1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Document Title | UN R13: Proposal for amendments | ||||||||
Reference Number | GRVA-23-11/Rev.2 | ||||||||
Date |
25 Sep 2025
|
||||||||
Summary | Proposal to establish definitions for “e-axle”, "e-axle trailer" and “dynamo function” and to establish provisions for the approval of e-axle trailers with regard to their “dynamo function”. | ||||||||
Source(s) | CLCCR, CLEPA, and OICA | ||||||||
Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R13 Heavy-Duty Braking | ||||||||
Proposal Status | Approved by GR | ||||||||
Meeting(s) | |||||||||
Related Documents | |||||||||
GRVA/2025/15 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments (superseded) | ||||||||
GRVA-21-12 | UN R13: Proposal to amend document GRVA/2025/15 (superseded) | ||||||||
GRVA-22-26 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2025/15 (superseded) | ||||||||
GRVA-23-41 | e-Axles and e-Trailers: Supporting information | ||||||||
Downloads | |||||||||
UNECE server | .pdf format | .docx format | |||||||
GAR server | .pdf format | .docx format | |||||||
Japan does not support due to concern that trailer might drive itself.
Germany cannot support in same line as Japan. Wording and definitions could be problematic in related to automation. Want to consider, including work being done on DCAS.
OICA: thought para. 1.2.6. was clear on propulsion. Will come back in January.
Rev.2 resolved the concerns enough to enable recommendation of the proposal to WP.29 for its March session subject to a final review in January GRVA.
|