|
00 series of amendments
(1969)
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 01 series of amendments
(1973)
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 02 series of amendments
(1974)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 03 series of amendments
(1979)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 04 series of amendments
(1981)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 05 series of amendments
(1984)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 05 series of amendments | Supplement 1
(1987)
|
5
|
1
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 05 series of amendments | Supplement 2
(1987)
|
5
|
2
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 05 series of amendments | Supplement 3
(1988)
|
5
|
3
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 06 series of amendments
(1990)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 06 series of amendments | Supplement 1
(1992)
|
6
|
1
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 06 series of amendments | Supplement 2
(1993)
|
6
|
2
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 07 series of amendments
(1994)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 08 series of amendments
(1995)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 08 series of amendments | Supplement 1
(1996)
|
8
|
1
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments
(1996)
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Corrigendum 1
(1997)
|
9
|
|
1
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Corrigendum 2
(1997)
|
9
|
|
2
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 1
(1997)
|
9
|
1
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 2
(1997)
|
9
|
2
|
|
|
|
09 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
| Corrigendum 2
(1999)
|
9
|
2
|
2
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 2 | Corrigendum 1
(1997)
|
9
|
2
|
1
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 3
(1998)
|
9
|
3
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 3 | Corrigendum 1
(2002)
|
9
|
3
|
1
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 4
(1999)
|
9
|
4
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 5
(2000)
|
9
|
5
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 5 | Corrigendum 1
(2001)
|
9
|
5
|
1
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 6 | Corrigendum 3
(2004)
|
9
|
6
|
3
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 6
(2000)
|
9
|
6
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 6 | Corrigendum 1
(2002)
|
9
|
6
|
1
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 6 | Corrigendum 2
(2003)
|
9
|
6
|
2
|
|
|
09 series of amendments
| Supplement 7
(2003)
|
9
|
7
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 7 | Corrigendum 1
(2004)
|
9
|
7
|
1
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 8
(2004)
|
9
|
8
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 8 | Corrigendum 1
(2004)
|
9
|
8
|
1
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 9
(2004)
|
9
|
9
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 10
(2005)
|
9
|
10
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 11
(2005)
|
9
|
11
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 11 | Corrigendum 1
(2006)
|
9
|
11
|
1
|
|
|
UN R13 | 09 series of amendments | Supplement 12
(2006)
|
9
|
12
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 10 series of amendments
(2005)
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 10 series of amendments | Supplement 1
(2005)
|
10
|
1
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 10 series of amendments | Supplement 2
(2007)
|
10
|
2
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 10 series of amendments | Supplement 3
(2007)
|
10
|
3
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 10 series of amendments | Supplement 4
(2011)
|
10
|
4
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments
(2008)
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Corrigendum 4
(2013)
|
11
|
|
4
|
|
|
11 series of amendments
| Corrigendum 1
(2020)
|
11
|
|
1
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 1
(2009)
|
11
|
1
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 2
(2009)
|
11
|
2
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 3
(2010)
|
11
|
3
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 4
(2010)
|
11
|
4
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 5
(2011)
|
11
|
5
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 6
(2011)
|
11
|
6
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 7
(2011)
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion from 153rd WP.29 session (8-11
Mar 2011)
|
|
|
|
11
|
7
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 8
(2012)
|
WP.29/2011/58: Integrated into the regulation via Amendment 3 to Revision 7. With 33 of the 41 Contracting Parties applying UN R13 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2011/58 by a vote of 33 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
|
Discussion from 154th WP.29 session (21-24
Jun 2011)
|
|
|
|
11
|
8
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 9
(2012)
|
WP.29/2011/94: Integrated into the regulation via Amendment 4 to Revision 7.
|
|
|
|
Discussion from 155th WP.29 session (15-18
Nov 2011)
|
|
63. The World Forum considered the draft amendment under agenda item 4.10.1 and agreed to postpone the voting of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2011/94 and Amend.1 to its March 2012 session. WP.29 referred WP.29-155-06, WP.29-155-19 and WP.29-155-20 to GRRF for detailed consideration of the documents at the February 2012 session.
4. Documents for consideration at September 2011 GRRF:
4.1. In discussing document AMEVSC-06-01e (GRRF/2011/36) from OICA it was considered that it was too restrictive on the modifier – provided the manufacturer of the original vehicle with commercial leverage – and was not only applicable to Annex 21, but also to Regulation 13 as a whole. Therefore, an alternative proposal for a new paragraph in the regulation was developed under the reference AMEVSC-06-08e (subsequently GRRF-71-15).
