Proposal to amend para. 6.2.2.1.4. to delete “For”, amend para. 6.2.2.1.5. to specify that requirements of para. 6.2.2.1.1. apply only to the support for parts made of material with Shore A hardness of less than 50 and mounted on rigid support, and insert new para. 6.2.2.1.6. stating requirements of para. 6.2.2.1.1. do not apply to camera monitor systems if their lower edge is mounted not less than 2 m above ground when vehicle is under maximum technical permissible mass load, based on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2026/28.

Proposal to amend para. 6.2.2.1.4. to delete “For”, amend para. 6.2.2.1.5. to clarify that requirements apply only to the support for parts made of material with Shore A hardness of less than 50 mounted on rigid support, and insert new para. 6.2.2.1.6. establishing that requirements do not apply to CMS with lower edge mounted not less than 2 m above the ground when vehicle is under load corresponding to its maximum technical permissible mass.

Proposal to:

• Amend para. 6.2.2.1.4. to exempt parts of the camera and the monitor installed outside the vehicle which are made of a material with a Shore A hardness of less than 60 from the relevant provisions,
• Amend para. 6.2.2.1.5. to apply requirements of para. 6.2.2.1.1. only to the support for parts of the camera and the monitor installed inside the vehicle which are made of a material with a Shore A hardness of less than 50 and which are mounted on a rigid support,
• Insert a new para. 6.2.2.1.6. to provide that the requirements of para. 6.2.2.1.1. do not apply to CMS if their lower edge is mounted not less than 2 m above the ground when the vehicle is under a load corresponding to its maximum technical permissible mass,
• Amend para. 22.33.5. to provide that Contracting Parties shall continue to accept type approvals issued according to the 04, 05 and 06 series of amendments to this Regulation for vehicles and devices for indirect vision which are not affected by changes introduced by the 07 series of amendments.

Proposal based on GRSG/2026/38 to amend para. 2.18. to define end of event time separately for planar events and all other events, amend para. 2.20. to redefine engine throttle percent full, insert new definitions for Advanced emergency braking system (AEBS) and Trigger activated, amend para. 5.4.3. to modify crash test data requirements and reference UN Regulations Nos. 95 and either 94 or 137, and amend Table 1 in Annex 4 to modify data element requirements including changing Air bag warning lamp and other elements from conditional to Mandatory, adding AEBS event recording, modifying Yaw Rate recording intervals and sample rate, clarifying Vulnerable road user secondary safety system warning indicator status recording, modifying Accident emergency call system status recording interval, and revising footnotes regarding TTC calculation and AEBS requirements, effective upon entry into force of the 03 Series of Amendments.

European Commission priorities for EDR Step 3 include improving detection of vehicle-to-vulnerable road user collisions and low-severity vehicle-to-vehicle collisions through adjusting delta-v trigger thresholds, developing new jerk-based trigger criteria, and exploring ADS collision detection for EDR triggering in automated vehicles on a long-term timeline. Data elements and format must be ensured to remain up-to-date with new safety system developments and close gaps between light and heavy vehicles through reviewing data elements in light of newly regulated safety systems and mirroring DDAW, ADDW and DCAS data elements from UN R160 to UN R169 on short-term and ongoing timelines.

Proposed changes to align RxSWIN provisions with the RxSWIN template adopted through WP.29-197-06, remove the proposed requirement to comply with UN R156/01 or later from R157 and R171, remove amendments to UN R155 as decided by the IWG CS/OTA, apply the RxSWIN amendments also to earlier series of amendments in R13, R13-H, R79, R131, R152, R157, and R171, update references to the latest version of R.E.3, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.8, in earlier series, and correct paragraph references and improve structure in R89, R139, R140, R155, R156, and R171.

Proposal to amend GRVA/2026/27, which proposes amendments to UN R13, UN R13-H, UN R79, UN R89, UN R130, UN R131, UN R139, UN R140, UN R152, UN R156, UN R157, UN R171, UN R175, and UN R178:

• Throughout these regulations, amend references to the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3) as document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.8,
• insert new definitions for Software Identification Numbers referring to R.E.3 Annex 7 para. 2,
• amend requirements for software identification to require manufacturers provide necessary information allowing Technical Services to uniquely identify hardware and software configurations,
• insert new provisions allowing vehicle manufacturers to apply for new approvals differentiating software versions for vehicles already registered in the market from new vehicles,
• amend production discontinuation provisions to clarify production is not considered definitively discontinued if manufacturer intends to obtain subsequent extensions of approval for software updates of registered vehicles,
• insert new items in annexes regarding additional information on software identification and software updates including R_xSWIN identification, whether held on vehicle, how to read if not held on vehicle, and relevant parameters for vehicle identification.

