Proposal to introduce a definition for “bidirectional vehicle” and to remove the references to
the 3-D “H”-point machine (per their transposition to MR1 on test tools).

Proposal to ensure that vehicles exhibiting functionality meeting the definition of ACSF-B2 or -E are required to comply with the 01 series of R171 (or later). The 01 series added the necessary technical requirements to ensure the safety of features that allow ‘hands-free’ operation or perform system-initiated manoeuvres.

Proposal to enable approval of an Enhanced Child Restraint System (ECRS) with a module that is, or can be, converted into a booster seat or an ECRS with a module of a vehicle-specific application.

Proposal to allow the use of talcum for the dust resistance test as an alternative to dry
quartz.

Proposal to correct paragraph references and add the Regulation number in the introduction section (i.e., replace “Regulation No. XXX” with “Regulation No. 174”).

Proposal to update the options under multiple International Organization for Standardization (ISO) envelope drawings in appendix 2 to annex 6, including adding references to UN R129.

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to remove the prohibition on use the Unique Identifier per the WP.29 decision to change the default application of the UI from a requirement (requiring prohibition in cases where UI does not apply) to a permission (requiring an affirmative statement that UI may be used under a Regulation).

Proposal to delete the Unique Identifier (UI) marking provisions

Proposal to amend in order to enable the application to vehicles equipped with an ADS.

Proposal by TF-AVRS to amend to enable the application of this Regulation to vehicles of categories X and Y

Proposal to enable the application of this Regulation to vehicles of categories X and Y.

Proposal to enable the application of this Regulation to vehicles of categories X and Y.

Pursuant to changing the application of the Unique Identifier (UI) under the 1958 Agreement, this proposal deletes the prohibition on use of the UI for replacement brake components under UN R90. Originally, the UI was applied by default to all UN Regulations which therefore required certain regulations to prohibit its use. Pursuant to the adopted proposal WP.29/2025/17, each regulation grants permission to use the UI so the provision prohibiting use under UN R90 is no longer needed.

Proposal to delete the Unique Identifier (UI) marking provisions.

Proposal to delete provisions concerning use of the Unique Identifier pursuant to the WP.29 decision to change the approach to its application from use “by default” to use if specified in each regulation.

Proposal to delete provisions concerning the Unique Identifier pursuant to the decision to change its application from “by default” to “if specified in the regulation”.

Proposal to remove provisions concerning the Unique Identifier pursuant to the WP.29 decision to change its application from “by default” to “if specified in the regulation”.

Proposal to delete provisions concerning the Unique Identifier pursuant to the WP.29 to replace its application “by default” by application if specific by the regulation.

Proposal to delete provisions concerning the Unique Identifier pursuant to the WP.29 decisions to changes its application from “by default” to if specified by the regulation.

Introduces an explanation to the background of the procedures to test
vehicle types including DPPS

Information to serve as guidance for Technical Services and Type Approval Authorities

Proposal ro clarify that the removal of an insert may also trigger additional tests with alternative dummy statures.

Proposal to improve the shoulder height requirements to properly take the dimensions of premature newborns into account

Presentation on creation of ISOFIX. There is interest from several specialists on Child Restraint Safety, CRS manufacturers and Consumer Organisations to add a 3rd fixed point.

Question remains, what if the ECRS is permanently or temporarily connected, on what basis can compliance with (the technical provisions of) UN R10 be required ?

Proposal applies to Supplements 3 to the 04 series of amendments. Proposal to clarify the scope of data from tests to the windscreen that must be provided for the purpose of type approval.

Procedural request for authorisation to introduce provisions for supply lines between compressed hydrogen storage systems (CHSS) and their thermally activated pressure relief devices (TPRD) based on the outcomes from the transposition of GTR-Phase 2 (Amendment 1) transposition into UN R134.

