UN R129: Proposal for draft Corrigendum 3 (Russian text only)
(Russia)
UN R129: Proposal for draft Corrigendum 3 (Russian text only)
|
Description
|
English wording “Upper neck tension force” corresponds to the following Russian wording “Сжимающая сила верхней части шеи”. English wording “Upper neck flexion moment” corresponds to the following Russian wording “Изгибающий момент верхней части шеи”.
|
Submitted by: Russia
|
Date: 18 Oct 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
WP.29/2019/58 | UN R129: Proposal for Corrigendum 3 (Russian only)
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
36. The expert from the Russian Federation introduced GRSP-64-01 to align the Russian text with the English version. The expert from France introduced a similar proposal (GRSP-64-11) to align the French text. GRSP adopted GRSP-64-01 and GRSP-64-11 as reproduced in Annex V to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit GRSP-64-01 as draft Corrigendum 3 to the original text of UN Regulation No. 129 and GRSP-64-11 as draft Corrigendum 1 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
GRSP-64-01
|
19 Oct 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
English wording “Upper neck tension force” corresponds to the following Russian wording “Сжимающая сила верхней части шеи”. English wording “Upper neck flexion moment” corresponds to the following Russian wording “Изгибающий момент верхней части шеи”.
|
GRSP-64-0001
|
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 9 to the 00 series of amendments
(Spain)
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 9 to the 00 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy.
|
Submitted by: Spain
|
Date: 11 Dec 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/19 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 8 to the 00 series of amendments
GRSP-64-06 | UN R129: D-E Plane Assessment Explanatory notes related to formal documents GRSP/2018/19 to 22
WP.29/2019/37 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 9 to the original series of amendments
WP.29/2019/38 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
29. The expert from Spain introduced GRSP-64-06, GRSP-64-02-Rev.1, GRSP-64-03-Rev.1, GRSP-64-04-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-05-Rev.1 which aimed at providing better provisions for the dummy’s head displacement when surpassing the reference plane DE during frontal and rear impact tests of forward facing Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS). She explained that these documents were revised proposals and have already been introduced at the May 2018 session of GRSP (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/63, para. 33) to provide better rationales for the sled test. GRSP adopted GRSP-64-02-Rev.1, GRSP-64-03-Rev.1, GRSP-64-04-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-05-Rev.1 as reproduced in Annex V to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit GRSP-64-02-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 9 to the original version of UN Regulation No. 129, GRSP-64-03-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments, GRSP-64-04-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments and GRSP-64-05-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
33. The expert from Spain introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/19, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/20, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/21 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/22 aimed at providing better provisions for the dummy’s head displacement when surpassing the reference plane DE during frontal and rear impact tests of forward facing Enhanced Child Restraint Systems. The expert from Germany argued that the current text of the UN Regulation prevented the contact of the head. He added that dummies have performance limits and that in this context these limitations would not affect the test results. The GRSP Chair requested the expert from Spain to provide better rationales for the sled test and to clarify if her proposals also referred to vehicle tests. GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its December 2018 session.
|
GRSP-64-02/Rev.1
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy.
|
GRSP-64-0002/Rev.1
|
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments
(Spain)
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy.
|
Submitted by: Spain
|
Date: 11 Dec 18
|
Status: Approved by GR
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/20 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 01 series of amendments
GRSP-64-06 | UN R129: D-E Plane Assessment Explanatory notes related to formal documents GRSP/2018/19 to 22
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
29. The expert from Spain introduced GRSP-64-06, GRSP-64-02-Rev.1, GRSP-64-03-Rev.1, GRSP-64-04-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-05-Rev.1 which aimed at providing better provisions for the dummy’s head displacement when surpassing the reference plane DE during frontal and rear impact tests of forward facing Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS). She explained that these documents were revised proposals and have already been introduced at the May 2018 session of GRSP (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/63, para. 33) to provide better rationales for the sled test. GRSP adopted GRSP-64-02-Rev.1, GRSP-64-03-Rev.1, GRSP-64-04-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-05-Rev.1 as reproduced in Annex V to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit GRSP-64-02-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 9 to the original version of UN Regulation No. 129, GRSP-64-03-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments, GRSP-64-04-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments and GRSP-64-05-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
33. The expert from Spain introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/19, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/20, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/21 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/22 aimed at providing better provisions for the dummy’s head displacement when surpassing the reference plane DE during frontal and rear impact tests of forward facing Enhanced Child Restraint Systems. The expert from Germany argued that the current text of the UN Regulation prevented the contact of the head. He added that dummies have performance limits and that in this context these limitations would not affect the test results. The GRSP Chair requested the expert from Spain to provide better rationales for the sled test and to clarify if her proposals also referred to vehicle tests. GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its December 2018 session.
|
GRSP-64-03/Rev.1
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy.
|
GRSP-64-0003/Rev.1
|
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
(Spain)
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy.
|
Submitted by: Spain
|
Date: 11 Dec 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/21 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 4 to the 02 series of amendments
GRSP-64-06 | UN R129: D-E Plane Assessment Explanatory notes related to formal documents GRSP/2018/19 to 22
WP.29/2019/39 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
29. The expert from Spain introduced GRSP-64-06, GRSP-64-02-Rev.1, GRSP-64-03-Rev.1, GRSP-64-04-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-05-Rev.1 which aimed at providing better provisions for the dummy’s head displacement when surpassing the reference plane DE during frontal and rear impact tests of forward facing Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS). She explained that these documents were revised proposals and have already been introduced at the May 2018 session of GRSP (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/63, para. 33) to provide better rationales for the sled test. GRSP adopted GRSP-64-02-Rev.1, GRSP-64-03-Rev.1, GRSP-64-04-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-05-Rev.1 as reproduced in Annex V to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit GRSP-64-02-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 9 to the original version of UN Regulation No. 129, GRSP-64-03-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments, GRSP-64-04-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments and GRSP-64-05-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
33. The expert from Spain introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/19, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/20, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/21 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/22 aimed at providing better provisions for the dummy’s head displacement when surpassing the reference plane DE during frontal and rear impact tests of forward facing Enhanced Child Restraint Systems. The expert from Germany argued that the current text of the UN Regulation prevented the contact of the head. He added that dummies have performance limits and that in this context these limitations would not affect the test results. The GRSP Chair requested the expert from Spain to provide better rationales for the sled test and to clarify if her proposals also referred to vehicle tests. GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its December 2018 session.
|
GRSP-64-04/Rev.1
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy.
|
GRSP-64-0004/Rev.1
|
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
(Spain)
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy.
|
Submitted by: Spain
|
Date: 11 Dec 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/22 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 03 series of amendments
GRSP-64-06 | UN R129: D-E Plane Assessment Explanatory notes related to formal documents GRSP/2018/19 to 22
WP.29/2019/40 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
29. The expert from Spain introduced GRSP-64-06, GRSP-64-02-Rev.1, GRSP-64-03-Rev.1, GRSP-64-04-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-05-Rev.1 which aimed at providing better provisions for the dummy’s head displacement when surpassing the reference plane DE during frontal and rear impact tests of forward facing Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS). She explained that these documents were revised proposals and have already been introduced at the May 2018 session of GRSP (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/63, para. 33) to provide better rationales for the sled test. GRSP adopted GRSP-64-02-Rev.1, GRSP-64-03-Rev.1, GRSP-64-04-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-05-Rev.1 as reproduced in Annex V to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit GRSP-64-02-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 9 to the original version of UN Regulation No. 129, GRSP-64-03-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments, GRSP-64-04-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments and GRSP-64-05-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
33. The expert from Spain introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/19, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/20, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/21 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/22 aimed at providing better provisions for the dummy’s head displacement when surpassing the reference plane DE during frontal and rear impact tests of forward facing Enhanced Child Restraint Systems. The expert from Germany argued that the current text of the UN Regulation prevented the contact of the head. He added that dummies have performance limits and that in this context these limitations would not affect the test results. The GRSP Chair requested the expert from Spain to provide better rationales for the sled test and to clarify if her proposals also referred to vehicle tests. GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its December 2018 session.
|
GRSP-64-05/Rev.1
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy.
|
GRSP-64-0005/Rev.1
|
UN R129: D-E Plane Assessment Explanatory notes related to formal documents GRSP/2018/19 to 22
(Spain)
UN R129: D-E Plane Assessment Explanatory notes related to formal documents GRSP/2018/19 to 22
|
Description
|
Explanatory notes related to formal documents GRSP/2018/ 19 through 22 (superseded by informal documents GRSP-64-02 to GRSP-64-05) submitted by Spain for the 63rd GRSP session.
|
Submitted by: Spain
|
Date: 28 Nov 18
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/19 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 8 to the 00 series of amendments
GRSP/2018/20 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 01 series of amendments
GRSP/2018/21 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 4 to the 02 series of amendments
GRSP/2018/22 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 03 series of amendments
GRSP-64-02/Rev.1 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 9 to the 00 series of amendments
GRSP-64-03/Rev.1 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments
GRSP-64-04/Rev.1 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
GRSP-64-05/Rev.1 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
29. The expert from Spain introduced GRSP-64-06, GRSP-64-02-Rev.1, GRSP-64-03-Rev.1, GRSP-64-04-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-05-Rev.1 which aimed at providing better provisions for the dummy’s head displacement when surpassing the reference plane DE during frontal and rear impact tests of forward facing Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS). She explained that these documents were revised proposals and have already been introduced at the May 2018 session of GRSP (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/63, para. 33) to provide better rationales for the sled test. GRSP adopted GRSP-64-02-Rev.1, GRSP-64-03-Rev.1, GRSP-64-04-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-05-Rev.1 as reproduced in Annex V to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit GRSP-64-02-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 9 to the original version of UN Regulation No. 129, GRSP-64-03-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments, GRSP-64-04-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments and GRSP-64-05-Rev.1 as draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
33. The expert from Spain introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/19, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/20, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/21 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/22 aimed at providing better provisions for the dummy’s head displacement when surpassing the reference plane DE during frontal and rear impact tests of forward facing Enhanced Child Restraint Systems. The expert from Germany argued that the current text of the UN Regulation prevented the contact of the head. He added that dummies have performance limits and that in this context these limitations would not affect the test results. The GRSP Chair requested the expert from Spain to provide better rationales for the sled test and to clarify if her proposals also referred to vehicle tests. GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its December 2018 session.
