Proposal to clarify provisions referring to the “vehicle master switch”. After a battery-off (circuit disconnection) event, some vehicle settings may turn to a default setting that is not the last setting. The proposal introduces an exemption applicable to FVA systems in such “system reset” cases.

Proposal to introduce two supplemental vehicle categories (X and Y) corresponding to driverless passenger and commercial vehicles.

Proposal to introduce a definition for “bidirectional vehicle” and to remove the references to
the 3-D “H”-point machine (per their transposition to MR1 on test tools).

Proposal to introduce two new supplemental categories (X and Y) for driverless passenger and commercial vehicles.

Proposal to clarify the obligations of the manufacturer to provide information on the location and safe use of emergency exits and fire extinguishers per para. 7.19. of Annex 3.

Proposal to improve accessibility of vehicles of categories M₂ and M₃, class I.

Proposal to extend the use of digital keys to L category vehicles.

Proposal to:

• Improve the positioning of pure Class I monitors for drivers with presbyopia (difficulty in clearly seeing close objects)
• Introduce installation requirements for surveillance mirrors and surveillance camera-monitor-recording devices
• Allow for single approval number for devices with more than one field-of-view
• Refine obstruction provisions
• Introduce provisions for rounding of magnification factors
• Introduce a new definition for “Surveillance camera-monitor-recording device”
• Clarification of the “external original surface” concept
• Clarification that the radius of curvature is not be mandatory on the back of Class I mirrors
• Allow greater flexibility in conducting the pendulum testing
• Clarify the “operation readiness” with respect to partially folded camera wings
• Allow for alternatives to the test defined in annex 7 for evaluating the radius of curvature on the reflecting surface if needed
• Correct certain errors.

Deletion of text that was informative only

Proposal to delete the Unique Identifier (UI) marking provisions

Proposal to include a definition of a bidirectional vehicle and to remove the references to the 3-D “H”-point machine

Proposal to enable the application of this Regulation to vehicles of categories X and Y.

Proposal to enable the application of this Regulation to vehicles of categories X and Y.

Proposal by TF-AVRS to amend to enable the application of this Regulation to vehicles of categories X and Y

Proposal to amend in order to enable the application to vehicles equipped with an ADS.

Proposal to clarify the time unit for the equation of the sinusoidal acceleration specifies in part 6.“VerificationProcedures”

Proposes additional requirements for LPD installation on vehicles equipped with blind spot information systems are specified.

Proposal to add the definitions “escape hatch” and “emergency exit”, as well as additional requirements for the safety of living space in the bus cabin. T

Proposal seeks to remove reference to providing information in the vehicle handbook, so as to maintain current harmonised practices.

Proposal aims to make extendible trailers conform to all lateral protection requirements for trailers regardless of length, in order to remove the safety risk to vulnerable road users when the trailer is in the fully extended position. This is achieved by the removal of section 13.1.1. and 16.1.1 that specify some exemptions to requirements when the trailer is extended.

Extension of the scope for the installation of surveillance mirrors and camera-recording devices

Proposal to amend the minimum height of Lateral protection devices for the vehicle with longer distance of axle

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R67 to ADS vehicles. In the absence of a driver/driver’s compartment/manual driving controls in the vehicle, provisions related to them shall not be taken into account if not already covered by this amendment. The proposal clarifies provisions for vehicles with a separate driver’s compartment.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable the application of UN R66 to ADS vehicles. In the absence of driver/driver’s compartment/manual driving controls in the vehicle, provisions related to them shall not be taken into account if not already covered by this amendment.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R61 to ADS vehicles. In the absence of driver/driver cab/manual driving controls in the ADS vehicle, provisions related to them shall not be taken into account if not already covered by this amendment.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to adapt UN R58 for application to ADS vehicles.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to clarify that an odometer display is not required for ADS vehicles of subcategories X and
Y (but if fitted, shall comply with the relevant provisions) and that requirements related to speedometers do not apply to these vehicles as well as to any ADS vehicle while an ADS feature of type 2 is active.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to exempt ADS vehicles without foot controls from the requirements of this Regulations.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to exempt ADS vehicles of subcategories X and Y from requirements related to the presence of a human driver and manual driving controls. The proposal permits X and Y vehicles to use alternative materials for windscreens given their 6 kph speed restriction. The proposal further permits translucence levels below 70% for ADS vehicles while an ADS feature is active (i.e., performing the DDT).

Proposal for the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to address ADS vehicles, including the exemption of vehicles of subcategories X and Y from provisions concerning manual driving controls. No special provisions or exemptions apply to other ADS vehicles (unless provided for under other requirements for the safety of ADS vehicles).

