Proposal to align the French version with the adopted English version of the text (reference document WP.29/2018/45).

Proposal of corrections to document GRSP/2018/29 (previously submitted by CLEPA) regarding the introduction of booster-cushion provisions into UN R129.

Proposal to update a reference regarding ISOFIX exemptions permitted under paragraph 5.3.8.8. (related to vehicles with one seat position per row). The reference should read 5.3.8.8. and 5.3.8.9.

Impact of WG17-legform and FlexPLI at lower velocities compared to Madymo and THUMS pedestrian impacts.

Proposal to address new active suspension technologies that can raise the height of the vehicle in motion up to a defined speed. Since the vehicle height has an influence on the headform test area (WAD) and on the test results for legform tests, all possible vehicle heights up to a driving speed of 11.1 m/s (40 km/h) should be considered to be relevant for the impact with a pedestrian. The proposal is a clarification on this issue.To ensure that such an active suspension system is considered for type approval, there should be a detailed description in the information document. Due to the fact that extensions for an existing vehicle type concerning UN Regulation No. 127 are still possible according to 00 and 01 series of amendments, the proposal is relevant for all series of amendments of the UN R127.

OICA questions in response to EVS action item 2: “All members identify specific questions in the white paper to contracting parties for agreement in order to continue with research.”

Japan response to EVS action item 2: “All members identify specific questions in the white paper to contracting parties for agreement in order to continue with research.”

China response to EVS action item 2: “All members identify specific questions in the white paper to contracting parties for agreement in order to continue with research.”

JRC responses to EVS action item 2: “All members identify specific questions in the white paper to contracting parties for agreement in order to continue with research.”

Korea responses to EVS action item 2: “All members identify specific questions in the white paper to contracting parties for agreement in order to continue with research.”

Revised proposal (superseding GRSP-63-24) to clarify the possibility to install side-facing seats in buses of category M₂ and M₃ of classes A and I.

Proposal to clarify the application of GTR 7 Phase 2 static alternative provisions and to modify the allowed range of tolerances under the backset retention and energy dissipations test.

Proposal to explicitly state that functional safety requirements apply to categories of vehicles beyond M₁.

Proposal to clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy.

Proposal to clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy.