Proposal for changes to the draft amendments to the 05, 06, and 07 series per the following justifications:

1. In GRPE-86-12, the introduction of SAE J 1979-2 was proposed for Series 05, 06 and 07 of Regulation No. 83. Due to the different structure of Series 05 and 06 compared to 07, this proposal was not adopted. This proposal introduces the new standard to Series 05 and 06 and aligns the standards with Series 07.
2. The standards used for transmission of OBD information are maintained by international standardisation bodies (ISO, SAE). These standardisation body have to be informed.
3. Alignment of wording between the first sentence of paragraph 3.2.1.2. (“ambient or engine temperatures”) and the second sentence, where “or engine” was missing to avoid misunderstanding and ambiguity. Engine temperature is sometimes used as a substitute for ambient temperature. In this case, the engine temperature is evaluated once after a longer engine shut off phase. Only in this case an approval is necessary, as this is the only case, where an OBD monitor is disabled for the complete trip.
4. Align Paragraph 6.5.1.3. with GTR No. 15 to avoid ambiguity.

Proposal to harmonize the requirements of the 00, 01, 02 and 03 series of amendments to UN R154 based on the following justifications:

1. Correction of a wrong reference. In Paragraph 3. the functional requirements for the OBD system are included. Paragraph 4. describes the requirements relating to type-approval including the provisions for deficiencies.
2. For Series 02 and 03, SAE J 1979-2 was allowed as a standard for the transmission of OBD relevant information. ISO 14229 was removed from the list of allowed standard. This proposal aligns series 00 and 01 with series 02 and 03.
3. The standards used for transmission of OBD information are maintained by international standardisation bodies (ISO, SAE). The standardisation body maintaining the affected standard has to be informed.
4. Alignment of wording between the first sentence of paragraph 3.2.1.2. (“ambient or engine temperatures”) and the second sentence, where “or engine” was missing to avoid misunderstanding and ambiguity. Engine temperature is sometimes used as a substitute for ambient temperature. In this case, the engine temperature is evaluated once after a longer engine shut off phase. Only in this case an approval is necessary, as this is the only case, where an OBD monitor is disabled for the complete trip.
5. The OBD requirements for Diesel engines in Paragraph 3.3.4 of Annex C5 are limited to Level 1A. The requirements in paragraphs 6.3. (“Failure modes to be tested”) and 6.4. (“OBD system test”), are not limited to Level 1A. This proposal corrects this.
6. Align Paragraph 6.5.1.3. with GTR No.15 to avoid ambiguity.
7. Alignment with Series 01/03. Those allow the use of alternative preconditioning
   methods for Level 2.

Background: Manufacturers design OBD monitoring conditions and functionalities for market specific driving conditions. Reliable monitors need enable conditions, which run the OBD monitors under circumstances, where failure detection works properly. Those enable conditions are not for all monitors represented by a three-phase WLTC, e.g. some monitors require higher load conditions. For those monitors alternative preconditioning methods are necessary.

Proposal to promote harmonisation in use of reference fuels for testing, including hydrogen fuel, based on the following justifications:

1. The use of test fuels is permitted for certification testing of gaseous and particulate pollutants and power/smoke testing in Europe. However, other countries that have adopted and referenced UN R85 may not allow this. In this case, manufacturers have to prepare fuels with different characteristics, which is costly and requires a long time due to the current inconsistent situation.
2. We believe that the use of test fuels for gaseous and particulate pollutant measurement tests should be a priority as a precondition for the introduction of more stringent emission levels.
3. Hydrogen fuelled vehicles are covered in UN Regulation No. 83, but hydrogen is not yet covered in UN R49 and UN R85.
4. Hydrogen fuelled engines could be one complementary option to reduce CO₂ emissions of future heavy-duty vehicles.
5. Therefore, hydrogen fuel should be integrated in UN R49 and UN R85 for better alignment with UN R83.

Background on changes proposed to UN R49 and UN R85 to address hydrogen fuel and heavy vehicles.

Revised proposal, superseding the original proposal, to clarify the wording regarding the use of the reference fuel required for emission testing, to permit testing with the same reference fuel used for emission testing, and to align with recently adopted amendments to Regulation No. 85.

Proposal to extend to the 05 series of amendments the option from the 06 and 07 series to use the calculation of road load values determined according to UN GTR 15 (WLTP).

Proposal to amend the charger requirement and the measurement method of REESS current for a hybrid electric power train in order to align UN R101 with the provisions in UN R154 and introduce the option to determine road load values for Pure Electric Vehicles according to the requirements of UN R83.

Proposal to permit the use of hydrogen (H2) as fuel for emissions type approval of heavy-duty vehicles.

Proposal to permit the use of hydrogen (H2) as fuel for emissions type approval of heavy-duty vehicles.

Proposes some amendments to working document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2024/8 introducing change stop footnotes to Table A3/1 and makes changes to the transition provisions

Proposal to amend ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2024/12

Proposal to align the Regulation with the latest regional requirements.

Proposal to align the Regulation with the latest regional requirements.

Proposal to clarify the wording regarding the use of the reference fuel required for emission testing, to permit testing with the same reference fuel used for emission testing, and to align with recently adopted amendments to Regulation No. 85.

Proposal to incorporate corrections, clarifications, and improvements to the text of UN R154 that have already been introduced in the 02 and 03 series of amendments to the Regulation.

Proposal to incorporate corrections, clarifications, and improvements to the 01 series of amendments to UN R154 that have already been introduced in the 02 and 03 series of amendments to the Regulation.

Proposal to extend the option from the 06 and 07 to the 05 series of amendments allowing the calculation of road load values from those determined according to UN GTR No.15 (WLTP).

Proposal to introduce corrections and clarifications for the 08 series of amendments.

Proposal to allow for an alternative process for electric energy consumption verification in Conformity of Production, and to amend the charger requirement and the measurement method of REESS current for a hybrid electric power train. Both changes align with procedures already included in 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 154.

Proposal incorporate corrections, clarifications and improvements that have already been introduced in the 02 and 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 154.

Proposal to permit the use of hydrogen (H2) as fuel for emissions type-approval of heavy duty vehicles.

Proposal to permit the use of hydrogen (H2) as fuel for emissions type-approval of heavy duty vehicles and to introduce an option to measure the total hydrocarbon (THC) emissions instead of measuring the non-methane hydrocarbon emissions in certain cases.

Proposal to clarify and update requirements for fitment of auxiliaries when testing the net power or 30 minutes power of electric drive trains.

Proposal to remove provisions for the verification of the acceleration data accuracy that require lead time for implementation. Specifically, lateral acceleration in rollover events are not recorded using the same sensors as used for lateral air bag deployments. A separate document proposes to include these verification procedures via a new series of amendments rather than as a supplement.

Proposal to introduce a new component-level verification procedure for acceleration sensor accuracy with a two-year transitional period to allow for implementation.

Proposal to add illustrations and editorial improvements to the original proposal in document GRSG/2023/16.

Proposal to remove provisions for the verification of the acceleration data accuracy that require lead time for implementation. Specifically, lateral acceleration in rollover events are not recorded using the same sensors as used for lateral air bag deployments. A separate document proposes to include these verification procedures via a new series of amendments rather than as a supplement.

Proposal to clarify permissibility of folding camera-monitor systems, including conditions for warnings to driver.

Proposal for amendments pursuant to the introduction of a headform impact test.

Proposal to enable EDR approval for vehicles between 8-12t under UN R160 subject to additional verifications.