|
GRSP-64-06
|
30 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Explanatory notes related to formal documents GRSP/2018/ 19 through 22 (superseded by informal documents GRSP-64-02 to GRSP-64-05) submitted by Spain for the 63rd GRSP session.
|
GRSP-64-0006
|
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
(Spain)
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to modify the approval markings: - specify the dimensions of the approval number
- update i-Size universal ISOFIX, Specific Vehicle ISOFIX, i-Size Booster seat and Specific Vehicle Booster seat numbering (omitted in WP29-2018-045)
- rearrange the dimensions mark for arrangements of the approval mark where used in combination with the module mark
- change the 145 cm stature of the Specific Vehicle Booster seat to 150 cm stature as this is the correct upper limit.
|
Submitted by: Spain
|
Date: 28 Nov 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP-64-10 | UN R129: Explanatory notes on the proposals to update approval mark arrangements
WP.29/2019/40 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
30. The expert from Spain also introduced GRSP-64-10 to present GRSP-64-07, GRSP-64-08-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-09 which aimed at updating the arrangements of the approval mark. GRSP adopted GRSP-64-07, GRSP-64-08-Rev.1, GRSP-64-09 and GRSP-64-31 as reproduced in Annex V to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit GRSP-64-08-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-31 as part of (see para. 29) draft Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments, GRSP-64-07 and GRSP-64-09 as part of (see para. 29) draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
GRSP-64-07
|
30 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to modify the approval markings:<ul><li>specify the dimensions of the approval number</li><li>update i-Size universal ISOFIX, Specific Vehicle ISOFIX, i-Size Booster seat and Specific Vehicle Booster seat numbering (omitted in WP29-2018-045)</li><li>rearrange the dimensions mark for arrangements of the approval mark where used in combination with the module mark</li><li>change the 145 cm stature of the Specific Vehicle Booster seat to 150 cm stature as this is the correct upper limit.</li></ul>
|
GRSP-64-0007
|
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
(Spain)
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to modify the approval markings for consistency between technical services and approval authorities and between the labels of products approved under the 02 and 03 series. Combinations of approval marks can be made as long as the categories are able to be combined (category-wise as given in paragraph 3.2.2 and as long as it is one approval number). By combining approval marks, space on the Enhanced Child Restraint can be saved and more space is available for clear installation and use instructions. The current layout of the module label in UN R129.02 is technically impossible because the example provides a rectangular shape, with the module and base placed next to each other and joined with a plus mark while the given symbols are on top of each other and joined with an arrow mark.
|
Submitted by: Spain
|
Date: 12 Dec 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP-64-10 | UN R129: Explanatory notes on the proposals to update approval mark arrangements
WP.29/2019/39 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
30. The expert from Spain also introduced GRSP-64-10 to present GRSP-64-07, GRSP-64-08-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-09 which aimed at updating the arrangements of the approval mark. GRSP adopted GRSP-64-07, GRSP-64-08-Rev.1, GRSP-64-09 and GRSP-64-31 as reproduced in Annex V to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit GRSP-64-08-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-31 as part of (see para. 29) draft Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments, GRSP-64-07 and GRSP-64-09 as part of (see para. 29) draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
GRSP-64-08/Rev.1
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to modify the approval markings for consistency between technical services and approval authorities and between the labels of products approved under the 02 and 03 series. Combinations of approval marks can be made as long as the categories are able to be combined (category-wise as given in paragraph 3.2.2 and as long as it is one approval number). By combining approval marks, space on the Enhanced Child Restraint can be saved and more space is available for clear installation and use instructions. The current layout of the module label in UN R129.02 is technically impossible because the example provides a rectangular shape, with the module and base placed next to each other and joined with a plus mark while the given symbols are on top of each other and joined with an arrow mark.
|
GRSP-64-0008/Rev.1
|
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
(Spain)
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to modify the approval markings for consistency between technical services and approval authorities and between the labels of products approved under the 02 and 03 series. Combinations of approval marks can be made as long as the categories are able to be combined (category-wise as given in paragraph 3.2.2 and as long as it is one approval number). By combining approval marks, space on the Enhanced Child Restraint can be saved and more space is available for clear installation and use instructions.
|
Submitted by: Spain
|
Date: 28 Nov 18
|
Status: Approved by GR
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP-64-10 | UN R129: Explanatory notes on the proposals to update approval mark arrangements
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
30. The expert from Spain also introduced GRSP-64-10 to present GRSP-64-07, GRSP-64-08-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-09 which aimed at updating the arrangements of the approval mark. GRSP adopted GRSP-64-07, GRSP-64-08-Rev.1, GRSP-64-09 and GRSP-64-31 as reproduced in Annex V to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit GRSP-64-08-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-31 as part of (see para. 29) draft Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments, GRSP-64-07 and GRSP-64-09 as part of (see para. 29) draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
GRSP-64-09
|
30 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to modify the approval markings for consistency between technical services and approval authorities and between the labels of products approved under the 02 and 03 series. Combinations of approval marks can be made as long as the categories are able to be combined (category-wise as given in paragraph 3.2.2 and as long as it is one approval number). By combining approval marks, space on the Enhanced Child Restraint can be saved and more space is available for clear installation and use instructions.
|
GRSP-64-0009
|
UN R129: Explanatory notes on the proposals to update approval mark arrangements
(Spain)
UN R129: Explanatory notes on the proposals to update approval mark arrangements
|
Description
|
Explanation of informal documents GRSP-64-07 to -09 regarding the rearrangement of approval markings.
|
Submitted by: Spain
|
Date: 28 Nov 18
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP-64-07 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
GRSP-64-08/Rev.1 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
GRSP-64-09 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
30. The expert from Spain also introduced GRSP-64-10 to present GRSP-64-07, GRSP-64-08-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-09 which aimed at updating the arrangements of the approval mark. GRSP adopted GRSP-64-07, GRSP-64-08-Rev.1, GRSP-64-09 and GRSP-64-31 as reproduced in Annex V to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit GRSP-64-08-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-31 as part of (see para. 29) draft Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments, GRSP-64-07 and GRSP-64-09 as part of (see para. 29) draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
GRSP-64-10
|
30 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Explanation of informal documents GRSP-64-07 to -09 regarding the rearrangement of approval markings.
|
GRSP-64-0010
|
UN R129: Proposal for Corrigendum 1 to 03 Series of amendments
(France)
UN R129: Proposal for Corrigendum 1 to 03 Series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to align the French version with the adopted English version of the text (reference document WP.29/2018/45).
|
Submitted by: France
|
Date: 28 Nov 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
WP.29/2018/45 | UN R129: Proposal for the 03 series of amendments
WP.29/2019/59 | UN R129: Proposal for Corrigendum 1 to the 03 series of amendments (French only)
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
36. The expert from the Russian Federation introduced GRSP-64-01 to align the Russian text with the English version. The expert from France introduced a similar proposal (GRSP-64-11) to align the French text. GRSP adopted GRSP-64-01 and GRSP-64-11 as reproduced in Annex V to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit GRSP-64-01 as draft Corrigendum 3 to the original text of UN Regulation No. 129 and GRSP-64-11 as draft Corrigendum 1 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
79. The World Forum considered the draft amendments under agenda items 4.6.1 to 4.6.8, and recommended their submission to AC.1 for voting.
80. The Chair of GRSP presented proposals on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/44 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/45 under agenda items 4.6.9 and 4.6.10, to amend UN Regulations No. 14 and No. 129, in the spirit of providing the highest level of safety for children.
81. The proposal on amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 was commended by CI as the last phase for a full replacement of UN Regulation No. 44, which had not been designed to fully avoid the wrong use of child restraint systems. He recalled that the shortcomings of UN Regulation No. 44, had been raised by consumer groups ten years ago which had led to the decision to stop further developing UN Regulation No. 44 and to start a new UN Regulation. He declared that his organization and ANEC were satisfied by UN Regulations No. 129 that entails not only better protection of children, but makes Child Restraint Systems (CRS) easier to use. He expressed his thank to all the stakeholders involved, and in particular Mr. P. Castaing, Chair of the IWG, for their contributions to this result. He recommended the phasing out of UN Regulation No. 44 as early as possible to avoid confusion among consumers and allow only UN Regulation No. 129 that offers the highest level of protection. He clarified that since 1 September 2017, integral ISOFIX CRS were no longer approved under UN Regulation No. 44, and this would be the case also for non-integral Group 2 and Group 2/3 seats from 1 September 2019. Finally, he announced that for belted integral systems his organization would submit a proposal at the GRSP 2018 December session to stop type approvals according to UN Regulation No. 44.
|
GRSP-64-11
|
30 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to align the French version with the adopted English version of the text (reference document WP.29/2018/45).
|
GRSP-64-0011
|
UN R14: Proposal for Corrigendum 1 to Supplement 6 to the 07 series of amendments
(France)
UN R14: Proposal for Corrigendum 1 to Supplement 6 to the 07 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to update a reference regarding ISOFIX exemptions permitted under paragraph 5.3.8.8. (related to vehicles with one seat position per row). The reference should read 5.3.8.8. and 5.3.8.9.
|
Submitted by: France
|
Date: 28 Nov 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP-63-03 | UN R14: Proposal for Corrigendum 1 to Supplement 6 to the 07 series of amendments
WP.29/2019/56 | UN R14: Proposal for Corrigendum 1 to Supplement 6 to the 07 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
14. The expert from France introduced GRSP-64-12 which corrected a typo error in the communication annex of UN Regulation No. 14. GRSP adopted GRSP-64-12 (reproduced in Annex II of the session report) and requested the secretariat to submit it as Corrigendum 1 to Supplement 6 to the 07 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 14, for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
16. The expert from France introduced GRSP-63-03 on editorial update in Annex 1 to the UN Regulation. GRSP agreed to resume consideration of this subject on the basis of a revised proposal tabled by the expert from France at its December 2018 session.
|
GRSP-64-12
|
30 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Safety-Belt and ISOFIX Anchorages
Safety-Belt/ISOFIX Anchorages
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to Safety-belt Anchorages, ISOFIX Anchorages Systems and ISOFIX Top Tether Anchorages
|
Proposal to update a reference regarding ISOFIX exemptions permitted under paragraph 5.3.8.8. (related to vehicles with one seat position per row). The reference should read 5.3.8.8. and 5.3.8.9.
