| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | Report on the proposal for Amendment 2 to GTR No. 9 | ||||||||
| Reference Number | GRSP-50-32 | ||||||||
| Date |
8 Dec 2011
|
||||||||
| Summary | Report, as adopted by the GRSP at its 50th session, for proposal to replace the "first contact point" procedures for the headform and legform tests of the pedestrian safety GTR with fuller three-dimensional test parameters. | ||||||||
| Source(s) | Netherlands | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | GTR No. 9 Pedestrian Safety (GTR) | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Related Documents | |||||||||
| GRSP-67-30 | GTR 9: Proposal for Amendment 3 - Revised Final Progress Report (superseded) | ||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .pdf format | ||||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| GRSP | Session 50 | 6-9 Dec 2011 |
9. GRSP noted that the Executive Committee of the 1998 Agreement (AC.3.) at its November 2011 session agreed to develop an amendment (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2011/148) to UN GTR No. 9 (see ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1093, para. 128). GRSP noted that ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2011/148 also included the concrete proposal of amendment to the UN GTR. The expert from the Netherlands introduced the final status report (GRSP-50-32) complementing the proposal. However, concerning the justification for changes of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2011/148, the expert from the EC expressed disagreement on paragraphs 5 to 7, agreed on paragraph 8 and raised a study reservation on paragraphs 10 and 12. 10. GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this agenda item at its May 2012 session and requested the secretariat to distribute GRSP-50-32 with an official symbol. |
||||||||