10. GRSP considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2011/12, GRSP-49-17 and GRSP-49-18 proposing a corrigendum to the gtr. The expert from OICA made a presentation (GRSP-49-31) justifying his proposal (GRSP-49-09) to clarify the headform test procedure. It was agreed to resume discussion on this agenda item at the December 2011 session of GRSP. The expert from the Netherlands volunteered to prepare a consolidated proposal of amendments (including ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2011/12, GRSP-49-17, GRSP-49-18 and GRSP-49-09). He offered to submit it together with an official proposal of developing an amendment to the gtr for the November 2011 sessions of WP.29 and AC.3.

9. GRSP noted that the Executive Committee of the 1998 Agreement (AC.3.) at its November 2011 session agreed to develop an amendment (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2011/148) to UN GTR No. 9 (see ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1093, para. 128). GRSP noted that ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2011/148 also included the concrete proposal of amendment to the UN GTR. The expert from the Netherlands introduced the final status report (GRSP-50-32) complementing the proposal. However, concerning the justification for changes of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2011/148, the expert from the EC expressed disagreement on paragraphs 5 to 7, agreed on paragraph 8 and raised a study reservation on paragraphs 10 and 12.

10. GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this agenda item at its May 2012 session and requested the secretariat to distribute GRSP-50-32 with an official symbol.