|
GRSP-64-0012
|
UN R145: Proposal for Corrigendum 1 to 00 series of amendments
(France)
UN R145: Proposal for Corrigendum 1 to 00 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to update a reference regarding ISOFIX exemptions permitted under paragraph 5.3.8.8. (related to vehicles with one seat position per row). The reference should read 5.3.8.8. and 5.3.8.9.
|
Submitted by: France
|
Date: 21 Dec 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
WP.29/2019/57 | UN R145: Proposal for Corrigendum 1 to the original version
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
42. The expert from France introduced GRSP-63-13-Rev.1, to correct a typo error in the communication annex of UN Regulation No. 145. GRSP adopted GRSP-63-13-Rev.1 as reproduced in Annex VI to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit GRSP-64-13-Rev.1 as draft Corrigendum 1 to the original text of UN Regulation No. 145 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1
|
GRSP-64-13/Rev.1
|
26 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
ISOFIX anchorages systems, ISOFIX top tether anchorages and i-Size seating positions
ISOFIX anchorage systems
|
Proposal to update a reference regarding ISOFIX exemptions permitted under paragraph 5.3.8.8. (related to vehicles with one seat position per row). The reference should read 5.3.8.8. and 5.3.8.9.
|
GRSP-64-0013/Rev.1
|
UN R135: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 00 and 01 series of amendments
(France)
UN R135: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 00 and 01 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to introduce objective criteria for evaluating whether a door remains latched following the pole impact test. Under UN R135, rear doors on the impacted side of the vehicle not directly struck by the pole may nonetheless be subjected to heavy loads and therefore need to be assessed. This proposal corresponds to a similar clarification already introduced into UN R95 on side impacts.
|
Submitted by: France
|
Date: 28 Nov 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2019/13 | UN R135: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 00 and 01 series of amendments
GRSP-65-36 | UN R135: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 00 and 01 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
39. The expert from France introduced GRSP-64-14, clarifying that rear doors on the impacted side which were not directly struck by the pole, might be subjected to heavy loads. He therefore proposed a similar amendment already adopted for UN Regulation No. 95. The expert from OICA requested a study reservation. Finally, GRSP agreed to resume discussion at its May 2019 session and requested the secretariat to distribute GRSP-64-14 with an official symbol.
37. The expert from France introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2019/13, clarifying that rear doors on the impacted side which were not directly struck by the pole, might be subjected to heavy loads. He proposed a similar amendment that had already been adopted for UN Regulation No. 95. The expert from OICA introduced GRSP-65-36, agreed with the expert from France to delete the applied force on the front door. Finally, GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2019/13, as amended by Annex VI to the session report and requested the secretariat to resume discussion at its May 2019 session and to submit it as Supplement 2 to the original series and to the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 135, for consideration and vote at the November 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
GRSP-64-14
|
30 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Pole side-impact protection
Pole Side Impact
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to their Pole Side Impact performance (PSI)
|
Proposal to introduce objective criteria for evaluating whether a door remains latched following the pole impact test. Under UN R135, rear doors on the impacted side of the vehicle not directly struck by the pole may nonetheless be subjected to heavy loads and therefore need to be assessed. This proposal corresponds to a similar clarification already introduced into UN R95 on side impacts.
|
GRSP-64-0014
|
UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
(CLEPA)
UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal of corrections to document GRSP/2018/29 (previously submitted by CLEPA) regarding the introduction of booster-cushion provisions into UN R129.
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
Date: 28 Nov 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/29 | UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
GRSP-64-16/Rev.1 | UN R129: Presentation on the Introduction of Booster Cushions (04 series)
GRSP-64-43 | UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
35. The expert from CLEPA introduced a summary of all the documents that he had submitted (GRSP-64-29) and presented GRSP-64-16-Rev.1 on the draft 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/29 complemented by GRSP-64-15) aimed at including in the scope of the UN Regulation: - non-integral Universal ECRS with no backrest (i-Size booster cushion) and
- non-integral Specific vehicle ECRS with no backrest (Specific vehicle booster cushion).
Moreover, the expert from CLEPA introduced a consolidated text of all the comments received ( GRSP-64-43). The expert from Germany argued that the definition of i-Size was associated with an additional side-impact test to assess protection of children when the vehicle was involved in such a collision and to ensure that children under fifteen months travel in the rearward facing position. Therefore, he stated that he opposed associating the above proposed new categories of ECRS with the i-Size definition to avoid confusion among users. The expert from Japan supported the opinion of the expert from Germany. The experts from IC and EC endorsed the inclusion of such ECRS in the scope of UN Regulation No. 129 to definitively phase out UN Regulation No. 44. Finally, GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its May 2019 session. Therefore, GRSP agreed to defer the discussion on parallel amendments to other series of amendments affected by the draft 04 series of amendments ( ECE/ TRANS/WP.29/ GRSP/2018/30, ECE/ TRANS/WP.29/ GRSP/2018/32 and GRSP-64-27) at its May 2019 session. Moreover, the secretariat was requested to keep GRSP-64-27 as a reference in the agenda and to distribute GRSP-64-43 with an official symbol at the next session of GRSP.
|
GRSP-64-15
|
30 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal of corrections to document GRSP/2018/29 (previously submitted by CLEPA) regarding the introduction of booster-cushion provisions into UN R129.
|
GRSP-64-0015
|
UN R129: Presentation on the Introduction of Booster Cushions (04 series)
(CLEPA)
UN R129: Presentation on the Introduction of Booster Cushions (04 series)
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
Date: 11 Dec 18
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/29 | UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
GRSP-64-15 | UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
35. The expert from CLEPA introduced a summary of all the documents that he had submitted (GRSP-64-29) and presented GRSP-64-16-Rev.1 on the draft 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/29 complemented by GRSP-64-15) aimed at including in the scope of the UN Regulation: - non-integral Universal ECRS with no backrest (i-Size booster cushion) and
- non-integral Specific vehicle ECRS with no backrest (Specific vehicle booster cushion).
Moreover, the expert from CLEPA introduced a consolidated text of all the comments received ( GRSP-64-43). The expert from Germany argued that the definition of i-Size was associated with an additional side-impact test to assess protection of children when the vehicle was involved in such a collision and to ensure that children under fifteen months travel in the rearward facing position. Therefore, he stated that he opposed associating the above proposed new categories of ECRS with the i-Size definition to avoid confusion among users. The expert from Japan supported the opinion of the expert from Germany. The experts from IC and EC endorsed the inclusion of such ECRS in the scope of UN Regulation No. 129 to definitively phase out UN Regulation No. 44. Finally, GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its May 2019 session. Therefore, GRSP agreed to defer the discussion on parallel amendments to other series of amendments affected by the draft 04 series of amendments ( ECE/ TRANS/WP.29/ GRSP/2018/30, ECE/ TRANS/WP.29/ GRSP/2018/32 and GRSP-64-27) at its May 2019 session. Moreover, the secretariat was requested to keep GRSP-64-27 as a reference in the agenda and to distribute GRSP-64-43 with an official symbol at the next session of GRSP.
|
GRSP-64-16/Rev.1
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
|
GRSP-64-0016/Rev.1
|
GRSP-64: Running order of the agenda
GRSP-64: Running order of the agenda
|
Date: 04 Dec 18
|
|
GRSP-64-17/Rev.1
|
05 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
|
|
GRSP-64-0017/Rev.1
|
GRSP-64: Internal annotations to the agenda
GRSP-64: Internal annotations to the agenda
|
Date: 10 Dec 18
|
|
GRSP-64-18
|
11 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
|
|
GRSP-64-0018
|
UN R80: Proposal for amendments to document GRSP/2018/10
(Russia)
UN R80: Proposal for amendments to document GRSP/2018/10
|
Description
|
Proposal to add injury criteria in relation to the neck bending moment along the lateral axis (not to exceed 57 Nm when stretched), clarify the distance between the seats to align with IN R107, and annulation of the proposal to delete paragraph 2.1.2 because the scope of UN R80 provides for testing of seats for vehicles of M2 and M3 categories of II, III and B classes where approval is allowed via testing without a vehicle and mounted rigidly on a test platform.
|
Submitted by: Russia
|
Date: 10 Dec 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/10 | UN R80: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
GRSP-64-19/Add.1 | Study of the passengers’ level of protection in a frontal collision for buses equipped with the seats with lap belts and lap-shoulder belts
GRSP-65-29/Rev.1 | UN R80: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
22. The expert from Germany introduced GRSP-64-22 and
GRSP-64-23 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/10, aimed at removing Appendix 5 (static test requirements and procedure) from UN Regulation No. 80 (GRSP-64-22) and at improving the dynamic test (GRSP-64-23) in two different series of amendments. The expert from OICA suggested that both tests be maintained as alternatives and that the static test be improved as a first step. The expert from Italy supported the approach of the expert from OICA. The expert from the Russian Federation introduced GRSP-64-19 and Add.1, proposing to include the assessment of the dummy neck injury criteria into the dynamic test of the UN Regulation. The Chair of GRSP suggested creating a task force of concerned parties led by Germany to provide a revised official document that would incorporate GRSP-64-19 and other comments submitted to the secretariat by 15 February 2019. The expert from Germany agreed with the Chair’s proposal and the expert from OICA offered his contribution in drafting the revised document.
24. GRSP resumed discussion on the proposal tabled by the expert from Germany (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/10), aimed at removing the static tests and improving the dynamic test on seat anchorages. The expert from Germany continued provide evidence to GRSP through a new presentation (GRSP-63-32 and a Video Presentation No. 1) to support his proposal. He stated that the current requirements of the UN Regulation allows the approval of seat systems in busses on the basis of a static test procedure which does not provide an adequate level of protection compared with the dynamic procedure. He added that tests with one seat model showed that occupants could be exposed to a high risk of death or serious injury in an accident from the collapse of the seat fixation. Finally, he informed GRSP that comparable seat fixations failure had been observed in bus accidents, and occupants had already been killed or seriously injured. He added that the German administration is concerned that these severe accidents could happen again in the future. The expert from the Russian Federation proposed to postpone the decision to the December 2018 session of GRSP. He justified his recommendation on the lack of research on the issue. He added that the Russian Federation considered it premature to exclude static tests from UN Regulation No. 80 and proposed to revise this type of test. He also suggested amending the dynamic test methodology according to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/10 and to the outcome of research conducted in the Russian Federation. Finally, he announced his intention to present these research results, accompanied with a draft amendment to UN Regulation No. 80 at the December 2018 session of GRSP. Several experts raised a study reservation to verify further statistical data. The expert from OICA also requested more time to prepare a revised proposal and requested to keeping GRSP-63-17 as a reference in the agenda of the next session.
