|
UN R79: Proposal to amend GRVA/2023/6
|
|
Reference Number: GRVA-15-54
|
|
Revised proposal prepared by the GRVA secretary pursuant to discussions during the 15th session to clarify a logical cascade of actions regarding activation of ACSF B1 and C and the indication on when the vehicle has entered an eligible road based on the following justification: - When the same means is used by the driver to simultaneously activate the Automatically Commanded Steering Function of Category B1 (ACSF B1) and of Category C (ACSF C), both functions switch to standby mode when the vehicle enters an ACSF C eligible road. But if the road is non-eligible to ACSF C, then only the ACSF B1 is activated.
- With the current text of the regulation, once the vehicle moves to an ACSF C eligible road, the driver must operate again the means to activate the ACSF C. This second deliberate action is confusing for the driver since it makes the manipulation more complex. The current wording discourages most drivers from using this assistance function.
- The proposed wording permits the following, logical, cascade of actions:
- The driver has done a deliberate action to activate ACSF B1 and ACSF C (on a non-eligible road); then
- He drives into an eligible road, and is clearly informed thereof; then
- He initiates a lane change procedure by activating e.g. the direction indicator.
- This amendment further clarifies the requirement on the indication of when the vehicle enters an eligible road. It gives some examples of the type of indication to be given to the driver, e.g. additional popup or blinking indication, without being design restrictive.
- A dedicated status indication of an ACSF C off-mode is by nature already different from the standby or active indication. Therefore, the driver is already sufficiently informed on a potential status change.
- Regarding paragraph 5.6.4.2.3.: While entering the eligible road, the driver may be distracted or annoyed by this “prominent” indication. His attention resources shall be totally available during this phase. So the system would switch automatically to standby mode when fulfilling these two conditions: reaching an eligible and regular lane of travel. This second condition may be fulfilled for example by implementing a suitable time delay or by a direct verification of the lane of travel. These criteria should be explained, agreed between the technical service and the vehicle manufacturer.
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 15th GRVA session (23-27
Jan 2023)
|
|
Document date: 27 Jan 23
|
|
Document status: Superseded
|
|
Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment
|
|
Click here to view the full document file
|
|
UN R140: Proposal to amend provisions for steering amplitude
|
|
Reference Number: GRVA-15-55
|
|
Proposal to add the text, "In case that saturation of the front tyres happens before the above calculated magnitude angle, this angle may be used as the final steering amplitude, but only if this angle is greater or equal to 6.5 A.” based on the following justification: - Reaching fixed amplitude, i.e., fixed steering wheel angular speed due to given 0.7 Hz sine frequency, needs much more torque with quick steering gear ratio systems than with slow steering gear ratio systems, and produces much more wheel steer.
- Car behavior (yaw rate, lateral acceleration and thus trajectory) is similar for all amplitudes above approx. 7 to 8 A (i.e., more than 7 times the steering wheel angle corresponding to 0.3 g), because front tires are saturated. More steer of the tires doesn’t provide more lateral force, so yaw rate and lateral acceleration don’t increase. Continuing to increase steering wheel amplitude after front tire saturation doesn’t give more information.
- There might appear in the future some vehicles which have significantly low steering gear ratio (i.e., quick steering characteristics) and may need too much steering wheel torque to achieve the 270 degrees sine amplitude at 0.7 Hz (not reachable by conventional steering robots), then jeopardizing the easy approval of future beneficial steering equipment e.g. steering-by-wire systems.
|
|
Submitted by:
OICA
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 15th GRVA session (23-27
Jan 2023)
|
|
Document date: 27 Jan 23
|
|
Document status: Superseded
|
|
Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 140 | Electronic Stability Control Systems
|
|
Click here to view the full document file
|
|
UN R140: Proposal for amendments
|
|
Reference Number: GRVA/2023/9
|
|
Proposal to add the text, "In case that saturation of the front tyres happens before the above calculated magnitude angle, this angle may be used as the final steering amplitude, but only if this angle is greater or equal to 6.5 A.” based on the following justification: - Reaching fixed amplitude, i.e., fixed steering wheel angular speed due to given 0.7 Hz sine frequency, needs much more torque with quick steering gear ratio systems than with slow steering gear ratio systems, and produces much more wheel steer.
