Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to permit the direction indicator lamp to be operated with the luminous intensity of its original specification when used as an answer-back signal, notwithstanding the 700 cd limitation on or above the HH line that applies to other approved lighting and light-signalling devices and exterior courtesy lamps. The proposal removes restrictions on direction indicator lamps used for answer-back activation of already type-approved light-signalling functions, while maintaining prohibitions on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 6.24.9.2. to clarify that approved lamps emitting white light, rear position lamps, parking lamps, side-marker lamps and end-outline marker lamps may be switched ON as exterior courtesy lamps, and that paragraphs 6.24.9.3., 6.24.9.4., and the conditions of paragraphs 5.11. and 5.12. are not applicable to these approved lamps. The clarification confirms that paragraph 6.24.9.2. allows the coexistence and simultaneous operation of approved lamps without re-classifying them as exterior courtesy lamps and without subjecting them to exterior courtesy lamp-specific concealment requirements.

Proposal to amend para. 2.4.10. to expand the definition of a pair to include vehicles of categories M, N and O with one or more lamps extending from left to right; amend para. 2.4.11. and its sub-paragraphs to redefine single and multiple lamps to refer to interdependent lamps marked “Y”; amend para. 2.4.12. to redefine interdependent lamp system and add definition of interdependent lamp marked “Y”; amend para. 5.5. and its sub-paragraphs to add that a pair shall be considered as two lamps and to establish requirements for manufacturer logos; amend para. 5.7.2.2.; amend para. 5.7.2.3.; delete para. 5.7.2.4.; amend para. 5.18.2.; add new para. 4.7.3. to UN Regulation No. 148 to require that a pair containing one or more light emitting surfaces extending from left to right shall contain at least one light source on each side; and amend para. 4.8.1.3. to clarify photometric measurement procedures.

Proposal to prohibit to approval of a manufacturer logo: insert a new para. 5.12.1.4. permitting the remaining non-substituted part of a front position lamp to remain switched on when part of it is substituted with an adjacent adaptive front-lighting system lamp, provided the distance to the closest energized AFS lighting unit fulfils the requirements of para. 5.7.2.1., amend para. 5.30.1. to improve language on logos for light-signalling devices approved to UN R148, and insert a new para. 4.5.4. to clarify that the apparent surface of a lamp shall not include a manufacturer logo built by transparent or non-transparent components that influence the propagation of light emitted.

Proposal to amend para. 5.10.3. to exclude retro-reflective devices, retro-reflective markings, lighting devices fitted for interior lighting, and reversing projections from the requirements for “red light to the front” and “white light to the rear”. The proposal aims to eliminate unnecessary testing burdens on functions that never emit light by themselves and would always meet the emission requirement of less than 0.25 cd by definition. The exemption aligns with Vienna Convention provisions and reflects an original intent from over twenty years prior.

Document describes the current answer-back signal requirement in UN R48-09, which limits maximum luminous intensity to 700 cd on or above the HH line. The regulation practically prohibits use of direction indicators with filament bulb light sources as answer-back signals, despite conventional widespread use without safety issues. Japan proposes excluding direction indicators from the 700 cd limitation to allow conventional answer-back signals using direction indicators with filament light sources, while maintaining other restrictions including the 700 cd limitation for other functions and prohibition of front fog lamps, rear fog lamps and stop lamps as answer-back signals. Revision is needed before UN R48-09 mandate for new vehicles in September 2027.

Proposal to amend para. 6.7.4.1. to require minimum distance of not less than 400 mm between inner edges of two apparent surfaces for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, amend para. 6.9.4.1. to require no special requirement for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, and amend para. 6.10.4.1. to require not less than 400 mm for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, addressing concerns about continuous LED light bars affecting hazard perception and traffic safety.

Status report on the Task Force on Lamp Under Parked Conditions (TF-LUPC). The group held two meetings since the 94th GRE session and continued developing a proposal on energy status indicators and lamp test modes. Open issues require advice from GRE experts on the number and switching conditions of energy status indicators, their size and colour, and on lamp test mode categories, AFS modes and classes, test duration, and inclusion of warning lamps. The group plans to submit a final proposal to the 96th GRE session in April 2027 for integration into the 10 Series of amendments to UN R48.

TF-LUPC is established to review requirements of the current suite of lamps under parked conditions and to develop, where necessary, within the framework of UN R48 a proposal pertaining to Energy Indicator and Lamp test mode. The task force is open to all GRE participants and is managed by two Co-Chairs (Japan/Netherlands) and a Secretary (OICA). Decisions are reached by consensus. STEP 2 aims to present an informal document at GRE-95 in October 2026 and a first formal document at GRE-96 in April 2027 for submission to WP.29 as part of the 10 Series of amendments to UN R48.

Proposal to:

• Amend para. 2.5.22. to define Energy status indicator,
• Amend para. 2.7.12. to define Lamp test mode,
• Insert new para. 2.11.5. to define Indicator Blue and Indicator Green chromaticity coordinates,
• Amend paras. 3.2.10. and 3.2.11. to add statements regarding energy status indicator lamps and lamp test mode,
• Amend para. 5.9.4. to permit energy status indicator to flash and vary in luminous intensity,
• Amend para. 5.11.1. to add conditions relating to energy status indicator and lamp test mode,
• Amend para. 5.15. to add colour specifications for energy status indicator,
• Insert new para. 6.29. specifying requirements for energy status indicator including presence, number, position, electrical connections, activation conditions, intensity, pulsation, flashing, and apparent surface area,
• Insert new para. 6.30. specifying lamp test mode requirements including activation conditions, duration, and operation,
• Amend Annex 1 to add items 9.33., 9.34., and 9.34.1. for lamp test mode and energy indicator approval statements,
• Amend Annex 14 to add observing areas for energy status indicators,
• Amend Annex 20 to add technical provisions for energy status indicator intensity based on ambient light levels.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to clarify that the direction indicator lamp used for the answer-back signal may be operated with a luminous intensity not exceeding its original specification, and to restructure the paragraph into subsections (a), (b), and (c) specifying maximum luminous intensity limits, direction indicator lamp operation, and prohibited lamp types.

GTB comments on proposals to restrict lighting options such as band, strip, or illuminated logo. GTB presents findings from a 2025 study by Vrije Universiteit Brussel on daytime running light (DRL) designs, comparing dual and single DRL configurations at different speeds. At 90 km/h no significant difference was found between designs; at 50 km/h dual DRLs showed slightly earlier detection by 30–50 metres (approximately 4 seconds), which researchers considered a perceptual side effect rather than safety-critical. GTB concludes single DRLs provide comparable safety performance to dual DRLs and are viable alternatives. GTB advocates for improved provisions to ensure consistent and harmonised interpretation among Contracting Parties, referencing proposals GRE/2026/6 and GRE/2026/21.

OICA comments on proposed amendments to introduce minimum separation requirements for stop lamps and position lamps in GRE-95-11. OICA contests the justification for the proposed 400 mm separation requirement for M₁ and N₁ vehicles and 600 mm for all vehicle categories, arguing the EC has not established a causal link between continuous lighting and safety deficits, that the claimed recognition distance differences lack meaningful influence on safe driving, and that introducing divergent UN requirements would create technical barriers to international trade contrary to the 1958 Agreement. OICA references published research indicating strip-type taillights provide optimal ergonomic solutions for vehicle conspicuity.