4.2. The secretary advised that in reviewing the documentation after the last meeting he had noted that the proposed amendment WP.29/2011/94 did not contain the amendment of the existing references to Annex 19 to include “part 1”, as there are now 2 parts and there should be a reference to part 1 to prevent any confusion. Therefore, document GRRF-71-03 (AMEVSC-06-02) had been raised to correct this situation. In reviewing the proposal the group indicated its agreement.
5. Development of amendments to appendices:
5.1. The text of the proposed amendments to Appendix 1 (AMEVSC-06-03e) was further refined, with the results shown in document AMEVSC-06-12e.
5.2. In reviewing the initial proposal for amendments to Appendix 2 (AMEVSC-06-04e, red text) it was considered that the use of the words “explicit” and “implicit” could lead to misunderstandings. Therefore, they were deleted. However this may need to be re-considered in light of the unfinished discussion regarding Appendix 3. Further refinements were made with the results shown in document AMEVSC-06-13e.
5.3. In developing amendments to Appendix 3 the working document AMEVSC-06-09e inadvertently did not include the amendments already agreed and contained in WP.29/2011/94. Therefore, they have been subsequently included by the secretary in document AMEVSC-06-14e.
11. GRRF noted the outcome of the discussion in WP.29 on dynamic/static references to other UN Regulations and private standards (see report ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1093, paras. 48 and 49). GRRF endorsed the recommendation to proceed on a case by case approach awaiting a final decision by WP.29 at one of its next sessions.
12. The expert from CLEPA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2011/35/Rev.1 clarifying the levels of braking performance of vehicles in relation with different positions of the ignition key. GRRF noted a number of comments. Following the discussion, CLEPA presented GRRF-72-27 amending ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2011/35/Rev.1. GRRF adopted the proposal, as reproduced in Annex II, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1, for consideration at their June 2012 sessions, as Supplement 14 to Regulation No. 13-H.
13. Recalling the purpose of WP.29-155-19, the expert from EC withdrew ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2012/9. As a consequence, the expert from CLEPA withdrew ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2012/7. Nevertheless, the experts from Germany, Japan and OICA expressed their support for ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2012/9 and their preference to keep it on the agenda. The Chair concluded that the item should be revisited, together with the related document from CLEPA (GRRF-72-17), at the next GRRF session on the basis of a new proposal, if available.
14. The expert from Belgium reported on the progress (GRRF-72-08) made by the informal group on Alternative Method Electronic Vehicle Stability Control (AMEVSC). On behalf of informal group, the expert from CLEPA proposed to use simulation tools to prove compliance of the vehicle stability function (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2012/2). The expert from OICA introduced GRRF-72-22 on some weaknesses in the current simulation tool. GRRF noted a number of comments and agreed to refer the proposal back to the informal group. GRRF agreed to resume consideration on this subject at its next session on the basis of a revised proposal to be submitted by the informal group, taking into account GRRF-72-17, GRRF-72-22 and the comments received. GRRF noted that the informal meeting was scheduled to be held in Brussels (at CLEPA offices) on 10-11 May 2012.
15. The expert from Germany introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2012/11 and GRRF-72-28 on the introduction of an electro-hydraulic transmission for electrical brake systems. GRRF noted some concerns and agreed to resume the discussion on this subject to the next session of GRRF on the basis a revised proposal, if available.
63. The World Forum considered the draft amendment under agenda item 4.10.1 and agreed to postpone the voting of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2011/94 and Amend.1 to its March 2012 session. WP.29 referred WP.29-155-06, WP.29-155-19 and WP.29-155-20 to GRRF for detailed consideration of the documents at the February 2012 session.
[Adopted by AC.1.]
It was understood, although there was no documentation available at the time, that the European Commission would table an amendment to the proposed Supplement 9 to the 11 Series of Amendments (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2011/94) which was on the agenda of the November 2011 session of WP.29/AC.1. The amendment, which had been proposed by Germany, would replace “system manufacturer” with “vehicle manufacturer”.
In considering this proposal it was concluded that this would be a complete change in the fundamental philosophy behind the work of the informal working group and could, therefore, not be supported.
