The Task Force reviewed and approved regulatory amendments for ADS-equipped vehicles across multiple UN Regulations. Key decisions included adopting a simplified and consistent definition of ‘vehicle user’ for light-duty and heavy-duty vehicles, retaining original wording for warning signal transmission to ADS systems, and amending engine torque terminology under UN R49. Amendments were reviewed for UN R49, UN R83, UN R115, UN R154, UN R177, UN R179, and UN R180, with focus on consistency regarding ADS testing modes and an additional 25 kg mass allowance for vehicles of categories X and Y. The Task Force acknowledged that ADS operation may result in additional energy consumption not fully reflected in current testing procedures and agreed to seek GRPE guidance on possible future work.

Provisional agenda for the 35th meeting of the AVRS Task Force scheduled for 12 October 2026, including adoption of agenda, review of minutes from the previous meeting, discussion of a proposal for a Supplement to the 02 and 03 series of amendments to UN R154, discussion on ADS vehicles and their energy consumption and continuation of the Task Force mandate, a status report on GRPE-95, and any other business.

Task force in-session amendments to the proposal to amend para. 0. to introduce provisions for vehicles of category Y and Automated Driving Systems, amend para. 1.4. to exclude category Y vehicles and exempt certain category N₁ vehicles, add sentences to paras. 2.8., 2.22., 2.29., 2.32., 2.45. defining or clarifying applicability for category Y vehicles, amend para. 2.44. to define windscreen test area for category Y vehicles without windscreens, and replace language in para. 5.3.1.2. to refer to active ADS rather than ADS performing the Dynamic Driving Task.

Task force in-session amendments to the proposal to insert a new introduction paragraph accounting for vehicles of category X and Y, amend para. 6.1.5. to clarify that the exemption for driver assistance systems does not fully apply to automated driving systems where the perception system forms part of the driving function, and make editorial improvements replacing ‘disoriented’ with ‘misaligned’ and ‘driver assist systems’ with ‘driver assistance systems’. The amendment enables application of UN R42 to vehicles equipped with an Automated Driving System.

Proposal to amend para. 0. to extend application to vehicles of category Y, amend para. 1.4. to clarify non-applicability to category Y vehicles, add provisions to paras. 2.8., 2.22., 2.29., 2.32., 2.44., and 2.45. defining terms and test areas for category Y vehicles without windscreens, and replace language in para. 5.3.1.2. regarding Automated Driving System activity and delete footnote 9.

Proposal to insert a new introduction para. 0. to account for vehicles of categories X and Y equipped with an Automated Driving System (ADS), amend footnote 1 in sections 0. and 1. to reference the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3.), document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.8, and amend para. 6.1.5. to clarify that the exemption for damaged driver assistance system sensors does not apply to vehicles of categories X and Y or automated driving systems unless the ADS performance of the DDT is not affected.

Proposal to amend para. 0. to extend application to vehicles of category Y, amend para. 1.4. to exclude category Y vehicles and certain category N₁ vehicles, add definitions and clarifications for category Y vehicles in paras. 2.8., 2.22., 2.29., 2.32., 2.44., and 2.45., and replace wording in para. 5.3.1.2. concerning Automated Driving System activation and delete footnote 9.

Proposal to insert a new introduction section accounting for vehicles of categories X and Y equipped with an Automated Driving System (ADS), amend footnote 1 to reference the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3.), document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.8, and amend para. 6.1.5. to clarify that the exemption for sensors and driver assistance systems does not apply to vehicles of categories X and Y or automated driving systems unless the ADS performance of the Designated Driving Task is not affected.

Agenda for the 29th meeting of the GRSP Task Force on Advanced Vehicle Regulatory Support, scheduled for 5 October 2026. The meeting will address Y-category regulatory framework developments for N1 vehicles, Y-category pedestrian protection under UN R127, UN R42 matters from GRSP-79, Y-category exclusion in UN R134, and other business.

Clean work-in-progress draft proposal to insert a new para. 0 establishing an introduction for vehicles of categories X and Y equipped with an Automated Driving System, and amend para. 6.1.5. to clarify that the exemption for sensors, cameras, and radar devices being part of driver assistance systems does not apply to automated driving systems unless the ADS performance of the DDT is not affected.