Proposal to insert a new definition of ‘call for help signal’ in para. 2.6.5., add provisions to para. 6.6.7.2. permitting the call for help signal as an alternative to the hazard warning signal following a collision, and insert a new para. 6.30. establishing requirements for the call for help signal. The call for help signal operates via simultaneous flashing of all direction-indicator lamps and optionally all stop lamps at 4.0±1.0 Hz (or 4.0+0.0/−1.0 Hz for filament rear lamps), activates automatically only after activation of an Accident Emergency Call System or equivalent emergency system, deactivates automatically if the vehicle exceeds 15 km/h or if the Emergency Call System is manually deactivated, and may be manually switched off.

Document addresses the Rear-End Collision Alert Signal (RECAS) in UN R48. It identifies unclear speed thresholds for RECAS activation, noting that RECAS may not operate when vehicles are stationary or moving at low speeds depending on system design. Accident data analysis shows 59 percent of rear-end crashes involved stopped lead vehicles and 22 percent involved decelerating lead vehicles. The document requests views on whether RECAS should flash when vehicles are completely stopped, whether owner manuals should state RECAS activation limitations, and seeks information on RECAS verification during type approval.

Document presenting challenges related to headlamp aiming limits for vehicles. Addresses up-down aiming challenges including vehicle load, cut-off line definition, lamp height consideration, and vehicle inspection management. Discusses left-right aiming challenges regarding vehicle references, aiming limits, and kink point definition. Concludes that vehicle approval is key to enabling vehicle inspection to develop its full potential in glare prevention.

Proposal to amend para. 6.7.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of position lamps to be not less than 400 mm, amend para. 6.9.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of stop lamps to be not less than 600 mm for vehicles other than M₁ and N₁ category vehicles (reducible to 400 mm where overall width is less than 1,300 mm) with no special requirement for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles, and amend para. 6.10.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of rear lamps to be not less than 400 mm for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for other categories (reducible to 400 mm where overall width is less than 1,300 mm).

Proposal to insert a new paragraph 2.xx. defining ‘band or strip’ as a luminous element having a maximum horizontal dimension at least 10 times greater than its maximum vertical dimension and having a substantially straight apparent shape, with maximum deviation of the centreline from the straight line connecting the extremities not exceeding 10 per cent of the overall length.

Proposal to amend para. 5.10. and its sub-paragraphs to clarify provisions regarding light which could give rise to confusion, specifically to clarify that for red light reflected by a retro-reflector fitted on the rear or white light reflected by a retro-reflector fitted on the front, the same requirements apply as for other lamps, and to specify that when the lamp is a retro-reflector, the observer shall make use of a torch to check visibility within specified zones.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to allow an answer-back signal generated by the direction indicator lamp to be operated with a luminous intensity not exceeding its original specification, thereby excluding the direction indicator lamp from the 700 cd limitation on or above the HH line. The proposal aims to remove unnecessary restrictions on already type-approved light-signalling functions while maintaining technological neutrality and road safety.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to exclude direction indicator lamps and dipped-beam headlamps from the 700 cd luminous intensity limitation on or above the HH line when operated as answer-back signals, allowing these devices to operate with their original specifications, while maintaining prohibitions on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 2.4.10. to define a pair for vehicles of categories M, N and O as one or more lamp(s) extending from left to right-hand side, amend para. 2.4.11. and 2.4.12. to define single and multiple lamps and interdependent lamp systems marked Y, amend para. 5.5. and its sub-paragraphs to establish requirements for paired lamps including symmetry and photometric characteristics, amend para. 5.7.2.2. and 5.7.2.3. to specify installation requirements for single lamps, delete para. 5.7.2.4. concerning positioning and length requirements, amend para. 5.18.2. regarding assembly of lamps marked D, add para. 4.7.3. to UN Regulation No. 148 requiring a pair to contain at least one light source on each side, and amend para. 4.8.1.3. to clarify photometric measurement procedures when lamps use multiple light sources.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to exclude direction indicator lamps and dipped-beam headlamps from the 700 cd maximum luminous intensity limitation on or above the HH line when used as answer-back signals, allowing these devices to operate with their original specifications, while maintaining the restriction on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to permit the direction indicator lamp to be operated with the luminous intensity of its original specification when used as an answer-back signal, notwithstanding the 700 cd limitation on or above the HH line that applies to other approved lighting and light-signalling devices and exterior courtesy lamps. The proposal removes restrictions on direction indicator lamps used for answer-back activation of already type-approved light-signalling functions, while maintaining prohibitions on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 6.24.9.2. to clarify that approved lamps emitting white light, rear position lamps, parking lamps, side-marker lamps and end-outline marker lamps may be switched ON as exterior courtesy lamps, and that paragraphs 6.24.9.3., 6.24.9.4., and the conditions of paragraphs 5.11. and 5.12. are not applicable to these approved lamps. The clarification confirms that paragraph 6.24.9.2. allows the coexistence and simultaneous operation of approved lamps without re-classifying them as exterior courtesy lamps and without subjecting them to exterior courtesy lamp-specific concealment requirements.

Proposal to amend para. 2.4.10. to expand the definition of a pair to include vehicles of categories M, N and O with one or more lamps extending from left to right; amend para. 2.4.11. and its sub-paragraphs to redefine single and multiple lamps to refer to interdependent lamps marked “Y”; amend para. 2.4.12. to redefine interdependent lamp system and add definition of interdependent lamp marked “Y”; amend para. 5.5. and its sub-paragraphs to add that a pair shall be considered as two lamps and to establish requirements for manufacturer logos; amend para. 5.7.2.2.; amend para. 5.7.2.3.; delete para. 5.7.2.4.; amend para. 5.18.2.; add new para. 4.7.3. to UN Regulation No. 148 to require that a pair containing one or more light emitting surfaces extending from left to right shall contain at least one light source on each side; and amend para. 4.8.1.3. to clarify photometric measurement procedures.

Proposal to prohibit to approval of a manufacturer logo: insert a new para. 5.12.1.4. permitting the remaining non-substituted part of a front position lamp to remain switched on when part of it is substituted with an adjacent adaptive front-lighting system lamp, provided the distance to the closest energized AFS lighting unit fulfils the requirements of para. 5.7.2.1., amend para. 5.30.1. to improve language on logos for light-signalling devices approved to UN R148, and insert a new para. 4.5.4. to clarify that the apparent surface of a lamp shall not include a manufacturer logo built by transparent or non-transparent components that influence the propagation of light emitted.

Proposal to amend para. 5.10.3. to exclude retro-reflective devices, retro-reflective markings, lighting devices fitted for interior lighting, and reversing projections from the requirements for “red light to the front” and “white light to the rear”. The proposal aims to eliminate unnecessary testing burdens on functions that never emit light by themselves and would always meet the emission requirement of less than 0.25 cd by definition. The exemption aligns with Vienna Convention provisions and reflects an original intent from over twenty years prior.

