Proposal for correction to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2015/62
(Germany)
Description
|
Correction to paragraph 6.2.2. “Sound level limits” to add a reference specifically to paragraph 3.1 of Annex 3 in order to ensure interpretation of the sound limit values as application only “noise in motion” and not to “stationary noise”. This aligns the 02 and 03 series texts.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-01
|
Submitted by: Germany
|
Document date: 26 Jan 17
|
Document status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
WP.29/2015/62 | Proposals for the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51
WP.29/2017/71 | Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
8. The expert from Germany proposed to clarify the wording of paragraph 6.2.2. “Sound level limits” (GRB-65-01). GRB adopted this proposal, as contained in Annex II of the session report, and requested the secretariat to submit it to the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) and the Administrative Committee (AC.1) for consideration and vote at their June 2017 sessions as a draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51.
67. The representative of EU, Japan and the Chair of GRB welcomed the adoption of the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2015/62) and acknowledged the work of GRB and its subsidiary bodies.
|
GRB-65-01
|
27 Jan 2017
|
Working Party
|
Vehicle Noise Emissions
Vehicle Noise
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Motor Vehicles having at least Four Wheels with regard to their Noise Emissions
|
Correction to paragraph 6.2.2. "Sound level limits" to add a reference specifically to paragraph 3.1 of Annex 3 in order to ensure interpretation of the sound limit values as application only "noise in motion" and not to "stationary noise". This aligns the 02 and 03 series texts.
|
GRB-65-0001
|
China research on M3 subcategories under UN Regulation No. 51-03 series
(China and CATARC)
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-02
|
Submitted by: China and CATARC
|
Document date: 31 Jan 17
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
11. The expert from China reported issues that had been identified when applying the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51 to M3 vehicles with different powertrain options. In particular, he was of the view that the Regulation should be amended with new provisions that would take into account the specific features of electric and hybrid vehicles.
|
GRB-65-02
|
02 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Vehicle Noise Emissions
Vehicle Noise
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Motor Vehicles having at least Four Wheels with regard to their Noise Emissions
|
|
GRB-65-0002
|
Proposal for amendments to the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3)
(Russia)
Description
|
Proposal to replace the use of metric “tonnes” with measurements in kilograms in the definitions of vehicle categories and mass.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-03/Rev.1
|
Submitted by: Russia
|
Document date: 17 Feb 17
|
Document status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSG-112-11 | Proposal for amendments to the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
26. The expert from the Russian Federation proposed to change the measuring units for vehicle masses from tonnes to kilograms in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.4) (GRB-65-03-Rev.1). GRB supported the proposal and requested the secretariat to circulate it to other WP.29 Working Parties, in particular, to Working Party on General Safety (GRSG) at its April 2017 session.
53. The expert from the Russian Federation introduced GRSG-112-11 on a proposal endorsed by the Working Party on Noise (GRB) to adapt in R.E.3 the measuring units for vehicle masses from tonnes to kilograms. GRSG endorsed the proposal in principle. The secretariat suggested to also aligning in R.E.3 some sub-categories of vehicles, such as L1A for powered cycles and L1B for two-wheeled mopeds. The expert from EC volunteered to prepare a comparison document between the categories listed in EU Regulation No. 168/2013 and those in Revision 5 of R.E.3. GRSG noted general support and agreed to circulate GRSG-112-11 with an official symbol for consideration at its next session.
|
GRB-65-03/Rev.1
|
17 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
RE3 Construction of Vehicles
RE3
Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles
|
Proposal to replace the use of metric "tonnes" with measurements in kilograms in the definitions of vehicle categories and mass.
|
GRB-65-0003/Rev.1
|
Proposal to introduce provisions for indoor testing under UN Regulation No. 51
(ISO)
Description
|
Proposal including indoor testing as an alternative to type approval tests of Annex 3 to Regulation No. 51 in accordance with ISO 26101:2012 and ISO 362-3.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-04
|
Submitted by: ISO
|
Document date: 01 Mar 17
|
Document status: Informal GR review
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
ASEP II-03-18 | Revision of GRB-65-24
GRB/2017/8 | Proposal for Supplement 3 to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
9. The expert from ISO proposed to introduce indoor testing in Annex 3 of Regulation No. 51 as an option (GRB-65-04). This proposal received comments from the experts of France, Germany, Poland, Russian Federation, EC and OICA. The Chair invited these experts, as well as other interested parties, to review the ISO proposal and to submit a revised document to the next session.
11. The expert from ISO proposed to introduce an option of indoor testing, according to standard ISO 362-3, in Annex 3 to Regulation No. 51 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRB/2017/8). This proposal received comments from the experts of France, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden and OICA. GRB decided to revert to the proposals at the next session and invited all experts to study the document and to send their questions and comments to ISO.
|
GRB-65-04
|
02 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Vehicle Noise Emissions
Vehicle Noise
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Motor Vehicles having at least Four Wheels with regard to their Noise Emissions
|
Proposal including indoor testing as an alternative to type approval tests of Annex 3 to Regulation No. 51 in accordance with ISO 26101:2012 and ISO 362-3.
|
GRB-65-0004
|
EU Regulation on AVAS requirements
(EC)
Description
|
Presentation on the current European Commission draft proposal for the transposition of UN R138 regarding “quiet road transport vehicles” into EU law. The draft would require the audible alert signal to be activated at vehicle start-up, but would allow for use of a pause function activated by the driver. A fuller set of documents was provided for the 64th Technical Committee-Motor Vehicles session.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-05
|
Submitted by: EC
|
Document date: 02 Mar 17
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
17. The expert from EC briefed GRB on preparing a new EU Regulation aimed to amend and supplement the Acoustic Vehicle Alerting System (AVAS) requirements in Annex VIII to EU Regulation No. 540/2014, based on the provisions of Regulation No. 138 and its 01 series of amendments (GRB-65-05). GRB noted the legal complications stemming from the fact that the so-called AVAS ‘pause switch’ was mandatory in EU Regulation No. 540/2014, optional in the original version of Regulation No. 138 and then prohibited in its 01 series of amendments.
