Industry comments on the draft conceptual framework and principles for automated vehicles.

Safety elements gathered from national guidelines, WP.29 documents, and other sources for consideration in developing eventual performance requirements for ADS.

Submitted by the ADS safety topics and DDT workstream pilot.

Submitted by the ADS safety topics and DDT workstream pilot.

The proposed amendments are aimed at redefining the class of bi-fuel vehicles to permit the simultaneous use of gas and petrol in gas mode. This submission follows the review by CLEPA members of the draft proposal (GRPE/2012/6).

The current Euro 6 light duty vehicle emission limits for total hydrocarbons (THC)
include the methane fraction as well as non-methane hydrocarbon emissions. When the
Euro 5/6 co-decision proposal was negotiated, an NMHC limit value was added but the
THC limit was unchanged and is too restrictive.

Documents GRPE-63-05/Rev.1 and GRPE/2012/6/Rev.1 propose to redefine the class of bi-fuel vehicles to permit the simultaneous use of gas and petrol in gas mode in UN Regulation No. 83. CLEPA proposes an alternative method to the weighing procedure of the fuel consumption test procedure.

Working draft of the text to introduce type approval provisions of fuel selection system.

Draft text to introduce type approval provisions for “valve control at stop-start”.

Copy of the proposal to introduce type approval provisions for “valve control at stop-start” into UN R67, submitted to the Working Party on General Safety as document GRSG/2013/24 for consideration at its October 2013 session.

Copy of the proposal to introduce type approval provisions for “valve control at stop-start” into UN R110 (originally submitted to the Working Party on General Safety as document GRSG/2013/26 for consideration at their October 2013 session).

Proposal to align UN R59 with recent amendments to UN R51.

CLEPA presentation of the results of its noise-emission tests on seven vehicles comparing original equipment and replacement (aftermarket) silencing systems (mufflers) under the “Additional Sound Emissions Provisions” test procedure.

CLEPA presentation on two alternatives for the application of “additional sound emission provisions” (ASEP) to replacement silencing systems.

CLEPA presentation on additional sound emission provisions for replacement silencing systems.

Proposal for additional sound emission provisions (ASEP) to align UN R59 with parallel amendments to the main vehicle noise regulation, UN R51.

Proposal pursuant to GRB discussions (55th session, para. 12) and document GRB/2013/8 to insert the amendments concerning the ASEP provisions as soon as Regulation No. 51 has been accordingly amended (in line with the draft proposal (Reference 2011/XXXX (COD)) of the European Commission “Proposal of the European Parliament and of the Council on the sound level of motor vehicles and of their exhaust systems”).

Proposal to introduce requirements for silencers or
components filled with absorbing materials into Regulation No. 59.

Text prepared by the European Association of Automotive Suppliers (CLEPA) to introduce Additional Sound Emission Provisions (ASEP) into the UN R59.

Proposal to clarify some prescriptions and correct some text inconsistencies

Proposal to update UN R27 in accordance with technological progress by establishing provisions for the use of fluorescent retro-reflective strip, enabling the consolidation of currently separate fluorescent (daytime) and retro-reflective (nighttime) striping.

Proposal from CLEPA submitted as an alternative to the German proposal (document GRE-67-04) concerning conspicuity markings for the cab of commercial vehicles.