Document describes the current answer-back signal requirement in UN R48-09, which limits maximum luminous intensity to 700 cd on or above the HH line. The regulation practically prohibits use of direction indicators with filament bulb light sources as answer-back signals, despite conventional widespread use without safety issues. Japan proposes excluding direction indicators from the 700 cd limitation to allow conventional answer-back signals using direction indicators with filament light sources, while maintaining other restrictions including the 700 cd limitation for other functions and prohibition of front fog lamps, rear fog lamps and stop lamps as answer-back signals. Revision is needed before UN R48-09 mandate for new vehicles in September 2027.

Proposal to amend para. 6.7.4.1. to require minimum distance of not less than 400 mm between inner edges of two apparent surfaces for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, amend para. 6.9.4.1. to require no special requirement for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, and amend para. 6.10.4.1. to require not less than 400 mm for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, addressing concerns about continuous LED light bars affecting hazard perception and traffic safety.

Status report on the Task Force on Lamp Under Parked Conditions (TF-LUPC). The group held two meetings since the 94th GRE session and continued developing a proposal on energy status indicators and lamp test modes. Open issues require advice from GRE experts on the number and switching conditions of energy status indicators, their size and colour, and on lamp test mode categories, AFS modes and classes, test duration, and inclusion of warning lamps. The group plans to submit a final proposal to the 96th GRE session in April 2027 for integration into the 10 Series of amendments to UN R48.

TF-LUPC is established to review requirements of the current suite of lamps under parked conditions and to develop, where necessary, within the framework of UN R48 a proposal pertaining to Energy Indicator and Lamp test mode. The task force is open to all GRE participants and is managed by two Co-Chairs (Japan/Netherlands) and a Secretary (OICA). Decisions are reached by consensus. STEP 2 aims to present an informal document at GRE-95 in October 2026 and a first formal document at GRE-96 in April 2027 for submission to WP.29 as part of the 10 Series of amendments to UN R48.

Proposal to:

• Amend para. 2.5.22. to define Energy status indicator,
• Amend para. 2.7.12. to define Lamp test mode,
• Insert new para. 2.11.5. to define Indicator Blue and Indicator Green chromaticity coordinates,
• Amend paras. 3.2.10. and 3.2.11. to add statements regarding energy status indicator lamps and lamp test mode,
• Amend para. 5.9.4. to permit energy status indicator to flash and vary in luminous intensity,
• Amend para. 5.11.1. to add conditions relating to energy status indicator and lamp test mode,
• Amend para. 5.15. to add colour specifications for energy status indicator,
• Insert new para. 6.29. specifying requirements for energy status indicator including presence, number, position, electrical connections, activation conditions, intensity, pulsation, flashing, and apparent surface area,
• Insert new para. 6.30. specifying lamp test mode requirements including activation conditions, duration, and operation,
• Amend Annex 1 to add items 9.33., 9.34., and 9.34.1. for lamp test mode and energy indicator approval statements,
• Amend Annex 14 to add observing areas for energy status indicators,
• Amend Annex 20 to add technical provisions for energy status indicator intensity based on ambient light levels.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to clarify that the direction indicator lamp used for the answer-back signal may be operated with a luminous intensity not exceeding its original specification, and to restructure the paragraph into subsections (a), (b), and (c) specifying maximum luminous intensity limits, direction indicator lamp operation, and prohibited lamp types.

GTB comments on proposals to restrict lighting options such as band, strip, or illuminated logo. GTB presents findings from a 2025 study by Vrije Universiteit Brussel on daytime running light (DRL) designs, comparing dual and single DRL configurations at different speeds. At 90 km/h no significant difference was found between designs; at 50 km/h dual DRLs showed slightly earlier detection by 30–50 metres (approximately 4 seconds), which researchers considered a perceptual side effect rather than safety-critical. GTB concludes single DRLs provide comparable safety performance to dual DRLs and are viable alternatives. GTB advocates for improved provisions to ensure consistent and harmonised interpretation among Contracting Parties, referencing proposals GRE/2026/6 and GRE/2026/21.

OICA comments on proposed amendments to introduce minimum separation requirements for stop lamps and position lamps in GRE-95-11. OICA contests the justification for the proposed 400 mm separation requirement for M₁ and N₁ vehicles and 600 mm for all vehicle categories, arguing the EC has not established a causal link between continuous lighting and safety deficits, that the claimed recognition distance differences lack meaningful influence on safe driving, and that introducing divergent UN requirements would create technical barriers to international trade contrary to the 1958 Agreement. OICA references published research indicating strip-type taillights provide optimal ergonomic solutions for vehicle conspicuity.

Proposal to insert a new definition of ‘call for help signal’ in para. 2.6.5., add provisions to para. 6.6.7.2. permitting the call for help signal as an alternative to the hazard warning signal following a collision, and insert a new para. 6.30. establishing requirements for the call for help signal. The call for help signal operates via simultaneous flashing of all direction-indicator lamps and optionally all stop lamps at 4.0±1.0 Hz (or 4.0+0.0/−1.0 Hz for filament rear lamps), activates automatically only after activation of an Accident Emergency Call System or equivalent emergency system, deactivates automatically if the vehicle exceeds 15 km/h or if the Emergency Call System is manually deactivated, and may be manually switched off.

Document addresses the Rear-End Collision Alert Signal (RECAS) in UN R48. It identifies unclear speed thresholds for RECAS activation, noting that RECAS may not operate when vehicles are stationary or moving at low speeds depending on system design. Accident data analysis shows 59 percent of rear-end crashes involved stopped lead vehicles and 22 percent involved decelerating lead vehicles. The document requests views on whether RECAS should flash when vehicles are completely stopped, whether owner manuals should state RECAS activation limitations, and seeks information on RECAS verification during type approval.

Document presenting challenges related to headlamp aiming limits for vehicles. Addresses up-down aiming challenges including vehicle load, cut-off line definition, lamp height consideration, and vehicle inspection management. Discusses left-right aiming challenges regarding vehicle references, aiming limits, and kink point definition. Concludes that vehicle approval is key to enabling vehicle inspection to develop its full potential in glare prevention.

Proposal to amend para. 6.7.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of position lamps to be not less than 400 mm, amend para. 6.9.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of stop lamps to be not less than 600 mm for vehicles other than M₁ and N₁ category vehicles (reducible to 400 mm where overall width is less than 1,300 mm) with no special requirement for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles, and amend para. 6.10.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of rear lamps to be not less than 400 mm for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for other categories (reducible to 400 mm where overall width is less than 1,300 mm).

Proposal to insert a new paragraph 2.xx. defining ‘band or strip’ as a luminous element having a maximum horizontal dimension at least 10 times greater than its maximum vertical dimension and having a substantially straight apparent shape, with maximum deviation of the centreline from the straight line connecting the extremities not exceeding 10 per cent of the overall length.

