Proposal to introduce a new “call for help” signal.

Proposal to clarify manufacturer logo requirements across several paragraphs: confirming that non-illuminated graphic marks are not considered logos (para. 2.1.7.); permitting vehicle manufacturers to keep the inner portion of a front position lamp active when an AFS headlamp substitutes the outer portion (para. 5.12.1.4.); improving logo language for Light Signalling Devices approved to UN R148 (para. 5.30.1.); and clarifying that Road Illumination Devices approved to UN R149 shall not include a manufacturer logo (para. 5.30.2.).

Proposal to clarify and modernize lamp installation and component requirements in UN R48 and UN R148 to address the growing variety of vehicle and lamp designs, particularly band/strip lamps extending across the full width of the vehicle. Key changes include: removing the “band/strip” terminology and expanding the definition of a pair of lamps to cover full-width designs; removing the three-device maximum for Y-lamps to ensure technology neutrality; adding a new paragraph §5.5.5 defining a pair as a two-lamp system; relocating light source requirements from UN R48 to UN R148 §4.7.3 to ensure at least one light source per side; removing the 0.8-metre minimum length requirement; and clarifying that definitions in §2.4.10 apply only to the relevant vehicle categories. Minor amendments to UN R148 include updated provisions for light source positioning, clarification of §4.8.1.3, and new sampling provisions in §4.8.11 for testing band/strip lamps. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-03.

Proposal to introduce selective yellow as an permitted alternative to white for front position lamps and daytime running lamps in UN R48 and UN R148. Studies confirm that selective yellow performs equally to white for oncoming vehicle recognition and speed estimation. Unlike historical filament lamp applications where a yellow filter reduced luminous intensity, modern LEDs achieve the same intensity levels without reduction. Specific amendments include: updating §5.15 to reflect selective yellow options and removing a duplicated front fog lamp requirement; amending §§6.9.7 and 6.19.7 to deactivate selective yellow position and daytime running lamps on the relevant side during direction indicator activation; and aligning UN R148 (01 series) by amending §§5.1.7, 5.4.7 and Annex 1 accordingly. The colour boundaries for selective yellow are already defined in §2.11.1.2 and require no amendment. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-05.

Proposal to exclude retro-reflective devices and markings from the requirement of “Red light to the front” and “White light to the rear”.

Proposal to align the Exterior Courtesy Lamps provisions of the 08 series amendments with those of the 09 series.

The European Cyclists Federation and International Federation of Pedestrians withhold support for Direction Indicator Projection (DIP) technology regulation. They contend available studies lack evidence of reduced conflicts or crashes in real-world conditions, raise concerns about behavioral adaptations that may redistribute rather than reduce risk, and note the technology does not address responsibility allocation where cyclists and pedestrians already have legal priority. Additional concerns include reliance on uncontrolled road surfaces affecting signal visibility and clarity, and risks of shifting safety burden onto vulnerable road users contrary to Safe System principles. They urge contracting parties to refrain from regulation pending robust research confirming the technology neither undermines priority rules nor introduces unintended behavioral risks.

Proposal to add work lamp definitions and requirements to UN R48, minimum height of 250 mm above ground, downward orientation, and automatic deactivation within 1 second if vehicle speed exceeds 15 km/h. Work lamps require independent manual controls and a mandatory visual operating tell-tale. Annex 1 adds item 9.32. for work lamp approval documentation.

TF LUPC proposal based on UN R48 consolidate version from SLR-73-07/Rev.1 including LUPC-01-03. Adds new annex for Technical Provisions for Energy Status Indicator

Proposal for a supplement to the 06/07/08/09 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 48 and the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 148 concerning manufacturer logos in side-marker lamps. The proposal amends paragraph 5.5.5. of UN R48 to clarify that no restrictions apply to logos in side-marker lamps, and amends paragraph 4.5.5. of UN R148 to add side-marker lamps to the list of lamps that shall not incorporate a logo. The justification references ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2020/5/Rev.2.

Proposal to add VRU warning pattern requirements. Document presents data from accident databases showing pedestrian crossing conflicts represent the highest proportion of nighttime road accidents at approximately 32% with obstructions and 19% without. Limited visibility and restricted communication between drivers and VRUs necessitates an assistance function. A spotlight feature with a bright narrow beam pattern directed at hazardous VRUs, moving with the target and flashing to remind drivers while warning VRUs, received positive feedback from customer experience surveys

Proposal clarifies the “Manufacturer logo” means a light emitting graphic mark, emblem, word, or combination of those elements used to aid public identification of a vehicle manufacturer’s brand name when the function is switched ON. Improved justification for the proposal

Paper introduces an ADS marker lamp to identify vehicles operating with an Automated Driving System. Industry does not seek to mandate such a lamp. It identifies safety and security concerns including no demonstrated real-world net safety benefit, targeting and public violence risks, cargo robbery risks, child safeguarding concerns, cyber-physical attack surface expansion, and spoofing and misuse potential.

Presentation on visualisation of signals for help

Proposal to introduce a new “call for help” signal.

Proposal to clarify manufacturer logo requirements across several paragraphs: confirming that non-illuminated graphic marks are not considered logos (para. 2.1.7.); permitting vehicle manufacturers to keep the inner portion of a front position lamp active when an AFS headlamp substitutes the outer portion (para. 5.12.1.4.); improving logo language for Light Signalling Devices approved to UN R148 (para. 5.30.1.); and clarifying that Road Illumination Devices approved to UN R149 shall not include a manufacturer logo (para. 5.30.2.).

