List of decisions subject to the special “silence procedure” whereby parties may signal any reservations concerning the decisions following the session proper. This procedure was adopted due to the shortened and virtual sessions necessitated by current health and travel restrictions.

Section 6 draft text of the VMAD Master Document on the New Assessment/Test Method for ADS.

Background information on FRAV discussions and decisions in the development of provisions for ADS safety.

Updated overview of the VMAD New Assessment Test Method reflecting discussions of the VMAD Scenarios subgroup.

Working document maintained by the FRAV informal group to document current working consensus and facilitate discussions (informally known as “Document 5”), updated for presentation during the 6th FRAV group session.

Safety elements gathered from national guidelines, WP.29 documents, and other sources for consideration in developing eventual performance requirements for ADS.

This document is intended to provide guidance on the major human factors challenges to be considered when providing remote support and control to assist vehicle operation under automation.

Review including discussion of “failure cases” where outcome from one test might conflict with outcomes under other test methods (e.g., handling a failure under one test/test run that passes under other methods).

Final version of the agenda.

Paper describing the elements and interactions across elements of the New Assessment/Test Method under development for the assessment of automated driving systems.

Draft paper pursuant to SG1a discussions held on 24 August.

This document provides a high level overview of key concepts and issues associated with the track and real-world testing pillars of the new assessment/test method (NATM).

Draft VMAD subgroup paper describing the concepts for the development of scenarios for use in assessing automated driving systems.

Input concerning the selection and prioritization of traffic situations for development as scenarios under the VMAD activity and request for comments regarding concepts of “edge cases” and “baseline scenarios” and regarding diverse views on “three-layer approach”.

Japan answers to questions raised during VMAD discussions.

Conceptual proposal for describing traffic scenarios under the New Assessment/Test Method for automated driving systems.

Updated version of the working paper on the “new assessment/test method” under development for automated driving systems.

Raw list of proposals gathered from FRAV stakeholders during the 2nd FRAV session.

Updated version of the FRAV “Document 5” per changes agreed in document FRAV-03-05-Add.2. and revised format to improve tracking and document open issues.

Outcome of FRAV discussions on development of elements for ODD descriptions to be provided by manufacturers.

Discussion paper to solicit input on scope and purpose of “System Safety” requirements, including on terms and definitions for use in such requirements.

Proposals for “tasks and deliverables” with regard to enhanced child restraint systems and alternative seating configurations enabled by automated driving.

Review of GRSG regulations and possible need for changes to address automated driving. The table considers how often regulations refer to a “driver” where the absence of a human driver could raise questions.

Version 2.2 of the description of interactions among the elements of the VMAD New Assessment/Test Method prepared by an OICA/CLEPA-led VMAD task force.

Revised safety considerations for activities other than driving undertaken by the driver in a vehicle when its automated driving system is engaged.

This document compiles the responses from VMAD’s subgroup 2b members concerning high level descriptions of the track test and real world test pillars received prior, during and following the SG2b virtual meeting on 24 June 2020.

This document seeks to provide a high-level overview of key concepts and issues associated with the development of traffic scenarios for validating automated vehicle (AV) safety as part of new assessment/test method (NATM) prepared by the VMAD subgroup 1a.

Paper prepared by the VMAD subgroup 2a.

This document compiles the responses from VMAD’s subgroup 4 (formerly subgroup 2b) members concerning high level descriptions of the track test and real world test pillars received prior, during and following the SG2b virtual meeting on 24 June 2020.

Presentation on the use of simulation tools under type approval and in discussions on the validation of automated driving systems.

VMAD co-chairs’ orientation presentation for the 7th session teleconference.