Proposal to supersede document GRBP/2026/4 intended to introduce a “default mode”, to specify requirements to be applied to the emission of Enhanced Exterior Sound (EES), with corresponding transitional provisions, and to draw a limit curve to introduce electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles that can be propelled without an internal combustion engine operating in the scope of ASEP (Annex 7).

Proposal to amend UN Regulation No. 142 to clarify that a maximum speed warning label specifying the lowest value of the maximum speed capability of fitted snow tyres displayed inside the vehicle in a prominent position readily and permanently visible to the driver can be via a permanent physical label or an electronic display, and in case of an electronic display the warning can be shown permanently or when the respective speed limit is approached, reached or exceeded, and to provide that the speed warning label shall not be required for vehicles of categories X and Y equipped with an ADS.

Proposal to amend para. 6.2.1.1. to permit testing of vehicle sound either indoors or outdoors with equivalent results, add new Annex 11 specifying indoor testing provisions, amend Annex 1 to insert para. 8.5. and 8.5.1. requiring documentation of test method selected, amend Annex 3 para. 1. to specify sound level meter requirements for indoor testing per IEC 651 and IEC 61672-3, amend Annex 3 para. 1.1.1. to provide calibration procedures for indoor testing per IEC 942:1988, amend Annex 3 para. 1.3. to exempt wind speed monitoring for indoor facilities, amend Annex 3 para. 2.1. and add para. 2.1.4. to specify outdoor and indoor test site requirements per ISO 362-3:2022 and ISO 26101, add para. 2.1.5. specifying indoor ambient conditions, add para. 2.2.7. addressing test mass for indoor dynamometer testing, amend Annex 3 para. 3. to specify outdoor and indoor test procedures per ISO 362-3:2022 Variant A, amend Annex 3 para. 3.1.1. to clarify outdoor testing microphone placement, add para. 3.1.1.4. defining virtual lines and simulated vehicle speeds for indoor testing, and renumber former paras. 3.1.1.4. and 3.1.1.5. as 3.1.1.5. and 3.1.1.6.

Rationale for Figure Part B.5 of GRBP-84-36-Rev.1

Proposal clarifies the “Manufacturer logo” means a light emitting graphic mark, emblem, word, or combination of those elements used to aid public identification of a vehicle manufacturer’s brand name when the function is switched ON. Improved justification for the proposal

Paper introduces an ADS marker lamp to identify vehicles operating with an Automated Driving System. Industry does not seek to mandate such a lamp. It identifies safety and security concerns including no demonstrated real-world net safety benefit, targeting and public violence risks, cargo robbery risks, child safeguarding concerns, cyber-physical attack surface expansion, and spoofing and misuse potential.

Proposal provides an alternative proposal to GRE/2024/12 Revision 2 as amended by GRE-93-28 Revision 1 .

Proposal to clarify manufacturer logo requirements across several paragraphs: confirming that non-illuminated graphic marks are not considered logos (para. 2.1.7.); permitting vehicle manufacturers to keep the inner portion of a front position lamp active when an AFS headlamp substitutes the outer portion (para. 5.12.1.4.); improving logo language for Light Signalling Devices approved to UN R148 (para. 5.30.1.); and clarifying that Road Illumination Devices approved to UN R149 shall not include a manufacturer logo (para. 5.30.2.).

Proposal to improve FTIR/QCL Analyser Examination (Para. 9.3.2.8.1, 9.3.2.9.1, 9.3.2.10, Appendices 10–11), including expanding the examination authority to include type-approval authorities and technical services, requiring witnessing of the testing at the instrument manufacturer’s facility, and introducing new appendices providing an examiner template and a verification certificate format, and to permit other techniques for the water quench check (Para. 9.3.2.9.9) to address the adverse effects of H₂O and CO₂ on the CLD’s NOx response and align with the provisions of 40 CFR 1065.750(e)(5).

Proposal to clarify the selection of the wheel load among vehicles with identical brake assemblies for particle emissions testing.