The group had the understanding that a vehicle manufacturer could also be a vehicle stability function system supplier, i.e. the vehicle manufacturer designs and manufacturers the vehicle stability function. However, it was considered that this may not be clear to people who are not participating in the informal group. Therefore, document AMEVSC-07-05e was created in which all the references to system manufacturer in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2011/94 were reviewed and either vehicle manufacturer was added – so as to read “vehicle manufacturer / system manufacturer” – or system manufacturer was deleted when it was not necessary to specify vehicle manufacturer / system manufacturer.
Following the meeting, the AMEVSC chairman made the views of the group (including AMEVSC-07-05e) known to the European Commission. In response the European Commission advised that the proposal would stand as it was a TCMV decision. Subsequently document WP.29-155-06 was presented by the European Commission.
Note: In response to WP.29-155-06, CLEPA presented documents WP.29-155-19 and WP.29-155-20 at the 155th session of WP.29/AC.1. At WP.29 no decision was reached and the proposed supplement was referred back to GRRF for further discussed at the February 2012 session of GRRF.
|
|
WP.29/2012/3: Integrated into the regulation via Amendment 4 to Revision 7. With 33 of the 42 Contracting Parties applying UN R13 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2012/3 by a vote of 33 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
|
Discussion from 156th WP.29 session (13-16
Mar 2012)
|
|
[Adopted by AC.1.]
|
|
11
|
9
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 10
(2014)
|
WP.29/2014/3: This supplement would introduce provisions for fully automatic coupling systems and clarify references in the regulation to Regulation No. 10 on electromagnetic compatibility. This proposal combines two distinct proposals (document GRRF/2013/12 as amended by Annex II to the GRRF 75th session report and document GRRF/2013/13 not amended) approved by the GRRF at its September 2013 session.
|
|
|
|
Discussion from 162nd WP.29 session (11-14
Mar 2014)
|
|
10. The Chair of GRRF recalled the purpose of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2013/13, adopted during the seventy-fifth GRRF session. The document remained on the agenda of GRRF, pending submission to WP.29 and AC.1 of the adopted text for Regulations Nos. 13 (Heavy vehicle braking), 13-H (Brakes of M1 and N1 vehicles), 79 (Steering equipment), 89 (Speed limitation devices), 130 (Lane Departure Warning Systems (AEBS)) and 131 (Advanced Emergency Braking System (AEBS)). At this stage, the proposal was incorporated in Regulation No. 13 (see ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2014/3).
|
|
11
|
10
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 11
(2014)
|
GRVA-13-05: Proposal to introduce provisions for the approval of electromechanical braking systems.
|
|
|
|
Discussion from 13th GRVA session (23-27
May 2022)
|
|
83. The expert from CLEPA presented GRVA-13-47, reflecting the ongoing discussions regarding the development of provisions for the type approval of electromechanical brakes (see current status in GRVA-13-05, amending ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/8).
84. The expert from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland introduced GRVA-13-19 proposing amendments to Annex XVIII on the assessment of complex electronic systems, based on the most recent provisions introduced in UN Regulation No. 157. He recalled that the review of the complex electronic assessment provisions was initiated when introducing Automatically Commanded Steering Functions of categories A and B in UN Regulation No. 79 and that it was agreed at that time, that UN Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H would need to be updated, too.
85. The expert from OICA inquired the reason why the provisions in UN Regulation No. 157 were used as a reference and why not simpler versions such as the one in UN Regulation No. 79. He recalled that the complexity of systems covered by UN Regulation No. 79 (i.e. Levels 0 to 2) differed from those in UN Regulation No. 157 (i.e. Level 3). He stated that the assessment for a power steering, an anti-lock braking system or an electronic stability function would not necessarily need to be as extensive as for ALKS.
86. The expert from CLEPA supported that Annex XVIII is updated in the context of the activities related to electro-mechanical brakes.
87. GRVA noted CLEPA’s intention to submit an official document, on the basis of GRVA-13-05 for consideration at the September 2022 session of GRVA. GRVA noted the proposal by United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to upgrade Annex XVIII of UN Regulation No. 13 and discussed whether or not to merge it with CLEPA’s document, mentioned above.
