Draft proposal to introduce a definition, requirements, and a test procedure for CRS lower tether anchorages.

Editorial corrections to document CMS II-01-02/Rev.1 (draft of amendments to UN R46 to enable the approval of camera-monitor systems as indirect vision devices in place of conventional mirrors.

Proposal to align UN R125 (driver forward field of vision) with the amendments to UN R46 under development to enable the approval of camera-monitor systems as indirect vision devices in place of conventional mirrors.

Proposed changes to the working draft of the amendment (document CMS II-01-02/Rev.1) to introduce camera-monitor systems into the regulation on indirect vision devices (UN R46) pursuant to decisions taken during recent sessions of the Working Party on General Safety (GRSG).

Review of the latest amendments to UN Regulation 46 as adopted by WP.29 through its March 2014 meetings which have not yet been fully incorporated into the IGCMS working draft to amend UN R46 with regard to camera-monitor systems.

The experts of France and the Netherlands have verified the text of document IGCMS-II-05-02 on its consistency of the wording for the different classes of devices, corrected the wording for the class VII devices, corrected several references and replace the transitional provisions by those of Revision 5 of R46.

Draft justifications for eventual inclusion in the amendment proposal submitted to the GRSP.

Proposal to clarify the wording concerning the prohibition on the obstruction of the driver’s view of the monitor and the definition of the monitor size.

The present working document incorporates vehicles with conventional propulsion. To adopt all current propulsion systems, like EV’s, the text is modified accordingly by including a reference to the “vehicle master control switch” in addition to the conventional ignition switch.

Proposal for further clarifications to the draft text amendments that would to extend the scope of UN R129 to include non-Integral child restraint systems (“Universal Booster” or “Specific to vehicle Booster”).

Proposal to clarify UN R129. 1. Requirements for car manufacturers (Regulation No. 16, Annex 17, Appendix 1, which allows a certain zone) are NOT compatible with requirements for Child Restraint System (CRS) manufacturers (Regulation No. 129, paragraph 6.1.3.4., asks for a different zone). The adult belt is supposed to run over the angle between adult thighs (that are more “fat” and the adult pelvis (that has a bigger depth). Therefore the required zone for the Child Restraint Systems has been adapted such that the routing of the adult belt over the child restraint has to closer to the intended use and design of the adult belt.

Working text for revisions to the 1958 Agreement in order to enable the use of the electronic data exchange system for type approvals under development.

A Universal International Whole Vehicle Type Approval issued for vehicles of category M₁ under UN R0 that includes type-approval under the UN Regulations concerned shall be considered equivalent to an EU type-approval granted under Framework Regulation (EU) 2018/858. The approval authority granting EU-WVTA must confirm for all variants and versions within the EU-WVTA vehicle type the equivalence of the Part III list and that the EU-WVTA type is covered by the IWVTA class and IWVTA type.

Proposal to require the electric side windows of the front seat row to function for at least ² minutes from the time of a vehicle entering water.

During vehicle submergence, at least 1 window per row of seats shall be able to be opened to allow occupant escape, and shall remain openable for at least 2 minutes from water entry. The vehicle shall be lowered into a water-filled container within a 10-degree horizontal angle in X longitudinal and lateral directions. T0 is counted from when lowering straps slacken and the vehicle floats. After 2 minutes of floating, the window must be opened to its lowest position, or automatically lowered if equipped with automatic window lowering system. Alternative sub-system tests demonstrating window opening functionality under water, in agreement with the approval authority and its designated technical service, are acceptable. The test is fulfilled if the window is open to its lowest position after the test.

A design is intuitive when users understand and use it correctly and efficiently without needing instructions or prior training. Key signs include matching user expectations, requiring little explanation, giving clear feedback, minimizing thinking, maintaining consistency, and building on familiar patterns. For emergency door opening, intuitive design requires interior release control to unlock doors and unlatch without separate controls. Alternative actions for power loss must be fully intuitive, integrated or in close vicinity, within reach, and properly marked. Exterior door handles need a proper force application area for at least four fingers of an adult hand.

Proposal to establish a submergence test procedure requiring that at least one window per row of seats be capable of being fully opened after a vehicle enters water for occupant escape, with the window operable up to 2 minutes after submergence as designed by the manufacturer, defining container dimensions to accommodate the vehicle without wall or floor contact during the 2-minute period except when fully submerged, permitting open-water test sites provided they comply with test conditions while prohibiting freshwater lakes, reservoirs, and saltwater bodies, requiring the master control switch position allow window operation, specifying unladen kerb mass with measuring apparatus not changing axle reference load by more than 5 per cent, lowering the vehicle into water-filled container at horizontal angle 0–10 degrees with time zero defined as when lowering straps become slack and vehicle floats freely, requiring the vehicle remain in water for 2 minutes from time zero without floor contact until fully submerged, requiring window operation by remote system after 2 minutes with vehicle immersed, and permitting alternative subsystem tests demonstrating window opening functionality under submerged conditions.

Proposal to explicity deem any rollover protection system as within the defintion of non-reversible occupant restraint systems for the purposes of the Regulation.

Proposal concerning “detected objects” and data element precision for the ADS regulation provisions on DSSAD.

Proposal concerning “detected objects” and data element precision.

Request for task force views with regard to the work on automatic emergency call devices (AECD):

1. Does R10.04 (and any later version) fully cover the EMC aspects for AECD components to be fitted to vehicles and for vehicles with these systems installed/integrated?
2. If not, what amendments can be proposed to Regulation 10?
3. Are specific EMC provisions necessary within the Regulation on AECS?

Additional comments related to document EMC-21-03.

FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.