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to address ADS vehicles, including exemption of vehicles of subcategories X and Y from the requirements of UN R46. For other ADS vehicles, no special provisions or exemptions apply under UN R46.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening to exempt vehicles without manual driving controls from provisions of UN R34 applicable only to vehicles with manual driving controls, to introduce definitions for “ADS feature of type 1” and “ADS feature of type 2”, to clarify the provisions for vehicles in case of separate driver compartment, and to clarify that the loading area shall be considered as luggage compartment for vehicles of category N.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening to exempt vehicles without manual driving controls from provisions of UN R26 applicable only to vehicles with manual driving controls, introduce definitions for “ADS feature of type 1” and “ADS feature of type 2”, and define the vertical transversal plane for vehicles without a driver.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening to exempt vehicles without manual driving controls from provisions of UN R18 applicable only to vehicles with manual driving controls.

Proposal to clarify that FVA displays indicating vehicle speed or distance traveled are not considered to be onboard speedometers or odometers for the purposes of paragraphs 5.1. and 5.2. of UN R39.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R125 to ADS vehicles, including the exemption of vehicles of subcategories X and Y.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R121 to ADS vehicles, including the exemption of vehicles of subcategory Y from the requirements of the Regulation.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R118 to ADS vehicles and to remove the references to Unique Identifier markings.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable the application of UN R122 to ADS vehicles and to ensure that the requirements minimise the risk of burns across all vehicle occupants.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R116 to ADS vehicles.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R151 to ADS vehicles, including the exemption of vehicle subcategories X and Y from the requirements, and to remove the references to Unique Identifier markings.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R73 to ADS vehicles.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R97 to ADS vehicles. In the absence of a driver/driver’s compartment//manual driving controls in the vehicle, provisions related to them shall not be taken into account if not already covered by this amendment. ADS vehicles that permit manual driving shall meet the requirements of this regulation when the vehicle is operated by a driver.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to update the footnote reference to vehicle categories and otherwise address the establishment of ADS vehicle subcategories X and Y. ADS vehicles are not subject to exemptions or special provisions under this Regulation.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to exempt ADS vehicles of subcategory Y from the requirements and to adapt the requirements for application to ADS vehicles, including vehicles of subcategory X. The proposal relies on the establishment of requirements for ADS vehicles to define specifications for ADS performance while an ADS feature is active.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to exempt vehicles of subcategories X and Y from the requirements and limit the requirements for other vehicles equipped with an ADS and when an ADS feature is active.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to require driver signals to be transmitted to the ADS and to introduce provisions for assessing ADS responses to the signals.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable the application of UN R107 to ADS vehicles, including exemptions of vehicles of subcategories X and/or Y from certain provisions concerning manual driving, attention to non-DDT tasks otherwise performed by the driver, introduction of provisions for “ADS features to type 1 and type 2”, and to update provisions concerning the running mass and occupants.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R110 to ADS vehicles, including exemption of vehicles of subcategories X and Y from provisions that concern manual driving controls, and to clarify the provisions for vehicles in case of separate driver´s compartment.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R166 to ADS vehicles, including the exemption of ADS vehicles of subcategories X and Y from the requirements of the Regulation.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R163 to ADS vehicles.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R162 to ADS vehicles.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable the application of UN R161 to ADS vehicles.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to exempt vehicles not operated by a human driver from the requirements of this Regulation, including vehicles of subcategories X and Y, and to delete the provisions concerning Unique Identifier markings.

Proposal to exempt vehicles of subcategories X and Y (ADS vehicles) from the requirements on UN R167 and to delete the provisions for Unique Identifier markings.

Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group pursuant to the work of the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R169 to ADS vehicles.

Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group pursuant to the work of the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R160 to ADS vehicles.

Proposal for a new UN Regulation on uniform technical prescriptions for the approval of vehicles used for the international carriage of dangerous goods by road with regard to their engine fire suppression system.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening to exempt ADS vehicles of subcategories X and Y from the requirements of UN R176.

Proposal to amend the transitional provisions to exempt Contracting Parties that apply UN R73 on or after the entry into force of the 02 series from the obligation to accept approvals granted in accordance with paragraph 11.11. of the Regulation.

Proposal for a new UN Regulation on uniform technical prescriptions concerning approval of a vehicle type with a Driver Drowsiness and Attention Warning (DDAW) system.

Frequent collisions between vehicle doors and approaching bicycles or motorcycles when a door is opened, causing injuries to riders and, in some cases, even fatalities. These collisions occur because drivers and passengers often fail to check for approaching vehicles before opening the door. The type of collisions are referred to as Dooring Accidents.

Proposal for amendment to the UN Regulation on the uniform technical prescriptions for the approval of vehicles used for the international carriage of dangerous goods by road with regards to its engine fire suppression system.

Proposal for consolidating similar subfunction controls (e.g., climate
control) into a unified system enables easier selection and contributes to
reducing distraction while driving.