96. The expert from CLEPA updated GRVA (GRVA-14-52) on the outcome achieved following the weekly meetings organized by CLEPA since February 2022, with both industry group representatives and contracting parties regarding the drafting of provisions for the approval of Electromechanical Brakes (EMB) for electric powered trucks and coaches. EMB was presented for the first time to GRVA at the seventh session of GRVA (see ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2020/21). The original proposal has been iteratively updated following GRVA guidance (see ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2021/24, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/8 and GRVA-13-05). He presented the recent developments related to the effect of aging of the electrical energy storage device. He presented GRVA-14-12, the most recent draft superseding GRVA-13-05. He kindly invited interested contracting parties to join their activities.
97. GRVA noted the presentation of the expert from CLEPA on EMB and their ambition to submit an amendment proposal to UN Regulation No. 13, based on GRVA-14-12, for consideration at the next session.
|
|
11
|
11
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 12
(2015)
|
WP.29/2014/45/Rev.1: Completes transition of ESC symbol to UN R121 and clarifies the transitional provisions.
|
|
|
|
11
|
12
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 13
(2015)
|
WP.29/2015/6: Proposal as approved by the GRRF to remove all references to Annex 10 from Annex 13 by transferring the provisions concerning vehicles with and without anti-lock braking systems to Annex 10 of UN R13.
|
|
|
|
11
|
13
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 14
(2017)
|
WP.29/2016/49: Proposal for corrections to the text and equations. With 37 of the 46 Contracting Parties applying UN R13 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2016/49 by a vote of 37 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
|
11
|
14
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 15
(2018)
WP.29/2018/9: Proposal to- delete redundant provisions (paragraphs 2.2. and 2.2.1.) in favor of paragraph 5.2.2.13. which requires all O4 trailers to be equipped with Anti-lock Braking Systems (ABS) of Category A.
- clarify exemptions from electronic stability control requirements, and
- enable the verification of sufficient movement of the balancer without having to take measurements underneath the trailer.
With 36 of the 47 Contracting Parties applying UN R13 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2018/9, as amended by para. 90 per the session report, by a vote of 36 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
|
Discussion from 174th WP.29 session (12-16
Mar 2018)
|
|
90. In ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/9, Annex 21, paragraph 2.1.4., second subparagraph, amend to read:
“Additionally, interventions by systems related to the vehicle stability function (including traction control, trailer stability assist, corner brake control, other similar functions that use throttle individual torque control to operate and share common components with vehicle stability function, and ESC or VSF intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability) may also be indicated to the driver by this flashing optical warning signal.”
|
|
11
|
15
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 16
(2018)
|
WP.29/2018/53: The 02 series of amendments to UN R79 introduced requirements for RCP systems. An RCP system requires the engagement of an EPB (electronic parking brake) once the manoeuvre has finished and the ignition is switched off. This proposal would allow the release or disconnection of the EPB by a remote control system (approved to R79) so the RCP can subsequently drive the vehicle out of a parking spot. With 35 of the 48 Contracting Parties applying UN R13 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2018/53, as amended by para. 83 per the session report, by a vote of 35 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
|
Discussion from 175th WP.29 session (18-22
Jun 2018)
|
|
83. The World Forum considered the draft amendments under agenda items 4.8.1 to 4.8.9 and recommended their submission to AC.1 for voting, subject to the following corrections:
In ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/53, page 2: for “Supplement 15” read “Supplement 16”,
In ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/59/Add.1, correct to read:
Insert the missing amendment to former paragraph 3.2.10, to read: | "3.2.11. | An indication, by means of the “PSI” index (as explained in Annex 7, Appendix 2 to this Regulation) or in kilopascals (kPa), of the inflation pressure to be adopted for the load/speed endurance tests. This indication may be placed on one sidewall only." |
Annex 7, paragraph 1.3., amend to read: | “1.3. | Inflate the tyre to the pressure corresponding to the indication on the sidewall as specified in paragraph 3.2.11. of this Regulation.” |
84. WP.29 referred informal documents WP.29-175-04 and WP.29-175-05 to the appropriate GR for further consideration.
|
|
11
|
16
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 17
(2021)
|
WP.29/2020/119: GRVA proposal to clarify the test method for the evaluation of performance of energy sources and energy storage devices under Annex 7. In particular, the proposal clarifies that the measurement is made on the ninth brake application. With 36 of the 50 Contracting Parties applying UN R13 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2020/119 by a vote of 36 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
|
11
|
17
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 18
(2021)
|
WP.29/2021/12: Proposal to introduce provisions for approving single vehicles involved in modular vehicle combinations, e.g. towing trailers, “road trains” and requirements for endurance braking systems for vehicles equipped with an electric regenerative endurance braking system. With 36 of the 50 Contracting Parties applying UN R13 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2021/12 by a vote of 36 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
|
11
|
18
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 19
(2023)
|
WP.29/2022/77: Proposal from GRVA to resolve problems with installation of stronger spring brake actuators in trailers to realize higher deceleration in the case of emergency braking caused by a cut of the supply line between towing vehicle and trailer.
