European Commission responses to document ACSF-13-04.

Revised proposal based upon document ACSF-12-11.

Proposal based on document ACSF-12-12.

Japanese proposal for false positive testing of automated emergency steering systems.

OICA-CLEPA perspectives on the definition and use of Category C lane-change systems, especially emphasizing the need for human supervision (SAE Level 2 automation).

Diagrams to illustrate Japan’s proposal (ACSF-13-13) for false-positive testing of emergency steering functions.

German proposal concerning performance requirements for rear and side view assistance systems defined as “a system that provides assistance to the driver in monitoring a defined area to the rear and to the side of the ACSF vehicle by the use of means (e.g. Radar, Lidar, Camera) whereby the driver remains in the full responsibility to surveil the traffic behind and beside the ACSF vehicle.”

OICA-CLEPA “homework” input addressing open issues from the previous ACSF informal group session.

Presentation covering

1. Lane change functional test
2. Abort of lane change test
3. Overriding force test
4. Deactivation test
5. Sensor performance test
6. Sensor blindness test (industry proposal)
7. Engine start/run cycle test (three phases)

OICA-CLEPA proposals for improvement of the draft text pursuant to open issues from the previous ACSF informal group session.

Proposals concerning capabilities and requirements for ultra-sonic sensors, radar systems, and blind-spot detection and view on HMI and C1-C2 mode confusion issue.

Following bench testing of steering override force of 50 N, all participants concurred that the 50 N force can be easily handled and therefore is appropriate for all categories of CSF, ACSF, and ESF systems.

Draft proposal for automated lane-change and related functions including open issues for consideration prior to the next ACSF informal group session.