Proposal to improve and clarify the text of the Regulation.

Proposal from the AEBS informal group to improve the assessment of AEBS robustness.

Draft informal group response to GRVA general agreement to address AEBS robustness and uncertainties of the test method.

Supporting the proposal for repetition of a limited number of unsuccessful test runs to compensate for external test influences.

The False Reaction scenarios in Annex 3-Appendix 2 were based on UN R131 (on-highway heavy vehicles) without verification of their applicability to urban light vehicles. Japan has begun research and anticipates proposing changes to the UN R152 scenarios in the near future. This proposal identifies scenarios under study and recommends tolerances for the vehicle and pedestrian dummy placements. Japan also raises concerns over the provision “the AEBS shall not provide a collision warning” in cases where there is no imminent collision risk.

Presentation in support of the proposals for the 01 series of amendments and for Supplement 1 to UN R152 (respectively, documents GRVA/2019/16 and GRVA/2019/17.

Pursuant to discussions during the 9th session of the informal working group on AEBS for M₁/N₁, paragraphs 6.5.2. (pass conditions regarding “car-to-car moving” collision warning) and 6.6.2. (pass conditions regarding the collision warning in the Car to Pedestrian scenario) were deleted given that pass conditions were already defined by the general requirements. For consistency, this proposal would delete the pass conditions under the car-to-car stationary scenario.

The 01 series of amendments aims at increasing the performance requirements in the Car to Pedestrian
scenario by permitting only reduced maximum impact speed compared to the original version of this
Regulation. Thereby the same maximum impact speed is required for the Car to Pedestrian as for the
Car to Car scenario. However, in the original proposal (GRVA/2019/16), the permitted maximum impact speed for an N₁ vehicle erroneously corresponds to that of an M₁ vehicle. This proposal corrects the error.

Proposal from the AEBS informal group to improve and clarify the text of the Regulation.

AEBS informal group proposal to introduce new and enhanced requirements for the car-to-pedestrian test scenario.

EU General Safety Regulation 5: AEBS–Proportion of M1 vehicles likely to pass the vehicle to pedestrian test of proposed draft regulation.

Draft proposal for the second step requirements for light vehicle AEBS.

Draft text with highlighted changes made during the 8th AEBS informal group session for eventual integration as Supplement 1 to the original AEBS regulation pending adoption at the June 2019 WP.29 session.

Proposal with changes from the 8th AEBS informal group session.

Proposal for uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Advanced Emergency Braking System (AEBS) for M₁ and N₁ vehicles.

Correction to the agreed changes to the draft AEBS regulation for light vehicles as noted by the GRVA secretariat.

Changes to the draft proposal for a new UN Regulation on light vehicle AEBS as noted during the second GRVA session.

Amendment proposal to the draft text for a new UN Regulation on M₁ and N₁vehicle automatic emergency braking systems.

Proposal of amendments from the AEBS informal group to their original submission for a new UN Regulation.

Password-protected .zip file of the standard for limited GRVA use. Please contact the GRVA secretariat for access.

Password protected .zip file of the standard for limited GRVA use. Please contact the GRVA secretariat for access.

Password protected .zip file of the ISO standard provided to GRVA for limited use. Please contact the GRVA secretariat for access.