Proposal to clarify and modernize lamp installation and component requirements in UN R48 and UN R148 to address the growing variety of vehicle and lamp designs, particularly band/strip lamps extending across the full width of the vehicle. Key changes include: removing the “band/strip” terminology and expanding the definition of a pair of lamps to cover full-width designs; removing the three-device maximum for Y-lamps to ensure technology neutrality; adding a new paragraph §5.5.5 defining a pair as a two-lamp system; relocating light source requirements from UN R48 to UN R148 §4.7.3 to ensure at least one light source per side; removing the 0.8-metre minimum length requirement; and clarifying that definitions in §2.4.10 apply only to the relevant vehicle categories. Minor amendments to UN R148 include updated provisions for light source positioning, clarification of §4.8.1.3, and new sampling provisions in §4.8.11 for testing band/strip lamps. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-03.

Proposal to introduce selective yellow as an permitted alternative to white for front position lamps and daytime running lamps in UN R48 and UN R148. Studies confirm that selective yellow performs equally to white for oncoming vehicle recognition and speed estimation. Unlike historical filament lamp applications where a yellow filter reduced luminous intensity, modern LEDs achieve the same intensity levels without reduction. Specific amendments include: updating §5.15 to reflect selective yellow options and removing a duplicated front fog lamp requirement; amending §§6.9.7 and 6.19.7 to deactivate selective yellow position and daytime running lamps on the relevant side during direction indicator activation; and aligning UN R148 (01 series) by amending §§5.1.7, 5.4.7 and Annex 1 accordingly. The colour boundaries for selective yellow are already defined in §2.11.1.2 and require no amendment. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-05.

Proposal to exclude retro-reflective devices and markings from the requirement of “Red light to the front” and “White light to the rear”.

Proposal to align the Exterior Courtesy Lamps provisions of the 08 series amendments with those of the 09 series.

The European Cyclists Federation and International Federation of Pedestrians withhold support for Direction Indicator Projection (DIP) technology regulation. They contend available studies lack evidence of reduced conflicts or crashes in real-world conditions, raise concerns about behavioral adaptations that may redistribute rather than reduce risk, and note the technology does not address responsibility allocation where cyclists and pedestrians already have legal priority. Additional concerns include reliance on uncontrolled road surfaces affecting signal visibility and clarity, and risks of shifting safety burden onto vulnerable road users contrary to Safe System principles. They urge contracting parties to refrain from regulation pending robust research confirming the technology neither undermines priority rules nor introduces unintended behavioral risks.

Proposal to add work lamp definitions and requirements to UN R48, minimum height of 250 mm above ground, downward orientation, and automatic deactivation within 1 second if vehicle speed exceeds 15 km/h. Work lamps require independent manual controls and a mandatory visual operating tell-tale. Annex 1 adds item 9.32. for work lamp approval documentation.

TF LUPC proposal based on UN R48 consolidate version from SLR-73-07/Rev.1 including LUPC-01-03. Adds new annex for Technical Provisions for Energy Status Indicator

Proposal for a supplement to the 06/07/08/09 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 48 and the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 148 concerning manufacturer logos in side-marker lamps. The proposal amends paragraph 5.5.5. of UN R48 to clarify that no restrictions apply to logos in side-marker lamps, and amends paragraph 4.5.5. of UN R148 to add side-marker lamps to the list of lamps that shall not incorporate a logo. The justification references ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2020/5/Rev.2.

Proposal to add VRU warning pattern requirements. Document presents data from accident databases showing pedestrian crossing conflicts represent the highest proportion of nighttime road accidents at approximately 32% with obstructions and 19% without. Limited visibility and restricted communication between drivers and VRUs necessitates an assistance function. A spotlight feature with a bright narrow beam pattern directed at hazardous VRUs, moving with the target and flashing to remind drivers while warning VRUs, received positive feedback from customer experience surveys

Proposal clarifies the “Manufacturer logo” means a light emitting graphic mark, emblem, word, or combination of those elements used to aid public identification of a vehicle manufacturer’s brand name when the function is switched ON. Improved justification for the proposal

Paper introduces an ADS marker lamp to identify vehicles operating with an Automated Driving System. Industry does not seek to mandate such a lamp. It identifies safety and security concerns including no demonstrated real-world net safety benefit, targeting and public violence risks, cargo robbery risks, child safeguarding concerns, cyber-physical attack surface expansion, and spoofing and misuse potential.

Presentation on visualisation of signals for help

Proposal to introduce a new “call for help” signal.

Proposal to clarify manufacturer logo requirements across several paragraphs: confirming that non-illuminated graphic marks are not considered logos (para. 2.1.7.); permitting vehicle manufacturers to keep the inner portion of a front position lamp active when an AFS headlamp substitutes the outer portion (para. 5.12.1.4.); improving logo language for Light Signalling Devices approved to UN R148 (para. 5.30.1.); and clarifying that Road Illumination Devices approved to UN R149 shall not include a manufacturer logo (para. 5.30.2.).

Proposal to clarify and modernize lamp installation and component requirements in UN R48 and UN R148 to address the growing variety of vehicle and lamp designs, particularly band/strip lamps extending across the full width of the vehicle. Key changes include: removing the “band/strip” terminology and expanding the definition of a pair of lamps to cover full-width designs; removing the three-device maximum for Y-lamps to ensure technology neutrality; adding a new paragraph §5.5.5 defining a pair as a two-lamp system; relocating light source requirements from UN R48 to UN R148 §4.7.3 to ensure at least one light source per side; removing the 0.8-metre minimum length requirement; and clarifying that definitions in §2.4.10 apply only to the relevant vehicle categories. Minor amendments to UN R148 include updated provisions for light source positioning, clarification of §4.8.1.3, and new sampling provisions in §4.8.11 for testing band/strip lamps. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-03.

Proposal to introduce selective yellow as an permitted alternative to white for front position lamps and daytime running lamps in UN R48 and UN R148. Studies confirm that selective yellow performs equally to white for oncoming vehicle recognition and speed estimation. Unlike historical filament lamp applications where a yellow filter reduced luminous intensity, modern LEDs achieve the same intensity levels without reduction. Specific amendments include: updating §5.15 to reflect selective yellow options and removing a duplicated front fog lamp requirement; amending §§6.9.7 and 6.19.7 to deactivate selective yellow position and daytime running lamps on the relevant side during direction indicator activation; and aligning UN R148 (01 series) by amending §§5.1.7, 5.4.7 and Annex 1 accordingly. The colour boundaries for selective yellow are already defined in §2.11.1.2 and require no amendment. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-05.

Proposal to exclude retro-reflective devices and markings from the requirement of “Red light to the front” and “White light to the rear”.

Proposal to align the Exterior Courtesy Lamps provisions of the 08 series amendments with those of the 09 series.

The European Cyclists Federation and International Federation of Pedestrians withhold support for Direction Indicator Projection (DIP) technology regulation. They contend available studies lack evidence of reduced conflicts or crashes in real-world conditions, raise concerns about behavioral adaptations that may redistribute rather than reduce risk, and note the technology does not address responsibility allocation where cyclists and pedestrians already have legal priority. Additional concerns include reliance on uncontrolled road surfaces affecting signal visibility and clarity, and risks of shifting safety burden onto vulnerable road users contrary to Safe System principles. They urge contracting parties to refrain from regulation pending robust research confirming the technology neither undermines priority rules nor introduces unintended behavioral risks.

Proposal to add work lamp definitions and requirements to UN R48, minimum height of 250 mm above ground, downward orientation, and automatic deactivation within 1 second if vehicle speed exceeds 15 km/h. Work lamps require independent manual controls and a mandatory visual operating tell-tale. Annex 1 adds item 9.32. for work lamp approval documentation.

TF LUPC proposal based on UN R48 consolidate version from SLR-73-07/Rev.1 including LUPC-01-03. Adds new annex for Technical Provisions for Energy Status Indicator

Proposal for a supplement to the 06/07/08/09 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 48 and the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 148 concerning manufacturer logos in side-marker lamps. The proposal amends paragraph 5.5.5. of UN R48 to clarify that no restrictions apply to logos in side-marker lamps, and amends paragraph 4.5.5. of UN R148 to add side-marker lamps to the list of lamps that shall not incorporate a logo. The justification references ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2020/5/Rev.2.

Proposal to add VRU warning pattern requirements. Document presents data from accident databases showing pedestrian crossing conflicts represent the highest proportion of nighttime road accidents at approximately 32% with obstructions and 19% without. Limited visibility and restricted communication between drivers and VRUs necessitates an assistance function. A spotlight feature with a bright narrow beam pattern directed at hazardous VRUs, moving with the target and flashing to remind drivers while warning VRUs, received positive feedback from customer experience surveys

Proposal clarifies the “Manufacturer logo” means a light emitting graphic mark, emblem, word, or combination of those elements used to aid public identification of a vehicle manufacturer’s brand name when the function is switched ON. Improved justification for the proposal

Paper introduces an ADS marker lamp to identify vehicles operating with an Automated Driving System. Industry does not seek to mandate such a lamp. It identifies safety and security concerns including no demonstrated real-world net safety benefit, targeting and public violence risks, cargo robbery risks, child safeguarding concerns, cyber-physical attack surface expansion, and spoofing and misuse potential.

Presentation on visualisation of signals for help

Proposal to introduce a new “call for help” signal.

Proposal to clarify manufacturer logo requirements across several paragraphs: confirming that non-illuminated graphic marks are not considered logos (para. 2.1.7.); permitting vehicle manufacturers to keep the inner portion of a front position lamp active when an AFS headlamp substitutes the outer portion (para. 5.12.1.4.); improving logo language for Light Signalling Devices approved to UN R148 (para. 5.30.1.); and clarifying that Road Illumination Devices approved to UN R149 shall not include a manufacturer logo (para. 5.30.2.).

Proposal to clarify and modernize lamp installation and component requirements in UN R48 and UN R148 to address the growing variety of vehicle and lamp designs, particularly band/strip lamps extending across the full width of the vehicle. Key changes include: removing the “band/strip” terminology and expanding the definition of a pair of lamps to cover full-width designs; removing the three-device maximum for Y-lamps to ensure technology neutrality; adding a new paragraph §5.5.5 defining a pair as a two-lamp system; relocating light source requirements from UN R48 to UN R148 §4.7.3 to ensure at least one light source per side; removing the 0.8-metre minimum length requirement; and clarifying that definitions in §2.4.10 apply only to the relevant vehicle categories. Minor amendments to UN R148 include updated provisions for light source positioning, clarification of §4.8.1.3, and new sampling provisions in §4.8.11 for testing band/strip lamps. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-03.

Proposal to introduce selective yellow as an permitted alternative to white for front position lamps and daytime running lamps in UN R48 and UN R148. Studies confirm that selective yellow performs equally to white for oncoming vehicle recognition and speed estimation. Unlike historical filament lamp applications where a yellow filter reduced luminous intensity, modern LEDs achieve the same intensity levels without reduction. Specific amendments include: updating §5.15 to reflect selective yellow options and removing a duplicated front fog lamp requirement; amending §§6.9.7 and 6.19.7 to deactivate selective yellow position and daytime running lamps on the relevant side during direction indicator activation; and aligning UN R148 (01 series) by amending §§5.1.7, 5.4.7 and Annex 1 accordingly. The colour boundaries for selective yellow are already defined in §2.11.1.2 and require no amendment. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-05.

Proposal to exclude retro-reflective devices and markings from the requirement of “Red light to the front” and “White light to the rear”.

Proposal to align the Exterior Courtesy Lamps provisions of the 08 series amendments with those of the 09 series.

The European Cyclists Federation and International Federation of Pedestrians withhold support for Direction Indicator Projection (DIP) technology regulation. They contend available studies lack evidence of reduced conflicts or crashes in real-world conditions, raise concerns about behavioral adaptations that may redistribute rather than reduce risk, and note the technology does not address responsibility allocation where cyclists and pedestrians already have legal priority. Additional concerns include reliance on uncontrolled road surfaces affecting signal visibility and clarity, and risks of shifting safety burden onto vulnerable road users contrary to Safe System principles. They urge contracting parties to refrain from regulation pending robust research confirming the technology neither undermines priority rules nor introduces unintended behavioral risks.

Proposal to add work lamp definitions and requirements to UN R48, minimum height of 250 mm above ground, downward orientation, and automatic deactivation within 1 second if vehicle speed exceeds 15 km/h. Work lamps require independent manual controls and a mandatory visual operating tell-tale. Annex 1 adds item 9.32. for work lamp approval documentation.

TF LUPC proposal based on UN R48 consolidate version from SLR-73-07/Rev.1 including LUPC-01-03. Adds new annex for Technical Provisions for Energy Status Indicator

Proposal for a supplement to the 06/07/08/09 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 48 and the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 148 concerning manufacturer logos in side-marker lamps. The proposal amends paragraph 5.5.5. of UN R48 to clarify that no restrictions apply to logos in side-marker lamps, and amends paragraph 4.5.5. of UN R148 to add side-marker lamps to the list of lamps that shall not incorporate a logo. The justification references ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2020/5/Rev.2.

Proposal to add VRU warning pattern requirements. Document presents data from accident databases showing pedestrian crossing conflicts represent the highest proportion of nighttime road accidents at approximately 32% with obstructions and 19% without. Limited visibility and restricted communication between drivers and VRUs necessitates an assistance function. A spotlight feature with a bright narrow beam pattern directed at hazardous VRUs, moving with the target and flashing to remind drivers while warning VRUs, received positive feedback from customer experience surveys

Proposal clarifies the “Manufacturer logo” means a light emitting graphic mark, emblem, word, or combination of those elements used to aid public identification of a vehicle manufacturer’s brand name when the function is switched ON. Improved justification for the proposal

Paper introduces an ADS marker lamp to identify vehicles operating with an Automated Driving System. Industry does not seek to mandate such a lamp. It identifies safety and security concerns including no demonstrated real-world net safety benefit, targeting and public violence risks, cargo robbery risks, child safeguarding concerns, cyber-physical attack surface expansion, and spoofing and misuse potential.

Presentation on visualisation of signals for help

Proposal to introduce a new “call for help” signal.

Proposal to clarify manufacturer logo requirements across several paragraphs: confirming that non-illuminated graphic marks are not considered logos (para. 2.1.7.); permitting vehicle manufacturers to keep the inner portion of a front position lamp active when an AFS headlamp substitutes the outer portion (para. 5.12.1.4.); improving logo language for Light Signalling Devices approved to UN R148 (para. 5.30.1.); and clarifying that Road Illumination Devices approved to UN R149 shall not include a manufacturer logo (para. 5.30.2.).

Proposal to clarify and modernize lamp installation and component requirements in UN R48 and UN R148 to address the growing variety of vehicle and lamp designs, particularly band/strip lamps extending across the full width of the vehicle. Key changes include: removing the “band/strip” terminology and expanding the definition of a pair of lamps to cover full-width designs; removing the three-device maximum for Y-lamps to ensure technology neutrality; adding a new paragraph §5.5.5 defining a pair as a two-lamp system; relocating light source requirements from UN R48 to UN R148 §4.7.3 to ensure at least one light source per side; removing the 0.8-metre minimum length requirement; and clarifying that definitions in §2.4.10 apply only to the relevant vehicle categories. Minor amendments to UN R148 include updated provisions for light source positioning, clarification of §4.8.1.3, and new sampling provisions in §4.8.11 for testing band/strip lamps. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-03.

Proposal to introduce selective yellow as an permitted alternative to white for front position lamps and daytime running lamps in UN R48 and UN R148. Studies confirm that selective yellow performs equally to white for oncoming vehicle recognition and speed estimation. Unlike historical filament lamp applications where a yellow filter reduced luminous intensity, modern LEDs achieve the same intensity levels without reduction. Specific amendments include: updating §5.15 to reflect selective yellow options and removing a duplicated front fog lamp requirement; amending §§6.9.7 and 6.19.7 to deactivate selective yellow position and daytime running lamps on the relevant side during direction indicator activation; and aligning UN R148 (01 series) by amending §§5.1.7, 5.4.7 and Annex 1 accordingly. The colour boundaries for selective yellow are already defined in §2.11.1.2 and require no amendment. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-05.

Proposal to exclude retro-reflective devices and markings from the requirement of “Red light to the front” and “White light to the rear”.

Proposal to align the Exterior Courtesy Lamps provisions of the 08 series amendments with those of the 09 series.

The European Cyclists Federation and International Federation of Pedestrians withhold support for Direction Indicator Projection (DIP) technology regulation. They contend available studies lack evidence of reduced conflicts or crashes in real-world conditions, raise concerns about behavioral adaptations that may redistribute rather than reduce risk, and note the technology does not address responsibility allocation where cyclists and pedestrians already have legal priority. Additional concerns include reliance on uncontrolled road surfaces affecting signal visibility and clarity, and risks of shifting safety burden onto vulnerable road users contrary to Safe System principles. They urge contracting parties to refrain from regulation pending robust research confirming the technology neither undermines priority rules nor introduces unintended behavioral risks.

Proposal to add work lamp definitions and requirements to UN R48, minimum height of 250 mm above ground, downward orientation, and automatic deactivation within 1 second if vehicle speed exceeds 15 km/h. Work lamps require independent manual controls and a mandatory visual operating tell-tale. Annex 1 adds item 9.32. for work lamp approval documentation.