- Car behavior (yaw rate, lateral acceleration and thus trajectory) is similar for all amplitudes above approx. 7 to 8 A (i.e., more than 7 times the steering wheel angle corresponding to 0.3 g), because front tires are saturated. More steer of the tires doesn’t provide more lateral force, so yaw rate and lateral acceleration don’t increase. Continuing to increase steering wheel amplitude after front tire saturation doesn’t give more information.
- There might appear in the future some vehicles which have significantly low steering gear ratio (i.e., quick steering characteristics) and may need too much steering wheel torque to achieve the 270 degrees sine amplitude at 0.7 Hz (not reachable by conventional steering robots), then jeopardizing the easy approval of future beneficial steering equipment e.g. steering-by-wire systems.
|
|
Submitted by:
OICA
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 16th GRVA session (22-26
May 2023)
|
|
Document date: 08 Mar 23
|
|
Document status: Superseded
|
|
Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 140 | Electronic Stability Control Systems
|
|
Click here to view the full document file
|
Documents 2023
24 Jan 2023
ADAS task force status report to GRVA
GRVA-15-44
25 Jan 2023
UN R13: Status report on electro-mechanical braking
GRVA-15-49
25 Jan 2023
UN R152: Draft consolidated Revision 1
GRVA-15-50
25 Jan 2023
UN R152: Draft consolidated Revision 2
GRVA-15-51
26 Jan 2023
UN R79: Proposal for amendments to the 03 and 04 series of amendments
GRVA-15-52
26 Jan 2023
UN R79: Proposal for amendments to the 03 and 04 series of amendments
GRVA-15-53
27 Jan 2023
UN R79: Proposal to amend GRVA/2023/6
GRVA-15-54
27 Jan 2023
UN R140: Proposal to amend provisions for steering amplitude
GRVA-15-55
27 Jan 2023
UN R13: Proposal for the 13 series of amendments
GRVA-15-56
27 Jan 2023
UN R78: Proposal for the 06 series of amendments
GRVA-15-57
3 Feb 2023
GRVA: Information and Highlights from the November 2022 WP.29 session
GRVA-15-03/Rev.1
8 Mar 2023
Programme for the GRVA Electromechanical Braking Workshop
GRVA-EMB-01
8 Mar 2023
GRVA-16: Annotated provisional agenda for the May 2023 session
GRVA/2023/7
8 Mar 2023
UN R90: Proposal for a Supplement 11 to the 02 series of amendments
GRVA/2023/12
8 Mar 2023
UN R157: Proposal for a supplement to the original version and to the 01 series of amendments
GRVA/2023/8
8 Mar 2023
UN R140: Proposal for amendments
GRVA/2023/9
8 Mar 2023
UN R13: Proposal for amendments
GRVA/2023/10
8 Mar 2023
UN R90: Proposal for a Supplement 12 to the 01 series of amendments
GRVA/2023/11
9 Mar 2023
UN R90: Proposal for a Supplement 12 to the 01 series of amendments
GRVA/2023/14
9 Mar 2023
UN R90: Proposal for amendments
GRVA/2023/15
9 Mar 2023
UN R90: Proposal for a Supplement 11 to the 02 series of amendments
GRVA/2023/13
28 Mar 2023
Electromechanical Brakes and UNECE R13/R13-H
GRVA-EMB-02/Rev.1
29 Mar 2023
EMB: Scope of amendment proposals and affected sections and paragraphs
GRVA-EMB-04/Rev.1
4 Apr 2023
GRVA: Report of the 15th (January 2023) session
GRVA/15
4 Apr 2023
UN R13 and UN R13-H: EMB correlation
GRVA-EMB-03