Proposal to amend para. 5.10. and its sub-paragraphs to clarify provisions regarding light which could give rise to confusion, specifically to clarify that for red light reflected by a retro-reflector fitted on the rear or white light reflected by a retro-reflector fitted on the front, the same requirements apply as for other lamps, and to specify that when the lamp is a retro-reflector, the observer shall make use of a torch to check visibility within specified zones.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to allow an answer-back signal generated by the direction indicator lamp to be operated with a luminous intensity not exceeding its original specification, thereby excluding the direction indicator lamp from the 700 cd limitation on or above the HH line. The proposal aims to remove unnecessary restrictions on already type-approved light-signalling functions while maintaining technological neutrality and road safety.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to exclude direction indicator lamps and dipped-beam headlamps from the 700 cd luminous intensity limitation on or above the HH line when operated as answer-back signals, allowing these devices to operate with their original specifications, while maintaining prohibitions on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 2.4.10. to define a pair for vehicles of categories M, N and O as one or more lamp(s) extending from left to right-hand side, amend para. 2.4.11. and 2.4.12. to define single and multiple lamps and interdependent lamp systems marked Y, amend para. 5.5. and its sub-paragraphs to establish requirements for paired lamps including symmetry and photometric characteristics, amend para. 5.7.2.2. and 5.7.2.3. to specify installation requirements for single lamps, delete para. 5.7.2.4. concerning positioning and length requirements, amend para. 5.18.2. regarding assembly of lamps marked D, add para. 4.7.3. to UN Regulation No. 148 requiring a pair to contain at least one light source on each side, and amend para. 4.8.1.3. to clarify photometric measurement procedures when lamps use multiple light sources.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to exclude direction indicator lamps and dipped-beam headlamps from the 700 cd maximum luminous intensity limitation on or above the HH line when used as answer-back signals, allowing these devices to operate with their original specifications, while maintaining the restriction on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to permit the direction indicator lamp to be operated with the luminous intensity of its original specification when used as an answer-back signal, notwithstanding the 700 cd limitation on or above the HH line that applies to other approved lighting and light-signalling devices and exterior courtesy lamps. The proposal removes restrictions on direction indicator lamps used for answer-back activation of already type-approved light-signalling functions, while maintaining prohibitions on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 6.24.9.2. to clarify that approved lamps emitting white light, rear position lamps, parking lamps, side-marker lamps and end-outline marker lamps may be switched ON as exterior courtesy lamps, and that paragraphs 6.24.9.3., 6.24.9.4., and the conditions of paragraphs 5.11. and 5.12. are not applicable to these approved lamps. The clarification confirms that paragraph 6.24.9.2. allows the coexistence and simultaneous operation of approved lamps without re-classifying them as exterior courtesy lamps and without subjecting them to exterior courtesy lamp-specific concealment requirements.

Proposal to amend para. 2.4.10. to expand the definition of a pair to include vehicles of categories M, N and O with one or more lamps extending from left to right; amend para. 2.4.11. and its sub-paragraphs to redefine single and multiple lamps to refer to interdependent lamps marked “Y”; amend para. 2.4.12. to redefine interdependent lamp system and add definition of interdependent lamp marked “Y”; amend para. 5.5. and its sub-paragraphs to add that a pair shall be considered as two lamps and to establish requirements for manufacturer logos; amend para. 5.7.2.2.; amend para. 5.7.2.3.; delete para. 5.7.2.4.; amend para. 5.18.2.; add new para. 4.7.3. to UN Regulation No. 148 to require that a pair containing one or more light emitting surfaces extending from left to right shall contain at least one light source on each side; and amend para. 4.8.1.3. to clarify photometric measurement procedures.

Proposal to prohibit to approval of a manufacturer logo: insert a new para. 5.12.1.4. permitting the remaining non-substituted part of a front position lamp to remain switched on when part of it is substituted with an adjacent adaptive front-lighting system lamp, provided the distance to the closest energized AFS lighting unit fulfils the requirements of para. 5.7.2.1., amend para. 5.30.1. to improve language on logos for light-signalling devices approved to UN R148, and insert a new para. 4.5.4. to clarify that the apparent surface of a lamp shall not include a manufacturer logo built by transparent or non-transparent components that influence the propagation of light emitted.

Proposal to amend para. 5.10.3. to exclude retro-reflective devices, retro-reflective markings, lighting devices fitted for interior lighting, and reversing projections from the requirements for “red light to the front” and “white light to the rear”. The proposal aims to eliminate unnecessary testing burdens on functions that never emit light by themselves and would always meet the emission requirement of less than 0.25 cd by definition. The exemption aligns with Vienna Convention provisions and reflects an original intent from over twenty years prior.

Document describes the current answer-back signal requirement in UN R48-09, which limits maximum luminous intensity to 700 cd on or above the HH line. The regulation practically prohibits use of direction indicators with filament bulb light sources as answer-back signals, despite conventional widespread use without safety issues. Japan proposes excluding direction indicators from the 700 cd limitation to allow conventional answer-back signals using direction indicators with filament light sources, while maintaining other restrictions including the 700 cd limitation for other functions and prohibition of front fog lamps, rear fog lamps and stop lamps as answer-back signals. Revision is needed before UN R48-09 mandate for new vehicles in September 2027.

Proposal to amend para. 6.7.4.1. to require minimum distance of not less than 400 mm between inner edges of two apparent surfaces for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, amend para. 6.9.4.1. to require no special requirement for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, and amend para. 6.10.4.1. to require not less than 400 mm for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, addressing concerns about continuous LED light bars affecting hazard perception and traffic safety.

Status report on the Task Force on Lamp Under Parked Conditions (TF-LUPC). The group held two meetings since the 94th GRE session and continued developing a proposal on energy status indicators and lamp test modes. Open issues require advice from GRE experts on the number and switching conditions of energy status indicators, their size and colour, and on lamp test mode categories, AFS modes and classes, test duration, and inclusion of warning lamps. The group plans to submit a final proposal to the 96th GRE session in April 2027 for integration into the 10 Series of amendments to UN R48.

TF-LUPC is established to review requirements of the current suite of lamps under parked conditions and to develop, where necessary, within the framework of UN R48 a proposal pertaining to Energy Indicator and Lamp test mode. The task force is open to all GRE participants and is managed by two Co-Chairs (Japan/Netherlands) and a Secretary (OICA). Decisions are reached by consensus. STEP 2 aims to present an informal document at GRE-95 in October 2026 and a first formal document at GRE-96 in April 2027 for submission to WP.29 as part of the 10 Series of amendments to UN R48.

Proposal to:

• Amend para. 2.5.22. to define Energy status indicator,
• Amend para. 2.7.12. to define Lamp test mode,
• Insert new para. 2.11.5. to define Indicator Blue and Indicator Green chromaticity coordinates,
• Amend paras. 3.2.10. and 3.2.11. to add statements regarding energy status indicator lamps and lamp test mode,
• Amend para. 5.9.4. to permit energy status indicator to flash and vary in luminous intensity,
• Amend para. 5.11.1. to add conditions relating to energy status indicator and lamp test mode,
• Amend para. 5.15. to add colour specifications for energy status indicator,
• Insert new para. 6.29. specifying requirements for energy status indicator including presence, number, position, electrical connections, activation conditions, intensity, pulsation, flashing, and apparent surface area,
• Insert new para. 6.30. specifying lamp test mode requirements including activation conditions, duration, and operation,
• Amend Annex 1 to add items 9.33., 9.34., and 9.34.1. for lamp test mode and energy indicator approval statements,
• Amend Annex 14 to add observing areas for energy status indicators,
• Amend Annex 20 to add technical provisions for energy status indicator intensity based on ambient light levels.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to clarify that the direction indicator lamp used for the answer-back signal may be operated with a luminous intensity not exceeding its original specification, and to restructure the paragraph into subsections (a), (b), and (c) specifying maximum luminous intensity limits, direction indicator lamp operation, and prohibited lamp types.