Proposal to amend UN R134 regarding hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles. The amendment clarifies requirements for supply lines serving additional thermally activated pressure relief devices (TPRDs) on compressed hydrogen storage systems. It specifies that supply lines must be constructed from metallic materials, demonstrate mechanical integrity through qualification tests excluding drop tests, and establishes handling procedures to prevent damage. The proposal also defines container attachments and refines test procedures for burst pressure, drop impact, permeation, and localized leak testing.

Proposed modifications to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2025/7

Proposal to allow the use of talcum for the dust resistance test as an alternative to dry quartz

The task force works on the improvement of UN Regulation no. 134 and a potential new UN Regulation on liquefied hydrogen

Proposal to update the captions underneath multiple ISO envelope
drawings in appendix 2 to annex 6, including adding references to UN Regulation No. 129.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening to exempt vehicles without manual driving controls from provisions of UN R18 applicable only to vehicles with manual driving controls.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening to exempt vehicles without manual driving controls from provisions of UN R26 applicable only to vehicles with manual driving controls, introduce definitions for “ADS feature of type 1” and “ADS feature of type 2”, and define the vertical transversal plane for vehicles without a driver.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to address ADS vehicles, including exemption of vehicles of subcategories X and Y from the requirements of UN R46. For other ADS vehicles, no special provisions or exemptions apply under UN R46.

Proposal for the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to address ADS vehicles, including the exemption of vehicles of subcategories X and Y from provisions concerning manual driving controls. No special provisions or exemptions apply to other ADS vehicles (unless provided for under other requirements for the safety of ADS vehicles).

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to exempt ADS vehicles of subcategories X and Y from requirements related to the presence of a human driver and manual driving controls. The proposal permits X and Y vehicles to use alternative materials for windscreens given their 6 kph speed restriction. The proposal further permits translucence levels below 70% for ADS vehicles while an ADS feature is active (i.e., performing the DDT).

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to exempt ADS vehicles without foot controls from the requirements of this Regulations.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to clarify that an odometer display is not required for ADS vehicles of subcategories X and
Y (but if fitted, shall comply with the relevant provisions) and that requirements related to speedometers do not apply to these vehicles as well as to any ADS vehicle while an ADS feature of type 2 is active.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to adapt UN R58 for application to ADS vehicles.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R61 to ADS vehicles. In the absence of driver/driver cab/manual driving controls in the ADS vehicle, provisions related to them shall not be taken into account if not already covered by this amendment.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable the application of UN R66 to ADS vehicles. In the absence of driver/driver’s compartment/manual driving controls in the vehicle, provisions related to them shall not be taken into account if not already covered by this amendment.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R67 to ADS vehicles. In the absence of a driver/driver’s compartment/manual driving controls in the vehicle, provisions related to them shall not be taken into account if not already covered by this amendment. The proposal clarifies provisions for vehicles with a separate driver’s compartment.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R110 to ADS vehicles, including exemption of vehicles of subcategories X and Y from provisions that concern manual driving controls, and to clarify the provisions for vehicles in case of separate driver´s compartment.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable the application of UN R107 to ADS vehicles, including exemptions of vehicles of subcategories X and/or Y from certain provisions concerning manual driving, attention to non-DDT tasks otherwise performed by the driver, introduction of provisions for “ADS features to type 1 and type 2”, and to update provisions concerning the running mass and occupants.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to require driver signals to be transmitted to the ADS and to introduce provisions for assessing ADS responses to the signals.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to exempt ADS vehicles of subcategory Y from the requirements and to adapt the requirements for application to ADS vehicles, including vehicles of subcategory X. The proposal relies on the establishment of requirements for ADS vehicles to define specifications for ADS performance while an ADS feature is active.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to update the footnote reference to vehicle categories and otherwise address the establishment of ADS vehicle subcategories X and Y. ADS vehicles are not subject to exemptions or special provisions under this Regulation.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R97 to ADS vehicles. In the absence of a driver/driver’s compartment//manual driving controls in the vehicle, provisions related to them shall not be taken into account if not already covered by this amendment. ADS vehicles that permit manual driving shall meet the requirements of this regulation when the vehicle is operated by a driver.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R151 to ADS vehicles, including the exemption of vehicle subcategories X and Y from the requirements, and to remove the references to Unique Identifier markings.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R116 to ADS vehicles.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable the application of UN R122 to ADS vehicles and to ensure that the requirements minimise the risk of burns across all vehicle occupants.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R118 to ADS vehicles and to remove the references to Unique Identifier markings.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R121 to ADS vehicles, including the exemption of vehicles of subcategory Y from the requirements of the Regulation.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R125 to ADS vehicles, including the exemption of vehicles of subcategories X and Y.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening to exempt ADS vehicles of subcategories X and Y from the requirements of UN R176.