|
GRB-65-05
|
03 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Quiet Road Transport Vehicles
Quiet Road Transport Vehicles
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of Quiet Road Transport Vehicles with regard to their reduced audibility (QRTV)
|
Presentation on the current European Commission draft proposal for the transposition of UN R138 regarding "quiet road transport vehicles" into EU law. The draft would require the audible alert signal to be activated at vehicle start-up, but would allow for use of a pause function activated by the driver. A fuller set of documents was provided for the <a href="https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/79af0476-e923-44de-9ca2-7961ab15beca" target="_blank" class="orange">64th Technical Committee-Motor Vehicles session</a>.
|
GRB-65-0005
|
Preliminary study on reversing alarms: Situation of Japan
(Japan and JASIC)
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-06
|
Submitted by: Japan and JASIC
|
Document date: 06 Feb 17
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRB-65-17 | Additional information on reversing alarms
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
3. The experts from Germany, Japan, Republic of Korea and Turkey outlined the present situation with reversing alarms at the national level, identified the existing problems in this field and proposed solutions (GRB-65-06, GRB-65-07-Rev.1, GRB-65-13, GRB-65-14 and GRB-65-19). The expert from the Netherlands suggested using white noise alarms that, according to him, have advantages over the traditional tonal noise alarms that beep (GRB-65-17).
4. GRB agreed that, rather than amending Regulation No. 28, a new Regulation on reversing alarm should be prepared. GRB noted that the main issues of the future Regulation would be its scope (categories of vehicles), the possible existence of a pause switch and the alarm sound composition (sound levels and frequencies). GRB agreed that there was no need to establish a new informal working group and that the initial drafting would be carried out by a small group (task force) of interested parties. The expert from Germany volunteered to steer the work of the task force with the assistance of OICA. The experts from Japan and Turkey pointed out that, if need be, they could also act as sponsors.
|
GRB-65-06
|
06 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Audible Reversing Warning Systems
Reversing Warning
|
|
GRB-65-0006
|
Reverse Alarm of M- and N-Vehicles: Consensus of Japan and Germany
(BMVI)
Description
|
Proposal to pursue harmonization of reversing alarm requirements through the establishment of a new UN Regulation in order to promote safety and address noise concerns.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-07/Rev.1
|
Submitted by: BMVI
|
Document date: 07 Feb 17
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRB-65-17 | Additional information on reversing alarms
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
3. The experts from Germany, Japan, Republic of Korea and Turkey outlined the present situation with reversing alarms at the national level, identified the existing problems in this field and proposed solutions (GRB-65-06, GRB-65-07-Rev.1, GRB-65-13, GRB-65-14 and GRB-65-19). The expert from the Netherlands suggested using white noise alarms that, according to him, have advantages over the traditional tonal noise alarms that beep (GRB-65-17).
4. GRB agreed that, rather than amending Regulation No. 28, a new Regulation on reversing alarm should be prepared. GRB noted that the main issues of the future Regulation would be its scope (categories of vehicles), the possible existence of a pause switch and the alarm sound composition (sound levels and frequencies). GRB agreed that there was no need to establish a new informal working group and that the initial drafting would be carried out by a small group (task force) of interested parties. The expert from Germany volunteered to steer the work of the task force with the assistance of OICA. The experts from Japan and Turkey pointed out that, if need be, they could also act as sponsors.
|
GRB-65-07/Rev.1
|
08 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Audible Reversing Warning Systems
Reversing Warning
Audible Warning Devices and Signals
Audible Warning Devices
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Audible Warning Devices and of Motor Vehicles with regard to their Audible Signals
|
Proposal to pursue harmonization of reversing alarm requirements through the establishment of a new UN Regulation in order to promote safety and address noise concerns.
|
GRB-65-0007/Rev.1
|
General information and WP.29 highlights for the 65th GRB session
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-08
|
Document date: 07 Feb 17
|
More information
|
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
28. The secretariat reported on the highlights of the 170th session of WP.29 (GRB-65-08).
|
GRB-65-08
|
08 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
|
|
GRB-65-0008
|
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 63
(EC)
Description
|
Proposal to clarify the text of the regulation, update provisions in line with Supplement 1 to the 02 series of amendments (WP.29/2015/64), and to align its provisions with those of UN R41 and R51, including: - replace the term “two wheeled moped” with “L1 category vehicle”;
- replace the term “moped” with “vehicle”;
- replace the term “noise” by “sound” except for its use related to background noise;
- replace “noise made by” with “sound emitted by”;
- specify in each use of the term “speed” whether the reference is to engine speed or vehicle speed;
- add definition for “rated engine speed” in addition to “rated maximum net power”;
- add definitions for “reference mass” and “test mass”;
- add definition for “maximum vehicle speed”;
- add the words “or electronically” and “rider selectable” to paragraph 6.3.2. to cover electronically adjustable exhaust or silencing systems;
- allow the use of in-motion testing in addition to stationary testing in Annex 1 and add the necessary data reporting provisions in Annex 3 similar to provisions under UN R41 04 series;
- update references to ISO standards; and
- add sub-paragraphs to Annex 3, paragraph 5.2. to hinder tampering.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-09
|
Submitted by: EC
|
Document date: 07 Feb 17
|
Document status: Informal GR review
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
14. The expert from EC introduced draft amendments on powered cycles (GRB-65-09), including definitions of new subcategories L1-A and L1-B, with a view to aligning Regulation No. 63 with the EU legislation. The experts from Germany and the Netherlands pointed out that the overwhelming majority of powered cycles were electric and questioned the need for the proposed amendments. The expert of Japan called for a prudent approach when and if introducing new categories of vehicles, because other Regulations might be affected as well. GRB was of the view that more time would be needed to study the proposal and invited the expert from EC to issue it as an official document for the next session.