25. GRSP agreed to resume discussion at the December 2018 session and invited experts to reach an agreement on this subject at that session.
26. The expert from Germany informed GRSP that TF on UN Regulation No. 80 had not started work due to the absence of new proposals as an alternative to the previous proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/10, that had aimed at removing Appendix 5 (static test requirements and procedure) from UN Regulation No. 80. The expert from OICA introduced GRSP-65-29-Rev.1 which proposed a compromise to the complete deletion of the static test as the static test will provide the basis for a simpler testing of small projects or Class I vehicles. He proposed a two-step approach: (a) the first step was presented with GRSP-65-29 Rev.1 with more stringent requirement for the attachments and fittings of the seat and (b) the second step would be a revision of the static and dynamic test. The expert from the United Kingdom acknowledged the need of small manufacturers to retain a static test as alternative and supported the proposal as a viable compromise. The experts from Finland, Italy and Russian Federation expressed similar views. The expert from Germany acknowledged that GRSP-65-29-Rev.1 had partially solved the problem of construction and fixation, and thus should be intended as a compromise that could be improved in the future. The expert from the Netherlands suggested that in the future, only the dynamic test should be used. Finally, GRSP adopted GRSP-65-29-Rev.1, as reproduced in Annex IV of the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit GRSP-65-29-Rev.1 as new 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 80, for consideration and vote at the November 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
GRSP-64-19
|
11 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Seat Strength and Seat Anchorages for Large Passenger Vehicles
Coach Seat Strength
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Seats of Large Passenger Vehicles and of these Vehicles with regard to the Strength of the Seats and their Anchorages
|
Proposal to add injury criteria in relation to the neck bending moment along the lateral axis (not to exceed 57 Nm when stretched), clarify the distance between the seats to align with IN R107, and annulation of the proposal to delete paragraph 2.1.2 because the scope of UN R80 provides for testing of seats for vehicles of M<sub>2</sub> and M<sub>3</sub> categories of II, III and B classes where approval is allowed via testing without a vehicle and mounted rigidly on a test platform.
|
GRSP-64-0019
|
Study of the passengers’ level of protection in a frontal collision for buses equipped with the seats with lap belts and lap-shoulder belts
(NAMI)
Study of the passengers’ level of protection in a frontal collision for buses equipped with the seats with lap belts and lap-shoulder belts
|
Submitted by: NAMI
|
Date: 10 Dec 18
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP-64-19 | UN R80: Proposal for amendments to document GRSP/2018/10
GRSP/2018/10 | UN R80: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
22. The expert from Germany introduced GRSP-64-22 and
GRSP-64-23 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/10, aimed at removing Appendix 5 (static test requirements and procedure) from UN Regulation No. 80 (GRSP-64-22) and at improving the dynamic test (GRSP-64-23) in two different series of amendments. The expert from OICA suggested that both tests be maintained as alternatives and that the static test be improved as a first step. The expert from Italy supported the approach of the expert from OICA. The expert from the Russian Federation introduced GRSP-64-19 and Add.1, proposing to include the assessment of the dummy neck injury criteria into the dynamic test of the UN Regulation. The Chair of GRSP suggested creating a task force of concerned parties led by Germany to provide a revised official document that would incorporate GRSP-64-19 and other comments submitted to the secretariat by 15 February 2019. The expert from Germany agreed with the Chair’s proposal and the expert from OICA offered his contribution in drafting the revised document.
24. GRSP resumed discussion on the proposal tabled by the expert from Germany (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/10), aimed at removing the static tests and improving the dynamic test on seat anchorages. The expert from Germany continued provide evidence to GRSP through a new presentation (GRSP-63-32 and a Video Presentation No. 1) to support his proposal. He stated that the current requirements of the UN Regulation allows the approval of seat systems in busses on the basis of a static test procedure which does not provide an adequate level of protection compared with the dynamic procedure. He added that tests with one seat model showed that occupants could be exposed to a high risk of death or serious injury in an accident from the collapse of the seat fixation. Finally, he informed GRSP that comparable seat fixations failure had been observed in bus accidents, and occupants had already been killed or seriously injured. He added that the German administration is concerned that these severe accidents could happen again in the future. The expert from the Russian Federation proposed to postpone the decision to the December 2018 session of GRSP. He justified his recommendation on the lack of research on the issue. He added that the Russian Federation considered it premature to exclude static tests from UN Regulation No. 80 and proposed to revise this type of test. He also suggested amending the dynamic test methodology according to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/10 and to the outcome of research conducted in the Russian Federation. Finally, he announced his intention to present these research results, accompanied with a draft amendment to UN Regulation No. 80 at the December 2018 session of GRSP. Several experts raised a study reservation to verify further statistical data. The expert from OICA also requested more time to prepare a revised proposal and requested to keeping GRSP-63-17 as a reference in the agenda of the next session.
25. GRSP agreed to resume discussion at the December 2018 session and invited experts to reach an agreement on this subject at that session.
|
GRSP-64-19/Add.1
|
11 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Seat Strength and Seat Anchorages for Large Passenger Vehicles
Coach Seat Strength
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Seats of Large Passenger Vehicles and of these Vehicles with regard to the Strength of the Seats and their Anchorages
|
|
GRSP-64-0019/Add.1
|
UN R127: Proposal for collective amendments to 00, 01 and 02 series of amendments
(Germany)
UN R127: Proposal for collective amendments to 00, 01 and 02 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to address new active suspension technologies that can raise the height of the vehicle in motion up to a defined speed. Since the vehicle height has an influence on the headform test area (WAD) and on the test results for legform tests, all possible vehicle heights up to a driving speed of 11.1 m/s (40 km/h) should be considered to be relevant for the impact with a pedestrian. The proposal is a clarification on this issue.To ensure that such an active suspension system is considered for type approval, there should be a detailed description in the information document. Due to the fact that extensions for an existing vehicle type concerning UN Regulation No. 127 are still possible according to 00 and 01 series of amendments, the proposal is relevant for all series of amendments of the UN R127.
|
Submitted by: Germany
|
Date: 10 Dec 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP-65-21 | UN R127: Proposal of Supplements to the 00, 01 and 02 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
27. The expert from Germany introduced GRSP-64-20, to clarify different interpretations on vehicle configuration testing in the presence of active suspensions, which arose in off-road driving (SUVs mostly) or driving in a car park (sports cars). He concluded that since the vehicle height had an influence on the headform test area and on the test results for legform tests, all possible vehicle heights up to a driving speed of 11.1 m/s (40 km/h) should be considered relevant for impact with a pedestrian. The expert of OICA agreed that the issue raised by Germany was valid and that there was a need to avoid different interpretations, but this needs to be studied carefully, also in relation to the normal procedure of “worst case definition”. He added that this would entail new requirements, therefore needing a series of amendments and transitional provisions. He also added that this issue should be considered in the ongoing WP.29 discussions on the performance of vehicles outside the test boundaries defined in the various UN Regulations. The expert from the Netherlands suggested developing simulation models to check worst case testing. The expert from OICA stressed that testing a vehicle in all potential configurations would be unrealistic and therefore welcomed the statements from the Netherlands. He referred to the work on the certification of automated vehicles whereby an additional 3-pillar approach was considered to address automation: - test track,
- road test and
- simulation and audit of development process.
28. The Chair of GRSP suggested establishing a group of interested experts to further develop the proposal. GRSP agreed with the proposal of its Chair. The expert from Germany announced a possible meeting before 15 February 2019, to submit a new official proposal. Finally, GRSP requested the secretariat to keep GRSP-64-20 as a reference in the agenda of the May 2019 session.
33. Referring to agenda item 3(b) (see paragraph 8 above), the expert from Germany suggested postponing discussion on GRSP-65-21 to allow careful consideration of the new provisions of the General Safety Regulation of the European Union, which had proposed an extension of the head impact zone. GRSP agreed to defer discussion of GRSP-65-21 to its December 2019 session and to distribute it with an official symbol.
|
GRSP-64-20
|
11 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Pedestrian Safety
Pedestrian Safety
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to their pedestrian safety performance
|
Proposal to address new active suspension technologies that can raise the height of the vehicle in motion up to a defined speed. Since the vehicle height has an influence on the headform test area (WAD) and on the test results for legform tests, all possible vehicle heights up to a driving speed of 11.1 m/s (40 km/h) should be considered to be relevant for the impact with a pedestrian. The proposal is a clarification on this issue.To ensure that such an active suspension system is considered for type approval, there should be a detailed description in the information document. Due to the fact that extensions for an existing vehicle type concerning UN Regulation No. 127 are still possible according to 00 and 01 series of amendments, the proposal is relevant for all series of amendments of the UN R127.
|
GRSP-64-0020
|
UN R17: Proposal for amendments
(Germany)
UN R17: Proposal for amendments
|
Description
|
Revised proposal (superseding GRSP-63-24) to clarify the possibility to install side-facing seats in buses of category M2 and M3 of classes A and I.
|
Submitted by: Germany
|
Date: 10 Dec 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP-63-24 | UN R17: Proposal for a supplement to the 08 series of amendments
WP.29/2019/35 | UN R17: Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 09 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
17. The expert from Germany introduced GRSP-64-21, to clarify the possibility of installing side facing seats in certain bus categories (M2 and M3 of Classes A and I). GRSP adopted the proposal as reproduced in Annex III to the session report and requested the secretariat to submit it as Supplement 1 to the 09 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 17, for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
20. The expert from Germany also introduced GRSP-63-24 clarifying the possibility of installing side-facing seats in buses of certain classes of vehicles. The expert from the Netherlands raised a study reservation. GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at the December 2018 session of GRSP on the basis of a new proposal jointly prepared by the experts from Germany and EC.