Clean work-in-progress draft proposal to amend para. 0 to introduce provisions for vehicles of category Y and vehicles equipped with an Automated Driving System, amend para. 1.4. to specify that the Regulation does not apply to vehicles of category Y and to exempt certain vehicles of category N₁, amend para. 2.8. to define the bonnet rear reference line for vehicles of category Y without a windscreen, amend para. 2.22. to include automated driving sensors in the definition of front structure for vehicles of category X and Y, amend para. 2.29. to specify normal ride attitude for vehicles of category X and Y, amend para. 2.32. to define side reference lines for vehicles of category Y without A-pillars, amend para. 2.44. to define windscreen test area boundaries for vehicles of category Y without a windscreen, amend para. 2.45. to specify cowl monitoring area for vehicles of category Y without a windscreen, and amend para. 5.3.1.2. to modify requirements for Actively Regulated Hydro-pneumatic Suspension System when an Automated Driving System feature is active.

Proposal to insert a new introduction section defining application to vehicles of categories X and Y equipped with an Automated Driving System, to amend para. 6.1.5. to replace “driver assist systems” with “driver assistance systems”, to remove the non-exhaustive list “cameras, radar devices, etc.”, to replace “disoriented” with “misaligned”, and to add provisions clarifying that the exemption for sensor damage does not apply to automated driving systems unless the Automated Driving System performance of the Designed Driving Task is not affected.

Proposal to:

• insert a new paragraph 0 introducing the amendment to account for vehicles of categories X and Y, stating that the Regulation was originally drafted for vehicles with a driver and manual driving controls and is being extended to vehicles without a driver and without manual driving controls, that in manual driving mode no special provisions apply to vehicles equipped with an Automated Driving System other than vehicles of categories X and Y, and that vehicles of category Y are exempted based on front structure geometry rather than driver “R” point position
• amend paragraph 1.2 to provide that for vehicles of category X, the “R” point of the most forward passenger seat shall be taken instead of the R-point of the driver’s seat
• amend paragraph 1.3 to provide that for vehicles of category X, the “R” point of the most forward passenger seat shall be taken instead of the R-point of the driver’s seat
• amend paragraph 1.4 to delete the statement that this Regulation does not apply to vehicles of category Y and instead provide that vehicles of category N1Y where a specified equation is fulfilled are exempted
• amend paragraph 2.8 to revise the definition of “Bonnet rear reference line” and provide that for vehicles of category Y without a windscreen, the BRRL is defined as the geometric trace of the most rearward points of contact between the sphere and the front structure as it is traversed across the vehicle’s rearward edge
• amend paragraph 2.22 to provide that for vehicles of categories X and Y, automated driving sensors that are essential for the vehicle’s operation and cannot be stowed during driving should be considered part of the “Front structure”
• amend paragraph 2.29 to provide that for vehicles of category X, two passenger masses are placed on the front seats instead of driver and one passenger masses, and for vehicles of category Y, no occupant mass is added
• amend paragraph 2.32 to provide that for vehicles of category Y where A-pillars are non-existent, side reference lines also define the lateral limits for the total test area
• amend paragraph 2.44 to provide that for vehicles of category Y where a windscreen is non-existent, the windscreen test area is defined as the “Upper structure test area” with specified front, rear, and side boundaries
• amend paragraph 2.45 to provide that for vehicles of category Y where a windscreen is non-existent, the cowl monitoring area is bound in the rear by the front of the “Upper structure test area”
• amend paragraph 5.3.1.2 to provide that ARHSS shall automatically return to normal ride height while an ADS feature is active

This Regulation establishes uniform provisions for crashworthiness approval of N₁Y vehicles regarding fuel system integrity, electrical shock protection, and crash compatibility during frontal, rear, and lateral collisions. The provisions for frontal impact are based on UN R94 or UN R137 per manufacturer choice with Technical Service agreement; lateral impact provisions are based on UN R95; rear impact provisions are based on UN R153. Vehicles with maximum design speeds not exceeding applicable impact speeds shall be tested at their maximum design speed and comply with post-impact requirements. Crash Compatibility Criterion shall not exceed 40–45 g and Crash Compatibility Value shall not exceed 100–120 g×tonne. For vehicles derived from types already approved under UN R94, UN R137, UN R95, or UN R153, previous test results may be used if mass increases do not exceed 8 per cent.

