OICA comments on the proposal for guidelines on the scope, administrative provisions and alternative requirements in Regulations annexed to the 1958 Agreement
Report summarizing the findings and recommendations in the different areas addressed by the informal group on Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles – Sub Group Environment (HFCV-SGE) in support of the harmonization process
Addendum to the report of the 154th WP.29 session: Statement of Principles on the Design of High-Priority Warning Signals for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS)
This proposal (WP.29/2011/54), as amended by para. 49, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 42 applying UN R14 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/55) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty Contracting Parties out of the 35 applying UN R94 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/56) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-two Contracting Parties out of the 39 applying UN R83 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-two voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/57) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-three Contracting Parties out of the 44 applying UN R120 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-three voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/58) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-three Contracting Parties out of the 41 applying UN R13 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-three voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/59) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 44 applying UN R13-H were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/60) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-one Contracting Parties out of the 38 applying UN R55 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-one voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/61) was adopted by the World Forum. Twenty-nine Contracting Parties out of the 32 applying UN R64 were present for the vote by AC.1. Twenty-nine voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/62), as amended by para. 53, was adopted by the World Forum. Sixteen Contracting Parties out of the 27 applying UN R41 were present for the vote by AC.1. Sixteen voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/63) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-two Contracting Parties out of the 39 applying UN R51 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-two voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/65) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty Contracting Parties out of the 37 applying UN R59 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/66) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-two Contracting Parties out of the 38 applying UN R12 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-two voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/67) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 42 applying UN R14 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/68) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-three Contracting Parties out of the 41 applying UN R16 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-three voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/69) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty Contracting Parties out of the 35 applying UN R94 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/70) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty Contracting Parties out of the 34 applying UN R95 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/71) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-three Contracting Parties out of the 44 applying UN R115 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-three voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/72) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 44 applying UN R13-H were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/73) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 42 applying UN R54 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/74) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-one Contracting Parties out of the 38 applying UN R75 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-one voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/75) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-three Contracting Parties out of the 44 applying UN R117 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-three voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/76) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-three Contracting Parties out of the 44 applying UN R117 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-three voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
This proposal (WP.29/2011/83) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-two Contracting Parties out of the 39 applying UN R10 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-two voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
Proposal for Terms of Reference, Rules of Procedure and first progress report of the informal group for the development of a global technical regulation on pole side impact