TF LUPC proposal based on UN R48 consolidate version from SLR-73-07/Rev.1 including LUPC-01-03. Adds new annex for Technical Provisions for Energy Status Indicator

Proposal for a supplement to the 06/07/08/09 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 48 and the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 148 concerning manufacturer logos in side-marker lamps. The proposal amends paragraph 5.5.5. of UN R48 to clarify that no restrictions apply to logos in side-marker lamps, and amends paragraph 4.5.5. of UN R148 to add side-marker lamps to the list of lamps that shall not incorporate a logo. The justification references ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2020/5/Rev.2.

Proposal to add VRU warning pattern requirements. Document presents data from accident databases showing pedestrian crossing conflicts represent the highest proportion of nighttime road accidents at approximately 32% with obstructions and 19% without. Limited visibility and restricted communication between drivers and VRUs necessitates an assistance function. A spotlight feature with a bright narrow beam pattern directed at hazardous VRUs, moving with the target and flashing to remind drivers while warning VRUs, received positive feedback from customer experience surveys

Proposal clarifies the “Manufacturer logo” means a light emitting graphic mark, emblem, word, or combination of those elements used to aid public identification of a vehicle manufacturer’s brand name when the function is switched ON. Improved justification for the proposal

Paper introduces an ADS marker lamp to identify vehicles operating with an Automated Driving System. Industry does not seek to mandate such a lamp. It identifies safety and security concerns including no demonstrated real-world net safety benefit, targeting and public violence risks, cargo robbery risks, child safeguarding concerns, cyber-physical attack surface expansion, and spoofing and misuse potential.

Presentation on visualisation of signals for help

Proposal to introduce a new “call for help” signal.

Proposal to clarify manufacturer logo requirements across several paragraphs: confirming that non-illuminated graphic marks are not considered logos (para. 2.1.7.); permitting vehicle manufacturers to keep the inner portion of a front position lamp active when an AFS headlamp substitutes the outer portion (para. 5.12.1.4.); improving logo language for Light Signalling Devices approved to UN R148 (para. 5.30.1.); and clarifying that Road Illumination Devices approved to UN R149 shall not include a manufacturer logo (para. 5.30.2.).

Proposal to clarify and modernize lamp installation and component requirements in UN R48 and UN R148 to address the growing variety of vehicle and lamp designs, particularly band/strip lamps extending across the full width of the vehicle. Key changes include: removing the “band/strip” terminology and expanding the definition of a pair of lamps to cover full-width designs; removing the three-device maximum for Y-lamps to ensure technology neutrality; adding a new paragraph §5.5.5 defining a pair as a two-lamp system; relocating light source requirements from UN R48 to UN R148 §4.7.3 to ensure at least one light source per side; removing the 0.8-metre minimum length requirement; and clarifying that definitions in §2.4.10 apply only to the relevant vehicle categories. Minor amendments to UN R148 include updated provisions for light source positioning, clarification of §4.8.1.3, and new sampling provisions in §4.8.11 for testing band/strip lamps. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-03.

Proposal to introduce selective yellow as an permitted alternative to white for front position lamps and daytime running lamps in UN R48 and UN R148. Studies confirm that selective yellow performs equally to white for oncoming vehicle recognition and speed estimation. Unlike historical filament lamp applications where a yellow filter reduced luminous intensity, modern LEDs achieve the same intensity levels without reduction. Specific amendments include: updating §5.15 to reflect selective yellow options and removing a duplicated front fog lamp requirement; amending §§6.9.7 and 6.19.7 to deactivate selective yellow position and daytime running lamps on the relevant side during direction indicator activation; and aligning UN R148 (01 series) by amending §§5.1.7, 5.4.7 and Annex 1 accordingly. The colour boundaries for selective yellow are already defined in §2.11.1.2 and require no amendment. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-05.

Proposal to exclude retro-reflective devices and markings from the requirement of “Red light to the front” and “White light to the rear”.

Proposal to align the Exterior Courtesy Lamps provisions of the 08 series amendments with those of the 09 series.

The European Cyclists Federation and International Federation of Pedestrians withhold support for Direction Indicator Projection (DIP) technology regulation. They contend available studies lack evidence of reduced conflicts or crashes in real-world conditions, raise concerns about behavioral adaptations that may redistribute rather than reduce risk, and note the technology does not address responsibility allocation where cyclists and pedestrians already have legal priority. Additional concerns include reliance on uncontrolled road surfaces affecting signal visibility and clarity, and risks of shifting safety burden onto vulnerable road users contrary to Safe System principles. They urge contracting parties to refrain from regulation pending robust research confirming the technology neither undermines priority rules nor introduces unintended behavioral risks.

Proposal to add work lamp definitions and requirements to UN R48, minimum height of 250 mm above ground, downward orientation, and automatic deactivation within 1 second if vehicle speed exceeds 15 km/h. Work lamps require independent manual controls and a mandatory visual operating tell-tale. Annex 1 adds item 9.32. for work lamp approval documentation.

TF LUPC proposal based on UN R48 consolidate version from SLR-73-07/Rev.1 including LUPC-01-03. Adds new annex for Technical Provisions for Energy Status Indicator

Proposal for a supplement to the 06/07/08/09 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 48 and the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 148 concerning manufacturer logos in side-marker lamps. The proposal amends paragraph 5.5.5. of UN R48 to clarify that no restrictions apply to logos in side-marker lamps, and amends paragraph 4.5.5. of UN R148 to add side-marker lamps to the list of lamps that shall not incorporate a logo. The justification references ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2020/5/Rev.2.

Proposal to add VRU warning pattern requirements. Document presents data from accident databases showing pedestrian crossing conflicts represent the highest proportion of nighttime road accidents at approximately 32% with obstructions and 19% without. Limited visibility and restricted communication between drivers and VRUs necessitates an assistance function. A spotlight feature with a bright narrow beam pattern directed at hazardous VRUs, moving with the target and flashing to remind drivers while warning VRUs, received positive feedback from customer experience surveys

Proposal clarifies the “Manufacturer logo” means a light emitting graphic mark, emblem, word, or combination of those elements used to aid public identification of a vehicle manufacturer’s brand name when the function is switched ON. Improved justification for the proposal

Paper introduces an ADS marker lamp to identify vehicles operating with an Automated Driving System. Industry does not seek to mandate such a lamp. It identifies safety and security concerns including no demonstrated real-world net safety benefit, targeting and public violence risks, cargo robbery risks, child safeguarding concerns, cyber-physical attack surface expansion, and spoofing and misuse potential.

