Meeting report documenting discussions on proposed amendments to the driver drowsiness alert warning (DDAW) system regulation. Topics addressed include: clarification of warning acknowledgement and continued monitoring; mandatory microsleep detection as a distinct safety-critical event; expanded operating conditions for system effectiveness; interaction between DDAW and Driver Control Assistance Systems (DCAS); system performance under driver occlusions such as eyewear; drowsiness warning thresholds and advisory information; false negative event classification methodology; test participant selection and validation procedures; specificity and positive predictive value as performance metrics; and Observer Rated Drowsiness (ORD) as an alternative to KSS measurement. The IWG discussed these proposals to inform development of a 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 182.

Presentation on proposal 6 summarising enhancements to DDAW system test methodology. Proposes setting clearer requirements for participant selection, pre-conditioning, repeated testing of each participant, continuation of testing after the first true positive warning, and capture and treatment of near-crash events. Addresses existing limitations including narrow participant coverage, limited lighting conditions, testing that ends after the first true positive, and exclusion of false negatives during learning phases. Proposes mandatory methodology for representative evidence including minimum test runs per participant, broader demographic and physical characteristic representation, fatigued and rested participant preparation, near-crash event capture, and shorter learning periods. Notes the interconnectedness to other 01 series proposals including drowsiness threshold, false negative classification, operating conditions, and performance metrics.

Proposal to expand minimum operating conditions for driver drowsiness and attention warning systems to include roads with absent or significantly faded lane markings requiring road-edge detection capability, strong direct light directed towards driver-facing and road-facing sensors, and cabin temperature and humidity conditions prone to causing camera fogging. The proposal applies technology-neutral consolidated performance requirements rather than distinguishing between direct and indirect system means. Data from Australian and Great Britain road networks show that the majority of road fatalities occur in rural areas on roads often unmarked or with degraded markings, and road-edge detection is already technically available and demonstrated by vehicles tested under ANCAP protocols.

Presentation summarising proposal 5 on drowsiness warnings acknowledgement. The 00 series permits warnings to cascade and intensify until driver acknowledgement but does not clearly prescribe acceptable driver actions or subsequent system response. Acknowledgement does not remove drowsiness risk. Proposal seeks to define acceptable acknowledgement actions, require continuous monitoring after acknowledgement, and mandate renewed warnings when safety conditions persist or return within a maximum time-period. Microsleep warnings must not be muted through acknowledgement of drowsiness warnings.

Proposal to develop a mandatory, testable microsleep detection and warning capability for the 01 series. Microsleep is a brief loss of consciousness indicated by 1–3 second eye closure that presents an immediate and significant road safety risk. The system should detect eye closure over time, use supporting cues such as neck droop or body slump to confirm events, and provide a dedicated and appropriately forceful warning strategy. Detection logic may use primary criteria such as >95% eye closure for >2.5 seconds or combined criteria such as >85% eye closure for >1.8 seconds plus neck droop or body slump. Testing pathways include controlled simulation with deliberate eye-closure events and fatigued-driver testing to observe genuine microsleep events.