|
|
|
|
11
|
19
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 11 series of amendments | Supplement 20
(2023)
|
WP.29/2022/137: Proposal to clarify provisions regarding the actuation of the parking brake warning device to cover the case of electric control transmission systems where there may be a transition between parked (applied) and un-parked (released) braking states. With 33 of the 51 Contracting Parties applying UN R13 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2022/137 by a vote of 33 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
|
11
|
20
|
|
|
|
11 series of amendments
| Supplement 21
(Formal WP.29 review)
|
WP.29/2024/4: Proposal to clarify the requirements related to the Type IIA test.
|
|
|
|
11
|
21
|
|
|
|
11 series of amendments
| Supplement 22
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
WP.29/2024/56: Proposal to adapt the regulation to allow for the approval of vehicles equipped with both an Automated Driving System and a manual driving mode.
|
|
|
|
11
|
22
|
|
|
|
11 series of amendments
| Supplement 24
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
WP.29/2025/8: Proposal to resolve an inconsistency in wording across the series with regard to the parking brake performance requirement.
|
|
|
|
11
|
24
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 12 series of amendments
(2022)
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 12 series of amendments | Supplement 1
(2023)
|
WP.29/2022/78: Proposal to resolve problems with installation of stronger spring brake actuators in trailers to realize higher deceleration in the case of emergency braking caused by a cut of the supply line between towing vehicle and trailer.
|
|
|
|
12
|
1
|
|
|
|
UN R13 | 12 series of amendments | Supplement 2
(2023)
|
12
|
2
|
|
|
|
12 series of amendments
| Supplement 3
(Formal WP.29 review)
|
WP.29/2024/5: Proposal to clarify the requirements related to the Type IIA test.
|
|
|
|
12
|
3
|
|
|
|
12 series of amendments
| Supplement 4
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
WP.29/2024/57: Proposal to enable approval of vehicles equipped with both an Automated Driving System and a manual driving mode.
|
|
|
|
12
|
4
|
|
|
|
12 series of amendments
| Supplement 6
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
WP.29/2025/9: Proposal to resolve an inconsistency in wording across the series with regard to the parking brake performance requirement.
|
|
|
|
12
|
6
|
|
|
|
13 series of amendments
(2024)
|
WP.29/2023/66: Proposal to require a vehicle stability function on vehicles with four axles commercial vehicles over 25 tons in accordance with their specific use. With 33 of the 52 Contracting Parties applying UN R13 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2023/66 by a vote of 33 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
13 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(Formal WP.29 review)
|
WP.29/2024/6: Proposal to clarify the requirements related to the Type IIA test.
|
|
|
|
13
|
1
|
|
|
|
13 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
WP.29/2024/58: Proposal to adapt the regulation to allow for the approval of vehicles equipped with both an Automated Driving System and a manual driving mode.
|
|
|
|
13
|
2
|
|
|
|
13 series of amendments
| Supplement 3
(Formal WP.29 review)
|
WP.29/2024/150: Proposal to clarify the need to apply, when relevant, the Type II test as required by Annex 4 under paragraph 1.8.2.5 (b) in Annex 15 for alternative brake lining purposes.
|
|
|
|
13
|
3
|
|
|
|
13 series of amendments
| Supplement 4
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
WP.29/2025/10: Proposal to resolve an inconsistency in wording across the series with regard to the parking brake performance requirement.
|
|
|
|
13
|
4
|
|
|
|
14 series of amendments
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
WP.29/2024/143: Proposal to update the regulation in line with technical advances and the emergence of a new type of braking system that employs stored electrical energy for both the control transmission and the energy transmission and to clarify the application of the Type II test.
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
14 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
WP.29/2025/11: Proposal to resolve an inconsistency in wording across the series with regard to the parking brake performance requirement.
|
|
|
|
14
|
1
|
|
|
|
15 series of amendments
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
WP.29/2025/6: Proposal to ensure that endurance braking is assessed in the context of the Type II-A test based on the maximum mass of the vehicle or vehicle combination.
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|