GTB comments on proposals to restrict lighting options such as band, strip, or illuminated logo. GTB presents findings from a 2025 study by Vrije Universiteit Brussel on daytime running light (DRL) designs, comparing dual and single DRL configurations at different speeds. At 90 km/h no significant difference was found between designs; at 50 km/h dual DRLs showed slightly earlier detection by 30–50 metres (approximately 4 seconds), which researchers considered a perceptual side effect rather than safety-critical. GTB concludes single DRLs provide comparable safety performance to dual DRLs and are viable alternatives. GTB advocates for improved provisions to ensure consistent and harmonised interpretation among Contracting Parties, referencing proposals GRE/2026/6 and GRE/2026/21.

OICA comments on proposed amendments to introduce minimum separation requirements for stop lamps and position lamps in GRE-95-11. OICA contests the justification for the proposed 400 mm separation requirement for M₁ and N₁ vehicles and 600 mm for all vehicle categories, arguing the EC has not established a causal link between continuous lighting and safety deficits, that the claimed recognition distance differences lack meaningful influence on safe driving, and that introducing divergent UN requirements would create technical barriers to international trade contrary to the 1958 Agreement. OICA references published research indicating strip-type taillights provide optimal ergonomic solutions for vehicle conspicuity.

Proposal to insert a new definition of ‘call for help signal’ in para. 2.6.5., add provisions to para. 6.6.7.2. permitting the call for help signal as an alternative to the hazard warning signal following a collision, and insert a new para. 6.30. establishing requirements for the call for help signal. The call for help signal operates via simultaneous flashing of all direction-indicator lamps and optionally all stop lamps at 4.0±1.0 Hz (or 4.0+0.0/−1.0 Hz for filament rear lamps), activates automatically only after activation of an Accident Emergency Call System or equivalent emergency system, deactivates automatically if the vehicle exceeds 15 km/h or if the Emergency Call System is manually deactivated, and may be manually switched off.

Document addresses the Rear-End Collision Alert Signal (RECAS) in UN R48. It identifies unclear speed thresholds for RECAS activation, noting that RECAS may not operate when vehicles are stationary or moving at low speeds depending on system design. Accident data analysis shows 59 percent of rear-end crashes involved stopped lead vehicles and 22 percent involved decelerating lead vehicles. The document requests views on whether RECAS should flash when vehicles are completely stopped, whether owner manuals should state RECAS activation limitations, and seeks information on RECAS verification during type approval.

Document presenting challenges related to headlamp aiming limits for vehicles. Addresses up-down aiming challenges including vehicle load, cut-off line definition, lamp height consideration, and vehicle inspection management. Discusses left-right aiming challenges regarding vehicle references, aiming limits, and kink point definition. Concludes that vehicle approval is key to enabling vehicle inspection to develop its full potential in glare prevention.

Proposal to amend para. 6.7.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of position lamps to be not less than 400 mm, amend para. 6.9.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of stop lamps to be not less than 600 mm for vehicles other than M₁ and N₁ category vehicles (reducible to 400 mm where overall width is less than 1,300 mm) with no special requirement for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles, and amend para. 6.10.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of rear lamps to be not less than 400 mm for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for other categories (reducible to 400 mm where overall width is less than 1,300 mm).

Proposal to insert a new paragraph 2.xx. defining ‘band or strip’ as a luminous element having a maximum horizontal dimension at least 10 times greater than its maximum vertical dimension and having a substantially straight apparent shape, with maximum deviation of the centreline from the straight line connecting the extremities not exceeding 10 per cent of the overall length.

Proposal to amend para. 5.10. and its sub-paragraphs to clarify provisions regarding light which could give rise to confusion, specifically to clarify that for red light reflected by a retro-reflector fitted on the rear or white light reflected by a retro-reflector fitted on the front, the same requirements apply as for other lamps, and to specify that when the lamp is a retro-reflector, the observer shall make use of a torch to check visibility within specified zones.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to allow an answer-back signal generated by the direction indicator lamp to be operated with a luminous intensity not exceeding its original specification, thereby excluding the direction indicator lamp from the 700 cd limitation on or above the HH line. The proposal aims to remove unnecessary restrictions on already type-approved light-signalling functions while maintaining technological neutrality and road safety.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to exclude direction indicator lamps and dipped-beam headlamps from the 700 cd luminous intensity limitation on or above the HH line when operated as answer-back signals, allowing these devices to operate with their original specifications, while maintaining prohibitions on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 2.4.10. to define a pair for vehicles of categories M, N and O as one or more lamp(s) extending from left to right-hand side, amend para. 2.4.11. and 2.4.12. to define single and multiple lamps and interdependent lamp systems marked Y, amend para. 5.5. and its sub-paragraphs to establish requirements for paired lamps including symmetry and photometric characteristics, amend para. 5.7.2.2. and 5.7.2.3. to specify installation requirements for single lamps, delete para. 5.7.2.4. concerning positioning and length requirements, amend para. 5.18.2. regarding assembly of lamps marked D, add para. 4.7.3. to UN Regulation No. 148 requiring a pair to contain at least one light source on each side, and amend para. 4.8.1.3. to clarify photometric measurement procedures when lamps use multiple light sources.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to exclude direction indicator lamps and dipped-beam headlamps from the 700 cd maximum luminous intensity limitation on or above the HH line when used as answer-back signals, allowing these devices to operate with their original specifications, while maintaining the restriction on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to permit the direction indicator lamp to be operated with the luminous intensity of its original specification when used as an answer-back signal, notwithstanding the 700 cd limitation on or above the HH line that applies to other approved lighting and light-signalling devices and exterior courtesy lamps. The proposal removes restrictions on direction indicator lamps used for answer-back activation of already type-approved light-signalling functions, while maintaining prohibitions on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 6.24.9.2. to clarify that approved lamps emitting white light, rear position lamps, parking lamps, side-marker lamps and end-outline marker lamps may be switched ON as exterior courtesy lamps, and that paragraphs 6.24.9.3., 6.24.9.4., and the conditions of paragraphs 5.11. and 5.12. are not applicable to these approved lamps. The clarification confirms that paragraph 6.24.9.2. allows the coexistence and simultaneous operation of approved lamps without re-classifying them as exterior courtesy lamps and without subjecting them to exterior courtesy lamp-specific concealment requirements.

