The 22nd ADS IWG session will be held in central Sydney, Australia, from 6-9 October. The meeting facility will be confirmed soon.

Proposal to:

• Add microsleep detection capability to DDAW systems,
• Require DDAW or equivalent monitoring when partial automation is active,
• Define broader driving conditions for effective operation including unmarked roads and direct lighting,
• Establish DDAW functionality under driver occlusions such as sunglasses,
• Set requirements for drowsiness warnings and acknowledgement by drivers,
• Enhance test methodology including continuation after first warning and demographic diversity,
• Establish mandatory drowsiness warning threshold at KSS level 8 with optional soft warnings at KSS levels 6–7,
• Introduce time-based penalties for delayed detection of drowsiness,
• Include specificity and positive predictive value as performance metrics.

Summary of research findings from DDADWS meetings 8 and 9 concerning driver drowsiness detection and warning systems. Topics covered include fatigue contributing to 15–30% of road crashes, the safety-critical nature of KSS levels 8 and 9, distinguishing drowsiness from microsleep events, eye-closure behaviour as a practical detection tool with 2-second minimum duration criteria removing 85% of false positives while preserving 90% of true positives, KSS as a validation reference measure, testing environments including simulators and on-road conditions, system performance metrics, observable signs of drowsy driving including lane deviations and ocular indicators, participant demographics and state, ensuring valid drowsiness testing, warning effectiveness and escalation strategies, and evidence-based design factors for drowsiness warnings.

Proposal to develop a mandatory, testable microsleep detection and warning capability for the 01 series. Microsleep is a brief loss of consciousness indicated by 1–3 second eye closure that presents an immediate and significant road safety risk. The system should detect eye closure over time, use supporting cues such as neck droop or body slump to confirm events, and provide a dedicated and appropriately forceful warning strategy. Detection logic may use primary criteria such as >95% eye closure for >2.5 seconds or combined criteria such as >85% eye closure for >1.8 seconds plus neck droop or body slump. Testing pathways include controlled simulation with deliberate eye-closure events and fatigued-driver testing to observe genuine microsleep events.

Presentation on maintaining effective drowsiness monitoring when Driver Control Assistance System (DCAS) is active. A DDAW system using indirect means cannot effectively assess driver drowsiness when the driver is not nominally required to steer, brake, or accelerate. Hands-on or eyes-on engagement does not establish alertness. Either the DDAW system or an alternate system should meet prescribed DDAW system performance while DCAS is active, with no gap in coverage or performance. UN R171 02 series amendments do not prescribe DDAW-equivalent performance criteria for drowsiness determination.

Proposal to expand minimum operating conditions for driver drowsiness and attention warning systems to include roads with absent or significantly faded lane markings requiring road-edge detection capability, strong direct light directed towards driver-facing and road-facing sensors, and cabin temperature and humidity conditions prone to causing camera fogging. The proposal applies technology-neutral consolidated performance requirements rather than distinguishing between direct and indirect system means. Data from Australian and Great Britain road networks show that the majority of road fatalities occur in rural areas on roads often unmarked or with degraded markings, and road-edge detection is already technically available and demonstrated by vehicles tested under ANCAP protocols.

Presentation summarising proposal 5 on drowsiness warnings acknowledgement. The 00 series permits warnings to cascade and intensify until driver acknowledgement but does not clearly prescribe acceptable driver actions or subsequent system response. Acknowledgement does not remove drowsiness risk. Proposal seeks to define acceptable acknowledgement actions, require continuous monitoring after acknowledgement, and mandate renewed warnings when safety conditions persist or return within a maximum time-period. Microsleep warnings must not be muted through acknowledgement of drowsiness warnings.

Presentation on proposal 6 summarising enhancements to DDAW system test methodology. Proposes setting clearer requirements for participant selection, pre-conditioning, repeated testing of each participant, continuation of testing after the first true positive warning, and capture and treatment of near-crash events. Addresses existing limitations including narrow participant coverage, limited lighting conditions, testing that ends after the first true positive, and exclusion of false negatives during learning phases. Proposes mandatory methodology for representative evidence including minimum test runs per participant, broader demographic and physical characteristic representation, fatigued and rested participant preparation, near-crash event capture, and shorter learning periods. Notes the interconnectedness to other 01 series proposals including drowsiness threshold, false negative classification, operating conditions, and performance metrics.