This proposal allows for Separate Technical Units (STU) or Components
approvals: The Industry may need a regulatory tool to approve STU or
Components and vehicles equipped with STU or Components because the
same technology can sometimes be fitted to various families or categories of
vehicles or is largely independent of a vehicle. Such mechanism will help
streamlining the approvals of vehicles and hence the introduction of safety
technologies on the market.

Request for ToR Changes – Timeline and Scope– Part related to Separate Technical Units (STU)

Proposal to add omitted text from the formal documents

Proposal for clarification on the definition of “adjusted ocular reference point”

Proposal to resolve such an inconsistency with UN R125 to harmonize the location of the lower datum point (at 5°) of the angle of obstruction requirement in
paragraph 5.1.3. (at 4°).

Proposal to amend to meet the visibility requirements of UN R125, there is a notch in the lower edge of the black band of the front window in some vehicles. This is required to satisfy the requirements of UN-R125, but is considered to be meaningless for driving vision and needs to be corrected.

Proposal to clarify the definition of bi-directional vehicle.

Proposal for withdrawal based on to highlight the broader implications for vehicle design and usability for consumers resulting from this proposal. The lowering of the sideguard and reduction in ramp angle will give reduced flexibility for vehicles and trailer combinations in certain applications (i.e. loading roll-
on, roll-off vessels) and conflict with the road surface and local infrastructure (i.e. grounding out), which will lead to damage or reduced life of sideguards.

Proposal to clarify the obligations of the manufacturer in relation to the provision of information regarding the location and safe use of emergency exits and fire extinguishers

Working document of the IWG on EDR/DSSAD and its subgroup SG-EDR.
This document serves as a placeholder for proposals to UN
Regulation No. 160, under consideration as part of the ‘EDR
Step 2’ workstream.

“Placeholder” document introducing draft new requirements under the EDR Step 2 workstream. The document defines non-volatile memory for permanent EDR data storage and volatile memory for temporary data buffering. Requirements specify that EDRs capture and record data to non-volatile memory when triggers occur, with capacity for at least five events. Triggers include sudden deceleration exceeding 3.25 m/s² for 0.7 seconds, vehicle stops at 0 km/h for 20 seconds, and safety system activation. The amendment allows certain stop events to be written to volatile memory only, transferring to non-volatile memory when other triggers occur or the master control switch deactivates, reducing memory wear in vehicles with frequent stops.

Proposal the inclusion of the definition of “Category 3-3 – 3-4 vehicle” within the Concerning the common definitions of vehicle categories, masses and dimensions.

Introduction of a new category L3-5, defined as a three-wheeled motor vehicle with a 2-wheeler-3-wheeler combination module, offers a
versatile and innovative approach to modern transportation needs

Proposal for amendments to the working documents ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2025/51

Proposal for amendments to the working documents ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2025/50

Secretariat rewrite of proposal to amends the document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2025/104
- amends the document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2025/12 to ensure equal treatment of all Contracting Parties signatories to this UN Regulation.

Proposal for amendments to working document GRSG/2025/51, This proposal is aimed at allowing the certification for peculiar vehicle architectures (e.g.
high-performance vehicles), where generally the “R” point of the driver seat is not more than 450 mm from ground level. High-performance vehicles have peculiar characteristics. For instance, in order to reduce the aerodynamic drag the frontal surface is reduced. This leads to specific architectural solutions such as thinner and very tilted “A” pillar, smaller field of view, low volume cabin compartment, compared to mass-market vehicles. As a consequence, for high performance vehicles:

The proposal seeks to clarify that Field of Vision Assistant (FVA) are not to be considered with regard to the visibility requirement during night and day in paragraph 5.2., since the speed displayed by the FVA is not the primary source of information.

Proposal to further take into account the impact of the modified requirement for the height of the lower edge of LPD on the Contracting Parties, including the need to adapt the infrastructure and to ensure equal treatment of all Contracting Parties signatories to this UN Regulation.

Proposal aiming to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/15

Discussion on the general idea to align the contact surface temperatures with those for M2/M3 vehicles and to introduce the possibility for manufacturers to allow for higher contact surface temperatures if it can be demonstrated that their safety concept covers for higher temperatures without increasing the risk for occupantsto get burns.

GRE expressed concerns whether Reversing projections would interfere in the behaviour of rear-view camera system In UN R48. GRSG to take into account in case further considerations need to be taken into account in UN-R.158

Modifications from GRSG-129-01 are taken on board to delete the Unique Identifier (UI) marking provisions.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/18.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/20.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/23.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/24.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/25.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/31.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/28.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/30.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/34.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/35.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/36.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/37.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document
ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/38.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document
ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/39.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document
ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/40.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document
ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/42.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document
ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/32.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document
ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/45.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated VehiclesRegulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/46.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document
ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/14.

Proposal by prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles
Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document
ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/19

Proposal aims to clarify the provisions for vehicles in case of separate driver compartment and the loading area to be considered as luggage compartment for vehicles of category N.