Proposal to amend footnote 25 to reduce the maximum number of recorded DCAS warnings from 15 to 10 per current ignition cycle. The justification presented cites data burden reduction while retaining information about habitual driver disengagement patterns. Supporting documentation references two autopilot collision cases—Florida 2016 and California 2018—where recorded warnings within existing data retention periods would have revealed repeated disengagement that current recording parameters miss, demonstrating that 10 warnings combined with extended recording duration enables identification of ineffective warning strategies.

Proposals for EDR Step 3:

• Improved triggering to increase detection rate of vehicle-to-vulnerable road user collisions and low-severity vehicle-to-vehicle collisions by considering delta-v and jerk-based trigger thresholds and developing updated triggering thresholds,
• Overwriting and multi-event issues by reviewing crash reconstruction experiences and developing updated requirements on overlapping events and overwriting,
• Data elements and formats to improve meaningfulness and close gaps by considering new data elements, modifications to data element format specifications, deviating recording duration, and focus on functions compared to specific systems,
• EDR for vehicles of category L₁–L₇ to establish relevant EDR requirements by understanding specificities of vehicles of category L₁–L₇ and developing triggering conditions, events, data elements, and survivability requirements.

A study of 24 professional truck drivers investigated how drowsiness develops during real-road driving to test a DDAW system. At night, 17 of 24 drivers reached a KSS level of 8, with average time to reach KSS 8 being 56 minutes. Ten drivers chose to stop or were requested to stop in the sleep-deprived condition. A DDAW recording window of 600 s would fail to capture information relevant to the EDR, whereas time windows of up to one hour could provide important indications of increased driver fatigue.

Proposal to clarify that the EDR volatile memory buffer for last stop trigger activation shall accommodate data related to at least five different stops to be overwritten on a first-in first-out basis, and that data for the most recent stops shall be written to non-volatile memory in a way that does not interfere with the event record related to any other trigger of paragraph 5.3.1.

For vehicles equipped with an Automated Driving System, it shall be possible to retrieve DSSAD time-stamp data elements specified under paragraph 5.2. of Annex 8 of UN Regulation No. 185 recorded within at least the last 30 seconds prior to triggering of the respective EDR event, regardless of whether the DSSAD and the EDR are implemented as a single system or as separate systems. The time-stamp data elements retrievable from the DSSAD shall include the record for the last activation or deactivation of the feature used at the time of the event within the same power cycle. The data elements shall be retrievable in the format specified in Annex 8 of UN Regulation No. 185, though DSSAD location data may be omitted and dates and times recorded may be replaced with information representing the time elapsed between the recording of each DSSAD data element and the triggering of the EDR.

Minutes from the 27th meeting of GRSP TF on AVRS held Wednesday 1st July 2026 online. The agenda and previous minutes were approved. EC reported from June WP.29-199 TF Expert FADS and presented WP.29-199-19. GRSP TF AVRS must complete crashworthiness regulation for Category Y and Pedestrian Protection R127, GRE TF AVSR ADS marker lamps, GRE IWG EMC refinements for ADS in 10R08, and GRPE TF AVRS amendments to UN Regulation No. 154. Regarding amendment proposals to UN Regulations Nos. 35 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2026/104) and 68 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2026/146), AC.1 postponed voting to the next session due to required quorum not being attained. EC presented updates on Y-category regulatory framework for N₁, Y-category Pedestrian Protection UN Reg 127, and UN Regulation No. 42 and 134. Next meetings scheduled 4th September, 5th October, week 4, 24th November or 1st December, and 7–11 December.

Proposal, updated with in session comments, to amend Footnote 1 to reference document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.8, amend para. 6.1.5. to clarify that the exemption for sensors being part of driver assistance systems does not apply to automated driving systems, remove non-exhaustive examples of sensors, replace “disoriented” with “misaligned”, and align terminology to “driver assistance systems”. The exemption for driver assistance systems is retained because their failure does not prevent manual vehicle operation, whereas automated driving systems’ perception equipment forms part of the driving function, and damage to sensing devices may prevent vehicle operation contrary to Regulation No. 42’s objective.

Proposal to insert a new introduction section defining application to vehicles of categories X and Y equipped with an Automated Driving System, to amend para. 6.1.5. to replace “driver assist systems” with “driver assistance systems”, to remove the non-exhaustive list “cameras, radar devices, etc.”, to replace “disoriented” with “misaligned”, and to add provisions clarifying that the exemption for sensor damage does not apply to automated driving systems unless the Automated Driving System performance of the Designed Driving Task is not affected.

