Proposal to transition test facilities from ISO 10844:2014 to ISO 10844:2021 by January 2029.

Small group (France, Netherlands, ETRTO, BIPAVER) proposal to restructure retreaded tyre requirements and regulations.

Small group proposal to split retreaded tyre requirements into a new UN Regulation.

Proposal from a small group effort for uniform provisions concerning the approval of pre-cured tread materials which are used for producing retreaded tyres or the approval of retreaded tyres produced by using mould cure process with regard to their snow performance.

Replace the proposal for Supplement 3 of the 05 Series of amendments

Proposal to replace the Supplement 11 of the 04 Series of amendments

Proposal to replace proposal for Supplement 6 of the 02 Series of amendments

Correction to the French version of the document which had a missing text in Annex 5 Table 7.

A proposal to meet the objective to reduce noise pollution (particularly in towns) and to be able to warn pedestrians, cyclists and others of the vehicle’s arrival with the least possible discomfort.

Proposal for Supplement 3 to the original version of UN Regulation No. 172 to amend para. 1.1. to clarify that this Regulation applies to retreaded pneumatic tyres of Classes C1, C2 and C3 with regard to their snow performance and for C2 and C3 tyres with regards to their classification as traction tyre, and insert new para. 1.2. to state that Contracting Parties shall issue or accept approvals to snow performance of retreaded tyres of classes C1, C2 and C3 and/or the classification as traction tyres for retreaded tyres of classes C2 and C3.

Proposal to amend para. 1.1. to clarify that retreaded pneumatic tyres of Classes C₁, C₂ and C₃ are subject to snow performance requirements and C₂ and C₃ tyres to traction tyre classification, and insert new para. 1.2. to establish that Contracting Parties shall issue or accept approvals to snow performance of retreaded tyres of Classes C₁, C₂ and C₃ and/or the classification as traction tyres for retreaded tyres of Classes C₂ and C₃.

Proposals for earlier series of amendments those may be used in certain country
where R156-01 is required. The provisions regarding provision of information on hardware and software relevant to approval testing are moved to the section related to specifications and/or tests as instructed in R.E.3. and the amendment made by WP29-197-06 is reflected.

Proposal to define “electronic” as a “principle of operation by electric or electro-magnetic force with amplifier and speaker or resonator”.

Proposal to expand and improve the current definition of a radial structure while ensuring the radial tyres key features (mechanical decoupling between the tread and the bead).

Proposal to expand and improve the current definition of a radial structure while ensuring the radial tyres key features (mechanical decoupling between the tread and the bead).

Proposal to amend the definition of “radial tyre” in UN Regulations No. 54, 75, 106, 108 and 109 based on the proposal for UN Regulation No. 30 in document GRBP/2021/9.

Proposal to clarify the use of an additional load/speed combination for a tyre type.

Proposal to clarify interpretation of the requirements concerning variation of sound emitted proportionally with the vehicle speed.

Proposal to align the provisions for retreaded tyres with the proposals of France for UN Regulation No. 30, of the European Tyre and Rim Technical Organization (ETRTO) for UN Regulation No. 117 and to cover all the tread materials.

Proposal to align the provisions for retreaded tyres with the proposals of the European Tyre and Rim Technical Organization (ETRTO) for UN Regulations Nos. 54 and 117 and to cover all the tread materials.

Proposal to allow, under certain condition of traceability, upgrading of the service description of a used casing.

Proposal to ensure that the test procedures for retreaded tyres are aligned with the text adopted by WP.29 per document WP.29/2021/8 for UN R117.

Proposal to specify explicitly that the maximum overall width of tyres identified by the “tyre to rim fitment configuration” symbol “A” includes a 4 per cent tolerance.

Proposal to align Annex 9 with Annex 1 (paragraphs 5., 6. and 7.) and to enable type approval authorities to make the connection with the relevant reports.

Proposal to insert paragraphs establishing references to Software Identification Number definitions in Consolidated Resolution R.E.3 Annex 7 para. 2, insert paragraphs requiring manufacturers to provide Technical Services with information on hardware and software influencing performance, insert paragraphs allowing vehicle manufacturers to apply for new approvals to differentiate software versions for registered vehicles from those for new vehicles with duplication of tests avoided where possible, amend production discontinuation provisions to clarify that production is not considered definitively discontinued if manufacturers intend to obtain subsequent extensions for software updates of registered vehicles, and amend approval communications to include additional information regarding software identification and software updates in UN Regulations 51, 64, 138, 141, 142 and 165, as presented in document GRBP-83-36 and implementing Revision 8 to Consolidated Resolution No. 3 (WP.29/2025/147).

Proposal that would align provisions in UN R48 with those of UN R121 (vehicle controlrs, telltales and indicators) with regard to the hazard warning telltale (para. 6.6.8.).

Correction to the French version of the proposal to extend the scope of UN R10 to all power train systems above a certain working voltage level when they are in charging mode.

Proposal to improve the draft text prepared in order to introduce provisions for direction indicator lamps with variable apparent surfaces.

Proposal to delete the requirement that the total objective luminous flux of all LED modules producing the principal passing (main low) beam of a headlamp be greater than or equal to 1000 lumens. France argues that the requirement is design-restrictive, unnecessary given the objective criteria for luminous output and photometric grid points of the regulation, and obsolete given improvements in LED technologies.

Proposal to delete the requirement that the total objective luminous flux of all LED modules producing the principal passing (main low) beam of a headlamp be greater than or equal to 1000 lumens. France argues that the requirement is design-restrictive, unnecessary given the objective criteria for luminous output and photometric grid points of the regulation, and obsolete given improvements in LED technologies.

Proposal to extend the modifications that introduced provisions for interdependent direction indicator lamps in the 06 series of amendments to UN R48 to the 04 and 05 series in order to avoid an unjustified design restriction for approvals under the earlier versions of the regulation.

Presentation in support of documents GRE/2014/35 and 2014/36 that would delete the requirement that the total objective luminous flux of all LED modules producing the principal passing (main low) beam of a headlamp be greater than or equal to 1000 lumens. UTAC/France argues that the requirement is design-restrictive, unnecessary given the objective criteria for luminous output and photometric grid points of the regulation, and obsolete given improvements in LED technologies.

Proposal to amend the draft text concerning sequential activation of direction indicators. The amendments aim to ensure reasonable uniformity across direction indicators in order to reduce the risk of misinterpretation by other road users. The modifications proposed by the France replace the terms “apparent surface” and “continuous” with specific objective criteria.

Request for guidance regarding interpretation of UN lighting rules:

1. Is it allowed that the shape of the apparent surface can be the logo of the manufacturer brand or other brand-identifying figures?
2. Is it allowed that the shape of the apparent surface can be the same as an evocative/suggestive figure? Even as an informative figure such as road traffic
   signs?
3. Is the advertising lighting allowed at the national level in the Contracting parties, regarding to its influence on road safety and distraction?
4. Do we have to consider an apparent surface, whose shape is the logo of a brand manufacturer or other brand-identifying figures, as a advertising lighting?

Proposal to add explicit references to indirect vision systems, blind spot systems, and accident emergency
call systems.