| Request for clarification regarding identification of CRS through type approval number |
| Reference Number: GRSP-79-34 |
|
This document raises concerns regarding identification of child restraint systems through type approval numbers. Multiple brand names are marketed under single type approval numbers, creating market confusion and hampering consumer choice. Products with identical type approval numbers but variations in plastic parts have been identified and failed frontal impact testing. Proposed measures include limiting brand names per type approval number to five maximum, adding manufacturer names to type approval labels, and establishing a publicly accessible database of type approval information. |
| Submitted by: CI |
| Meeting Sessions: 79th GRSP session (1-5 Jun) |
| Document date: 02 Jun 26 |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 129 | Enhanced Child Restraint Systems |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| UN R129: Proposal for a 06 series of amendments |
| Reference Number: GRSP-79-24 |
|
Proposal to:
|
| Submitted by: Netherlands |
| Meeting Sessions: 79th GRSP session (1-5 Jun) |
| Document date: 29 May 26 |
| Document status: Informal GR review |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 129 | Enhanced Child Restraint Systems |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| ISOFIX and iSize position definitions under UN R145 and R173 per R129 |
| Reference Number: STCBC-TF173-06-06 |
|
ISOFIX position means a position satisfying regulation requirements to allow installation of ISOFIX child restraint systems as defined in UN R44 and UN R129. i-Size seating position means a seating position satisfying regulation requirements to allow installation of i-Size child restraint systems as defined in UN R129. |
| Meeting Sessions: 6th STCBC-TF173 session (24 Feb) |
| Document date: 24 Feb 26 |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 129 | Enhanced Child Restraint Systems, UN Regulation No. 173 | Installation of safety belts, restraint systems, child restraint systems, ISOFIX child restraint systems and i-Size child restraint systems, and UN Regulation No. 145 | ISOFIX anchorages systems, ISOFIX top tether anchorages and i-Size seating positions |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| UN R129: Proposal for a 05 series of amendments |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2026/55 |
|
Proposal to modify para. 6.2.1.1. regarding insert layers for small babies with stature below 50 cm, amend Annex 18, table 1 with updated shoulder height dimensions for statures 40 cm to 70 cm, update approval markings in Annex 2, and introduce transitional provisions with Contracting Parties no longer obliged to accept preceding series approvals from 1 September 2028. |
| Submitted by: GRSP |
| Meeting Sessions: 199th WP.29 session (22-26 Jun) |
| Document date: 31 Mar 26 |
| Document status: Adopted by WP.29 |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 129 | Enhanced Child Restraint Systems |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| UN R129: Proposal for a Supplement 5 to the 04 series of amendments |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2026/54 |
|
Proposal based on GRSP/2025/31 to amend para. 7.1.3.6. to require relevant intermediate dummies testing when Enhanced Child Restraint Systems require substantial modification for different sizes or when size range covers more than 3 size ranges and to delete paragraph 5.5. and renumber paragraphs 5.6. to 5.8. as 5.5. to 5.7. |
| Submitted by: GRSP |
| Meeting Sessions: 199th WP.29 session (22-26 Jun) |
| Document date: 31 Mar 26 |
| Document status: Adopted by WP.29 |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 129 | Enhanced Child Restraint Systems |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| UN R129: Proposal for a Supplement 5 to the 04 series and a Supplement 1 to the 05 series of amendments |
| Reference Number: GRSP/2026/2 |
|
Proposal to amend UN Regulation No. 129 to remove rebound head contact from the head acceleration requirement for all Child Restraint Systems. The regulation currently lacks consistency regarding whether rebound head movement is considered in testing. Variations in test bench design cause booster seats to pass in some laboratories but fail in others based solely on rebound contact. The proposal ensures consistency between different CRS types and reproducibility across laboratories with different test bench designs, and aligns with the approach in UN Regulations 94 and 137. |
| Submitted by: CLEPA |
| Meeting Sessions: 79th GRSP session (1-5 Jun) |
| Document date: 19 Mar 26 |
| Document status: Formal GR review |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 129 | Enhanced Child Restraint Systems |
| Click here to view the full document file |
No matching documents.