|
GRSP-64-21
|
11 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Strength of Seats, Anchorages, and Head Restraints
Strength of Seats
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to the Seats, their Anchorages and any Head Restraints
|
Revised proposal (superseding GRSP-63-24) to clarify the possibility to install side-facing seats in buses of category M<sub>2</sub> and M<sub>3</sub> of classes A and I.
|
GRSP-64-0021
|
UN R80: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
(Germany)
UN R80: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to delete Appendix 5 as a basis for type approval and thereby end static testing as a compliance option.
|
Submitted by: Germany
|
Date: 10 Dec 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP-62-35 | UN R80: Comparative study of static and dynamic test procedures
GRSP-62-35/Add.1 | UN R80: Comparative study of static and dynamic test procedures-Dynamic test video
GRSP-62-35/Add.2 | UN R80: Comparative study of static and dynamic test procedures-Static test video
GRSP-62-36 | UN R80: Systems comparison of static and dynamic test procedures
GRSP/2018/10 | UN R80: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
GRSP-65-29/Rev.1 | UN R80: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
22. The expert from Germany introduced GRSP-64-22 and
GRSP-64-23 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/10, aimed at removing Appendix 5 (static test requirements and procedure) from UN Regulation No. 80 (GRSP-64-22) and at improving the dynamic test (GRSP-64-23) in two different series of amendments. The expert from OICA suggested that both tests be maintained as alternatives and that the static test be improved as a first step. The expert from Italy supported the approach of the expert from OICA. The expert from the Russian Federation introduced GRSP-64-19 and Add.1, proposing to include the assessment of the dummy neck injury criteria into the dynamic test of the UN Regulation. The Chair of GRSP suggested creating a task force of concerned parties led by Germany to provide a revised official document that would incorporate GRSP-64-19 and other comments submitted to the secretariat by 15 February 2019. The expert from Germany agreed with the Chair’s proposal and the expert from OICA offered his contribution in drafting the revised document.
51. The expert from Germany gave two presentations (GRSP-62-35 and GRSP-62-36) to introduce a proposal of amendment (GRSP-62-12) to the UN Regulation aimed at removing the static tests and improving the dynamic test on seat anchorages. Referring also to the video presentations Nos. 1 and 2, he provided evidence that seat anchorages tested statically do not reach the same level of safety as that tested dynamically and, therefore, they cannot be considered as equivalent. GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its May 2018 session and requested the secretariat to distribute GRSP-62-12 with an official symbol.
24. GRSP resumed discussion on the proposal tabled by the expert from Germany (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/10), aimed at removing the static tests and improving the dynamic test on seat anchorages. The expert from Germany continued provide evidence to GRSP through a new presentation (GRSP-63-32 and a Video Presentation No. 1) to support his proposal. He stated that the current requirements of the UN Regulation allows the approval of seat systems in busses on the basis of a static test procedure which does not provide an adequate level of protection compared with the dynamic procedure. He added that tests with one seat model showed that occupants could be exposed to a high risk of death or serious injury in an accident from the collapse of the seat fixation. Finally, he informed GRSP that comparable seat fixations failure had been observed in bus accidents, and occupants had already been killed or seriously injured. He added that the German administration is concerned that these severe accidents could happen again in the future. The expert from the Russian Federation proposed to postpone the decision to the December 2018 session of GRSP. He justified his recommendation on the lack of research on the issue. He added that the Russian Federation considered it premature to exclude static tests from UN Regulation No. 80 and proposed to revise this type of test. He also suggested amending the dynamic test methodology according to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/10 and to the outcome of research conducted in the Russian Federation. Finally, he announced his intention to present these research results, accompanied with a draft amendment to UN Regulation No. 80 at the December 2018 session of GRSP. Several experts raised a study reservation to verify further statistical data. The expert from OICA also requested more time to prepare a revised proposal and requested to keeping GRSP-63-17 as a reference in the agenda of the next session.
25. GRSP agreed to resume discussion at the December 2018 session and invited experts to reach an agreement on this subject at that session.
26. The expert from Germany informed GRSP that TF on UN Regulation No. 80 had not started work due to the absence of new proposals as an alternative to the previous proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/10, that had aimed at removing Appendix 5 (static test requirements and procedure) from UN Regulation No. 80. The expert from OICA introduced GRSP-65-29-Rev.1 which proposed a compromise to the complete deletion of the static test as the static test will provide the basis for a simpler testing of small projects or Class I vehicles. He proposed a two-step approach: (a) the first step was presented with GRSP-65-29 Rev.1 with more stringent requirement for the attachments and fittings of the seat and (b) the second step would be a revision of the static and dynamic test. The expert from the United Kingdom acknowledged the need of small manufacturers to retain a static test as alternative and supported the proposal as a viable compromise. The experts from Finland, Italy and Russian Federation expressed similar views. The expert from Germany acknowledged that GRSP-65-29-Rev.1 had partially solved the problem of construction and fixation, and thus should be intended as a compromise that could be improved in the future. The expert from the Netherlands suggested that in the future, only the dynamic test should be used. Finally, GRSP adopted GRSP-65-29-Rev.1, as reproduced in Annex IV of the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit GRSP-65-29-Rev.1 as new 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 80, for consideration and vote at the November 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
GRSP-64-22
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Seat Strength and Seat Anchorages for Large Passenger Vehicles
Coach Seat Strength
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Seats of Large Passenger Vehicles and of these Vehicles with regard to the Strength of the Seats and their Anchorages
|
Proposal to delete Appendix 5 as a basis for type approval and thereby end static testing as a compliance option.
|
GRSP-64-0022
|
UN R80: Proposal for the 05 series of amendments
(Germany)
UN R80: Proposal for the 05 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to amend Appendix 1 by reducing the forward movement of the head of the manikin to 1.2 m in alignment with UN R14. The proposal would also limit the movement of the seat anchorages to 100 mm to ensure a minimum residual space for the passenger between the seats. Lastly, to ensure that seat fixations are reliably fastened after relocation, the proposal would require the necessary information to be marked directly on the seat and provided in the owner’s manual.
|
Submitted by: Germany
|
Date: 10 Dec 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/10 | UN R80: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
GRSP-65-29/Rev.1 | UN R80: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
22. The expert from Germany introduced GRSP-64-22 and
GRSP-64-23 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/10, aimed at removing Appendix 5 (static test requirements and procedure) from UN Regulation No. 80 (GRSP-64-22) and at improving the dynamic test (GRSP-64-23) in two different series of amendments. The expert from OICA suggested that both tests be maintained as alternatives and that the static test be improved as a first step. The expert from Italy supported the approach of the expert from OICA. The expert from the Russian Federation introduced GRSP-64-19 and Add.1, proposing to include the assessment of the dummy neck injury criteria into the dynamic test of the UN Regulation. The Chair of GRSP suggested creating a task force of concerned parties led by Germany to provide a revised official document that would incorporate GRSP-64-19 and other comments submitted to the secretariat by 15 February 2019. The expert from Germany agreed with the Chair’s proposal and the expert from OICA offered his contribution in drafting the revised document.
24. GRSP resumed discussion on the proposal tabled by the expert from Germany (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/10), aimed at removing the static tests and improving the dynamic test on seat anchorages. The expert from Germany continued provide evidence to GRSP through a new presentation (GRSP-63-32 and a Video Presentation No. 1) to support his proposal. He stated that the current requirements of the UN Regulation allows the approval of seat systems in busses on the basis of a static test procedure which does not provide an adequate level of protection compared with the dynamic procedure. He added that tests with one seat model showed that occupants could be exposed to a high risk of death or serious injury in an accident from the collapse of the seat fixation. Finally, he informed GRSP that comparable seat fixations failure had been observed in bus accidents, and occupants had already been killed or seriously injured. He added that the German administration is concerned that these severe accidents could happen again in the future. The expert from the Russian Federation proposed to postpone the decision to the December 2018 session of GRSP. He justified his recommendation on the lack of research on the issue. He added that the Russian Federation considered it premature to exclude static tests from UN Regulation No. 80 and proposed to revise this type of test. He also suggested amending the dynamic test methodology according to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/10 and to the outcome of research conducted in the Russian Federation. Finally, he announced his intention to present these research results, accompanied with a draft amendment to UN Regulation No. 80 at the December 2018 session of GRSP. Several experts raised a study reservation to verify further statistical data. The expert from OICA also requested more time to prepare a revised proposal and requested to keeping GRSP-63-17 as a reference in the agenda of the next session.
25. GRSP agreed to resume discussion at the December 2018 session and invited experts to reach an agreement on this subject at that session.
26. The expert from Germany informed GRSP that TF on UN Regulation No. 80 had not started work due to the absence of new proposals as an alternative to the previous proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/10, that had aimed at removing Appendix 5 (static test requirements and procedure) from UN Regulation No. 80. The expert from OICA introduced GRSP-65-29-Rev.1 which proposed a compromise to the complete deletion of the static test as the static test will provide the basis for a simpler testing of small projects or Class I vehicles. He proposed a two-step approach: (a) the first step was presented with GRSP-65-29 Rev.1 with more stringent requirement for the attachments and fittings of the seat and (b) the second step would be a revision of the static and dynamic test. The expert from the United Kingdom acknowledged the need of small manufacturers to retain a static test as alternative and supported the proposal as a viable compromise. The experts from Finland, Italy and Russian Federation expressed similar views. The expert from Germany acknowledged that GRSP-65-29-Rev.1 had partially solved the problem of construction and fixation, and thus should be intended as a compromise that could be improved in the future. The expert from the Netherlands suggested that in the future, only the dynamic test should be used. Finally, GRSP adopted GRSP-65-29-Rev.1, as reproduced in Annex IV of the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit GRSP-65-29-Rev.1 as new 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 80, for consideration and vote at the November 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
GRSP-64-23
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Seat Strength and Seat Anchorages for Large Passenger Vehicles
Coach Seat Strength
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Seats of Large Passenger Vehicles and of these Vehicles with regard to the Strength of the Seats and their Anchorages
|
Proposal to amend Appendix 1 by reducing the forward movement of the head of the manikin to 1.2 m in alignment with UN R14. The proposal would also limit the movement of the seat anchorages to 100 mm to ensure a minimum residual space for the passenger between the seats. Lastly, to ensure that seat fixations are reliably fastened after relocation, the proposal would require the necessary information to be marked directly on the seat and provided in the owner’s manual.
|
GRSP-64-0023
|
UN R100: Proposal for the 02 series of amendments
(Netherlands)
UN R100: Proposal for the 02 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to explicitly state that functional safety requirements apply to categories of vehicles beyond M1.