Minutes from the 27th meeting of GRSP TF on AVRS held Wednesday 1st July 2026 online. The agenda and previous minutes were approved. EC reported from June WP.29-199 TF Expert FADS and presented WP.29-199-19. GRSP TF AVRS must complete crashworthiness regulation for Category Y and Pedestrian Protection R127, GRE TF AVSR ADS marker lamps, GRE IWG EMC refinements for ADS in 10R08, and GRPE TF AVRS amendments to UN Regulation No. 154. Regarding amendment proposals to UN Regulations Nos. 35 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2026/104) and 68 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2026/146), AC.1 postponed voting to the next session due to required quorum not being attained. EC presented updates on Y-category regulatory framework for N₁, Y-category Pedestrian Protection UN Reg 127, and UN Regulation No. 42 and 134. Next meetings scheduled 4th September, 5th October, week 4, 24th November or 1st December, and 7–11 December.

Proposal to insert a new Introduction section containing provisions for vehicles of categories X and Y, amend the Scope to include vehicles of categories X and Y with specific exemptions based on the “R” point or front structural geometry, amend definitions of “Bonnet rear reference line,” “Front structure,” “Normal ride attitude,” “Side reference line,” “Windscreen test area,” and “Cowl monitoring area” to address vehicles of categories X and Y, and amend paragraph 5.3.1.2. regarding Automated Riding Height Suspension System engagement conditions. Changes compared to document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2026/53 are indicated by red markup.

Proposal to simplify text on AV screening in the GID Introduction section. The revised text condenses the explanation that AV screening amendments to WP.29 Regulations are outside the scope of the GID. The original lengthy paragraph explained WP.29’s screening process, task forces, and technical requirements for systems such as braking, steering, and lighting. The revised text concisely states that WP.29 has updated its regulations concerning aspects of the DDT to enable their application to ADS vehicles, and these AV-related amendments are outside the scope of this document.

Y-category vehicles are equipped with an Automated Driving System and not designed to carry occupants. They may develop aggressive front structures that could harm passenger cars in accidents. The proposal introduces the Occupant Load Criterium (OLC), derived from velocity-time graphs in crash tests, as a compatibility assessment criterion. OLC multiplied by vehicle mass indicates impact aggressivity. Data from ODB tests show OLC values range from approximately 22 to 35 g across various vehicles. The proposal suggests using a maximum OLC × mass value to prevent excessively aggressive vehicle front structures while keeping current passenger car designs unaffected.

A decision was taken in mid-2025 to start drafting a new regulation collecting relevant safety requirements for Category Y vehicles. UN R127 on pedestrian safety performance could be directly amended to include Y-category vehicles instead of including requirements in a new regulation. TF AVRS agreed to amend UN R127 to include Y-category vehicles. A draft regulation (v4) is available proposing supplement 5 to the 04 series of amendments, including amendment suggestions in scope to determine exemptions for Y-category vehicles based on front structural geometry dimensions rather than R-point criteria.

Minutes of the 26th meeting of GRSP TF on AVRS held on Tuesday 22nd of May 2026 online. The agenda and previous minutes were approved. Status reports were received from other groups, with a closing meeting on ADS fitness expected in June. GRSP reviewed consistency of ADS fitness work and UN Regulation 137 sensor updates. EC presented updates on UN Regulation N₁Y and UN Regulation 127 pedestrian protection. OICA raised discussion on frontal test procedures in Annex 3 referencing UN Regulation No. 94 for vehicles with maximum mass not exceeding 2,500 kg and UN Regulation No. 137 for vehicles with maximum mass exceeding 2,500 kg and not exceeding 3,500 kg. No comments were received on passive safety requirements for ADS steering systems. Future meetings are scheduled for 1–5 June, 1st July, 4th September, 5th October, 27th November, 1st December, and 7–11 December.