Presentation on visualisation of signals for help

Proposal to introduce a new “call for help” signal.

Proposal to clarify manufacturer logo requirements across several paragraphs: confirming that non-illuminated graphic marks are not considered logos (para. 2.1.7.); permitting vehicle manufacturers to keep the inner portion of a front position lamp active when an AFS headlamp substitutes the outer portion (para. 5.12.1.4.); improving logo language for Light Signalling Devices approved to UN R148 (para. 5.30.1.); and clarifying that Road Illumination Devices approved to UN R149 shall not include a manufacturer logo (para. 5.30.2.).

Proposal to clarify and modernize lamp installation and component requirements in UN R48 and UN R148 to address the growing variety of vehicle and lamp designs, particularly band/strip lamps extending across the full width of the vehicle. Key changes include: removing the “band/strip” terminology and expanding the definition of a pair of lamps to cover full-width designs; removing the three-device maximum for Y-lamps to ensure technology neutrality; adding a new paragraph §5.5.5 defining a pair as a two-lamp system; relocating light source requirements from UN R48 to UN R148 §4.7.3 to ensure at least one light source per side; removing the 0.8-metre minimum length requirement; and clarifying that definitions in §2.4.10 apply only to the relevant vehicle categories. Minor amendments to UN R148 include updated provisions for light source positioning, clarification of §4.8.1.3, and new sampling provisions in §4.8.11 for testing band/strip lamps. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-03.

Proposal to introduce selective yellow as an permitted alternative to white for front position lamps and daytime running lamps in UN R48 and UN R148. Studies confirm that selective yellow performs equally to white for oncoming vehicle recognition and speed estimation. Unlike historical filament lamp applications where a yellow filter reduced luminous intensity, modern LEDs achieve the same intensity levels without reduction. Specific amendments include: updating §5.15 to reflect selective yellow options and removing a duplicated front fog lamp requirement; amending §§6.9.7 and 6.19.7 to deactivate selective yellow position and daytime running lamps on the relevant side during direction indicator activation; and aligning UN R148 (01 series) by amending §§5.1.7, 5.4.7 and Annex 1 accordingly. The colour boundaries for selective yellow are already defined in §2.11.1.2 and require no amendment. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-05.

Proposal to exclude retro-reflective devices and markings from the requirement of “Red light to the front” and “White light to the rear”.

Proposal to align the Exterior Courtesy Lamps provisions of the 08 series amendments with those of the 09 series.

The European Cyclists Federation and International Federation of Pedestrians withhold support for Direction Indicator Projection (DIP) technology regulation. They contend available studies lack evidence of reduced conflicts or crashes in real-world conditions, raise concerns about behavioral adaptations that may redistribute rather than reduce risk, and note the technology does not address responsibility allocation where cyclists and pedestrians already have legal priority. Additional concerns include reliance on uncontrolled road surfaces affecting signal visibility and clarity, and risks of shifting safety burden onto vulnerable road users contrary to Safe System principles. They urge contracting parties to refrain from regulation pending robust research confirming the technology neither undermines priority rules nor introduces unintended behavioral risks.

Proposal to add work lamp definitions and requirements to UN R48, minimum height of 250 mm above ground, downward orientation, and automatic deactivation within 1 second if vehicle speed exceeds 15 km/h. Work lamps require independent manual controls and a mandatory visual operating tell-tale. Annex 1 adds item 9.32. for work lamp approval documentation.

TF LUPC proposal based on UN R48 consolidate version from SLR-73-07/Rev.1 including LUPC-01-03. Adds new annex for Technical Provisions for Energy Status Indicator

Proposal for a supplement to the 06/07/08/09 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 48 and the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 148 concerning manufacturer logos in side-marker lamps. The proposal amends paragraph 5.5.5. of UN R48 to clarify that no restrictions apply to logos in side-marker lamps, and amends paragraph 4.5.5. of UN R148 to add side-marker lamps to the list of lamps that shall not incorporate a logo. The justification references ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2020/5/Rev.2.

Proposal to add VRU warning pattern requirements. Document presents data from accident databases showing pedestrian crossing conflicts represent the highest proportion of nighttime road accidents at approximately 32% with obstructions and 19% without. Limited visibility and restricted communication between drivers and VRUs necessitates an assistance function. A spotlight feature with a bright narrow beam pattern directed at hazardous VRUs, moving with the target and flashing to remind drivers while warning VRUs, received positive feedback from customer experience surveys

Proposal clarifies the “Manufacturer logo” means a light emitting graphic mark, emblem, word, or combination of those elements used to aid public identification of a vehicle manufacturer’s brand name when the function is switched ON. Improved justification for the proposal

Paper introduces an ADS marker lamp to identify vehicles operating with an Automated Driving System. Industry does not seek to mandate such a lamp. It identifies safety and security concerns including no demonstrated real-world net safety benefit, targeting and public violence risks, cargo robbery risks, child safeguarding concerns, cyber-physical attack surface expansion, and spoofing and misuse potential.

Presentation on visualisation of signals for help

Proposal to introduce a new “call for help” signal.

Proposal to clarify manufacturer logo requirements across several paragraphs: confirming that non-illuminated graphic marks are not considered logos (para. 2.1.7.); permitting vehicle manufacturers to keep the inner portion of a front position lamp active when an AFS headlamp substitutes the outer portion (para. 5.12.1.4.); improving logo language for Light Signalling Devices approved to UN R148 (para. 5.30.1.); and clarifying that Road Illumination Devices approved to UN R149 shall not include a manufacturer logo (para. 5.30.2.).