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Date: 10 Dec 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2019/3 | UN R100: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
25. GRSP noted GRSP-64-24, tabled by the expert from the Netherlands to extend the functional safety in UN Regulation No. 100 to other categories of vehicles. Referring to the work in progress of aligning UN Regulation No. 100 to UN GTR No. 20, the expert from OICA suggested to include this proposal in the programme of work of the IWG on UN GTR No. 20. Finally, GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this agenda item and requested the secretariat to distribute GRSP-64-24 with an official symbol at its May 2019 session.
30. The experts from the Netherlands and OICA introduced GRSP-65-33-Rev.1 (superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.297GRSP/2019/3) which proposed functional safety requirements that focused on other categories of vehicles other than M1. The expert from the United States of America reminded GRSP that harmonization shall be kept when UN GTR No. 20 was transposed into UN Regulation No. 100. GRSP agreed to distribute GRSP-65-33-Rev.1 with an official symbol to the December 2019 session of GRSP, awaiting a proposal of amendments that align UN Regulation No. 100 to UN GTR No. 20.
31. The expert from the Russian Federation introduced GRSP-65-07, proposing further improvement of functional safety requirements. The expert from Japan suggested that this extensive revision of safety requirements should be handed over to the IWG on UN GTR No. 20, Phase 2 to be compared or aligned with their ongoing work on the UN GTR. GRSP agreed with the proposal of Japan and to refer it to IWG UN GTR No. 20, Phase 2 and, to resume discussion at its December 2019 session.
|
GRSP-64-24
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Construction and Safety of Electric Powertrains
Electric Powertrain Vehicles
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to specific requirements for the electric power train
|
Proposal to explicitly state that functional safety requirements apply to categories of vehicles beyond M<sub>1</sub>.
|
GRSP-64-0024
|
UN R17: Proposal for a 10 series of amendments
(CLEPA)
UN R17: Proposal for a 10 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to clarify the application of GTR 7 Phase 2 static alternative provisions and to modify the allowed range of tolerances under the backset retention and energy dissipations test.
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
Date: 10 Dec 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/34 | UN R17: Proposal for the 10 series of amendments
GRSP/2019/9 | UN R17: Proposal for the 10 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
6. Finally, GRSP experts were invited to provide comments to GRSP-64-39-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-40 to the expert from Japan by the end of January 2019. Moreover, it was agreed that IWG organize a webex meeting to allow the expert from Japan to submit an official proposal of amendments, which would also incorporate GRSP-64-25 (see para. 16 of this report) by 15 February 2019.
16. The experts from Japan and EC introduced GRSP-64-37 on the proposal of amendments (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/34) to UN Regulation No. 17 (Strength of seats) that would align it with Phase 2 of UN GTR No. 7 (see para. 5 above). The expert from CLEPA introduced GRSP-64-25, to clarify static alternative provisions of UN GTR No. 7, Phase 2 and modifications to the allowed range of tolerances to backset retention and to the energy dissipation test. GRSP agreed to hand over GRSP-64-25 to the IWG for its possible integration in the proposal of amendments to UN Regulation No. 17 and to the draft amendment to UN GTR No. 7. GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its May 2019 session on the basis of the progress of the IWG work.
|
GRSP-64-25
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Strength of Seats, Anchorages, and Head Restraints
Strength of Seats
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to the Seats, their Anchorages and any Head Restraints
|
Proposal to clarify the application of GTR 7 Phase 2 static alternative provisions and to modify the allowed range of tolerances under the backset retention and energy dissipations test.
|
GRSP-64-0025
|
New Legislation for Systems to Prevent Small Children from Being Left Unattended in Vehicles
(Italy)
New Legislation for Systems to Prevent Small Children from Being Left Unattended in Vehicles
|
Description
|
Presentation on Italy’s National Law No.117 of 1 October 2018 which makes the use systems to prevent children from being left unattended in vehicles mandatory from 1 July 2019 for M1, N1, N2, and N3 vehicles.
|
Submitted by: Italy
|
Date: 10 Dec 18
|
More information
|
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
50. Finally, GRSP agreed to defer discussion on GRSP-64-26 to its May 2019 session due to the lack of time.
|
GRSP-64-26
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
|
Presentation on Italy's National Law No.117 of 1 October 2018 which makes the use systems to prevent children from being left unattended in vehicles mandatory from 1 July 2019 for M<sub>1</sub>, N<sub>1</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>, and N<sub>3</sub> vehicles.
|
GRSP-64-0026
|
UN R129: Proposal of amendments to GRSP/2018/32
(CLEPA)
UN R129: Proposal of amendments to GRSP/2018/32
|
Description
|
Proposal to clarify the use of the i-Size logo on i-Size boosters.
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
Date: 10 Dec 18
|
Status: Informal GR review
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
35. The expert from CLEPA introduced a summary of all the documents that he had submitted (GRSP-64-29) and presented GRSP-64-16-Rev.1 on the draft 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/29 complemented by GRSP-64-15) aimed at including in the scope of the UN Regulation: - non-integral Universal ECRS with no backrest (i-Size booster cushion) and
- non-integral Specific vehicle ECRS with no backrest (Specific vehicle booster cushion).
Moreover, the expert from CLEPA introduced a consolidated text of all the comments received ( GRSP-64-43). The expert from Germany argued that the definition of i-Size was associated with an additional side-impact test to assess protection of children when the vehicle was involved in such a collision and to ensure that children under fifteen months travel in the rearward facing position. Therefore, he stated that he opposed associating the above proposed new categories of ECRS with the i-Size definition to avoid confusion among users. The expert from Japan supported the opinion of the expert from Germany. The experts from IC and EC endorsed the inclusion of such ECRS in the scope of UN Regulation No. 129 to definitively phase out UN Regulation No. 44. Finally, GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its May 2019 session. Therefore, GRSP agreed to defer the discussion on parallel amendments to other series of amendments affected by the draft 04 series of amendments ( ECE/ TRANS/WP.29/ GRSP/2018/30, ECE/ TRANS/WP.29/ GRSP/2018/32 and GRSP-64-27) at its May 2019 session. Moreover, the secretariat was requested to keep GRSP-64-27 as a reference in the agenda and to distribute GRSP-64-43 with an official symbol at the next session of GRSP.
|
GRSP-64-27
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to clarify the use of the i-Size logo on i-Size boosters.
|
GRSP-64-0027
|
UN R129: Proposal of amendments to GRSP/2018/28
(CLEPA)
UN R129: Proposal of amendments to GRSP/2018/28
|
Description
|
Labels under UN R129, paragraph 4.5. highlight that the ECRS should not be used by children under 15 months old. This proposal presents the same layout for rearward/forward-facing and for forward-only CRS.
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
Date: 10 Dec 18
|
Status: GR amended and approved
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/28 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 9 to the 00 series of amendments, Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments, Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments and Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
31. The expert from CLEPA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/24 to clarify the definition of “infant carrier” and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/28 to clarify that certain user information was displayed sufficiently. The expert from Spain introduced GRSP-64-28 to improve the consistency of the information. GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/24 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/28 as amended by Annex V to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/24 as part of (see paras. 29 and 30) draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/28 as part of (see para. 29) draft Supplement 9 to the original version of UN Regulation No. 129, as part of (see paras. 29 and 30) Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments, as part of (see paras. 29 and 30) draft Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments and as part of (see paras. 29 and 30) draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
GRSP-64-28
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Labels under UN R129, paragraph 4.5. highlight that the ECRS should not be used by children under 15 months old. This proposal presents the same layout for rearward/forward-facing and for forward-only CRS.
|
GRSP-64-0028
|
Child Restraint Document Summary: GRSP-64
(CLEPA)
Child Restraint Document Summary: GRSP-64
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
Date: 10 Dec 18
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
35. The expert from CLEPA introduced a summary of all the documents that he had submitted (GRSP-64-29) and presented GRSP-64-16-Rev.1 on the draft 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/29 complemented by GRSP-64-15) aimed at including in the scope of the UN Regulation: - non-integral Universal ECRS with no backrest (i-Size booster cushion) and
- non-integral Specific vehicle ECRS with no backrest (Specific vehicle booster cushion).
Moreover, the expert from CLEPA introduced a consolidated text of all the comments received ( GRSP-64-43). The expert from Germany argued that the definition of i-Size was associated with an additional side-impact test to assess protection of children when the vehicle was involved in such a collision and to ensure that children under fifteen months travel in the rearward facing position. Therefore, he stated that he opposed associating the above proposed new categories of ECRS with the i-Size definition to avoid confusion among users. The expert from Japan supported the opinion of the expert from Germany. The experts from IC and EC endorsed the inclusion of such ECRS in the scope of UN Regulation No. 129 to definitively phase out UN Regulation No. 44. Finally, GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its May 2019 session. Therefore, GRSP agreed to defer the discussion on parallel amendments to other series of amendments affected by the draft 04 series of amendments ( ECE/ TRANS/WP.29/ GRSP/2018/30, ECE/ TRANS/WP.29/ GRSP/2018/32 and GRSP-64-27) at its May 2019 session. Moreover, the secretariat was requested to keep GRSP-64-27 as a reference in the agenda and to distribute GRSP-64-43 with an official symbol at the next session of GRSP.
|
GRSP-64-29
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Child Restraint Systems
Child Restraint Systems
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Restraining Devices for Child Occupants of Power-driven Vehicles ("Child Restraint System")
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
|
GRSP-64-0029
|
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
(Spain)
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to specify that, in the case of an infant carrier, the dummy shall be restrained in the Enhanced Child Restraint System before it is installed on the test bench.
|
Submitted by: Spain
|
Date: 12 Dec 18
|
Status: Approved by GR
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
33. The expert from Spain introduced GRSP-64-30-Rev.1, to clarify the installation sequence of an infant carrier on the test bench. GRSP adopted GRSP-64-30-Rev.1 as reproduced in Annex V to the session report and requested the secretariat to submit it as part of (see paras. 29–32) draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
GRSP-64-30/Rev.1
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to specify that, in the case of an infant carrier, the dummy shall be restrained in the Enhanced Child Restraint System before it is installed on the test bench.