|
GRB-65-09
|
08 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Two-wheeled Moped Noise
Moped Noise
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Two-wheeled Mopeds with regard to Noise
|
Proposal to clarify the text of the regulation, update provisions in line with Supplement 1 to the 02 series of amendments (WP.29/2015/64), and to align its provisions with those of UN R41 and R51, including:<ol class="alpha"><li>replace the term "two wheeled moped" with "L<sub>1</sub> category vehicle";</li><li>replace the term "moped" with "vehicle";</li><li>replace the term "noise" by "sound" except for its use related to background noise;</li><li>replace "noise made by" with "sound emitted by";</li><li>specify in each use of the term "speed" whether the reference is to engine speed or vehicle speed;</li><li>add definition for "rated engine speed" in addition to "rated maximum net power";</li><li>add definitions for "reference mass" and "test mass";</li><li>add definition for "maximum vehicle speed";</li><li>add the words “or electronically” and “rider selectable” to paragraph 6.3.2. to cover electronically adjustable exhaust or silencing systems;</li><li>allow the use of in-motion testing in addition to stationary testing in Annex 1 and add the necessary data reporting provisions in Annex 3 similar to provisions under UN R41 04 series;</li><li>update references to ISO standards; and</li><li>add sub-paragraphs to Annex 3, paragraph 5.2. to hinder tampering.</li></ol>
|
GRB-65-0009
|
Proposal for correction to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51
(France)
Description
|
Proposal for clarifications, including the applicability of certain provisions, in Annex 3: Methods and instruments for measuring the sound made by motor vehicles.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-10
|
Submitted by: France
|
Document date: 09 Feb 17
|
Document status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
7. The expert from France proposed to correct some inconsistences in the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51 (GRB-65-10). The experts from China and OICA pointed out that more corrections would be necessary. GRB invited all interested experts to cooperate on this issue with a view to preparing a consolidated official document for the next session.
|
GRB-65-10
|
09 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Vehicle Noise Emissions
Vehicle Noise
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Motor Vehicles having at least Four Wheels with regard to their Noise Emissions
|
Proposal for clarifications, including the applicability of certain provisions, in Annex 3: Methods and instruments for measuring the sound made by motor vehicles.
|
GRB-65-0010
|
Proposal for correction to the 04 series of amendments to Regulation No. 41
(France)
Description
|
Proposal to correct Annex 3, paragraph 1.4.1. of the French version of the regulation to align with the original English text.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-11
|
Submitted by: France
|
Document date: 09 Feb 17
|
Document status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
5. The expert from France identified the missing value of 1 dB(A) in the French version of paragraph 1.4.1. of Annex 3 (GRB-65-11). GRB requested the secretariat to correct this mistake by issuing an erratum.
|
GRB-65-11
|
09 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Motorcycle Noise
Motorcycle Noise
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Motor Cycles with regard to Noise
|
Proposal to correct Annex 3, paragraph 1.4.1. of the French version of the regulation to align with the original English text.
|
GRB-65-0011
|
Proposals for interpretation of Regulation No. 51-03
(France)
Description
|
Presentation for discussion of specific technical questions concerning the application of UN 51 test procedures.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-12
|
Submitted by: France
|
Document date: 09 Feb 17
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
10. The expert from France identified a number of ambiguous provisions in the current text of the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51 that would allow different interpretations (GRB-65-12). He suggested that an implementation or interpretation guide be prepared to address these issues. The expert of OICA welcomed this initiative and pointed out that OICA had started compiling its own list of ambiguities. Following an exchange of views, GRB invited the experts from France, ISO and OICA to prepare a consolidated list of such issues for GRB review and envisaged that further work could be pursued in the framework of a small drafting group.
|
GRB-65-12
|
09 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Vehicle Noise Emissions
Vehicle Noise
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Motor Vehicles having at least Four Wheels with regard to their Noise Emissions
|
Presentation for discussion of specific technical questions concerning the application of UN 51 test procedures.
|
GRB-65-0012
|
Proposal for amendment to Regulation No. 28 on reversing audible warning devices
(Turkey)
Description
|
Draft proposal to incorporate provisions for reverse audible warning devices for [M2], [N2], N3 and M3 vehicles.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-13
|
Submitted by: Turkey
|
Document date: 09 Feb 17
|
Document status: Informal GR review
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRB-64-05 | Amendment proposals to Regulation No. 28 on reversing alarm
WP.29-168-04 | Proposal for establishment of New Regulation with regard to reversing sound warning devices
GRB-65-14 | Reversing audible warning devices for M- and N-vehicles
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
3. The experts from Germany, Japan, Republic of Korea and Turkey outlined the present situation with reversing alarms at the national level, identified the existing problems in this field and proposed solutions (GRB-65-06, GRB-65-07-Rev.1, GRB-65-13, GRB-65-14 and GRB-65-19). The expert from the Netherlands suggested using white noise alarms that, according to him, have advantages over the traditional tonal noise alarms that beep (GRB-65-17).
4. GRB agreed that, rather than amending Regulation No. 28, a new Regulation on reversing alarm should be prepared. GRB noted that the main issues of the future Regulation would be its scope (categories of vehicles), the possible existence of a pause switch and the alarm sound composition (sound levels and frequencies). GRB agreed that there was no need to establish a new informal working group and that the initial drafting would be carried out by a small group (task force) of interested parties. The expert from Germany volunteered to steer the work of the task force with the assistance of OICA. The experts from Japan and Turkey pointed out that, if need be, they could also act as sponsors.
41. The World Forum took note of a proposal by Turkey to establish a new Regulation on vehicle reversing sound warning devices (WP.29-168-04) and invited GRB to consider this issue.
4. The expert from Germany presented an analysis of the current diverging requirements and challenges for reversing alarms of M and N categories of vehicles and called for harmonization in this area in the framework of the 1958 Agreement (GRB-64-06). As an example of a possible solution, he mentioned amending Regulation No. 28 with the provisions on reversing alarms (GRB-64-05). The expert from Turkey recalled its alternative proposal, at the March 2016 session of WP.29, to establish a new Regulation on vehicle reversing sound warning devices (WP.29-168-04).
