Part II, Chapter I, Paragraph 1.1.2 and 2.1.3 of the ANNEX of the Technical Prescription (2004/90/EC) dated on 04. February 2004 to which is referred in Article 3 of the EU Directive for Pedestrian Protection (2003/102/EC) dated on 06. December 2003.

Revisions proposed by OICA to the scope, objectives, and work plan of the informal group to further develop GTR No. 9.

Presentation concerning durability of the pedestrian lower legform tool under consideration for the GTR on pedestrian safety.

Remarks and questions from OICA concerning the technical specifications (drawings) and procedures for the assembly, disassembly and inspection (user manual) of the Flex-PLI proposed for use in GTR 9.

Presentation on automaker experience in running tests with the Flex-PLI test tool (versions SN02, SN04, IND-Impactor).

Revision, integrating Netherlands and OICA input, of the EC submission intended to raise awareness of concerns over clarity and implications of proposed amendments related to the measuring points of the headform and lower legform test procedures and to ensure full support among Contracting Parties.

Proposal to transpose the front and rear ride heights and vehicle attitude tolerances from the repealed 2004/90/EC into GTR No. 9 preamble and proposal for supplement 1 of UN-R127

Initial comments of OICA representatives to the 5th GTR9-Phase 2 informal group meeting in response to the BASt presentation on the verification of Draft FlexPLI prototype impactor limits and application to FlexPLI serial production level.

Initial comments of OICA representatives to the 5th IG GTR9-PH2 meeting in response to document GTR9-5-20: corrected version.

Comparison of the behaviour from FlexPLI and Human Model THUMS in the outer area of the bumper.

Proposal for wording to consider tolerances of the normal ride height.

OICA response opposing the BASt proposal (document GTR9-5-20) to change the impactor thresholds for FlexPLI testing.

OICA updated proposal concerning FlexPLI test results and the measurement criteria appropriate for GTR 9-Phase 2 test procedures.

Review of test results applying the Flex PLI and EEVC legs outside the regulatory bumper test area.

Review of EEVC and Flex-PLI legform behavior in tests along the bumper test area and bumper corner.

Comparison of the behaviour from FlexPLI and Human Model THUMS in the outer area of the bumper. This is an expanded version of the original presentation.

OICA review and proposals for improvement of the FlexPLI leg form test tool manual.

Presentation of an assessment of 2D vs. 3D impactor positioning methods.

OICA comments and concerns regarding the generally accepted proposal for the definition of the bumper test area for use with the Flex-PLI lower leg impactor. The document raises issues concerning limitations of the test procedure and notes that the new requirements would have a significant impact on bumper design such that the transitional period for implementation should be 2019 to allow for a full vehicle development cycle.

Proposal to introduce provisions for “deployable pedestrian protection systems in the bonnet area” (e.g., active hood systems where a pedestrian impact triggers tge hood release to allow for greater impact absorption and exterior frontal airbags).

Proposal of provisions that can be applied within GTR No. 9 based upon the text developed for Revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement (Schedule 8) on the validation of a simulation method.

Proposal as revised during the first DPPS task force session.

Presentation on the Pedestrian Detection Impactor 2 performance. The PDI-2 was developed jointly by the Altran Concept Tech GmbH and ACEA to test sensor systems for active pedestrian protection systems (e.g. active engine bonnets).

OICA Proposal for a Rev. 4 of Document TF-DPPS/2/03 (Requirements Overview Deployable Pedestrian Protection Systems).

Input regarding the testing of systems with and without deployment of the pedestrian protection system.

Task 27 of the DPPS informal working group list: Provide evidence that the deploying bonnet does not cause additional risks for the pedestrian hitting the bonnet.

HIT and WAD discussion for assessment of deployable pedestrian protection systems.

Input for the draft provisions on deployable pedestrian protection systems under GTR 9 and UN R127.