|
GRSP-64-0030/Rev.1
|
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
(Spain)
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to specify the dimensions of the approval number, correct term from " Regulation No. 129-02" to “UN Regulation No. 129/02”, and change the 145 cm stature of the Specific Vehicle Booster seat to the 150 cm stature as this is the upper limit.
|
Submitted by: Spain
|
Date: 10 Dec 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
WP.29/2019/39 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
30. The expert from Spain also introduced GRSP-64-10 to present GRSP-64-07, GRSP-64-08-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-09 which aimed at updating the arrangements of the approval mark. GRSP adopted GRSP-64-07, GRSP-64-08-Rev.1, GRSP-64-09 and GRSP-64-31 as reproduced in Annex V to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit GRSP-64-08-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-31 as part of (see para. 29) draft Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments, GRSP-64-07 and GRSP-64-09 as part of (see para. 29) draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
GRSP-64-31
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to specify the dimensions of the approval number, correct term from " Regulation No. 129-02" to "UN Regulation No. 129/02", and change the 145 cm stature of the Specific Vehicle Booster seat to the 150 cm stature as this is the upper limit.
|
GRSP-64-0031
|
UN R44: Phase out of belted integral CRS approvals
(CI)
UN R44: Phase out of belted integral CRS approvals
|
Submitted by: CI
|
Date: 10 Dec 18
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
20. The expert from IC introduced GRSP-64-32 which explained that for the forthcoming entry into force of “Phase 3” of UN Regulation No. 129 (belted Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS)), all groups and categories except Group III on forward-facing non-integral CRS would be covered. Accordingly, he explained that belted CRS could be still approved according to UN Regulation No. 44 for an undefined period. He therefore proposed to phase out this category of CRS (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/26). The proposal received comments on the transitional provisions and GRSP considered GRSP-64-35-Rev.1. Finally, GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/26, as amended by Annex IV to the session report, and requested the secretariat to submit it as Supplement 16 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No.44, for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
GRSP-64-32
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Child Restraint Systems
Child Restraint Systems
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Restraining Devices for Child Occupants of Power-driven Vehicles ("Child Restraint System")
|
|
GRSP-64-0032
|
Child Restraint System Evaluation Programme (PESRI)
(CI)
Child Restraint System Evaluation Programme (PESRI)
|
Submitted by: CI
|
Date: 11 Dec 18
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
21. The expert from CI introduced GRSP-64-33 on the Child Restraint System Evaluation Programme (PESRI), conducted in Latin American countries and sponsored by FIA, Global NCAP and CI research and tests. He highlighted that from this programme had emerged several regulatory irregularities, poor market surveillance and easily-granted approvals. The experts from other contracting parties stated that in their countries, market surveillance was an issue for child restraint systems and protective helmets.
|
GRSP-64-33
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Child Restraint Systems
Child Restraint Systems
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Restraining Devices for Child Occupants of Power-driven Vehicles ("Child Restraint System")
|
|
GRSP-64-0033
|
UN R129: Proposal for a Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
(Netherlands)
UN R129: Proposal for a Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to specify usage requirements for unfixed CRS inserts.
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Date: 12 Dec 18
|
Status: Approved by GR
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
34. The expert from the Netherlands introduced GRSP-64-34, amending ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/33, aiming at achieving a proper legalized use of non-permanent fixed inserts in UN Regulation No. 129. GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/33 as amended by Annex V to the session report and requested the secretariat to submit it as part of (see paras. 29–33) draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
GRSP-64-34
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to specify usage requirements for unfixed CRS inserts.
|
GRSP-64-0034
|
UN R44: Proposal for Supplement 16 to the 04 series of amendments
(CI)
UN R44: Proposal for Supplement 16 to the 04 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to cease new CRS approvals under UN Regulation No. 44 as of [1 September 2020], including amended transitional provisions.
|
Submitted by: CI
|
Date: 13 Dec 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/26 | UN R44: Proposal for Supplement 16 to the 04 series of amendments
WP.29/2019/36 | UN R44: Proposal for Supplement 16 to the 04 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
20. The expert from IC introduced GRSP-64-32 which explained that for the forthcoming entry into force of “Phase 3” of UN Regulation No. 129 (belted Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS)), all groups and categories except Group III on forward-facing non-integral CRS would be covered. Accordingly, he explained that belted CRS could be still approved according to UN Regulation No. 44 for an undefined period. He therefore proposed to phase out this category of CRS (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/26). The proposal received comments on the transitional provisions and GRSP considered GRSP-64-35-Rev.1. Finally, GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/26, as amended by Annex IV to the session report, and requested the secretariat to submit it as Supplement 16 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No.44, for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
GRSP-64-35/Rev.1
|
13 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Child Restraint Systems
Child Restraint Systems
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Restraining Devices for Child Occupants of Power-driven Vehicles ("Child Restraint System")
|
Proposal to cease new CRS approvals under UN Regulation No. 44 as of [1 September 2020], including amended transitional provisions.
|
GRSP-64-0035/Rev.1
|
Status Report of the Deployable Pedestrian Protection Systems informal group (IWG-DPPS)
(Korea)
Status Report of the Deployable Pedestrian Protection Systems informal group (IWG-DPPS)
|
Submitted by: Korea
|
Date: 12 Dec 18
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
9. The expert from the Republic of Korea, Chair of the IWG on Deployable Pedestrian Protection Systems (DPPS) introduced GRSP-64-36 to inform GRSP about the status of the IWG work. He explained that the group had last convened in Geneva on 11 December 2018. He added that the group was working to develop new and more detailed requirements to ensure that deployable systems were correctly activated as designed to protect pedestrians and other vulnerable road users. He underlined that among the major issues was the validation of the Head Impact Time (HIT) determination procedure and that the group was considering both numerical simulation and physical dummy testing. The expert from OICA stated that when numerical simulation was conducted, the manufacturer should provide supporting evidence showing the appropriateness of the simulation tool and suitable biofidelity and kinematics of the chosen numerical models. Therefore, he recommended that the walking posture of the model should be in M.R.1. and be updated regularly. The expert from the Republic of Korea concluded that IWG also was considering the development of a corresponding proposal to amend UN Regulation No. 127. GRSP agreed to resume consideration on this agenda item at its May 2019 session.
|
GRSP-64-36
|
12 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Pedestrian Safety
Pedestrian Safety (GTR)
Global Technical Regulation No. 9: Pedestrian Safety
Pedestrian Safety
Pedestrian Safety
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to their pedestrian safety performance
|
|
GRSP-64-0036
|
UN R17: Presentation on the revision to align UN R17 with GTR 7 (document GRSP/2018/34)
(EC and Japan)
UN R17: Presentation on the revision to align UN R17 with GTR 7 (document GRSP/2018/34)
|
Submitted by: EC and Japan
|
Date: 13 Dec 18
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/34 | UN R17: Proposal for the 10 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
16. The experts from Japan and EC introduced GRSP-64-37 on the proposal of amendments (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/34) to UN Regulation No. 17 (Strength of seats) that would align it with Phase 2 of UN GTR No. 7 (see para. 5 above). The expert from CLEPA introduced GRSP-64-25, to clarify static alternative provisions of UN GTR No. 7, Phase 2 and modifications to the allowed range of tolerances to backset retention and to the energy dissipation test. GRSP agreed to hand over GRSP-64-25 to the IWG for its possible integration in the proposal of amendments to UN Regulation No. 17 and to the draft amendment to UN GTR No. 7. GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its May 2019 session on the basis of the progress of the IWG work.
|
GRSP-64-37
|
13 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Strength of Seats, Anchorages, and Head Restraints
Strength of Seats
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to the Seats, their Anchorages and any Head Restraints
|
|
GRSP-64-0037
|
Introduction to Revision of GTR 7 (document GRSP/2018/27)
(Germany)
Introduction to Revision of GTR 7 (document GRSP/2018/27)
|
Submitted by: Germany
|
Date: 13 Dec 18
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/27 | GTR 7: Proposal for Amendment 1
|
GRSP-64-38
|
13 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Head Restraints
Head Restraints
Global Technical Regulation No. 7: Head Restraints
|
|
GRSP-64-0038
|
GTR 7: Proposal for Amendment 1 (Phase 2 development)
(Germany, Japan, and Netherlands)
GTR 7: Proposal for Amendment 1 (Phase 2 development)
|
Description
|
Proposal to introduce a new measurement procedure for the effective height of the head restraint and introduction of the Biofidelic Rear Impact Device (BioRID). This proposal eliminates the backset measurement test procedure using the HRMD method.
|
Submitted by: Germany, Japan, and Netherlands
|
Date: 13 Dec 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/27 | GTR 7: Proposal for Amendment 1
GRSP/2019/5 | GTR 7: Proposal for Amendment 1 (Phase 2)
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
4. The expert from Germany introduced GRSP-64-38, to present the proposed Amendment 2 (GRSP-64-39-Rev.1 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/27) to UN GTR No. 7 (Phase 2 of the UN GTR on head restraints), jointly prepared with the experts from Japan and the Netherlands. He explained that the proposal still has several items, in several square brackets, to be solved. However, he added that the draft amendment would introduced five main changes to the UN GTR: - Procedure for establishing the height of the head restraint base on the head contact rather than at its absolute height;
- Height measurement test procedure;
- Deletion of the backset measurement test procedure using the H-point machine method;
- Introduction of the backset measurement test procedure using the R-point method; and
- Introduction of the dynamic performance test procedure, by using the Biomechanical Rear Impact Dummy (BioRID) and empirical criteria instead of biomechanical (due to the absence of an absolute medical definition of whiplash) to establish seat performance.
6. Finally, GRSP experts were invited to provide comments to GRSP-64-39-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-40 to the expert from Japan by the end of January 2019. Moreover, it was agreed that IWG organize a webex meeting to allow the expert from Japan to submit an official proposal of amendments, which would also incorporate GRSP-64-25 (see para. 16 of this report) by 15 February 2019.