Proposal to clarify Annex 3, table A3/1 regarding minimum type-approval requirements for Euro 6e, Euro 6e-bis, and Euro 6e-bis-FCM under UN R83 by specifying the relevant series of amendments for UN R24, R85, and R168, which were omitted when the 08 Series was created as no new amendments were anticipated at the time. A minor editorial correction is also included.

Proposal to correct several outdated references following structural changes to UN R154 (04 series of amendments), including updated appendix numbering in paragraphs 2.47, 2.48, and Annex 5, removal of “worst case certified energy consumption Part B family” from Table 4 reporting requirements, and correction of the vehicle survey reference to reflect its relocation to the 9 Series of amendments to UN R83.

Proposal to delete two paragraphs relating to “Operating Mode Switch” that were overlooked when that concept was removed from Regulation No. 83, from both the manufacturer’s information document (Annex 1) and the approval certificate addendum (Annex 2). The same documentation requirements were removed from the 08 series of amendments (during GREP-93), differing only in paragraph numbering.

Proposal clarifies the text relating to On-Board Diagnostics (OBD)

Proposal brings clarity to references and to correct copy & paste mistakes and possible misinterpretations related to in-vehicle battery durability and low
temperature.

Proposal clarifies the OBFCM requirements

Proposal for change in transitional provisions to take into considerations of the lifetime value retention status

Current status of calculation method and component dynamometer tests

Provides corrections and updates to the requirements, including to reflect the fact that requirements for manipulation devices and manipulation strategies

This proposal updates provisions for automated vehicles and automated driving systems.

Proposal to remove the provisions relating to manipulation devices and manipulation strategies that are being moved to UN R154 and clarify that in-service conformity checks for electric range of pure electric vehicles at low temperatures are optional.

Proposal to introduce in-service conformity requirements for system power.

Proposal to introduce provisions relating to

• Manipulation Devices and Strategies that were previously in the 09 series of amendments to UN R83,
• the levels to which certain provisions apply,
• clarifications and corrections to the requirements for the laboratory test for pure electric range ratio at low temperature for Pure Electric Vehicles
• an update to allow the use in Levels 1A and 2 of actual tyre rolling resistance values to calculate the final road load coefficient for the individual vehicles, and
• align the Regulation with the current regional status and the current state-of-the-art.

Proposal to reintroduce text that was unintentionally omitted in document GRPE/2025/12 as adopted by GRPE during its 92nd session.

Proposal to amend the scope to allow type approval of vehicles of categories M₁, M₂, N₁ and N₂ with a reference mass not exceeding 2,840 kg at the manufacturer’s request as an extension from vehicles with reference mass not exceeding 2,610 kg, and to allow type approval of special purpose vehicles of categories M₁, M₂, N₁ and N₂ regardless of their reference mass at the manufacturer’s request, with the manufacturer demonstrating to the Type Approval Authority that the vehicle in question is a special purpose vehicle.

Proposal to amend the scope to allow type approval of vehicles of categories M₁, M₂, N₁ and N₂ with a reference mass not exceeding 2,840 kg as direct approvals rather than only as extensions based on approved configurations below 2,610 kg. The modification permits manufacturers to obtain type approval for vehicles within the 2,610 kg to 2,840 kg reference mass range regardless of whether lower-mass configurations of the same vehicle type are approved, addressing concerns that the previous restriction created market distortions affecting different manufacturers differently, a concern heightened by fleet electrification.

Proposal to amend para. 1 to clarify that type approval may be granted to vehicles of categories M₁, M₂, and N₁ with a reference mass not exceeding 2,840 kg at the manufacturer’s request, without requiring an existing approval of a configuration below 2,610 kg. The current wording restricts approval between 2,610 kg and 2,840 kg to extensions of existing approvals, creating market distortion. The concern is becoming more relevant with fleet electrification, as electrified vehicles are heavier and require different type designations in emissions-based regulations.

Proposal to clarify opaque obscuration in indirect vision devices. The proposal inserts a definition of opaque obscuration and amends paragraph 15.1.4 to correct a reference to UN R43, Annex 24 rather than Annex 21. Paragraph 15.2.4.9.1 is amended to exclude areas of opaque obscuration from obstruction calculations for Class I rear-view devices, treating them similarly to mandatory rubber sealings used for window mounting.