GAR | GRRF-82-08

Document Number GRRF-82-08

1	2	3	4	6
Document title	Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79
Date	16 Sep 2016			Proposal to amend "option 4" as presented in the proposal introduce technical requirements for Corrective Steering Functions under UN R79 (document GRRF/2016/45). Option 4 for consideration by GRRF proposes to amend the definition of corrective steering functions and to include technical requirements for LKAS as an ASCF of Category B1. The proposal includes: Clarification of Corrective steering function (CSF) incl. defining of new requirements; Establishment of new categories for automatically commanded steering function (ACSF): Categories A, B1, B2, C, D and E; Wording for requirements of Category A (incl. remote parking RCP), and Category B1. The ACSF informal group intends to define provisions for systems of categories B2, C, D and E during its future sessions. Testing requirements will be defined in a separate informal document.

Status	Superseded
Rulemaking area(s)	UN R79 Steering Equipment
Meeting(s)	GRRF \| Session 82 \| 20-23 Sep 2016 Agenda item 9. (c) Automatically Commanded Steering Function (ACSF)
Related documents
	GRRF/2016/45		Proposal for amendment to Regulation No. 79 (Superseded)
	GRRF-82-12		Proposal for amendments to GRRF-82-08 (Superseded)
	GRRF-82-12/Rev.1		Consolidated proposal for amendments to GRRF-82-08 (Superseded)
Downloads:		.pdf format	.doc format
Excerpts from session reports related to this document
GRRF \| Session 82 \| 20-23 Sep 2016			53. The expert from Germany introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/45, containing four options as possible ways forward to progress on ACSF. The Secretary of the IWG on Automatically Commanded Steering Function (ACSF) gave a presentation reporting on the progress made by the group (GRRF-82-17). He reported on definitions proposed for ACSF of Categories A to E, clarifications proposed for Corrective Steering Functions (CSF) and new provisions proposed for RCP. GRRF acknowledged the status report received and agreed to work on an amendment to Option 4 as proposed by GRRF-82-12. The proposal for Option 4 received several comments in GRRF-82-08, GRRF-82-09, GRRF-82-14, GRRF-82-15, GRRF-82-18, GRRF-82-19 and GRRF-82-26.