4. The expert from Germany introduced GRSP-65-32, to present the proposed Amendment 2 (GRSP-65-24 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2019/5) to UN GTR No. 7 (Phase 2 of the UN GTR on head restraints), jointly prepared with the experts from Japan and the Netherlands. He explained that the proposal has removed several square brackets and therefore solving the main issues. He added that the draft amendment would introduce: (a) injury criteria focusing on Neck Injury Criteria (NIC) namely upper and lower neck flexion and extension, (b) BioRID as an option for contracting parties to Hybrid III still and © procedure for establishing the height of the head restraint based on the head contact rather than at its absolute height. He clarified that the proposal that would need still some changes, will be complemented by a proposal of Addendum 1 to the Mutual Resolution No. 1 to insert drawings and specifications of the BioRID, to be presented at the December 2019 session of GRSP. Moreover, the experts from France and Russian Federation announced that they would not need the translation of the BioRID manual or other dummy specification and can be dealt with in English only. GRSP noted that all these specifications, when they would be submitted, shall need a disclaimer letter from the dummy manufacturer concerning copyright claims and that they might be upload on the M.R.1 website without any copyright infringements.
5. [At] the same time, the expert from Japan introduced the ninth status report of the Informal Working Group (IWG) on Head Restraints (GRSP-65-31). The expert from CLEPA withdrew ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2019/8 and introduced GRSP-65-30 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2019/10 amending the static options of the proposal.
6. Finally, GRSP experts were invited to provide comments to GRSP-65-24 to the expert from Japan by 13 September 2019. Moreover, GRSP requested the secretariat to distribute GRSP-65-30 and GRSP-65-31 with an official symbol and agreed to seek consent of WP.29 and AC.3 to extend the mandate of the IWG until June 2020.
|
GRSP-64-39/Rev.1
|
13 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Head Restraints
Head Restraints
Global Technical Regulation No. 7: Head Restraints
|
Proposal to introduce a new measurement procedure for the effective height of the head restraint and introduction of the Biofidelic Rear Impact Device (BioRID). This proposal eliminates the backset measurement test procedure using the HRMD method.
|
GRSP-64-0039/Rev.1
|
GTR 7: Draft 8th progress report of the informal group on Phase 2
(Japan)
GTR 7: Draft 8th progress report of the informal group on Phase 2
|
Submitted by: Japan
|
Date: 13 Dec 18
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
5. In the same time, the expert from Japan introduced the eighth status report of the Informal Working Group (IWG) on Head Restraints. The expert from OICA suggested that both UN GTR No. 7 and UN Regulation No. 17 be kept aligned. However, he added that if, at this time, it was difficult to maintain alignment, he urged GRSP to at least amend UN Regulation No. 17 to include the outcome of the IWG work. The expert from CLEPA introduced GRSP-64-44, expressing concerns on repeatability and reproducibility of BioRID test results and suggesting permissible variations to the injury criteria. GRSP noted that a proposal for amendments to Mutual Resolution No. 1 (M.R.1), which incorporated drawings and specifications of the BioRID dummy would possibly be presented at the May 2019 session of GRSP.
6. Finally, GRSP experts were invited to provide comments to GRSP-64-39-Rev.1 and GRSP-64-40 to the expert from Japan by the end of January 2019. Moreover, it was agreed that IWG organize a webex meeting to allow the expert from Japan to submit an official proposal of amendments, which would also incorporate GRSP-64-25 (see para. 16 of this report) by 15 February 2019.
|
GRSP-64-40
|
13 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Head Restraints
Head Restraints
Global Technical Regulation No. 7: Head Restraints
|
|
GRSP-64-0040
|
Pedestrian safety in Japan
(Japan, MLIT, NTSEL, and NTSEL)
Pedestrian safety in Japan
|
Submitted by: Japan, MLIT, NTSEL, and NTSEL
|
Date: 13 Dec 18
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
49. The expert from Japan introduced GRSP-64-41 on the current research programme in his country on improving pedestrian safety. He added that notwithstanding successful national regulatory efforts, pedestrians still accounted for the largest proportion of recent fatal traffic accidents. He concluded that performance protection such as at A-pillar would be increased by airbag deployment.
|
GRSP-64-41
|
14 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Pedestrian Safety
Pedestrian Safety (GTR)
Global Technical Regulation No. 9: Pedestrian Safety
Pedestrian Safety
Pedestrian Safety
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to their pedestrian safety performance
|
|
GRSP-64-0041
|
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series and Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
(CLEPA)
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series and Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to clarify that Conformity of Production assessments shall be conducted under the same requirements as those of the original approval or, if applicable, the extension of the approval. This proposal supersedes the proposal to require testing of Integral ISOFIX ECRS to use the door panel geometry of the 00 series of UN R129 (document GRSP/2018/31).
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
Date: 13 Dec 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/31 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments and Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
WP.29/2019/40 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
32. The expert from CLEPA withdrew ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/31 and introduced GRSP-64-42 to clarify that conformity of production (COP) testing should be conducted using the same requirements which were effective at the time of the initial approval or any later applicable extension. The expert from Italy suggested that a similar requirement could be handed over to other UN Regulations to ensure consistency of COP testing. GRSP adopted GRSP-64-42 as reproduced in Annex V to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit GRSP-64-42 as part of (see paras. 29–31) draft Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments and as part of (see paras. 29–31) draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
GRSP-64-42
|
14 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to clarify that Conformity of Production assessments shall be conducted under the same requirements as those of the original approval or, if applicable, the extension of the approval. This proposal supersedes the proposal to require testing of Integral ISOFIX ECRS to use the door panel geometry of the 00 series of UN R129 (document GRSP/2018/31).
|
GRSP-64-0042
|
UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
(CLEPA)
UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Proposal to introduce provisions for the booster cushion category of child restraint systems under UN R129.
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
Date: 13 Dec 18
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/29 | UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
GRSP-64-15 | UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
GRSP/2019/12 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 3 to the 03 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
35. The expert from CLEPA introduced a summary of all the documents that he had submitted (GRSP-64-29) and presented GRSP-64-16-Rev.1 on the draft 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/29 complemented by GRSP-64-15) aimed at including in the scope of the UN Regulation: - non-integral Universal ECRS with no backrest (i-Size booster cushion) and
- non-integral Specific vehicle ECRS with no backrest (Specific vehicle booster cushion).
Moreover, the expert from CLEPA introduced a consolidated text of all the comments received ( GRSP-64-43). The expert from Germany argued that the definition of i-Size was associated with an additional side-impact test to assess protection of children when the vehicle was involved in such a collision and to ensure that children under fifteen months travel in the rearward facing position. Therefore, he stated that he opposed associating the above proposed new categories of ECRS with the i-Size definition to avoid confusion among users. The expert from Japan supported the opinion of the expert from Germany. The experts from IC and EC endorsed the inclusion of such ECRS in the scope of UN Regulation No. 129 to definitively phase out UN Regulation No. 44. Finally, GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its May 2019 session. Therefore, GRSP agreed to defer the discussion on parallel amendments to other series of amendments affected by the draft 04 series of amendments ( ECE/ TRANS/WP.29/ GRSP/2018/30, ECE/ TRANS/WP.29/ GRSP/2018/32 and GRSP-64-27) at its May 2019 session. Moreover, the secretariat was requested to keep GRSP-64-27 as a reference in the agenda and to distribute GRSP-64-43 with an official symbol at the next session of GRSP.
34. The expert from CLEPA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2019/12 and its amendment, GRSP-65-27-Rev.1. He explained that the proposal introduced the booster cushion without a backrest, and concluded the development of UN Regulation No. 129. GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2019/12, as amended by Annex V to the session report, and requested the secretariat to submit it as Supplement 3 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129, for consideration and vote at the November 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
GRSP-64-43
|
14 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to introduce provisions for the booster cushion category of child restraint systems under UN R129.
|
GRSP-64-0043
|
GTR 7: Dynamic criteria for the BioRID dummy
(CLEPA)
GTR 7: Dynamic criteria for the BioRID dummy
|
Description
|
Report on CLEPA assessments of the proposed GTR 7 Phase 2 BioRID criteria.
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
Date: 13 Dec 18
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2019/7 | UN R17: Proposal for the 10 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
5. In the same time, the expert from Japan introduced the eighth status report of the Informal Working Group (IWG) on Head Restraints. The expert from OICA suggested that both UN GTR No. 7 and UN Regulation No. 17 be kept aligned. However, he added that if, at this time, it was difficult to maintain alignment, he urged GRSP to at least amend UN Regulation No. 17 to include the outcome of the IWG work. The expert from CLEPA introduced GRSP-64-44, expressing concerns on repeatability and reproducibility of BioRID test results and suggesting permissible variations to the injury criteria. GRSP noted that a proposal for amendments to Mutual Resolution No. 1 (M.R.1), which incorporated drawings and specifications of the BioRID dummy would possibly be presented at the May 2019 session of GRSP.
|
GRSP-64-44
|
14 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Head Restraints
Head Restraints
Global Technical Regulation No. 7: Head Restraints
|
Report on CLEPA assessments of the proposed GTR 7 Phase 2 BioRID criteria.
|
GRSP-64-0044
|
Highlights of the first GRVA session
Highlights of the first GRVA session
|
Date: 14 Dec 18
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
46. GRSP noted GRSP-64-45 on the decision of WP.29 to convert the Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF) into the Working Party on Automated/Autonomous and Connected Vehicles (GRVA) and to reallocate certain tasks of GRRF to other GRs (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1139, para. 33). GRSP also noted the recommendation of WP.29 that GRSP should insert UN Regulation No. 111 into its programme of work. The Chair of GRSP suggested that the group start exploring which areas under the responsibility of GRSP should be revised by developing vehicle automation. Thus, he indicatively mentioned topics such as safety-belts, frontal impact and seat strength and volunteered to provide a more complete list at the May 2019 session of GRSP.
|
GRSP-64-45
|
17 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management
Cybersecurity
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to cyber security and cyber security management system
Guidelines of Software Update Technical Requirements
Software Updates Guidelines
Software Update Processes and Management Systems
SW Updates
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to software update and software update management system
Automatic Emergency Braking for M1/N1 vehicles
Light Vehicle AEBS
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Advanced Emergency Braking System (AEBS) for M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> vehicles
Steering Equipment
Steering Equipment
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to Steering Equipment
Advanced Emergency Braking Systems
Advanced Emergency Braking
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to advanced emergency braking systems
|
|
GRSP-64-0045
|