Proposal to add guidance on Artificial Intelligence in the context of road vehicles. GRVA drafted a resolution addressing AI in wheeled vehicles, organized two workshops, reviewed definitions, and identified considerations on data management. The guidance recommends that industry shall not issue software updates significantly modifying certified functions without resuming certification procedures, that trained AI-systems be validated by authorized parties and assessed for safety, security, and environmental performance before deployment, and that data protection and privacy regulations be fully respected. Annex 1 provides simplified definitions of AI-based systems and related terms for vehicle regulations context.

This paper seeks to clarify the expected approval process to be utilized by Contracting Parties concerning UN Regulation No. 131 which requires Contracting Parties applying UN R131 and UN R152 to recognise approvals to either Regulation as equally valid for vehicles of category M₂ and for those of category M₃/N₂ with a maximum weight below or equal to 8t and equipped with a hydraulic braking system.

Joint statement of the expert groups on regulatory fitness for automated driving systems regarding the establishment of a task force on categories for automated vehicles.

This document proposes an approach for launching work on ADS regulatory texts under the 1958 and 1998 Agreements. The secretariat prepared this document upon request from AC.2, following discussions at the seventeenth session of GRVA, at the informal AC.2 session in October 2023, the 143th session of AC.2 in November 2023 and an informal AC.2 session on 14 November 2023.

Proposal to establish a target date of June 2026 for delivery of proposals for a UN GTR and a UN Regulation on Automated Driving Systems.

Proposal to introduce an explanation clarifying the possibility for Approval Authorities to recognise Certificates of Compliance for Cyber Security Management Systems (CSMS) issued by the Approval Authority of another Contracting Party.

Proposal to amend the current support leg volume to improve the compatibility between the support leg volume and the Child Restraint Fixtures used for assessing the external dimensions of an ECRS.

Proposal to reinsert text allowing tolerances on the vehicle mass and simplified testing that was deleted by the 02 series of amendments.

Proposal to reinsert text allowing tolerances on the vehicle mass and simplified testing that was deleted by the 02 series of amendments.

Proposal for clarifications to the text (subsequent to documents WP.29/2022/70, WP.29/2022/129 and WP.29/2022/130), especially relating to the definitions of the cowl monitoring, the windscreen, and the jerk areas, and to facilitate the administrative control of two-stage requirements.

Proposal for clarifications to the text (subsequent to documents WP.29/2022/70, WP.29/2022/129 and WP.29/2022/130), especially relating to the definitions of the cowl monitoring, the windscreen, and the jerk areas.

Proposal to amend the current support leg volume to improve the compatibility between the support leg volume and the Child Restraint Fixtures used for assessing the external dimensions of an Enhanced Child Restraint System (ECRS), harmonize the vertical excursion limit for Q3 and Q6 dummies, update the references to EN Standards for toxicity and flammability, clarify the approach used in the production-qualification testing phase, and make editorial improvements.

Proposal to clarify the procedure and the characteristics of the measuring device used for the compliance test of the vehicle exhaust system.

Proposal to clarify the procedure and the characteristics of the measuring device used for the compliance test of the vehicle exhaust system.

Proposal to reinsert provisions allowing tolerances on the vehicle mass that was omitted in the 02 series of amendments.

Proposal to reinsert text allowing tolerances on the vehicle mass and simplified testing that was omitted in the 02 series of amendments.

Proposal to clarify the conditions under which variations of a vehicle can be covered under a single vehicle type without having to apply for a separate approval for another type. The proposal amends certain current provisions that explicitly state that differences will only cause a new type of vehicle if the differences affect the results of the impact test and clarifies the application of this principle across the regulation.