1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Document Title | REC draft regulation: Hungarian proposals for Annex 2 communication form | ||||||||
Reference Number | REC-14-09 | ||||||||
Date |
19 Feb 2013
|
||||||||
Source(s) | Hungary | ||||||||
Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R132 Retrofit Emissions | ||||||||
Meeting(s) | |||||||||
Downloads | |||||||||
UNECE server | .doc format | ||||||||
Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
REC | Session 14 | 19-20 Feb 2013 |
Baarbé noted the Hungarian comment but his concern is that an impression could be created that a full Euro-stage vehicle is created. Uhlik said it would only refer to the tables with the limit values as listed in annex 9. Hallauer suggested adapting the wording accordingly and Schulte suggested to take the wording from the equivalency tables. May noted that a differentiation has to be made per pollutant (NOx, PM, CO & HC). For example, where a PM reduction REC is fitted, emissions of CO, HC and NOx must still meet the original level, but not the higher one that is to be achieved for PM. |
||||||||