GRRF-82-07
Data Privacy and Cyber Security in (partly) Automated Driving (FIA Foundation)
Data Privacy and Cyber Security in (partly) Automated Driving
FIA comments on data privacy provisions under UN Regulations including remarks concerning the work of the informal groups on automated driving (ITS/AD), automatic emergency calls systems (AECS), and automatically commanded steering functions (ACSF). The presentation covers issues such as protection of personal data, aggregation of data to protect individual identities, protection against unauthorized access (hacking), and prohibition against data use for purposes other than those specifically intended by a regulation. FIA proposes the deletion of data storage (DSSA) provisions under the draft texts for ACSF.
GRRF-82-08
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79
Proposal to amend “option 4” as presented in the proposal introduce technical requirements for Corrective Steering Functions under UN R79 (document GRRF/2016/45). Option 4 for consideration by GRRF proposes to amend the definition of corrective steering functions and to include technical requirements for LKAS as an ASCF of Category B1. The proposal includes:
Clarification of Corrective steering function (CSF) incl. defining of new requirements;
Establishment of new categories for automatically commanded steering function (ACSF): Categories A, B1, B2, C, D and E;
Wording for requirements of Category A (incl. remote parking RCP), and Category B1.
The ACSF informal group intends to define provisions for systems of categories B2, C, D and E during its future sessions. Testing requirements will be defined in a separate informal document.
GRRF-82-09
Proposal for amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/45 (Germany)
Proposal for amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/45
Proposal of amendments to the draft proposal concerning technical requirements for automated steering functions operating at speeds up to 10 km/h and for corrective steering functions under UN R79.
GRRF-82-12
Proposal for amendments to GRRF-82-08 (OICA)
Proposal for amendments to GRRF-82-08
Proposal, consolidating document GRRF-82-08 with the proposed test procedures, revising “option 4” as presented in the proposal introduce technical requirements for Corrective Steering Functions under UN R79 (document GRRF/2016/45). Option 4 proposes to amend the definition of corrective steering functions and to include technical requirements for LKAS as an ASCF of Category B1. The proposal includes:
Clarification of Corrective steering function (CSF) incl. defining of new requirements;
Establishment of new categories for automatically commanded steering function (ACSF): Categories A, B1, B2, C, D and E;
Wording for requirements of Category A (incl. remote parking RCP), and Category B1.
GRRF-82-12/Rev.1
Consolidated proposal for amendments to GRRF-82-08
Consolidated proposal for amendments to GRRF-82-08
Updated version of the draft amendment to introduce provisions for corrective steering and Category B1 ACSF into UN R79 based upon discussions held during the afternoon GRRF session of 21 September.
GRRF-82-12/Rev.2
Consolidated proposal for amendments to GRRF-82-08
Consolidated proposal for amendments to GRRF-82-08
Updated version of the proposal to introduce corrective steering and B1 level ACSF provisions into UN R79 prepared pursuant to discussions held among interested parties following the afternoon GRRF session on 21 September.
GRRF-82-12/Rev.3
Consolidated proposal for amendments to GRRF-82-08
Consolidated proposal for amendments to GRRF-82-08
Updated version of the proposal to introduce corrective steering and B1 level ACSF provisions into UN R79 as agreed by the GRRF during its September 2016 session.
GRRF-82-13
Emergency Steering Function (ESF) (OICA)
Emergency Steering Function (ESF)
During its 8th meeting (Stockholm), the ACSF informal group decided that all functions to “assist the avoidance of a collision” would be excluded from the definition of “Corrective Steering Function”. ACSF decided to establish a new definition for “Emergency Steering Functions (ESF)” with specific requirements. The intention was to draft this definition during a second phase effort through which requirements for ACSF categories beyond B1 will be established. In order to enable the approval of ESF systems critical to road safety, OICA has prepared this proposal for an ESF definition and simple requirements based upon provisions for Complex Electronics (CEL) in Annex 6. A footnote has also been added to define the specific conditions for the approval of these systems, until uniform provisions are defined by the ACSF informal group.
GRRF-82-14
Justification for an acceleration greater than 1.0 m/s² under document GRRF-82-08 (CSF) (OICA)
Justification for an acceleration greater than 1.0 m/s² under document GRRF-82-08 (CSF)
In order to enhance the safety of B1 corrective steering functions (by reducing the probability of driver over-reliance and misunderstanding of system limitations), OICA proposes a minimum value of 0.8 m/s2 for maximum lateral acceleration in place of the draft 1 m/s2 for the speed range between 100-130 km/h for M1 and N1 vehicles. OICA believes that this would ensure that a system is capable under all conditions of generating the required minimum acceleration.
GRRF-82-15
Proposal for amendments to GRRF-82-09 (CLEPA and OICA)
Proposal for amendments to GRRF-82-09
Proposed changes to the draft amendments to UN R79 concerning ACSF B1 systems. The proposed new wording for the triggering condition of the warning (“any front tyre of the vehicle is crossing the lane marking”) is technically more specific than the original (“the vehicle is going to leave the lane”). The use of a haptic signal as an alternative to the acoustic signal achieves the goal pursued by Germany. This proposal is consistent with the warning strategy of AEBS specified in UN R131. In the case of M2 M3 N2 N3 vehicle categories, it is proposed to take as a base the requirements specified in UN R130 LDWS regulation, which achieves the goal.
GRRF-82-19
Proposal for amendments to Annex 6 of Regulation No. 79 (EC)
Proposal for amendments to Annex 6 of Regulation No. 79
Proposal to amend the annex on complex electronic systems, in particular, to require auditing of the methodologies used to ensure system safety at both concept and system level. Concept level specifically requires consideration of interaction with other vehicle systems.
GRRF-82-26
Proposal for amendments to GRRF-82-12 (France)
Proposal for amendments to GRRF-82-12
Proposal to amend the consolidated draft amendment to UN R79 to introduce technical requirements for Corrective Steering Functions and Level B1 ACSF under UN R79 (document GRRF/2016/45).
GRRF-82-34
Automatically Commanded Steering Function: Demonstration of the Feasibility of the Proposed Test Cases with a Production Vehicle (BASt and Germany)
Automatically Commanded Steering Function: Demonstration of the Feasibility of the Proposed Test Cases with a Production Vehicle
Presentation on trial runs of the proposed test procedures for evaluating automated steering systems under UN R79.
GRRF/2016/45
Proposal for amendment to Regulation No. 79 (EC, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Netherlands, and Sweden)
Proposal for amendment to Regulation No. 79
Proposal to introduce technical requirements for Corrective Steering Functions (lane departure prevention, lane-keeping assistance (LKAS), steering angle correction, etc.) as defined in the regulation. The proposal offers four options to ensure appropriate approvals of LKAS and related CSF systems until such time as more precise requirements can be defined:
Option 1 and option 2: Not to grant any type approvals for corrective steering functions until detailed technical requirements for CSF are incorporated into this Regulation.
Option 3: Amend the definition of CSF as proposed in this document.
Option 4: Amend the definition of corrective steering functions and to include technical requirements for LKAS as an ASCF of Category B1 as proposed in this document.