Proposal to amend para. 2.4.10. to expand the definition of a pair to include vehicles of categories M, N and O with one or more lamps extending from left to right; amend para. 2.4.11. and its sub-paragraphs to redefine single and multiple lamps to refer to interdependent lamps marked “Y”; amend para. 2.4.12. to redefine interdependent lamp system and add definition of interdependent lamp marked “Y”; amend para. 5.5. and its sub-paragraphs to add that a pair shall be considered as two lamps and to establish requirements for manufacturer logos; amend para. 5.7.2.2.; amend para. 5.7.2.3.; delete para. 5.7.2.4.; amend para. 5.18.2.; add new para. 4.7.3. to UN Regulation No. 148 to require that a pair containing one or more light emitting surfaces extending from left to right shall contain at least one light source on each side; and amend para. 4.8.1.3. to clarify photometric measurement procedures.

Proposal to prohibit to approval of a manufacturer logo: insert a new para. 5.12.1.4. permitting the remaining non-substituted part of a front position lamp to remain switched on when part of it is substituted with an adjacent adaptive front-lighting system lamp, provided the distance to the closest energized AFS lighting unit fulfils the requirements of para. 5.7.2.1., amend para. 5.30.1. to improve language on logos for light-signalling devices approved to UN R148, and insert a new para. 4.5.4. to clarify that the apparent surface of a lamp shall not include a manufacturer logo built by transparent or non-transparent components that influence the propagation of light emitted.

Proposal to amend para. 5.10.3. to exclude retro-reflective devices, retro-reflective markings, lighting devices fitted for interior lighting, and reversing projections from the requirements for “red light to the front” and “white light to the rear”. The proposal aims to eliminate unnecessary testing burdens on functions that never emit light by themselves and would always meet the emission requirement of less than 0.25 cd by definition. The exemption aligns with Vienna Convention provisions and reflects an original intent from over twenty years prior.

Document describes the current answer-back signal requirement in UN R48-09, which limits maximum luminous intensity to 700 cd on or above the HH line. The regulation practically prohibits use of direction indicators with filament bulb light sources as answer-back signals, despite conventional widespread use without safety issues. Japan proposes excluding direction indicators from the 700 cd limitation to allow conventional answer-back signals using direction indicators with filament light sources, while maintaining other restrictions including the 700 cd limitation for other functions and prohibition of front fog lamps, rear fog lamps and stop lamps as answer-back signals. Revision is needed before UN R48-09 mandate for new vehicles in September 2027.

Proposal to amend para. 6.7.4.1. to require minimum distance of not less than 400 mm between inner edges of two apparent surfaces for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, amend para. 6.9.4.1. to require no special requirement for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, and amend para. 6.10.4.1. to require not less than 400 mm for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, addressing concerns about continuous LED light bars affecting hazard perception and traffic safety.

Status report on the Task Force on Lamp Under Parked Conditions (TF-LUPC). The group held two meetings since the 94th GRE session and continued developing a proposal on energy status indicators and lamp test modes. Open issues require advice from GRE experts on the number and switching conditions of energy status indicators, their size and colour, and on lamp test mode categories, AFS modes and classes, test duration, and inclusion of warning lamps. The group plans to submit a final proposal to the 96th GRE session in April 2027 for integration into the 10 Series of amendments to UN R48.

TF-LUPC is established to review requirements of the current suite of lamps under parked conditions and to develop, where necessary, within the framework of UN R48 a proposal pertaining to Energy Indicator and Lamp test mode. The task force is open to all GRE participants and is managed by two Co-Chairs (Japan/Netherlands) and a Secretary (OICA). Decisions are reached by consensus. STEP 2 aims to present an informal document at GRE-95 in October 2026 and a first formal document at GRE-96 in April 2027 for submission to WP.29 as part of the 10 Series of amendments to UN R48.

Proposal to:

• Amend para. 2.5.22. to define Energy status indicator,
• Amend para. 2.7.12. to define Lamp test mode,
• Insert new para. 2.11.5. to define Indicator Blue and Indicator Green chromaticity coordinates,
• Amend paras. 3.2.10. and 3.2.11. to add statements regarding energy status indicator lamps and lamp test mode,
• Amend para. 5.9.4. to permit energy status indicator to flash and vary in luminous intensity,
• Amend para. 5.11.1. to add conditions relating to energy status indicator and lamp test mode,
• Amend para. 5.15. to add colour specifications for energy status indicator,
• Insert new para. 6.29. specifying requirements for energy status indicator including presence, number, position, electrical connections, activation conditions, intensity, pulsation, flashing, and apparent surface area,
• Insert new para. 6.30. specifying lamp test mode requirements including activation conditions, duration, and operation,
• Amend Annex 1 to add items 9.33., 9.34., and 9.34.1. for lamp test mode and energy indicator approval statements,
• Amend Annex 14 to add observing areas for energy status indicators,
• Amend Annex 20 to add technical provisions for energy status indicator intensity based on ambient light levels.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to clarify that the direction indicator lamp used for the answer-back signal may be operated with a luminous intensity not exceeding its original specification, and to restructure the paragraph into subsections (a), (b), and (c) specifying maximum luminous intensity limits, direction indicator lamp operation, and prohibited lamp types.

GTB comments on proposals to restrict lighting options such as band, strip, or illuminated logo. GTB presents findings from a 2025 study by Vrije Universiteit Brussel on daytime running light (DRL) designs, comparing dual and single DRL configurations at different speeds. At 90 km/h no significant difference was found between designs; at 50 km/h dual DRLs showed slightly earlier detection by 30–50 metres (approximately 4 seconds), which researchers considered a perceptual side effect rather than safety-critical. GTB concludes single DRLs provide comparable safety performance to dual DRLs and are viable alternatives. GTB advocates for improved provisions to ensure consistent and harmonised interpretation among Contracting Parties, referencing proposals GRE/2026/6 and GRE/2026/21.

OICA comments on proposed amendments to introduce minimum separation requirements for stop lamps and position lamps in GRE-95-11. OICA contests the justification for the proposed 400 mm separation requirement for M₁ and N₁ vehicles and 600 mm for all vehicle categories, arguing the EC has not established a causal link between continuous lighting and safety deficits, that the claimed recognition distance differences lack meaningful influence on safe driving, and that introducing divergent UN requirements would create technical barriers to international trade contrary to the 1958 Agreement. OICA references published research indicating strip-type taillights provide optimal ergonomic solutions for vehicle conspicuity.

Proposal to insert a new definition of ‘call for help signal’ in para. 2.6.5., add provisions to para. 6.6.7.2. permitting the call for help signal as an alternative to the hazard warning signal following a collision, and insert a new para. 6.30. establishing requirements for the call for help signal. The call for help signal operates via simultaneous flashing of all direction-indicator lamps and optionally all stop lamps at 4.0±1.0 Hz (or 4.0+0.0/−1.0 Hz for filament rear lamps), activates automatically only after activation of an Accident Emergency Call System or equivalent emergency system, deactivates automatically if the vehicle exceeds 15 km/h or if the Emergency Call System is manually deactivated, and may be manually switched off.

Document addresses the Rear-End Collision Alert Signal (RECAS) in UN R48. It identifies unclear speed thresholds for RECAS activation, noting that RECAS may not operate when vehicles are stationary or moving at low speeds depending on system design. Accident data analysis shows 59 percent of rear-end crashes involved stopped lead vehicles and 22 percent involved decelerating lead vehicles. The document requests views on whether RECAS should flash when vehicles are completely stopped, whether owner manuals should state RECAS activation limitations, and seeks information on RECAS verification during type approval.

