44. The representative of the United States of America reported that OMB Circular No. A-199 which establishes policies when third party standards are referenced into national legislation is currently being
revised. Following the suggestion of the Chair of GRRF, the World Forum agreed to discuss this issue with all the Chairs of the GRs at the next session of AC.2.
53. WP.29 noted that this subject was considered under agenda item 4.3.
The experts were informed that WP29 at its 158th session of November 2012 adopted the four documents creating the new regulation on AEBS and its 1st series of amendments. This information can be found in p 26 of the official report ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1099:
| Document Title | CPs | Document Reference | Vote For/Opp/Abs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) | 35 | 2011/92 and its Amend.1 | 35/0/0 |
| 01 series of amendments to the Regulation on AEBS | 35 | 2011/93 and its Amend.1 | 35/0/0 |
The Chair was of the opinion that some clarification of the text adopted at WP29-158, p 3 of document WP29/2011/93/Amend.1, last sentence of the row 2, was necessary because an interpretation could be that the M3 vehicles with hydraulic braking would not have to fulfil the requirements of row 1 before the 2016 date mentioned in row 2. The authors of the text in cells B-H/2 indeed aimed the vehicles mentioned in cell A/2, but omitted to precise whether the vehicles addressed by the footnote 1 (Vehicles of category M3 with hydraulic braking system) would be subject to the same provisions.
OICA was of the opinion that the vehicles in footnote 1 are part of row2. Then the 1st date would be in Nov 2016. But the expert acknowledged that the wording is such that these vehicles could be approved already as from 2013.
CLEPA did not share the interpretation of OICA, and proposed to discuss this at a later stage.
The question of the true date of the Nov 2013 WP29 session was also raised, leading to the question whether the values should be adopted already at the June session of WP29.
The European Commission representative clarified that the intention is that, once the AEBS and LDWS UN Regulations have entered into force and the EU has acceded to them, UN regulations approvals would be accepted as an alternative to the EU approvals, taking into account that the EU legislation provides for a number of exemptions from the AEBS/LDWS carriage requirements. The representative of the European Commission informed that the European Commission Services were about to send a letter to the UN Secretariat to clarify the way how the EU intends to apply the new UN regulations, in response to the request of the WP.29 Secretariat to CPs to provide information on the application of the 01 series of the AEBS regulation (done, see Annex 1 attached).
Conclusion: items to be addressed at a later stage, to be added in the agenda for next meeting.