Revised submission from the Netherlands in order to include vehicles equipped with automatically activated door locking systems in the test procedure for Regulation No. 95.

Submission from Belgium and Germany to solve errors in the current text of the Regulation concerning the anchorage angles (α1 and α2) and the seating reference point (R-point).

CLEPA presentation asserting that inflatable car seat systems being approved under UN R44 fail to comply with the regulation’s requirements because the lap portion of the belt intrudes into the abdomen of the dummy, leading to a submarining situation.

Document GRSP/2011/10 would require seats which can be tipped or folded automatically to lock in all positions, which could suggest locking in positions throughout the unfolding procedure. This submission clarifies the assumed intent of requiring seats to lock in their final positions.

Proposal for amendments to UN R12, R94, and R95 to introduce provisions for excluding the REESS coupling system in cases where testing is performed under the condition that part(s) of the high voltage system are not energized.

Because the subject of protection from direct contact with live electrical parts in the regulations concerns the “occupants”, not the “power train” as currently specified, Japan proposes to exchange the terms in the appropriate paragraphs of the subject rules.

The current CRS label describes the dangers of using a child restraint system with an active front seat passenger airbag and was designed to correspond with the in-vehicle label of UN R94. Since the latter has been changed into a style without text, this proposal similarly revises the CRS version.

Presently, rearward-facing child restraint systems cannot be type approved under the ISOFIX Universal category of UN R16. Spain sees no technical reasons to forbid type approval of rearward facing ISOFIX as universal CRS and so proposes to add such enabling provisions to the regulation.

Proposal to introduce minimum force and two-action release requirements to prevent children from inadvertantly disengaging ISOFIX child restraints.

Proposal to revise the upper belt anchorage height requirements of UN R14 in order to permit adjustable restraint systems that have recently appeared on the European market and have proven to satisfactorily restrain children and adults in buses and motor-coaches.

Revision of Table 1 of the new draft regulation on child restraint systems to replace the bench foam of UN R44 with the foam of the New Programme for the Assessment of Child restraint Systems (NPACS) used during the regulation’s evaluation phase and adopted by the informal group.

Recommended changes to the final progress report on the hydrogen fuel-cell vehicle safety global technical regulation proposal.

Draft of the hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles GTR updated with proposals for amendments (to the earlier version GRSP/2011/33) as agreed by GRSP at its December 2011 session.

Progress report for presentation to the December 2011 session of the Working Party on Passive Safety.

Czech Republic defense of its approval of the BEDI inflatable car seat system in response to the CLEPA assertion that such seats fail to meet UN R44 requirements.

Draft of the new child restraint systems regulation following the 49th session of the Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP) and of the 29th meeting of the informal group on child restraints systems (CRS) held in December 2011.

Review of bus and motor-coach seat-belt systems with adjustable anchorages for use by adults or children. Certain systems do not conform with UN R14 and R16; however, Germany argues that the belts can have benefits under certain conditions and suggests revising R14 provisions.

Presentation for the December 2011 session of the Working Party on Passive Safety to report on the effort to develop regulatory provisions for rechargeable energy storage systems (REESS), such as Li-Ion batteries of electric vehicles.

Presentation detailing non-compliance issues identified in child seat belt guides and inflatable child seat systems.

Initial draft of a proposal for an amendment to the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (RE3). This document complements (and read in conjunction with) the proposal for a series of addenda to RE3 as described in informal document
GRSP-50-27.

Discussion document prepared by the informal group on phase 2 of GTR 7 (Head Restraints) elaborating the proposal to manage drawings, calibration and maintenance procedures associated with test tools. The document describes the concept using the BioRID dummy as an example.

Presentation on the second phase crash tests of the pilot program seeking to establish a Latin American new car assessment program.

Compendium of decisions supporting the establishment of Phase 2 in the development of the Pedestrian Safety GTR and draft operating principles and terms of reference for the informal group undertaking this work.

Draft of the first progress report from the informal group developing the second phase of the GTR on pedestrian safety, presented for review by the Working Party on Passive Safety.

Draft progress report of the informal group working on the second phase of the GTR on head restraints for review by the Working Party on Passive Safety.

Report, as adopted by the GRSP at its 50th session, for proposal to replace the “first contact point” procedures for the headform and legform tests of the pedestrian safety GTR with fuller three-dimensional test parameters.

Submission from the Netherlands to more precisely explain the phrase “positively guide the lap strap” to prevent erroneous interpretations of the dynamic test procedure under UN R44.

Submission from France and Germany further explaining why belt guide devices such as that cited by CLEPA in document GRSP-50-09 cannot be approved as a child restraint system. Document GRSP-50-28 provided results of the Latin NCAP crash tests.