Document presenting challenges related to headlamp aiming limits for vehicles. Addresses up-down aiming challenges including vehicle load, cut-off line definition, lamp height consideration, and vehicle inspection management. Discusses left-right aiming challenges regarding vehicle references, aiming limits, and kink point definition. Concludes that vehicle approval is key to enabling vehicle inspection to develop its full potential in glare prevention.

Proposal to amend para. 6.7.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of position lamps to be not less than 400 mm, amend para. 6.9.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of stop lamps to be not less than 600 mm for vehicles other than M₁ and N₁ category vehicles (reducible to 400 mm where overall width is less than 1,300 mm) with no special requirement for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles, and amend para. 6.10.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of rear lamps to be not less than 400 mm for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for other categories (reducible to 400 mm where overall width is less than 1,300 mm).

Proposal to insert a new paragraph 2.xx. defining ‘band or strip’ as a luminous element having a maximum horizontal dimension at least 10 times greater than its maximum vertical dimension and having a substantially straight apparent shape, with maximum deviation of the centreline from the straight line connecting the extremities not exceeding 10 per cent of the overall length.

Proposal to amend para. 5.10. and its sub-paragraphs to clarify provisions regarding light which could give rise to confusion, specifically to clarify that for red light reflected by a retro-reflector fitted on the rear or white light reflected by a retro-reflector fitted on the front, the same requirements apply as for other lamps, and to specify that when the lamp is a retro-reflector, the observer shall make use of a torch to check visibility within specified zones.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to allow an answer-back signal generated by the direction indicator lamp to be operated with a luminous intensity not exceeding its original specification, thereby excluding the direction indicator lamp from the 700 cd limitation on or above the HH line. The proposal aims to remove unnecessary restrictions on already type-approved light-signalling functions while maintaining technological neutrality and road safety.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to exclude direction indicator lamps and dipped-beam headlamps from the 700 cd luminous intensity limitation on or above the HH line when operated as answer-back signals, allowing these devices to operate with their original specifications, while maintaining prohibitions on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 2.4.10. to define a pair for vehicles of categories M, N and O as one or more lamp(s) extending from left to right-hand side, amend para. 2.4.11. and 2.4.12. to define single and multiple lamps and interdependent lamp systems marked Y, amend para. 5.5. and its sub-paragraphs to establish requirements for paired lamps including symmetry and photometric characteristics, amend para. 5.7.2.2. and 5.7.2.3. to specify installation requirements for single lamps, delete para. 5.7.2.4. concerning positioning and length requirements, amend para. 5.18.2. regarding assembly of lamps marked D, add para. 4.7.3. to UN Regulation No. 148 requiring a pair to contain at least one light source on each side, and amend para. 4.8.1.3. to clarify photometric measurement procedures when lamps use multiple light sources.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to exclude direction indicator lamps and dipped-beam headlamps from the 700 cd maximum luminous intensity limitation on or above the HH line when used as answer-back signals, allowing these devices to operate with their original specifications, while maintaining the restriction on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to permit the direction indicator lamp to be operated with the luminous intensity of its original specification when used as an answer-back signal, notwithstanding the 700 cd limitation on or above the HH line that applies to other approved lighting and light-signalling devices and exterior courtesy lamps. The proposal removes restrictions on direction indicator lamps used for answer-back activation of already type-approved light-signalling functions, while maintaining prohibitions on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 6.24.9.2. to clarify that approved lamps emitting white light, rear position lamps, parking lamps, side-marker lamps and end-outline marker lamps may be switched ON as exterior courtesy lamps, and that paragraphs 6.24.9.3., 6.24.9.4., and the conditions of paragraphs 5.11. and 5.12. are not applicable to these approved lamps. The clarification confirms that paragraph 6.24.9.2. allows the coexistence and simultaneous operation of approved lamps without re-classifying them as exterior courtesy lamps and without subjecting them to exterior courtesy lamp-specific concealment requirements.

Proposal to amend para. 2.4.10. to expand the definition of a pair to include vehicles of categories M, N and O with one or more lamps extending from left to right; amend para. 2.4.11. and its sub-paragraphs to redefine single and multiple lamps to refer to interdependent lamps marked “Y”; amend para. 2.4.12. to redefine interdependent lamp system and add definition of interdependent lamp marked “Y”; amend para. 5.5. and its sub-paragraphs to add that a pair shall be considered as two lamps and to establish requirements for manufacturer logos; amend para. 5.7.2.2.; amend para. 5.7.2.3.; delete para. 5.7.2.4.; amend para. 5.18.2.; add new para. 4.7.3. to UN Regulation No. 148 to require that a pair containing one or more light emitting surfaces extending from left to right shall contain at least one light source on each side; and amend para. 4.8.1.3. to clarify photometric measurement procedures.

Proposal to prohibit to approval of a manufacturer logo: insert a new para. 5.12.1.4. permitting the remaining non-substituted part of a front position lamp to remain switched on when part of it is substituted with an adjacent adaptive front-lighting system lamp, provided the distance to the closest energized AFS lighting unit fulfils the requirements of para. 5.7.2.1., amend para. 5.30.1. to improve language on logos for light-signalling devices approved to UN R148, and insert a new para. 4.5.4. to clarify that the apparent surface of a lamp shall not include a manufacturer logo built by transparent or non-transparent components that influence the propagation of light emitted.

Proposal to amend para. 5.10.3. to exclude retro-reflective devices, retro-reflective markings, lighting devices fitted for interior lighting, and reversing projections from the requirements for “red light to the front” and “white light to the rear”. The proposal aims to eliminate unnecessary testing burdens on functions that never emit light by themselves and would always meet the emission requirement of less than 0.25 cd by definition. The exemption aligns with Vienna Convention provisions and reflects an original intent from over twenty years prior.

Document describes the current answer-back signal requirement in UN R48-09, which limits maximum luminous intensity to 700 cd on or above the HH line. The regulation practically prohibits use of direction indicators with filament bulb light sources as answer-back signals, despite conventional widespread use without safety issues. Japan proposes excluding direction indicators from the 700 cd limitation to allow conventional answer-back signals using direction indicators with filament light sources, while maintaining other restrictions including the 700 cd limitation for other functions and prohibition of front fog lamps, rear fog lamps and stop lamps as answer-back signals. Revision is needed before UN R48-09 mandate for new vehicles in September 2027.

Proposal to amend para. 6.7.4.1. to require minimum distance of not less than 400 mm between inner edges of two apparent surfaces for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, amend para. 6.9.4.1. to require no special requirement for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, and amend para. 6.10.4.1. to require not less than 400 mm for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, addressing concerns about continuous LED light bars affecting hazard perception and traffic safety.

Status report on the Task Force on Lamp Under Parked Conditions (TF-LUPC). The group held two meetings since the 94th GRE session and continued developing a proposal on energy status indicators and lamp test modes. Open issues require advice from GRE experts on the number and switching conditions of energy status indicators, their size and colour, and on lamp test mode categories, AFS modes and classes, test duration, and inclusion of warning lamps. The group plans to submit a final proposal to the 96th GRE session in April 2027 for integration into the 10 Series of amendments to UN R48.