Proposal to distinguish optional early information from mandatory warning thresholds by allowing optional soft information at Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) levels 6–7 and requiring mandatory hard warnings at KSS 8 or above. The proposal sets one mandatory threshold for warning classification and performance criteria, allowing visual advisory messages with limited audible tone at KSS 6–7 without driver acknowledgement required, and requiring clear visual indicators, audible warnings with minimum duration and volume, and haptic escalation at KSS 8 or above. Hard warnings would be subject to validation testing for sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value classification.

Proposal to record successive false negative events for each interval where the driver remains at or above Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) 8 and no warning is given, after a defined grace period of [X] minutes following the initial false negative. Currently, under the 00 series of UN R182, only one false negative is recorded per KSS transition, regardless of warning delay duration. The proposal introduces a time-based penalty to penalise delayed detection and make sensitivity metrics better reflect actual system performance.

Proposal to include specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) as complementary performance metrics in the 01 series alongside sensitivity. Specificity measures how well the system avoids warning non-drowsy drivers; PPV measures how often a warning corresponds to genuine drowsiness. Both metrics address the false-positive burden not adequately shown by the 00 series, which focuses on sensitivity alone. Separate criteria should be set for drowsiness monitoring and microsleep detection, developed together with revised test methodology rather than simply added to the existing methodology.

The initial regulations for Driver Drowsiness and Attention Warning and Advanced Driver Distraction Warning systems were adopted at GRSG-130 and WP.29-198. DDADWS is developing 01 series regulations, with workshops and online meetings planned. The group seeks a mandate extension to October 2028 to complete 01 series development, with proposed submission for approval to GRSG-136.

Proposal to extend the mandate of the DDADWS informal group until October 2028 to enable development of new (01) series of amendments to the original texts of the driver drowsiness and driver distraction warning systems regulations.

Proposal to correct cross-references in UN R73. The amendments modify paragraphs 12.1, 15.1, and Annex 3, paragraph 2.4 to replace incorrect paragraph citations with accurate ones. The corrections address invalid references that do not exist or lack contextual relevance. The changes do not increase requirement stringency.

Proposal to correct cross-references in UN R73. The document amends paragraphs 12.1, 15.1, and Annex 3 paragraph 2.4 to correct invalid or non-existent paragraph references. Changes include updating references from paragraphs 12.4.4 and 15.2.4 to 12.4.2/3 and 15.2.2/3 respectively, and replacing the non-existent paragraph 2.8 reference with paragraph 12.10. The corrections do not increase requirement stringency.

Status report on the IWG on Driver Drowsiness and Distraction Warning Systems. The IWG is developing new regulations for vehicles of categories M and N, specifically a Driver Drowsiness and Attention Warning system and an Advanced Driver Distraction Warning system. Nine hybrid meetings and four online meetings have been held. The next meeting is scheduled for 5–7 October 2026 in London to confirm priorities for the 01 series DDAW system regulation and discuss key technical requirements. GRSG adoption of both the DDAW and ADDW system regulations is targeted for October 2028, with WP.29 adoption in March 2029.

Proposal to amend para. 2.12. to replace the reference to ISO [CD] 19206-4 with ISO 19206-4:2020 and specify an adult bicyclist target, and amend para. 5.3.2. to replace the reference to ISO [CD] 19206-4:2018 with ISO 19206-4:2020, clarify requirements for demonstrating BSIS performance for smaller bicycles and smaller bicyclists differing by up to 36 per cent from nominal dimensions for the adult bicyclist target through physical testing using a child bicyclist target, simulation sufficiently validated by physical testing, or another documented means sufficiently valid and accurate to establish BSIS performance for a child bicyclist target.

Proposal to amend UN R73 to correct paragraph references:

• Amend para. 12.1. to correct paragraph references from 12.4.3. and 12.4.4. to 12.4.2. and 12.4.3.,
• Amend para. 15.1. to correct paragraph references from 15.2.3. and 15.2.4. to 15.2.2. and 15.2.3.,
• Amend Annex 3, para. 2.4. to correct the paragraph reference from 2.8. to 12.10. and insert clarifying language [of this regulation].

Australia proposes examining the case to bring UN R95 in line with Euro NCAP by establishing an ad-hoc group of interested experts to consider a more representative test barrier and dummy, allow flexibility to update Euro NCAP protocols, further consider alternative or additional equitable dummy choice and addition of a near-side rear occupant to UN R95, and examine more advanced barriers with improved dummy bio-fidelity and alternative injury assessment.

Proposal to correct errors in the text of the 02 series and its supplements.