Proposal to:

• insert new paragraphs 2.71. to 2.78. defining
  • Position Code,
  • Turn Signal Switch Status,
  • Hazard Warning Signal Switch Status,
  • Hazard Warning Signal Lamp Status,
  • Turn Signal Lamp Status,
  • Gear Positions,
  • Seat-Track Position-1, and
  • Seat-Track Position-2,
• Delete existing data elements for Safety belt status by driver position, Frontal air bag deployment by driver and front passenger, Side air bag deployment by driver and front passenger, and Pretensioner deployment by driver and front passenger,
• Amend Table 1 to replace position-specific safety belt, frontal air bag, side air bag, knee airbag, far-side airbag, pretensioner, and occupant size classification entries with X-Y Position Code entries,
• Add Turn Signal Lamp status, Hazard Warning Signal Lamp Status, Turn Signal Switch Status, Hazard Warning Signal Switch Status, Gear Positions, and Seat-Track Position entries with recording intervals from -5.0 to 0 seconds or -1.0 seconds and sample rates of 2 samples per second.

Presentation of a method of testing for immunity of vehicles of category M₁ to electromagnetic radiation for Blind Spot Detection (BSD)/Blind Spot Information System (BSIS) as defined in the latest series of amendments to UN R151. EMC immunity test criteria for BSD are added.

Proposal to amend para. 5.1.1.3. to adjust the lower vertical datum point from 5 degrees to 4 degrees below the horizontal and update the corresponding figure in Annex 4, Figure 1. This harmonizes the location of the lower datum point with the angle of obstruction requirement in para. 5.1.3., resolving an inconsistency between the allowed area of obstruction and the mandated transparent area of the windscreen.

Document presents automated shuttles as vehicles designed for public transport with autonomy by design, typically featuring fewer than 10 seats and often limited to 50 km/h maximum speed. Shuttles are deployed globally but are incompatible with current UN vehicle categories: category M₁ does not accommodate standing passengers and is incompatible with crashworthiness regulations, while M₂/M₃ Class A construction alignment is prevented by the fewer-than-10-seat threshold. Proposal calls for a workshop organized by the GRSG/GRVA task force on automated vehicle categories to engage stakeholders and confirm need for an international category or class, addressing administrative questions, alignment with M₂/M₃ regulations, seating capacity, dimensions, weight, speed limits, and bidirectionality options.

The agenda includes:

• DDAW system warnings and driver acknowledgement,
• microsleep detection requirements,
• system effectiveness under varied driving conditions and when DCAS is active,
• system functionality where driver occlusions occur,
• drowsiness thresholds for warnings,
• criteria for classifying false negatives,
• test methods,
• specificity and positive predictive value as performance metrics,
• observer-rated drowsiness,
• timing of future meetings.

Proposal to increase yaw rate recording frequency to 10 Hz. Yaw-rate data recorded at 2 Hz corresponds to one measurement every 500 ms; increasing to 10 Hz provides a measurement every 100 ms, resulting in a fivefold improvement in temporal resolution. This enhancement significantly improves ability to reconstruct pre-crash vehicle dynamics, identify vehicle instability onset and progression, and evaluate Electronic Stability Control functionality. A yaw-rate recording frequency of at least 10 Hz reduces temporal uncertainty from 500 ms to 100 ms and enables more accurate reconstruction of loss-of-control events, vehicle rotation, ESC interventions, and driving dynamical issues.

Proposal to amend para. 1.4. to clarify obligations for recording data elements where sensors or systems cannot meet specified format requirements. Recording is not required if no system or sensor is designed to provide the trigger or data element, or if not operational at the time of the trigger condition or recording. However, if the vehicle is fitted with an original equipment manufacturer sensor or system designed to provide the trigger or data element in the specified format, reporting in that format is mandatory when operational. Where sensor or system design capabilities do not allow format requirements to be met, the data element shall nevertheless be recorded and the corresponding limitation reported. Failure states shall be recorded by the EDR.

Agenda for the 48th session of the Subgroup on EDR, a hybrid meeting scheduled for 15-16 September 2026 in Berlin. The agenda includes a final review of and potential amendments to official documents to GRSG regarding UN R160 and UN R169, discussion of the need for Step 3 and inventory of potential items for Step 3 workstream with presentations by IWG delegations expected, EDR for ADS, and a list of action items and schedule of future conference call meetings.

Document presents Korean research on event data recorder (EDR) data survivability in electric vehicles following post-crash fires. Analysis of nine Korean EV fire cases shows EDR data retrieval failed in three cases due to ACU damage in fully burned vehicles, while six cases achieved data retrieval despite water immersion from firefighting. The document proposes water immersion testing to assess EDR data survivability for inclusion in EDR Step 3, referencing international automotive standards for test method development.

Clean work-in-progress draft proposal to insert a new para. 0 establishing an introduction for vehicles of categories X and Y equipped with an Automated Driving System, and amend para. 6.1.5. to clarify that the exemption for sensors, cameras, and radar devices being part of driver assistance systems does not apply to automated driving systems unless the ADS performance of the DDT is not affected.