5. GRB was of the view that, before taking a decision on the legal form of reversing alarm requirements, this issue would need to be studied further. The experts from China, France, Germany, Hungary, Republic of Korea, Spain, Turkey and OICA expressed their interest in participating in this work. The Chair invited the expert of Germany to solicit comments from GRB experts with a view to preparing proposals for the next session. The expert from Japan pointed out the need to cooperate with the Working Party on General Safety Provisions (GRSG) on devices for indirect vision (Regulation No. 46) which could be an alternative to reversing alarms.
|
GRB-65-13
|
10 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Audible Reversing Warning Systems
Reversing Warning
Audible Warning Devices and Signals
Audible Warning Devices
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Audible Warning Devices and of Motor Vehicles with regard to their Audible Signals
|
Draft proposal to incorporate provisions for reverse audible warning devices for [M2], [N2], N3 and M3 vehicles.
|
GRB-65-0013
|
Reversing audible warning devices for M- and N-vehicles
(Turkey)
Description
|
Presentation of Turkey’s proposals for revering audible warning devices, including provisions for multiple sound levels and pause functions.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-14
|
Submitted by: Turkey
|
Document date: 09 Feb 17
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRB-65-13 | Proposal for amendment to Regulation No. 28 on reversing audible warning devices
GRB-64-05 | Amendment proposals to Regulation No. 28 on reversing alarm
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
3. The experts from Germany, Japan, Republic of Korea and Turkey outlined the present situation with reversing alarms at the national level, identified the existing problems in this field and proposed solutions (GRB-65-06, GRB-65-07-Rev.1, GRB-65-13, GRB-65-14 and GRB-65-19). The expert from the Netherlands suggested using white noise alarms that, according to him, have advantages over the traditional tonal noise alarms that beep (GRB-65-17).
4. GRB agreed that, rather than amending Regulation No. 28, a new Regulation on reversing alarm should be prepared. GRB noted that the main issues of the future Regulation would be its scope (categories of vehicles), the possible existence of a pause switch and the alarm sound composition (sound levels and frequencies). GRB agreed that there was no need to establish a new informal working group and that the initial drafting would be carried out by a small group (task force) of interested parties. The expert from Germany volunteered to steer the work of the task force with the assistance of OICA. The experts from Japan and Turkey pointed out that, if need be, they could also act as sponsors.
4. The expert from Germany presented an analysis of the current diverging requirements and challenges for reversing alarms of M and N categories of vehicles and called for harmonization in this area in the framework of the 1958 Agreement (GRB-64-06). As an example of a possible solution, he mentioned amending Regulation No. 28 with the provisions on reversing alarms (GRB-64-05). The expert from Turkey recalled its alternative proposal, at the March 2016 session of WP.29, to establish a new Regulation on vehicle reversing sound warning devices (WP.29-168-04).
5. GRB was of the view that, before taking a decision on the legal form of reversing alarm requirements, this issue would need to be studied further. The experts from China, France, Germany, Hungary, Republic of Korea, Spain, Turkey and OICA expressed their interest in participating in this work. The Chair invited the expert of Germany to solicit comments from GRB experts with a view to preparing proposals for the next session. The expert from Japan pointed out the need to cooperate with the Working Party on General Safety Provisions (GRSG) on devices for indirect vision (Regulation No. 46) which could be an alternative to reversing alarms.
|
GRB-65-14
|
10 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Audible Reversing Warning Systems
Reversing Warning
Audible Warning Devices and Signals
Audible Warning Devices
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Audible Warning Devices and of Motor Vehicles with regard to their Audible Signals
|
Presentation of Turkey's proposals for revering audible warning devices, including provisions for multiple sound levels and pause functions.
|
GRB-65-0014
|
GRB subjects for the future
Description
|
Table prepared by the GRB chair of possible subjects for the future development of noise regulations.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-15
|
Document date: 20 Feb 17
|
More information
|
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
29. The Chair presented a revised list of possible issues for the future GRB activities compiled at several informal meetings (GRB-65-15). GRB invited experts to submit their comments in writing to the Chair.
|
GRB-65-15
|
22 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
|
Table prepared by the GRB chair of possible subjects for the future development of noise regulations.
|
GRB-65-0015
|
Study on Euro 5 sound level limits of L-category vehicles
(EC, EMISIA, Ricardo, and TNO)
Description
|
Status report on the European Commission program to investigate the potential for new sound limits of L-category vehicles at Euro 5 step and make a justified proposal.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-16
|
Submitted by: EC, EMISIA, Ricardo, and TNO
|
Document date: 10 Feb 17
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRB-65-16/Add.1 | Addendum to the EC presentation on the study on Euro 5 sound level limits of L-category vehicles
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
21. The experts from EC informed GRB about an ongoing study on Euro 5 sound level limits of L-category vehicles (GRB-65-16 and Add.1), with the aim to investigate the potential for lower limits and to prepare justified proposals for amendments to EU Regulation No. 168/2013 and, at a later stage, to UN Regulations Nos. 9, 41 and 63. According to the experts, the study had been launched in response to frequent complaints from citizens over the excessive levels of sound emissions from L-category vehicles, which were often perceived as disturbing and harmful noise for the public health.