Proposal to increase the usability and safety of the ELKS and to align the technical requirements with technological progress:

• Ensure that an ELKS is not adversely affected by magnetic or electrical fields
• Clarify when the system shall automatically deactivate to prevent unintended consequences, which should be at least detailed in the vehicle’s operating instructions as a minimum
• Include dashed lane markings for CDCF and road edges for ELKS, ensuring all systems fitted meet the highest safety standards and utilise the latest technology to prevent unintended lane departures 1
• Include the latest lane markings located in Annex 3 to UN Regulation 130. This is important as the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation 130
  includes Australian lane markings, ensuring compatibility
• Eliminate the option for an acoustic warning for LDWS to reduce confusion with the CDCF intervention acoustic warning required in paragraph 6.6.4.
• Correct minor grammatical errors
• Enhance usability by establishing system response limits, where recent research has highlighted the prevalence of consumers turning these lifesaving systems off
• Ensure consistent and repeatable testing.

Proposal to:

1. Clarify that the PBC values listed in para. 2.14. are minimum values,
2. Align the collision-warning requirements of para. 5.2.1.1. with those for the pedestrian and bicycle scenarios under paras. 5.2.2.1 and 5.2.3.1., and
3. Clarify para. 5.2.1.2. based on feedback from a recent public consultation in Australia.

Proposal to remove para. 5.2.1.2. titled “Emergency braking” and delete the corresponding justification text “Update to paragraph 5.2.1.2.” At the January 2026 GRVA, it was agreed not to proceed with an amendment proposed to para. 5.2.1.2. The current proposal GRVA/2026/21 does not reflect the discussions from the previous session of GRVA.

Amends para. 5.3. to insert requirements that ELKS effectiveness shall not be adversely affected by magnetic or electrical fields, demonstrated through UN Regulation No. 10 (06 or later) series; para. 6.2.2.1. to require vehicle operating instructions include situations where ELKS is automatically deactivated; para. 6.5.2., 7.2.1., and 8.2.1. to reference UN Regulation No. 130 in its 01 series of amendments; para. 7.2.2.3. to insert “(the latest occurring warning)”; para. 8.3.3.1. to reference para. 6.6.2.1.; and inserts para. 14. establishing transitional provisions applicable from entry into force until 1 September 2030.

Proposal to introduce clarifications and references to lane markings and ELKS provisions:

• Include ELKS effectiveness not be adversely affected by magnetic or electrical fields per UN R10 05 series
• Vehicle operating instructions include situations where ELKS is automatically deactivated
• Reference lane markings in UN R130 01 series amendments in paragraphs 6.5.2, 6.6.2.1, 7.2.1, and 8.2.1
• Amend tyre pressure and warning threshold test procedures
• Insert transitional provisions (May 2027-May 2029)

Proposal to amend paragraph 2.14. to clarify that road surface friction coefficient of at least the specified Peak Braking Coefficient represents minimum values; amend paragraph 5.2.1.1. to align collision warning requirements with pedestrian and bicycle scenarios, requiring collision warning no later than 0.8 seconds before emergency braking or at braking start if anticipation time is insufficient; amend paragraph 5.2.1.2. to clarify that emergency braking involves a braking demand of at least 5.0 m/s² to the service braking system, permitting higher demands during collision warning for short durations.

Proposal to amend paragraph 5.4.2.3. of the 01 series of amendments and the original version to UN R152 to require at least two deliberate actions by the driver where automatic deactivation of the AEBS function is a consequence of the driver manually switching off the ESC function of the vehicle. Footnotes 2 to 8 in the 01 series are renumbered to accurately reference correct footnotes. This revision addresses GRVA-24-04.

Proposal to amend Annex 4 Table 1 to modify the Vulnerable road user secondary safety system warning indicator status data element to record interval -1.1 to 0 sec, modify the VRU Accident emergency call system status data element to recording interval 0-300 ms or 0 to end of event time plus 30 ms whichever is shorter, add Advanced driver distraction warning (ADDW) status as mandatory with On and Off values for Planar, VRU, Rollover, and AEBS events, add ADDW time since warning issued as mandatory with 0 to 240 sec range and +/-1% accuracy at 1 sec resolution, add Driver control assistance system driver monitoring system time since disengagement warning issued as mandatory with 0 to 1000 sec or 0 to 240 sec range and +/-1% accuracy at 1 sec resolution, add Driver drowsiness and attention warning (DDAW) status as mandatory with On and Off values for Planar, VRU, Rollover, and AEBS events, and add DDAW time since warning issued as mandatory with 0 to 60 min or 0 to 600 seconds range, +/-1% accuracy, and 1 min or 1 sec resolution.