Proposal to amend para. 6.1.5. to state that sensors, cameras, radar devices, etc. being part of driver assist systems and automated driving systems may become damaged, disoriented or broken due to an impact as long as basic braking and steering performance remain intact. The amendment enables application of UN R42 to vehicles equipped with an Automated Driving System.

Agenda items include approval of the agenda and minutes of the previous meeting, feedback and status from GRSP-79, Joint closing meeting in Paris, and WP.29, Y-category Regulatory framework New for N₁, Y-category Pedestrian Protection UN Reg 127, UN Regulation No. 42, UN Regulation No. 134 Y-category exclusion, and any other business. Dates for next meetings are 4th September and 5th October with further meetings in November and December under consideration.

This status report summarizes work by expert groups on regulatory fitness for Automated Driving Systems presented to WP.29 at its 198th session. Expert groups screened UN Regulations and GTRs to determine relevance for automated vehicles and drafted amendments. As of June 2026, 92 amendment proposals across 88 Regulations have been submitted. Key closed items include overlap with ADS capabilities, test modes, monitoring passengers, and user roles. Ongoing tasks include crashworthiness regulation for category Y, ADS marker lamps, and EMC refinements. The groups concluded that urban shuttles and delivery robots represent use cases potentially requiring future category consideration based on Contracting Party and stakeholder input.

Proposal for editorial modifications to official documents introducing ADS-related amendments to WP.29/2026/59, WP.29/2026/61, WP.29/2026/62, WP.29/2026/48, WP.29/2026/63, WP.29/2026/64, WP.29/2026/65, WP.29/2026/66, WP.29/2026/50, WP.29/2026/53, WP.29/2026/57, WP.29/2026/67, WP.29/2026/68, WP.29/2026/69, WP.29/2026/70, WP.29/2026/71, WP.29/2026/72, WP.29/2026/162, WP.29/2026/163, WP.29/2026/147, WP.29/2026/148, WP.29/2026/149, WP.29/2026/150, WP.29/2026/151, WP.29/2026/154, WP.29/2026/101, WP.29/2026/102, WP.29/2026/103, WP.29/2026/104, WP.29/2026/105, WP.29/2026/106, WP.29/2026/107, WP.29/2026/108, WP.29/2026/109, WP.29/2026/110, WP.29/2026/111, WP.29/2026/112, WP.29/2026/113, WP.29/2026/114, WP.29/2026/115, WP.29/2026/116, WP.29/2026/118, WP.29/2026/117, WP.29/2026/119, WP.29/2026/120, WP.29/2026/121, WP.29/2026/122, WP.29/2026/125, WP.29/2026/126, WP.29/2026/127, WP.29/2026/129, WP.29/2026/130, WP.29/2026/131, WP.29/2026/132, WP.29/2026/165, WP.29/2026/166, WP.29/2026/134, WP.29/2026/159, WP.29/2026/124, WP.29/2026/133, WP.29/2026/158, WP.29/2026/89, WP.29/2026/90, WP.29/2026/95, WP.29/2026/98, and WP.29/2026/145.

This document amends formal proposals adapting regulations for Automated Driving Systems application in WP.29/2026/59, WP.29/2026/61, WP.29/2026/62, WP.29/2026/48, WP.29/2026/63, WP.29/2026/64, WP.29/2026/65, WP.29/2026/66, WP.29/2026/50, WP.29/2026/53, WP.29/2026/57, WP.29/2026/67, WP.29/2026/68, WP.29/2026/69, WP.29/2026/70, WP.29/2026/71, WP.29/2026/72, WP.29/2026/162, WP.29/2026/163, WP.29/2026/147, WP.29/2026/148, WP.29/2026/149, WP.29/2026/150, WP.29/2026/151, WP.29/2026/154, WP.29/2026/101, WP.29/2026/102, WP.29/2026/103, WP.29/2026/104, WP.29/2026/105, WP.29/2026/106, WP.29/2026/107, WP.29/2026/108, WP.29/2026/109, WP.29/2026/110, WP.29/2026/112, WP.29/2026/113, WP.29/2026/114, WP.29/2026/115, WP.29/2026/116, WP.29/2026/117, WP.29/2026/118, WP.29/2026/119, WP.29/2026/120, WP.29/2026/121, WP.29/2026/122, WP.29/2026/123, WP.29/2026/124, WP.29/2026/125, WP.29/2026/126, WP.29/2026/127, WP.29/2026/128, WP.29/2026/129, WP.29/2026/130, WP.29/2026/131, WP.29/2026/132, WP.29/2026/133, WP.29/2026/134, as well as WP.29/2026/165 and WP.29/2026/166. The amendments update footnotes across documents to reference the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3.), document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.8. The document modifies provisions related to Automated Driving Systems and Advanced Driver Assistance Systems sensors, test mass specifications, logical signal transmission, acoustic characteristics, category definitions, and occupant compartment requirements across multiple regulations.

