1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Document Title | Comments on the proposed GTR 9 amendments of document WP.29/AC.3/31: Revised | ||||||||
Reference Number | GRSP-51-10/Rev.1 | ||||||||
Date |
23 May 2012
|
||||||||
Summary | Revision, integrating Netherlands and OICA input, of the EC submission intended to raise awareness of concerns over clarity and implications of proposed amendments related to the measuring points of the headform and lower legform test procedures and to ensure full support among Contracting Parties. | ||||||||
Source(s) | EC, Netherlands, and OICA | ||||||||
Rulemaking Area(s) | GTR No. 9 Pedestrian Safety (GTR) | ||||||||
Meeting(s) | |||||||||
Downloads | |||||||||
UNECE server | .pdf format | ||||||||
Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
GRSP | Session 51 | 21-25 May 2012 |
11. As follow-up of the concerns raised during the December 2011 session of GRSP, the expert from EC introduced GRSP-51-10-Rev.1, jointly prepared by the experts from the Netherlands and OICA, amending the initial proposal. The proposal received further comments from the experts from South Korea, Japan and the United States of America. Accordingly, GRSP considered GRSP-51-33-Rev.2 (superseding GRSP-51-10 GRSP-51-10-Rev.1 and GRSP-51-33-Rev.1). However, some experts requested a study reservation of the proposal. GRSP requested the secretariat to distribute GRSP-51-33-Rev.2 with an official symbol at its December 2012 session. Finally, GRSP recommended experts to prepare an update of the final report of the amendment of the UN GTR (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2012/2), if needed and draft a similar proposal of amendments to the UN Regulation on pedestrian safety for the next session of GRSP. |
||||||||