22. The experts of Germany, Netherlands, IMMA and OICA pointed out that the underlying problems were not because of the prescribed limits for new vehicles, but due to retrofitting and tampering with silencers of the vehicles in use. Thus, these experts were of the view that only reducing the sound level limits in the above Regulations would not improve the situation, unless accompanied by efficient enforcement measures and market surveillance. GRB agreed to study the relevant documents and to monitor the developments at the EU level.
|
GRB-65-16
|
10 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Three-Wheeled Cycle Noise
Three-Wheeled Cycle Noise
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Category L2, L4 and L5 Vehicles with Regard to Noise
Motorcycle Noise
Motorcycle Noise
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Motor Cycles with regard to Noise
Two-wheeled Moped Noise
Moped Noise
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Two-wheeled Mopeds with regard to Noise
|
Status report on the European Commission program to investigate the potential for new sound limits of L-category vehicles at Euro 5 step and make a justified proposal.
|
GRB-65-0016
|
Addendum to the EC presentation on the study on Euro 5 sound level limits of L-category vehicles
(EC)
Description
|
Additional materials covering task force topics and possible time frame for EC proposal on Euro 5 sound limits.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-16/Add.1
|
Submitted by: EC
|
Document date: 13 Feb 17
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRB-65-16 | Study on Euro 5 sound level limits of L-category vehicles
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
21. The experts from EC informed GRB about an ongoing study on Euro 5 sound level limits of L-category vehicles (GRB-65-16 and Add.1), with the aim to investigate the potential for lower limits and to prepare justified proposals for amendments to EU Regulation No. 168/2013 and, at a later stage, to UN Regulations Nos. 9, 41 and 63. According to the experts, the study had been launched in response to frequent complaints from citizens over the excessive levels of sound emissions from L-category vehicles, which were often perceived as disturbing and harmful noise for the public health.
22. The experts of Germany, Netherlands, IMMA and OICA pointed out that the underlying problems were not because of the prescribed limits for new vehicles, but due to retrofitting and tampering with silencers of the vehicles in use. Thus, these experts were of the view that only reducing the sound level limits in the above Regulations would not improve the situation, unless accompanied by efficient enforcement measures and market surveillance. GRB agreed to study the relevant documents and to monitor the developments at the EU level.
|
GRB-65-16/Add.1
|
13 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Three-Wheeled Cycle Noise
Three-Wheeled Cycle Noise
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Category L2, L4 and L5 Vehicles with Regard to Noise
Motorcycle Noise
Motorcycle Noise
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Motor Cycles with regard to Noise
Two-wheeled Moped Noise
Moped Noise
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Two-wheeled Mopeds with regard to Noise
|
Additional materials covering task force topics and possible time frame for EC proposal on Euro 5 sound limits.
|
GRB-65-0016/Add.1
|
Additional information on reversing alarms
(Netherlands)
Description
|
Netherlands proposal in response to the initiative from Germany and Japan to standardize and limit the sound emission from Reversing Alarms (documents 64-05, 64-06, 65-06 and 65-07) to amend the requirements, including the use a “white noise alarm” instead of a “tonal noise alarm”.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-17
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Document date: 13 Feb 17
|
Document status: Informal GR review
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRB-64-05 | Amendment proposals to Regulation No. 28 on reversing alarm
GRB-64-06 | Category M and N vehicle reversing alarms
GRB-65-06 | Preliminary study on reversing alarms: Situation of Japan
GRB-65-07/Rev.1 | Reverse Alarm of M- and N-Vehicles: Consensus of Japan and Germany
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
3. The experts from Germany, Japan, Republic of Korea and Turkey outlined the present situation with reversing alarms at the national level, identified the existing problems in this field and proposed solutions (GRB-65-06, GRB-65-07-Rev.1, GRB-65-13, GRB-65-14 and GRB-65-19). The expert from the Netherlands suggested using white noise alarms that, according to him, have advantages over the traditional tonal noise alarms that beep (GRB-65-17).
4. GRB agreed that, rather than amending Regulation No. 28, a new Regulation on reversing alarm should be prepared. GRB noted that the main issues of the future Regulation would be its scope (categories of vehicles), the possible existence of a pause switch and the alarm sound composition (sound levels and frequencies). GRB agreed that there was no need to establish a new informal working group and that the initial drafting would be carried out by a small group (task force) of interested parties. The expert from Germany volunteered to steer the work of the task force with the assistance of OICA. The experts from Japan and Turkey pointed out that, if need be, they could also act as sponsors.
4. The expert from Germany presented an analysis of the current diverging requirements and challenges for reversing alarms of M and N categories of vehicles and called for harmonization in this area in the framework of the 1958 Agreement (GRB-64-06). As an example of a possible solution, he mentioned amending Regulation No. 28 with the provisions on reversing alarms (GRB-64-05). The expert from Turkey recalled its alternative proposal, at the March 2016 session of WP.29, to establish a new Regulation on vehicle reversing sound warning devices (WP.29-168-04).
5. GRB was of the view that, before taking a decision on the legal form of reversing alarm requirements, this issue would need to be studied further. The experts from China, France, Germany, Hungary, Republic of Korea, Spain, Turkey and OICA expressed their interest in participating in this work. The Chair invited the expert of Germany to solicit comments from GRB experts with a view to preparing proposals for the next session. The expert from Japan pointed out the need to cooperate with the Working Party on General Safety Provisions (GRSG) on devices for indirect vision (Regulation No. 46) which could be an alternative to reversing alarms.
|
GRB-65-17
|
13 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Audible Reversing Warning Systems
Reversing Warning
Audible Warning Devices and Signals
Audible Warning Devices
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Audible Warning Devices and of Motor Vehicles with regard to their Audible Signals
|
Netherlands proposal in response to the initiative from Germany and Japan to standardize and limit the sound emission from Reversing Alarms (documents 64-05, 64-06, 65-06 and 65-07) to amend the requirements, including the use a “white noise alarm” instead of a “tonal noise alarm”.
