts from Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands and Norway expressed concerns. The expert from the Netherlands explained that the dynamics problems reported by the manufacturer, member of AVERE, were not due to the provisions in the Regulation but were due to design choices made by this manufacturer. The experts from the European Commission, Korea and United Kingdom and Northern Ireland supported the proposals; the expert from OICA, too. The expert from the Russian Federation proposed alternative proposals (GRVA-05-59) improving the text. The expert from the United Kingdom proposed GRVA-05-57 aimed at addressing the comments expressed by the expert from Sweden. GRVA reviewed all revised proposals produced by the expert from AVERE during the week but remained divided. GRVA agreed to review a revised proposal at the sixth session of GRVA, if time allows.
44. The Chair of GRVA noted the division of GRVA on this matter. He proposed that GRVA performs a general review of the Regulation at its September 2020 session.
|
|
2020-02-13 |
2020-02-13 09:41:08 UTC |
2020 January 29 |
Draft ALKS UN Regulation matrix of test procedures (version 3) | ACSF-25-22
|
2020-01-29 |
2020-01-24 12:32:05 UTC |
2020 January 29 |
ALKS: Communication form | ACSF-25-24
|
2020-01-29 |
2020-01-29 16:06:47 UTC |
2020 January 14 |
SR.1 Vehicle Category Definitions | FRAV-02-03/Rev.1
|
2020-01-14 |
2019-12-05 18:31:10 UTC |