3. (c) Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H: Clarifications
|
11. The Chair of GRRF recalled the purpose of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2013/13, adopted during the seventy-fifth GRRF session. The document remained on the agenda of GRRF, pending submission to the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) and the Administrative Committee of the 1958 Agreement (AC.1) of the adopted text for Regulation No. 89 (Speed limitation devices).
|
GRRF/2013/13 | Proposal for collective amendments - Regulation Nos. 13, 13-H, 79, 89, and the LDWS and AEBS regulations
|
Proposal for collective amendments - Regulation Nos. 13, 13-H, 79, 89, and the LDWS and AEBS regulations
|
|
Reference Number: GRRF/2013/13
|
|
Proposal for collective amendments of amendments to Regulations Nos. 13 (Heavy vehicle braking), 13-H (Brakes of M1 and N1 vehicles), 79 (Steering equipment) and 89 (Speed limitation devices) and the new Regulations on LDWS and AEBS to clarify the references to Regulation No. 10 into the UN Regulations mentioned above.
|
|
Submitted by: OICA and CLEPA
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 75th GRRF session (17-19
Sep 2013)
|
|
Document date: 06 Jul 13
|
|
Document status: Superseded
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. The expert from the Netherlands introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/2 proposing to delete an obsolete provision in Annex 5 to Regulation No. 13. He recalled the context of this proposal, originally suggested by the expert from the Netherlands the ninety-nine session of the Working Party on the Transport of Dangerous Goods (WP.15) and considered at the 168th session of WP.29 (WP.29-168-16). He added that this proposal took into consideration the comments received at the previous session of GRRF (see ECE/TRANS/WP29/GRRF/82, para. 11).
13. GRRF adopted the proposal and requested the secretariat to keep it on the agenda for the next session.
|
GRRF/2017/2 | Proposal for an amendment of Regulation No. 13
|
Proposal for an amendment of Regulation No. 13
|
|
Reference Number: GRRF/2017/2
|
|
Proposal to delete a redundant requirement. The paragraphs 2.2. and 2.2.1. are superfluous since paragraph 5.2.2.13. already requires all O4 trailers to be equipped with Anti-lock Braking Systems (ABS) of Category A.
|
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 83rd GRRF session (23-27
Jan 2017)
|
|
Document date: 14 Nov 16
|
|
Document status: Superseded
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
WP.29-168-16 | Proposal from WP.15 to amend Regulation No. 13
|
Proposal from WP.15 to amend Regulation No. 13
|
|
Reference Number: WP.29-168-16
|
|
Proposal from the Working Party on Dangerous Goods to delete paragraph 2.2.1 and 2.3.2 in Annex 5 of Regulation No. 13 permitting the use of an endurance braking system on a trailer to compensate for insufficient performance of the endurance braking system of the motor vehicles. Such systems have been prohibited by WP.15 such that alignment of the vehicle technical requirements is needed.
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 168th WP.29 session (8-11
Mar 2016)
|
|
Document date: 08 Mar 16
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. The expert from CLEPA presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/27, as amended by GRRF-82-03. Following discussions, the experts from the European Commission and from CLEPA presented GRRF-83-31. GRRF agreed to resume consideration of this subject and requested the secretariat to distribute this informal document with an official symbol at its September 2017 session.
|
GRRF-82-03 | Proposal for amendments to Regulations No. 13
|
Proposal for amendments to Regulations No. 13
|
|
Reference Number: GRRF-82-03
|
|
UN R13 allows for the exemption of certain vehicles from the requirement for electronic stability controls. This proposal seeks to clarify the scope of the exemptions to include any special purpose vehicle with a non-standard chassis. The change was prompted by a modified vehicle where use of ESC was not feasible, but where the current UN R13 language left doubt as to whether the ESC requirement was applicable. This revised proposal takes into account comments received during the February 2016 GRRF session.
|
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 82nd GRRF session (20-23
Sep 2016)
|
|
Document date: 01 Sep 16
|
|
Document status: Superseded
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
GRRF-83-31 | Proposal for amendments to Footnote 12 in Regulation No. 13
|
Proposal for amendments to Footnote 12 in Regulation No. 13
|
|
Reference Number: GRRF-83-31
|
|
UN R13 allows for the exemption of certain vehicles from the requirement for electronic stability controls (footnote 12). This proposal (following proposals GRRF/2016/27 and GRRF-82-03) seeks to clarify the scope of the exemptions to include any special purpose vehicle with a non-standard chassis. The change was prompted by a modified vehicle where use of ESC was not feasible, but where the current UN R13 language left doubt as to whether the ESC requirement was applicable.
|
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 83rd GRRF session (23-27
Jan 2017)
|
|
Document date: 27 Jan 17
|
|
Document status: Superseded
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
GRRF/2016/27 | Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13
|
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13
|
|
Reference Number: GRRF/2016/27
|
|
UN R13 allows for the exemption of certain vehicles from the requirement for electronic stability controls. This proposal seeks to clarify the scope of the exemptions to include any special purpose vehicle with a non-standard chassis. The change was prompted by a modified vehicle where use of ESC was not feasible, but where the current UN R13 language left doubt as to whether the ESC requirement was applicable. This revised proposal takes into account comments received during the February 2016 GRRF session.
|
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 82nd GRRF session (20-23
Sep 2016)
|
|
Document date: 05 Jul 16
|
|
Document status: Superseded
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. The expert from Germany presented GRRF-83-07 based on ECE/TRANS/WP29/GRRF/2016/26, originally tabled by the expert from France. GRRF noted that the proposed amendment to para. 2.2.18. in Annex 12 already existed and the wording proposed could be clarified. GRRF agreed to resume consideration of this proposal on the basis of an official working document that the experts from Germany and France volunteered to prepare.
|
GRRF-83-07 | Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13, Annex 12
|
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13, Annex 12
|
|
Reference Number: GRRF-83-07
|
|
Proposal to simplify the verification of sufficient movement on the balancer (of the compensator) without having to take measurements underneath the trailer in an potentially unsecured position and to correct the text of Annex 12 (Conditions governing the testing of vehicles equipped with inertia (overrun) braking systems). Intention to provide an objective calculation method as part of setting requirements for permissible “differential travel” or swivel.
|
|
Submitted by: France and Germany
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 83rd GRRF session (23-27
Jan 2017)
|
|
Document date: 20 Jan 17
|
|
Document status: Superseded
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
GRRF/2016/26 | Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13
|
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13
|
|
Reference Number: GRRF/2016/26
|
|
Proposal to clarify paragraph 8.1.2. The paragraph aimed to verify that the compensator can accept a difference of the travel when one brake operates in forward direction and the other in rearward direction with a margin of twenty per cent.
|
|
Submitted by: France
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 82nd GRRF session (20-23
Sep 2016)
|
|
Document date: 05 Jul 16
|
|
Document status: Superseded
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
|
|
|
|