|
GRB-65-0017
|
Proposal for amendment to Regulation No. 41-04
(IMMA)
Description
|
Proposal to delete category L4 vehicles from the scope of the regulation. Motorcycles with a side car (L4 category vehicles) should be tested in a state that is designed to be operated on the road (i.e. the side car fitted to the vehicle) using the test procedures of UN Regulation No. 9. Since UN Regulation No. 41.04 does not cover motorcycles with a side car, this text should be deleted in order to avoid any potential misunderstandings.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-18
|
Submitted by: IMMA
|
Document date: 13 Feb 17
|
Document status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
WP.29/2019/6 | UN R9: Proposal for the 08 series of amendments
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
6. The expert from IMMA proposed to delete the last sentence in paragraph 1.3.2.1., since the scope of the 04 series of amendments to Regulation No. 41 does not cover motorcycles with a sidecar (L4 category of vehicles) (GRB-65-18). The expert from EC requested more time to study if the proposed modification would also require a change in the European Union (EU) legislation. GRB agreed to continue consideration of this issue at the next session, based on an official document to be submitted by IMMA.
|
GRB-65-18
|
13 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Motorcycle Noise
Motorcycle Noise
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Motor Cycles with regard to Noise
|
Proposal to delete category L<sub>4</sub> vehicles from the scope of the regulation. Motorcycles with a side car (L4 category vehicles) should be tested in a state that is designed to be operated on the road (i.e. the side car fitted to the vehicle) using the test procedures of UN Regulation No. 9. Since UN Regulation No. 41.04 does not cover motorcycles with a side car, this text should be deleted in order to avoid any potential misunderstandings.
|
GRB-65-0018
|
Reversing alarms
(Korea and KOTSA)
Description
|
Information on back-up accidents in Korea and proposal for scope and content of new requirements for reversing warning alarms.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-19
|
Submitted by: Korea and KOTSA
|
Document date: 13 Feb 17
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
3. The experts from Germany, Japan, Republic of Korea and Turkey outlined the present situation with reversing alarms at the national level, identified the existing problems in this field and proposed solutions (GRB-65-06, GRB-65-07-Rev.1, GRB-65-13, GRB-65-14 and GRB-65-19). The expert from the Netherlands suggested using white noise alarms that, according to him, have advantages over the traditional tonal noise alarms that beep (GRB-65-17).
4. GRB agreed that, rather than amending Regulation No. 28, a new Regulation on reversing alarm should be prepared. GRB noted that the main issues of the future Regulation would be its scope (categories of vehicles), the possible existence of a pause switch and the alarm sound composition (sound levels and frequencies). GRB agreed that there was no need to establish a new informal working group and that the initial drafting would be carried out by a small group (task force) of interested parties. The expert from Germany volunteered to steer the work of the task force with the assistance of OICA. The experts from Japan and Turkey pointed out that, if need be, they could also act as sponsors.
|
GRB-65-19
|
13 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Audible Reversing Warning Systems
Reversing Warning
Audible Warning Devices and Signals
Audible Warning Devices
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Audible Warning Devices and of Motor Vehicles with regard to their Audible Signals
|
Information on back-up accidents in Korea and proposal for scope and content of new requirements for reversing warning alarms.
|
GRB-65-0019
|
Labelling road surfaces - benefits and necessity
(Netherlands)
Description
|
Information on work in the Netherlands to implement noise-level labeling for roads (in a format similar to that used in Europe for labeling energy efficiency of household appliances).
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-20
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Document date: 26 May 16
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRB-65-21 | Labelling road surfaces - numerical substantiation
GRB-65-22 | Labelling road surfaces
GRB-67-19 | Labelling road surfaces
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
24. The expert from the Netherlands presented a project on labelling road surfaces (GRB-65-20, GRB-65-21, GRB-65-22 and Add.1) based on four criteria: skid resistance, noise reduction, rolling resistance and lifespan. According to the expert, labelling road surfaces could contribute to road safety, public health, sustainability and economics. GRB noted that the scope of the 1958 and the 1998 Agreements (wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts thereof) does not cover road surfaces and, therefore, no legally binding regulatory decisions could be taken at the WP.29, AC.1 or AC.3 levels. This does not preclude, however, adopting a Recommendation or Resolution on the issue. GRB welcomed the presentation and reiterated the importance of a holistic approach to sound emissions in the system ‘tyre-road surface’. Finally, GRB agreed to keep this item on the agenda and looked forward to new presentations on activities conducted at the national level in the field of road surfaces.
22. The expert from the Netherlands presented an update of the project on labelling road surfaces (GRB-67-19), based on the following criteria: skid resistance, noise reduction, rolling resistance and lifespan. GRB recalled its view that labelling road surfaces could only be introduced as a non-legally binding document, e.g. a recommendation or resolution, and its intention to find the most appropriate body to adopt such a document. In this context, the Chair informed GRB about the AC.2 considerations of this issue, at its November 2017 session. The secretariat further reported that the Working Party on Road Transport (SC.1), at its September 2017 session, had indicated that the project was beyond the SC.1 Terms of Reference. The Chair invited the Netherlands, in cooperation with the Chair, secretariat and other interested parties, to draft a recommendation or resolution for consideration at the next session of GRB.
|
GRB-65-20
|
13 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Tire Rolling Sound Emissions, Adhesion on Wet Surfaces, and Rolling Resistance
Tire Noise, Wet Adhesion, and Rolling Resistance
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of tyres with regard to rolling sound emissions and/or to adhesion on wet surfaces and/or to rolling resistance
Road Surface Labeling Recommendations
Road Surface Labeling
|
Information on work in the Netherlands to implement noise-level labeling for roads (in a format similar to that used in Europe for labeling energy efficiency of household appliances).
|
GRB-65-0020
|
Labelling road surfaces - numerical substantiation
(Netherlands)
Description
|
Explanation of Netherlands interest in labeling of road surfaces, in particular as a means to encourage reductions in rolling resistance.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-21
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Document date: 29 Jul 16
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRB-65-20 | Labelling road surfaces - benefits and necessity
GRB-65-22 | Labelling road surfaces
GRB-67-19 | Labelling road surfaces
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
24. The expert from the Netherlands presented a project on labelling road surfaces (GRB-65-20, GRB-65-21, GRB-65-22 and Add.1) based on four criteria: skid resistance, noise reduction, rolling resistance and lifespan. According to the expert, labelling road surfaces could contribute to road safety, public health, sustainability and economics. GRB noted that the scope of the 1958 and the 1998 Agreements (wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts thereof) does not cover road surfaces and, therefore, no legally binding regulatory decisions could be taken at the WP.29, AC.1 or AC.3 levels. This does not preclude, however, adopting a Recommendation or Resolution on the issue. GRB welcomed the presentation and reiterated the importance of a holistic approach to sound emissions in the system ‘tyre-road surface’. Finally, GRB agreed to keep this item on the agenda and looked forward to new presentations on activities conducted at the national level in the field of road surfaces.
