The provision in paragraph 5.3.5. may need clarification on what the granting Approval Authority should do, if that Authority can’t take into account the comments received as per paragraph 5.3.4. Should it continue processing with granting the approval or postpone granting? The proposal is to clarify that the Approval Authority should postpone granting the approval until the agreement on the common interpretation of the questioned issue is reached.

Report to 182nd WP.29 session from the 39th IWG on DETA meeting.

Mark up of the draft UN Regulation on cyber security (WP.29/2020/79) towards transposition of technical requirements into an instrument under the 1998 Agreement.

Question concerning coverage of cybersecurity risks under the new UN R155 on cybersecurity managements and under UN R116 (with the understanding of the current proposals to split UN R116 into three separate regulations).

CS/OTA informal group proposal for a document to assist with the implementation of the new UN Regulation on cybersecurity management. This document is also available with track changes in a word document format and portable document format.

Proposal to clarify that the Approval Authority should postpone granting a cybersecurity management approval in the absence of agreement on the common interpretation of a provision where the interpretation of the Approval Authority has raised comments from other authorities under the review procedure provided for in paragraph 5.3.4.

Cybersecurity and OTA software updates task force session dedicated to discussion of interpretation documents to support the use of UN R155 on cybersecurity approvals and UN R156 on software update approvals.

Clean version of the UN R155 interpretation document pursuant to the third TFCS ad hoc session.

Document as amended during the third day of the third TFCS ad hoc session.

Document as amended during the 2nd day of the third TFCS ad hoc session.

Interpretation document as updated during the first day of the 3rd Interpretation Document ad hoc session of the Cybersecurity and Software Updates task force (27-29 July).

Template (reviewed by Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, the European Commission, Japan, and France) for the exchange of type-approval information related to cybersecurity via the electronic Data Exchange for Type Approvals (DETA) system.

Small drafting group comments.

Document prepared by the Task Force chair.

Comments concerning the implementation of the following paragraph:
7.3.7. The vehicle manufacturer shall implement measures for the vehicle type to:

1. detect and prevent cyber-attacks against vehicles of the vehicle type;
2. support the monitoring capability of the vehicle manufacturer with regards to detecting threats, vulnerabilities and cyber-attacks relevant to the vehicle type;
3. provide data forensic capability to enable analysis of attempted or successful cyberattacks.