Proposal to clarify and modernize lamp installation and component requirements in UN R48 and UN R148 to address the growing variety of vehicle and lamp designs, particularly band/strip lamps extending across the full width of the vehicle. Key changes include: removing the “band/strip” terminology and expanding the definition of a pair of lamps to cover full-width designs; removing the three-device maximum for Y-lamps to ensure technology neutrality; adding a new paragraph §5.5.5 defining a pair as a two-lamp system; relocating light source requirements from UN R48 to UN R148 §4.7.3 to ensure at least one light source per side; removing the 0.8-metre minimum length requirement; and clarifying that definitions in §2.4.10 apply only to the relevant vehicle categories. Minor amendments to UN R148 include updated provisions for light source positioning, clarification of §4.8.1.3, and new sampling provisions in §4.8.11 for testing band/strip lamps. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-03.

Proposal to introduce selective yellow as an permitted alternative to white for front position lamps and daytime running lamps in UN R48 and UN R148. Studies confirm that selective yellow performs equally to white for oncoming vehicle recognition and speed estimation. Unlike historical filament lamp applications where a yellow filter reduced luminous intensity, modern LEDs achieve the same intensity levels without reduction. Specific amendments include: updating §5.15 to reflect selective yellow options and removing a duplicated front fog lamp requirement; amending §§6.9.7 and 6.19.7 to deactivate selective yellow position and daytime running lamps on the relevant side during direction indicator activation; and aligning UN R148 (01 series) by amending §§5.1.7, 5.4.7 and Annex 1 accordingly. The colour boundaries for selective yellow are already defined in §2.11.1.2 and require no amendment. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-05.

Proposal to exclude retro-reflective devices and markings from the requirement of “Red light to the front” and “White light to the rear”.

Proposal to align the Exterior Courtesy Lamps provisions of the 08 series amendments with those of the 09 series.

The European Cyclists Federation and International Federation of Pedestrians withhold support for Direction Indicator Projection (DIP) technology regulation. They contend available studies lack evidence of reduced conflicts or crashes in real-world conditions, raise concerns about behavioral adaptations that may redistribute rather than reduce risk, and note the technology does not address responsibility allocation where cyclists and pedestrians already have legal priority. Additional concerns include reliance on uncontrolled road surfaces affecting signal visibility and clarity, and risks of shifting safety burden onto vulnerable road users contrary to Safe System principles. They urge contracting parties to refrain from regulation pending robust research confirming the technology neither undermines priority rules nor introduces unintended behavioral risks.

Proposal to add work lamp definitions and requirements to UN R48, minimum height of 250 mm above ground, downward orientation, and automatic deactivation within 1 second if vehicle speed exceeds 15 km/h. Work lamps require independent manual controls and a mandatory visual operating tell-tale. Annex 1 adds item 9.32. for work lamp approval documentation.

TF LUPC proposal based on UN R48 consolidate version from SLR-73-07/Rev.1 including LUPC-01-03. Adds new annex for Technical Provisions for Energy Status Indicator

Proposal for a supplement to the 06/07/08/09 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 48 and the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 148 concerning manufacturer logos in side-marker lamps. The proposal amends paragraph 5.5.5. of UN R48 to clarify that no restrictions apply to logos in side-marker lamps, and amends paragraph 4.5.5. of UN R148 to add side-marker lamps to the list of lamps that shall not incorporate a logo. The justification references ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2020/5/Rev.2.

Proposal to add VRU warning pattern requirements. Document presents data from accident databases showing pedestrian crossing conflicts represent the highest proportion of nighttime road accidents at approximately 32% with obstructions and 19% without. Limited visibility and restricted communication between drivers and VRUs necessitates an assistance function. A spotlight feature with a bright narrow beam pattern directed at hazardous VRUs, moving with the target and flashing to remind drivers while warning VRUs, received positive feedback from customer experience surveys

Proposal clarifies the “Manufacturer logo” means a light emitting graphic mark, emblem, word, or combination of those elements used to aid public identification of a vehicle manufacturer’s brand name when the function is switched ON. Improved justification for the proposal

Paper introduces an ADS marker lamp to identify vehicles operating with an Automated Driving System. Industry does not seek to mandate such a lamp. It identifies safety and security concerns including no demonstrated real-world net safety benefit, targeting and public violence risks, cargo robbery risks, child safeguarding concerns, cyber-physical attack surface expansion, and spoofing and misuse potential.

Presentation on visualisation of signals for help

Proposal to introduce a new “call for help” signal.

Proposal to clarify manufacturer logo requirements across several paragraphs: confirming that non-illuminated graphic marks are not considered logos (para. 2.1.7.); permitting vehicle manufacturers to keep the inner portion of a front position lamp active when an AFS headlamp substitutes the outer portion (para. 5.12.1.4.); improving logo language for Light Signalling Devices approved to UN R148 (para. 5.30.1.); and clarifying that Road Illumination Devices approved to UN R149 shall not include a manufacturer logo (para. 5.30.2.).

Proposal to clarify and modernize lamp installation and component requirements in UN R48 and UN R148 to address the growing variety of vehicle and lamp designs, particularly band/strip lamps extending across the full width of the vehicle. Key changes include: removing the “band/strip” terminology and expanding the definition of a pair of lamps to cover full-width designs; removing the three-device maximum for Y-lamps to ensure technology neutrality; adding a new paragraph §5.5.5 defining a pair as a two-lamp system; relocating light source requirements from UN R48 to UN R148 §4.7.3 to ensure at least one light source per side; removing the 0.8-metre minimum length requirement; and clarifying that definitions in §2.4.10 apply only to the relevant vehicle categories. Minor amendments to UN R148 include updated provisions for light source positioning, clarification of §4.8.1.3, and new sampling provisions in §4.8.11 for testing band/strip lamps. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-03.