22. The expert from the Netherlands presented an update of the project on labelling road surfaces (GRB-67-19), based on the following criteria: skid resistance, noise reduction, rolling resistance and lifespan. GRB recalled its view that labelling road surfaces could only be introduced as a non-legally binding document, e.g. a recommendation or resolution, and its intention to find the most appropriate body to adopt such a document. In this context, the Chair informed GRB about the AC.2 considerations of this issue, at its November 2017 session. The secretariat further reported that the Working Party on Road Transport (SC.1), at its September 2017 session, had indicated that the project was beyond the SC.1 Terms of Reference. The Chair invited the Netherlands, in cooperation with the Chair, secretariat and other interested parties, to draft a recommendation or resolution for consideration at the next session of GRB.
|
GRB-65-21
|
13 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Tire Rolling Sound Emissions, Adhesion on Wet Surfaces, and Rolling Resistance
Tire Noise, Wet Adhesion, and Rolling Resistance
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of tyres with regard to rolling sound emissions and/or to adhesion on wet surfaces and/or to rolling resistance
Road Surface Labeling Recommendations
Road Surface Labeling
|
Explanation of Netherlands interest in labeling of road surfaces, in particular as a means to encourage reductions in rolling resistance.
|
GRB-65-0021
|
Labelling road surfaces
(Netherlands)
Description
|
Paper presented at a Dutch Infra Congress 2016 held on 23 June 2016 concerning the potential benefits of a road labelling system.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-22
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Document date: 13 Feb 17
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRB-65-21 | Labelling road surfaces - numerical substantiation
GRB-65-20 | Labelling road surfaces - benefits and necessity
GRB-65-22/Add.1 | Presentation on labelling of road surfaces for noise performance
GRB-67-19 | Labelling road surfaces
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
24. The expert from the Netherlands presented a project on labelling road surfaces (GRB-65-20, GRB-65-21, GRB-65-22 and Add.1) based on four criteria: skid resistance, noise reduction, rolling resistance and lifespan. According to the expert, labelling road surfaces could contribute to road safety, public health, sustainability and economics. GRB noted that the scope of the 1958 and the 1998 Agreements (wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts thereof) does not cover road surfaces and, therefore, no legally binding regulatory decisions could be taken at the WP.29, AC.1 or AC.3 levels. This does not preclude, however, adopting a Recommendation or Resolution on the issue. GRB welcomed the presentation and reiterated the importance of a holistic approach to sound emissions in the system ‘tyre-road surface’. Finally, GRB agreed to keep this item on the agenda and looked forward to new presentations on activities conducted at the national level in the field of road surfaces.
22. The expert from the Netherlands presented an update of the project on labelling road surfaces (GRB-67-19), based on the following criteria: skid resistance, noise reduction, rolling resistance and lifespan. GRB recalled its view that labelling road surfaces could only be introduced as a non-legally binding document, e.g. a recommendation or resolution, and its intention to find the most appropriate body to adopt such a document. In this context, the Chair informed GRB about the AC.2 considerations of this issue, at its November 2017 session. The secretariat further reported that the Working Party on Road Transport (SC.1), at its September 2017 session, had indicated that the project was beyond the SC.1 Terms of Reference. The Chair invited the Netherlands, in cooperation with the Chair, secretariat and other interested parties, to draft a recommendation or resolution for consideration at the next session of GRB.
|
GRB-65-22
|
13 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Tire Rolling Sound Emissions, Adhesion on Wet Surfaces, and Rolling Resistance
Tire Noise, Wet Adhesion, and Rolling Resistance
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of tyres with regard to rolling sound emissions and/or to adhesion on wet surfaces and/or to rolling resistance
Road Surface Labeling Recommendations
Road Surface Labeling
|
Paper presented at a Dutch Infra Congress 2016 held on 23 June 2016 concerning the potential benefits of a road labelling system.
|
GRB-65-0022
|
Presentation on labelling of road surfaces for noise performance
(Netherlands)
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-22/Add.1
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Document date: 17 Feb 17
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRB-65-22 | Labelling road surfaces
GRB-67-19 | Labelling road surfaces
Related discussions
22. The expert from the Netherlands presented an update of the project on labelling road surfaces (GRB-67-19), based on the following criteria: skid resistance, noise reduction, rolling resistance and lifespan. GRB recalled its view that labelling road surfaces could only be introduced as a non-legally binding document, e.g. a recommendation or resolution, and its intention to find the most appropriate body to adopt such a document. In this context, the Chair informed GRB about the AC.2 considerations of this issue, at its November 2017 session. The secretariat further reported that the Working Party on Road Transport (SC.1), at its September 2017 session, had indicated that the project was beyond the SC.1 Terms of Reference. The Chair invited the Netherlands, in cooperation with the Chair, secretariat and other interested parties, to draft a recommendation or resolution for consideration at the next session of GRB.
|
GRB-65-22/Add.1
|
17 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Vehicle Noise Emissions
Vehicle Noise
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Motor Vehicles having at least Four Wheels with regard to their Noise Emissions
Tire Rolling Sound Emissions, Adhesion on Wet Surfaces, and Rolling Resistance
Tire Noise, Wet Adhesion, and Rolling Resistance
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of tyres with regard to rolling sound emissions and/or to adhesion on wet surfaces and/or to rolling resistance
Road Surface Labeling Recommendations
Road Surface Labeling
|
|
GRB-65-0022/Add.1
|
Proposal for a new Supplement to the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 138
(OICA)
Description
|
Proposal to amend the wording of the transitional provisions as drafted for the 01 series to Regulation No. 138 (document WP.29/2017/7 for the March 2017 WP.29 session, prohibiting the AVAS pause function) with the guidelines for these provisions as established by Revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-23
|
Submitted by: OICA
|
Document date: 13 Feb 17
|
Document status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
WP.29/2017/7 | Proposal for the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 138
WP.29/2019/55 | UN R138: Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 01 series of amendments
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
19. The expert from OICA proposed to slightly modify the wording of the transitional provisions introduced in the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 138 (GRB-65-23). Following a brief exchange of comments, GRB invited OICA to submit an official document for consideration at the next session.
