Comments from the UK proposing new text for the 1997 Agreement on Periodical Technical Inspections for consideration at the 2nd PTI informal group session.

UK comments on UN Rule No. 1 for discussion during the 2nd PTI informal group session.

Proposal to amend Annex 4 – Data elements and format, Table 1, modifying Advanced driver distraction warning (ADDW) data elements to record status and time since warning issued instead of number of warnings and time elapsed since last warning, modifying Driver control assistance system (DCAS) driver monitoring system data elements to record time since disengagement warning issued and warning type instead of number of hands-on requests, eyes-on requests, direct control alerts, and time elapsed since last warning, and adding Driver drowsiness and attention warning (DDAW) status and time since warning issued data elements while removing number of warnings and time elapsed since last warning, with ADDW and DDAW elements listed up to five times for most recent warnings and DCAS warning type listed up to fifteen times for most recent warnings on current trip.

Proposal to amend UN R160:

• Amend definitions 2.8., 2.10., and 2.11. to clarify that automatically commanded steering function categories B2, D, and E are not part of a DCAS
• Delete definition 2.25.
• Amend definition 2.35. to simplify non-volatile memory
• Amend para. 2.45. to change service brake terminology
• Amend para. 2.51. to clarify time interval between events
• Amend para. 2.65. to abbreviate vulnerable road user
• Insert new definitions 2.71.–2.83. for rollover protection system, advanced emergency braking system, trigger activated, pre-event synchronization timer, blind spot monitoring system, emergency stop signal, turn signal, acceleration control for pedal error, advanced driver distraction warning system, driver drowsiness and attention warning system, driver control assistance system, and time to collision
• Restructure para. 5.3.1. to distinguish planar, VRU, and rollover events from AEBS events with specified triggers
• Amend para. 5.3.2. to clarify data locking conditions
• Restructure para. 5.3.3. to establish time zero for planar, VRU, rollover, and AEBS events
• Amend para. 5.4.3. to specify side and frontal collision tests
• Amend para. 6.1. to clarify post-crash acceleration measurement
• Insert transitional provisions 12.12.–12.16. providing that as from the official date of entry into force Contracting Parties shall not refuse type-approvals under the 03 series, as from 1 September 2031 or 2029 [date TBD] shall not accept type-approvals to preceding series first issued after that date, until 1 September 2033 shall continue accepting preceding series approvals first issued before 1 September 2031 or 2029 [date TBD], may grant approvals to preceding series, and shall grant extensions of existing approvals
• Amend Annex 4 Table 1 to split engine throttle and accelerator pedal data elements, increase sampling rates to 10 Hz, extend recording intervals for rollover events, add pre-event synchronization timer, trigger activated, ACPE status, ADDW status, DDAW status, blind spot monitoring status, turn signal status, DCAS status, DCAS driver monitoring system warnings, emergency stop signal status, and time to collision data elements, and modify footnotes accordingly

Proposal to amend UN R160:

• Insert new paras. 12.12. to 12.17. establishing transitional provisions for the 03 series of amendments, including that:
  • from the official date of entry into force, no Contracting Party shall refuse type approvals under the amended Regulation,
  • from 1 September 2031, Contracting Parties shall not be obliged to accept type approvals to preceding series first issued after that date,
  • until 1 September 2033, Contracting Parties shall accept type approvals to the 02 series first issued before 1 September 2031,
  • from 1 September 2033, Contracting Parties shall not be obliged to accept type approvals to preceding series,
  • Contracting Parties may grant type approvals according to any preceding series,
  • and Contracting Parties shall continue to grant extensions of existing approvals to any preceding series,
• Amend Annex 4 Table 1 and footnotes 28, 29, and 30 regarding trigger activated recording, powertrain torque demand signals, AEBS target classification, and TTC calculation requirements.

Proposal to amend footnote 25 to reduce the maximum number of recorded DCAS warnings from 15 to 10 per current ignition cycle. The justification presented cites data burden reduction while retaining information about habitual driver disengagement patterns. Supporting documentation references two autopilot collision cases—Florida 2016 and California 2018—where recorded warnings within existing data retention periods would have revealed repeated disengagement that current recording parameters miss, demonstrating that 10 warnings combined with extended recording duration enables identification of ineffective warning strategies.

Comments from Australia and the UK on the draft “Proposal for Revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement”.

The intention of this document is to explain important concepts and to provide guidance for Contracting Parties in order to enable effective and consistent application of the IWVTA process. This revision incorporates discussions from the 8th SGR0 group meeting.

Presentation to review the draft regulation that would enable the international type approval of whole vehicles.

Proposal to amend the paragraph concerning the modification of a vehicle type and extension or modification of approval.

Proposal to delete the Supplement number from the approval since supplements are not extensions and do not require renumbering under 1958 Agreement procedures.

Proposal to delete exhaust and fuel consumption provisions since these attributes are regulated by contracting parties and national authorities.

Following a request from the European Commission, the Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks (SCHEER) reviewed recent evidence to assess potential risks to human health posed by Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) emissions. The review of the published research conducted by the SCHEER has led to valuable conclusions and identified certain gaps in knowledge on potential risks to human health. The Committee concluded that there is no evidence of direct adverse health effects from
LEDs emission in normal use (lamps and displays) by the general healthy population.

Revised terms of reference submitted by the UK for the subgroup on physical certification and auditing of automated vehicles and driving systems.

This is an extraction and abridged summary of recommendations from papers on vehicle cybersecurity.

Reissued on 16 August for filing reasons.

Draft “Manufacturer’s declaration of compliance with the requirements for the Cyber Security Management System”