Proposal to introduce a definition for “bidirectional vehicle” and to remove the references to
the 3-D “H”-point machine (per their transposition to MR1 on test tools).

Proposal to ensure that vehicles exhibiting functionality meeting the definition of ACSF-B2 or -E are required to comply with the 01 series of R171 (or later). The 01 series added the necessary technical requirements to ensure the safety of features that allow ‘hands-free’ operation or perform system-initiated manoeuvres.

Proposal to enable approval of an Enhanced Child Restraint System (ECRS) with a module that is, or can be, converted into a booster seat or an ECRS with a module of a vehicle-specific application.

Proposal to allow the use of talcum for the dust resistance test as an alternative to dry
quartz.

Proposal to correct paragraph references and add the Regulation number in the introduction section (i.e., replace “Regulation No. XXX” with “Regulation No. 174”).

Proposal to update the options under multiple International Organization for Standardization (ISO) envelope drawings in appendix 2 to annex 6, including adding references to UN R129.

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to delete the Unique Identifier (UI) marking provisions

Proposal to amend in order to enable the application to vehicles equipped with an ADS.

Proposal by TF-AVRS to amend to enable the application of this Regulation to vehicles of categories X and Y

Proposal to enable the application of this Regulation to vehicles of categories X and Y.

Proposal to enable the application of this Regulation to vehicles of categories X and Y.

Pursuant to changing the application of the Unique Identifier (UI) under the 1958 Agreement, this proposal deletes the prohibition on use of the UI for replacement brake components under UN R90. Originally, the UI was applied by default to all UN Regulations which therefore required certain regulations to prohibit its use. Pursuant to the adopted proposal WP.29/2025/17, each regulation grants permission to use the UI so the provision prohibiting use under UN R90 is no longer needed.

Introduces an explanation to the background of the procedures to test
vehicle types including DPPS

Information to serve as guidance for Technical Services and Type Approval Authorities

Proposal ro clarify that the removal of an insert may also trigger additional tests with alternative dummy statures.

Proposal to improve the shoulder height requirements to properly take the dimensions of premature newborns into account

Presentation on creation of ISOFIX. There is interest from several specialists on Child Restraint Safety, CRS manufacturers and Consumer Organisations to add a 3rd fixed point.

Question remains, what if the ECRS is permanently or temporarily connected, on what basis can compliance with (the technical provisions of) UN R10 be required ?

Proposal applies to Supplements 3 to the 04 series of amendments. Proposal to clarify the scope of data from tests to the windscreen that must be provided for the purpose of type approval.

Procedural request for authorisation to introduce provisions for supply lines between compressed hydrogen storage systems (CHSS) and their thermally activated pressure relief devices (TPRD) based on the outcomes from the transposition of GTR-Phase 2 (Amendment 1) transposition into UN R134.

Transposing Amendment 1 to UN Global Technical Regulation
No. 13, Phase 2 (GTR13-PH2) into the UN R134

Proposed modifications to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2025/7

Proposal to allow the use of talcum for the dust resistance test as an alternative to dry quartz

The task force works on the improvement of UN Regulation no. 134 and a potential new UN Regulation on liquefied hydrogen

Proposal to update the captions underneath multiple ISO envelope
drawings in appendix 2 to annex 6, including adding references to UN Regulation No. 129.