OICA presentation on approaches and trade-offs in handling driver availability for transitions between automated vehicle system and human driver.

OICA and CLEPA note that the current work on ACSF does not address class O vehicles (trailers) and therefore leaves unsettled the issue of heavy-duty commercial vehicles. The two groups signal that the informal group must coordinate with the GRRF to ensure that trailers are eventually incorporated in the ACSF approval procedures under UN R79.

Presentation and supporting materials to facilitate discussion towards clarifying provisions on sensor range and monitoring of the vehicle environment.

Discussion of parameters to delineate corrective steering function (CSF) from automatically commanded steering function (ACSF) systems. The former refers to intermittent systems such as lane-keeping while the latter refers to systems in continuous control of the steering function.

Proposal to refine the language ensuring that drivers may override the ACSF system through deliberate action.

Proposal for amendments to document ACSF-07-02.

Proposal towards defining corrective steering functions as a distinct function apart from automatically commanded steering functions.

OICA input on definition of corrective steering and automatically commanded steering functions.

Industry comment in support of “Option 4” in document GRRF/2016/45, the proposal to introduce technical requirements for Corrective Steering Functions (lane departure prevention, lane-keeping assistance (LKAS), steering angle correction, etc.) as defined in the regulation.

VDA research on warning times and proposing a 30s threshold at lower speeds.

Proposal for an “Emergency Steering Function” to automatically assist drivers in avoiding an impending collision with an obstacle or other vehicle.

Proposal to include under the complex electronics annex of UN R79, if only as an interim measure, provisions for the approval of automated systems that bring a vehicle safely to a stop in the event of driver incapacitation.

Proposals to clarify and refine provisions in the draft corrective steering function amendment to UN R79 (document GRRF-82-12/Rev.3).

Proposals for the text of the draft amendment to UN R79 to enable the approval of automated lane-changing systems.

Proposal to amend provisions on electronic stability control warnings under braking regulations to allow for activation of the ESC visual warning during a stability-assistance intervention of an electronic steering control. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated stability assistance that would lead to two visual warnings where only one is appropriate.

OICA proposal for the definition of ay_smax (the maximum lateral acceleration under which an automated steering function is designed to operate).

OICA comments on the ISO proposals to clarify the provisions of Regulation No. 51, Revision 3, Annex 7.

iSize CRS vehicle compatibility analysis

Working draft proposal to update UN R16 in accordance with the Phase 2 development of UN Regulation Nos. 44 and 129 on child restraint systems, especially with regard to the ISO booster-seat fixtures (B2 and B3).

Proposal to align provision of the UN R14 with the phase 2 (02 series of amendments) development of UN R129 on child restraint systems.

Proposal for Appendix 5: Installation of booster seat fixtures. Addition of ISO/B2 and ISO/B3 booster seat fixtures.

Working draft text to update UN R14 with regard to ISOFIX restraint fixtures.

Proposal from OICA to harmonize the mass tolerances of the ISO CRS fixtures and provide for transitional provisions.

Presentation prepared by OICA.

Proposed definition of the scope of a UI in terms of product compliance with the regulations under which it has been approved. If a product modification would require its testing for conformity with one or more UN Regulations as a new approval, then the UI must be changed to distinguish the product from similar product(s) approved previously. If a modification to a product has no consequences in terms of its current conformity, compliance, certification or approval(s), then the product may continue to use the current UI assigned pursuant to its approval.

During its first session, the EMC Task Force considered proposal regarding the application of UN R10 to trolley buses (under UN R107), to UN R46 (indirect vision and camera monitor systems), and to the work on automatic emergency call systems (AECS), as well as a proposal to amend UN R10 itself. OICA provides the views of its EMC experts in this document.

When a vehicle charger is tested to UN R10.05 as an “Electrical/electronic Sub-Assembly” (ESA) (annexes 17-22), what is the valid route for avoiding duplicate vehicle-level tests to Annexes 11-16?

Comments regarding the method of stating energy consumption and arguing against pursuing an electrified vehicle durability assessment method given the rapidly changing technologies.