The document addresses consistency issues across multiple UN Regulations (R26, R28, R29, R34, R35, R39, R43, R45, R46, R48, R49, R134, R135, R137, R138, R141, R142, R143, R144) concerning automated driving systems. It proposes improved wording for fuel leakage provisions, foot control applicability for vehicles of category M₁, and speedometer requirements when ADS features are active. The document recommends removing duplicate definitions of ADS, DDT, bi-directional vehicle, and forward direction across regulations. It raises questions regarding application to category Y vehicles, handling of bi-directional traffic equipped vehicles, and whether requirements should apply to vehicle users or only when ADS features are active.

The agenda includes amendments to UN Regulations and GTRs regarding their fitness for automated vehicles, review of documents received for review, compilation of an informal editorial document for the 199th session of WP.29, future steps of the work, review of past open and low-priority items, discussion on future needs for ADS fitness and general regulatory fitness, and agreement on the contents of the final presentation to WP.29.

Corrections to documents submitted by TF-AVRS and subsequently by GRBP were adopted without additional proposals. The next meeting is to be scheduled at a later date, if needed.

Proposal to amend ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2026/89, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2026/90, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2026/95, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2026/96, and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2026/98 to modify para. 2.11.3. to define reference point for bi-directional vehicles, amend para. 2.31. to define bi-directional, amend Annex 3 Table 2 test mass values for vehicles in categories X and Y and vehicles equipped with ADS, amend para. 5.1.6.1. to specify logical and optical signals for category X or Y vehicles with ADS, amend para. 6.2. to reference ADS-specific provisions in Annex 5, amend Annex 9 paras. 2.2., 2.2.1., and 2.2.2. regarding vehicles equipped with ADS other than categories X and Y, amend para. 11.7. to define Category Y vehicles, add new para. 14.1.6. specifying ADS provisions in Annex 7, and amend para. 14.3. regarding pause function design for ADS features.

Corrections to documents submitted by TF-AVRS and approved by GRBP amend terminology in UN R51.03 to harmonize bidirectional spelling, correct vehicle category references in UN R51.03 and UN R165 to reference category X only rather than non-existent category M1Y or category M, clarify in UN R64 that logical signals shall be transmitted to the ADS when an ADS feature is active, introduce references to specific ADS provisions in Annexes 5 and 7 of UN R138.02 and UN R165, add grammatical corrections to UN R141, and align UN R165 terminology with ADS regulation language.

The agenda includes discussion of the upcoming process for submission of documents and corrections to documents submitted by TF AVRS with track changes and justifications, and consideration of next meetings.

Proposal to amend para. 6.5.4. to clarify control of cleaning devices when an ADS feature is active, modify manual control requirements for vehicles of categories X and Y, and specify automatic activation requirements when cleaning devices are required under UN Regulation No. 48, and insert a new footnote 4 defining ADS as specified in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3.), document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.8.

Proposal to amend para. 6.1.5. to state that sensors, cameras, radar devices, etc. being part of driver assist systems and automated driving systems may become damaged, disoriented or broken due to an impact as long as basic braking and steering performance remain intact. The amendment enables application of UN R42 to vehicles equipped with an Automated Driving System.