Proposal to exempt vehicles of subcategories X and Y (ADS vehicles) from the requirements on UN R167 and to delete the provisions for Unique Identifier markings.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to exempt vehicles not operated by a human driver from the requirements of this Regulation, including vehicles of subcategories X and Y, and to delete the provisions concerning Unique Identifier markings.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable the application of UN R161 to ADS vehicles.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R162 to ADS vehicles.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R163 to ADS vehicles.

Proposal from the GRSG task force on Automated Vehicles Regulation Screening to enable application of UN R166 to ADS vehicles, including the exemption of ADS vehicles of subcategories X and Y from the requirements of the Regulation.

Request for authorization to develop test procedures to assess the mechanical integrity and durability of supply lines to any additional Thermally activated Pressure Relief Devices (TPRD) connected directly to the Compressed Hydrogen Storage System (CHSS).

Proposal to introduce provisions on Deployable Pedestrian Protection Systems (DPPS) pursuant to Amendment 3 to GTR 9.

Proposal to clarify that the removal of an insert may also trigger additional tests with alternative dummy statures.

Proposal to improve the shoulder height requirements to properly take the dimensions of premature newborns into account.

Proposal to clarify the scope of data from tests to the windscreen that must be provided for the purpose of type approval.

Proposal to clarify the scope of data from tests to the windscreen that must be provided for the purpose of type approval.

Proposal for clarification on the definition of “adjusted ocular reference point”

The proposal seeks to clarify that Field of Vision Assistant (FVA) are not to be considered with regard to the visibility requirement during night and day in paragraph 5.2., since the speed displayed by the FVA is not the primary source of information.

Discussion on the general idea to align the contact surface temperatures with those for M2/M3 vehicles and to introduce the possibility for manufacturers to allow for higher contact surface temperatures if it can be demonstrated that their safety concept covers for higher temperatures without increasing the risk for occupantsto get burns.

Proposal aiming to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/15

Proposal aims to clarify the provisions for vehicles in case of separate driver compartment and the loading area to be considered as luggage compartment for vehicles of category N.

Proposal by prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles
Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document
ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/19

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document
ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/14.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated VehiclesRegulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/46.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document
ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/45.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document
ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/32.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document
ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/42.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document
ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/40.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document
ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/39.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document
ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/38.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/37.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/36.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/35.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/34.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/30.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/28.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/31.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/25.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/24.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/23.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/20.

Proposal prepared by the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF-AVRS), with the aim to amend and supersede document ECE/TRANS/GRSG/2025/18.

Proposal to introduce provisions on thermal propagation as a result of a single cell thermal runaway.

Proposal to require the electric side windows of the front seat row to function for at least ² minutes from the time of a vehicle entering water.

Proposal to change the transitional provisions in such a way as to allow Contracting Parties to issue approvals according to the 05 series of amendments.

Proposal to amend UN R129 concerning Enhanced Child Restraint Systems. Modifications include: adjusting shoulder height dimensions in Annex 18 table 1 to align with anthropometric data for children from 40-70 cm; permitting one additional insert layer for infants below 50 cm; establishing minimum stature of 35 cm; and adding transitional provisions regarding type-approval acceptance timelines from September 2028-2029. Changes address fit concerns for premature newborns and small children.