Proposal to introduce provisions for post-crash electrical safety to align with GTR 20 on electric vehicle safety.

The H-point machine is used to verify the Seat Reference Point of the driver seat (and other seating positions in the car). This SRP is the basis of many prescriptions related to e.g. seat strength/head restraint requirements, seat belt anchorage locations, forward field of vision requirements, rearward visibility, etc.

Proposal to facilitate the administrative control of two-stage requirements

Proposal makes a few minor adaptations and clarifications to the existing requirements.

This proposal aims at re-introducing a text (allowing tolerances on the vehicle mass) that was deleted by the 02 series of amendments.

The proposed amendment does not intend to change the requirements nor the level of stringency. The footnote to paragraph 3.2.2. is added to further clarify the definition of the use of a one belt route. In its current state, the text apparently has been interpreted as to allow the use of a single belt route for each application that an Enhanced Child Restraint System (ECRS) would offer. That way, one belt route for a rearward facing ECRS (integral) and a second belt route for a forward facing (non- integral) ECRS has been introduced, making a combination of C and E.

The text reproduced prepared by the Ad Hoc Group on Child Restraint Systems to introduce definitions, requirements and a test procedure for lower tether anchorages.

The proposal aimed to an identification of buses and trucks equipped with an electric drivetrain which is consistent with existing regulated identification for Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG), Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) and Compressed Hydrogen (H2) fuelled trucks and buses.

The text prepared by the Ad Hoc Group on CRS, aiming to introduce definitions, requirements and a test procedure for lower tether anchorages.

The text prepared by the Ad Hoc Group on Child Restraint Systems, aiming to introduce definitions, requirements and a test procedure for lower tether anchorages.

Proposal to define the judgement phase of the dynamic seat belt component test on the sled as limited up to the point where the manikin contacts the seat back during its backward movement after impact.

Proposal to introduce provisions for the specifications and calibration procedure of the 3-D “H”-point machine and the procedure for determining the “H”-point and the actual torso angle for seating positions in motor vehicles for use across all relevant UN Regulations and GTR.

Explanations and clarifications concerning the “one belt route” provisions.

Proposal to enable identification of buses and trucks equipped with an electric drivetrain.

Technical appendices supporting amendments to the three dimensional (3-D) “H” point machine test tool provisions and their harmonisation under Mutual Resolution 1.

Revised proposal based on document GRSP/2024/7 to update references to the three-dimensional “H” point measurement and calibration procedure pursuant to moving such provisions from the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3) to Mutual Resolution No. 1.

Proposal to correct an inconsistency in para. 6.3.8.1. by replacing the provision to apply a force of 2,500 N ± 50 N to each generic lower tether bracket with a force of 5,000 ± 100 N.

Proposal for a new regulation on “Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of a Vehicle with regard to Safety-Belt Reminders”.

Revised proposal based on document GRSP/2024/4 to amend UN R16 pursuant to proposal by the Ad Hoc Group on splitting UN R16 into three UN Regulations, separating safety-belt components and restraint systems from safety-belt installation requirements and safety-belt reminders.

Proposal prepared by the members of the Technical Services Group (TSG) and submitted on their behalf by the Netherlands to update the keynotes underneath multiple ISO envelope drawings in annex 6 appendix 2 as well as adding a specific reference to Regulation No. 129.

Proposal to allow thevuse of talcum for the dust resistance test as alternative to dry quartz.

Proposal to extend the definition of a module.

Proposal to clarify: (a) exemption of the presence of SBR on folding seats, (b) first level of warning tests with transmission in neutral position, and (c) interference of devices for remote starting of vehicles with SBR.

Request to amend GTR 13 to align the GTR with technical progress and remove inconsistencies between Parts I and II of Amendment 1.

Proposal to update references to the three-dimensional “H” point measurement and calibration procedure pursuant to the transposition of these provisions from the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (RE3) to Mutual Resolution No. 1.

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Introduces an explanation to the background of the procedures to test
vehicle types including DPPS

Information to serve as guidance for Technical Services and Type Approval Authorities

Proposed modifications to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2025/7