67. The World Forum considered the draft amendments under agenda items 4.6.1 to 4.6.6 and recommended their submission to AC.1 for voting, subject to the following modification of the title on top of page 2 of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2017/7 (agenda item 4.6.6): “01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 138 (Quiet Road Transport Vehicles (QRTV))”.
|
GRB-65-23
|
13 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Quiet Road Transport Vehicles
Quiet Road Transport Vehicles
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of Quiet Road Transport Vehicles with regard to their reduced audibility (QRTV)
|
Proposal to amend the wording of the transitional provisions as drafted for the 01 series to Regulation No. 138 (document WP.29/2017/7 for the March 2017 WP.29 session, prohibiting the AVAS pause function) with the guidelines for these provisions as established by Revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement.
|
GRB-65-0023
|
Progress report of the ASEP II informal working group
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-24
|
Document date: 15 Feb 17
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
13. The expert from France also presented a status report of IWG ASEP to GRB (GRB-65-24), together with a detailed work plan and timeline of future activities. The Chair invited all experts to contribute to the work of IWG ASEP.
|
GRB-65-24
|
16 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Vehicle Noise Emissions
Vehicle Noise
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Motor Vehicles having at least Four Wheels with regard to their Noise Emissions
|
|
GRB-65-0024
|
Presentation on the ASEP II informal group proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51
Description
|
Explanation of the proposals contained in documents GRB/2017/2 and GRB-65-26.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-25
|
Document date: 15 Feb 17
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRB/2017/2 | Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51
GRB-65-26 | Proposal to amend the draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51
WP.29/2017/71 | Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
12. On behalf of the Informal Working Group (IWG) on Additional Sound Emission Provisions (ASEP), the expert from France introduced proposals for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRB/2017/2, GRB-65-25 and GRB-65-26). GRB adopted these proposals, as laid down in Annex III, and requested the secretariat to submit them to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2017 sessions as a draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51.
|
GRB-65-25
|
16 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Vehicle Noise Emissions
Vehicle Noise
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Motor Vehicles having at least Four Wheels with regard to their Noise Emissions
|
Explanation of the proposals contained in documents GRB/2017/2 and GRB-65-26.
|
GRB-65-0025
|
Proposal to amend the draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51
Description
|
ASEP II informal group amendments to document GRB/2017/2. See document GRB-65-25 for additional explanations.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-26
|
Document date: 15 Feb 17
|
Document status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRB/2017/2 | Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51
GRB-65-25 | Presentation on the ASEP II informal group proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51
WP.29/2017/71 | Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
12. On behalf of the Informal Working Group (IWG) on Additional Sound Emission Provisions (ASEP), the expert from France introduced proposals for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRB/2017/2, GRB-65-25 and GRB-65-26). GRB adopted these proposals, as laid down in Annex III, and requested the secretariat to submit them to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2017 sessions as a draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51.
|
GRB-65-26
|
16 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Vehicle Noise Emissions
Vehicle Noise
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Motor Vehicles having at least Four Wheels with regard to their Noise Emissions
|
ASEP II informal group amendments to document GRB/2017/2. See document GRB-65-25 for additional explanations.
|
GRB-65-0026
|
Push and Pull for Noise Emission Reduction from Road Traffic in the Netherlands and EU
(Netherlands)
Description
|
Presentation on legal requirements (push) and public education/incentivization (pull) strategies to decrease road noise levels. The presentation especially addresses the Dutch interest in a road labeling system for rating road surface noise levels.
|
Document Reference Number: GRB-65-27
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Document date: 16 Feb 17
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
65th GRB session (15-17
Feb 2017)
23. The expert from the Netherlands introduced a summary of various initiatives to reduce noise emissions from road traffic (GRB-65-27) which addressed different sources of noise (road surfaces, tyres and powertrain). He reiterated the benefits of better tyres and maintaining the correct tyre pressure for road safety and fuel efficiency. Finally, he pointed out that excessive drivers’ reliance on the Tyre Pressure Monitoring System (TPMS) might be counter-productive. GRB thanked the Dutch expert and noted that these initiatives had already been considered by GRB on various occasions and that some of them fall under the competence of other bodies. For example, the Chair indicated that tyre labelling and TPMS should be addressed by, respectively, EU and the WP.29 Working Party on Braking and Running Gear (GRRF). The Chair also recalled the GRB position that it would premature to tighten the current tyre noise limits in Regulation No. 117.
|
GRB-65-27
|
17 Feb 2017
|
Working Party
|
Vehicle Noise Emissions
Vehicle Noise
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Motor Vehicles having at least Four Wheels with regard to their Noise Emissions
Tire Rolling Sound Emissions, Adhesion on Wet Surfaces, and Rolling Resistance
Tire Noise, Wet Adhesion, and Rolling Resistance
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of tyres with regard to rolling sound emissions and/or to adhesion on wet surfaces and/or to rolling resistance
|
Presentation on legal requirements (push) and public education/incentivization (pull) strategies to decrease road noise levels. The presentation especially addresses the Dutch interest in a road labeling system for rating road surface noise levels.
|
GRB-65-0027
|