Proposal to introduce selective yellow as an permitted alternative to white for front position lamps and daytime running lamps in UN R48 and UN R148. Studies confirm that selective yellow performs equally to white for oncoming vehicle recognition and speed estimation. Unlike historical filament lamp applications where a yellow filter reduced luminous intensity, modern LEDs achieve the same intensity levels without reduction. Specific amendments include: updating §5.15 to reflect selective yellow options and removing a duplicated front fog lamp requirement; amending §§6.9.7 and 6.19.7 to deactivate selective yellow position and daytime running lamps on the relevant side during direction indicator activation; and aligning UN R148 (01 series) by amending §§5.1.7, 5.4.7 and Annex 1 accordingly. The colour boundaries for selective yellow are already defined in §2.11.1.2 and require no amendment. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-05.

Proposal to exclude retro-reflective devices and markings from the requirement of “Red light to the front” and “White light to the rear”.

Proposal to align the Exterior Courtesy Lamps provisions of the 08 series amendments with those of the 09 series.

The European Cyclists Federation and International Federation of Pedestrians withhold support for Direction Indicator Projection (DIP) technology regulation. They contend available studies lack evidence of reduced conflicts or crashes in real-world conditions, raise concerns about behavioral adaptations that may redistribute rather than reduce risk, and note the technology does not address responsibility allocation where cyclists and pedestrians already have legal priority. Additional concerns include reliance on uncontrolled road surfaces affecting signal visibility and clarity, and risks of shifting safety burden onto vulnerable road users contrary to Safe System principles. They urge contracting parties to refrain from regulation pending robust research confirming the technology neither undermines priority rules nor introduces unintended behavioral risks.

Proposal to add work lamp definitions and requirements to UN R48, minimum height of 250 mm above ground, downward orientation, and automatic deactivation within 1 second if vehicle speed exceeds 15 km/h. Work lamps require independent manual controls and a mandatory visual operating tell-tale. Annex 1 adds item 9.32. for work lamp approval documentation.

TF LUPC proposal based on UN R48 consolidate version from SLR-73-07/Rev.1 including LUPC-01-03. Adds new annex for Technical Provisions for Energy Status Indicator

Proposal for a supplement to the 06/07/08/09 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 48 and the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 148 concerning manufacturer logos in side-marker lamps. The proposal amends paragraph 5.5.5. of UN R48 to clarify that no restrictions apply to logos in side-marker lamps, and amends paragraph 4.5.5. of UN R148 to add side-marker lamps to the list of lamps that shall not incorporate a logo. The justification references ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2020/5/Rev.2.

Proposal to add VRU warning pattern requirements. Document presents data from accident databases showing pedestrian crossing conflicts represent the highest proportion of nighttime road accidents at approximately 32% with obstructions and 19% without. Limited visibility and restricted communication between drivers and VRUs necessitates an assistance function. A spotlight feature with a bright narrow beam pattern directed at hazardous VRUs, moving with the target and flashing to remind drivers while warning VRUs, received positive feedback from customer experience surveys

Proposal clarifies the “Manufacturer logo” means a light emitting graphic mark, emblem, word, or combination of those elements used to aid public identification of a vehicle manufacturer’s brand name when the function is switched ON. Improved justification for the proposal

Paper introduces an ADS marker lamp to identify vehicles operating with an Automated Driving System. Industry does not seek to mandate such a lamp. It identifies safety and security concerns including no demonstrated real-world net safety benefit, targeting and public violence risks, cargo robbery risks, child safeguarding concerns, cyber-physical attack surface expansion, and spoofing and misuse potential.

Presentation on visualisation of signals for help

Proposal to introduce a new “call for help” signal.

Proposal to clarify manufacturer logo requirements across several paragraphs: confirming that non-illuminated graphic marks are not considered logos (para. 2.1.7.); permitting vehicle manufacturers to keep the inner portion of a front position lamp active when an AFS headlamp substitutes the outer portion (para. 5.12.1.4.); improving logo language for Light Signalling Devices approved to UN R148 (para. 5.30.1.); and clarifying that Road Illumination Devices approved to UN R149 shall not include a manufacturer logo (para. 5.30.2.).

Proposal to clarify and modernize lamp installation and component requirements in UN R48 and UN R148 to address the growing variety of vehicle and lamp designs, particularly band/strip lamps extending across the full width of the vehicle. Key changes include: removing the “band/strip” terminology and expanding the definition of a pair of lamps to cover full-width designs; removing the three-device maximum for Y-lamps to ensure technology neutrality; adding a new paragraph §5.5.5 defining a pair as a two-lamp system; relocating light source requirements from UN R48 to UN R148 §4.7.3 to ensure at least one light source per side; removing the 0.8-metre minimum length requirement; and clarifying that definitions in §2.4.10 apply only to the relevant vehicle categories. Minor amendments to UN R148 include updated provisions for light source positioning, clarification of §4.8.1.3, and new sampling provisions in §4.8.11 for testing band/strip lamps. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-03.

Proposal to introduce selective yellow as an permitted alternative to white for front position lamps and daytime running lamps in UN R48 and UN R148. Studies confirm that selective yellow performs equally to white for oncoming vehicle recognition and speed estimation. Unlike historical filament lamp applications where a yellow filter reduced luminous intensity, modern LEDs achieve the same intensity levels without reduction. Specific amendments include: updating §5.15 to reflect selective yellow options and removing a duplicated front fog lamp requirement; amending §§6.9.7 and 6.19.7 to deactivate selective yellow position and daytime running lamps on the relevant side during direction indicator activation; and aligning UN R148 (01 series) by amending §§5.1.7, 5.4.7 and Annex 1 accordingly. The colour boundaries for selective yellow are already defined in §2.11.1.2 and require no amendment. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-05.