TF-LUPC is established to review requirements of the current suite of lamps under parked conditions and to develop, where necessary, within the framework of UN R48 a proposal pertaining to Energy Indicator and Lamp test mode. The task force is open to all GRE participants and is managed by two Co-Chairs (Japan/Netherlands) and a Secretary (OICA). Decisions are reached by consensus. STEP 2 aims to present an informal document at GRE-95 in October 2026 and a first formal document at GRE-96 in April 2027 for submission to WP.29 as part of the 10 Series of amendments to UN R48.

Proposal to:

• Amend para. 2.5.22. to define Energy status indicator,
• Amend para. 2.7.12. to define Lamp test mode,
• Insert new para. 2.11.5. to define Indicator Blue and Indicator Green chromaticity coordinates,
• Amend paras. 3.2.10. and 3.2.11. to add statements regarding energy status indicator lamps and lamp test mode,
• Amend para. 5.9.4. to permit energy status indicator to flash and vary in luminous intensity,
• Amend para. 5.11.1. to add conditions relating to energy status indicator and lamp test mode,
• Amend para. 5.15. to add colour specifications for energy status indicator,
• Insert new para. 6.29. specifying requirements for energy status indicator including presence, number, position, electrical connections, activation conditions, intensity, pulsation, flashing, and apparent surface area,
• Insert new para. 6.30. specifying lamp test mode requirements including activation conditions, duration, and operation,
• Amend Annex 1 to add items 9.33., 9.34., and 9.34.1. for lamp test mode and energy indicator approval statements,
• Amend Annex 14 to add observing areas for energy status indicators,
• Amend Annex 20 to add technical provisions for energy status indicator intensity based on ambient light levels.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to clarify that the direction indicator lamp used for the answer-back signal may be operated with a luminous intensity not exceeding its original specification, and to restructure the paragraph into subsections (a), (b), and (c) specifying maximum luminous intensity limits, direction indicator lamp operation, and prohibited lamp types.

GTB comments on proposals to restrict lighting options such as band, strip, or illuminated logo. GTB presents findings from a 2025 study by Vrije Universiteit Brussel on daytime running light (DRL) designs, comparing dual and single DRL configurations at different speeds. At 90 km/h no significant difference was found between designs; at 50 km/h dual DRLs showed slightly earlier detection by 30–50 metres (approximately 4 seconds), which researchers considered a perceptual side effect rather than safety-critical. GTB concludes single DRLs provide comparable safety performance to dual DRLs and are viable alternatives. GTB advocates for improved provisions to ensure consistent and harmonised interpretation among Contracting Parties, referencing proposals GRE/2026/6 and GRE/2026/21.

OICA comments on proposed amendments to introduce minimum separation requirements for stop lamps and position lamps in GRE-95-11. OICA contests the justification for the proposed 400 mm separation requirement for M₁ and N₁ vehicles and 600 mm for all vehicle categories, arguing the EC has not established a causal link between continuous lighting and safety deficits, that the claimed recognition distance differences lack meaningful influence on safe driving, and that introducing divergent UN requirements would create technical barriers to international trade contrary to the 1958 Agreement. OICA references published research indicating strip-type taillights provide optimal ergonomic solutions for vehicle conspicuity.

Proposal to insert a new definition of ‘call for help signal’ in para. 2.6.5., add provisions to para. 6.6.7.2. permitting the call for help signal as an alternative to the hazard warning signal following a collision, and insert a new para. 6.30. establishing requirements for the call for help signal. The call for help signal operates via simultaneous flashing of all direction-indicator lamps and optionally all stop lamps at 4.0±1.0 Hz (or 4.0+0.0/−1.0 Hz for filament rear lamps), activates automatically only after activation of an Accident Emergency Call System or equivalent emergency system, deactivates automatically if the vehicle exceeds 15 km/h or if the Emergency Call System is manually deactivated, and may be manually switched off.

Document addresses the Rear-End Collision Alert Signal (RECAS) in UN R48. It identifies unclear speed thresholds for RECAS activation, noting that RECAS may not operate when vehicles are stationary or moving at low speeds depending on system design. Accident data analysis shows 59 percent of rear-end crashes involved stopped lead vehicles and 22 percent involved decelerating lead vehicles. The document requests views on whether RECAS should flash when vehicles are completely stopped, whether owner manuals should state RECAS activation limitations, and seeks information on RECAS verification during type approval.

Document presenting challenges related to headlamp aiming limits for vehicles. Addresses up-down aiming challenges including vehicle load, cut-off line definition, lamp height consideration, and vehicle inspection management. Discusses left-right aiming challenges regarding vehicle references, aiming limits, and kink point definition. Concludes that vehicle approval is key to enabling vehicle inspection to develop its full potential in glare prevention.

Proposal to amend para. 6.7.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of position lamps to be not less than 400 mm, amend para. 6.9.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of stop lamps to be not less than 600 mm for vehicles other than M₁ and N₁ category vehicles (reducible to 400 mm where overall width is less than 1,300 mm) with no special requirement for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles, and amend para. 6.10.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of rear lamps to be not less than 400 mm for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for other categories (reducible to 400 mm where overall width is less than 1,300 mm).

Proposal to insert a new paragraph 2.xx. defining ‘band or strip’ as a luminous element having a maximum horizontal dimension at least 10 times greater than its maximum vertical dimension and having a substantially straight apparent shape, with maximum deviation of the centreline from the straight line connecting the extremities not exceeding 10 per cent of the overall length.

Proposal to amend para. 5.10. and its sub-paragraphs to clarify provisions regarding light which could give rise to confusion, specifically to clarify that for red light reflected by a retro-reflector fitted on the rear or white light reflected by a retro-reflector fitted on the front, the same requirements apply as for other lamps, and to specify that when the lamp is a retro-reflector, the observer shall make use of a torch to check visibility within specified zones.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to allow an answer-back signal generated by the direction indicator lamp to be operated with a luminous intensity not exceeding its original specification, thereby excluding the direction indicator lamp from the 700 cd limitation on or above the HH line. The proposal aims to remove unnecessary restrictions on already type-approved light-signalling functions while maintaining technological neutrality and road safety.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to exclude direction indicator lamps and dipped-beam headlamps from the 700 cd luminous intensity limitation on or above the HH line when operated as answer-back signals, allowing these devices to operate with their original specifications, while maintaining prohibitions on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 2.4.10. to define a pair for vehicles of categories M, N and O as one or more lamp(s) extending from left to right-hand side, amend para. 2.4.11. and 2.4.12. to define single and multiple lamps and interdependent lamp systems marked Y, amend para. 5.5. and its sub-paragraphs to establish requirements for paired lamps including symmetry and photometric characteristics, amend para. 5.7.2.2. and 5.7.2.3. to specify installation requirements for single lamps, delete para. 5.7.2.4. concerning positioning and length requirements, amend para. 5.18.2. regarding assembly of lamps marked D, add para. 4.7.3. to UN Regulation No. 148 requiring a pair to contain at least one light source on each side, and amend para. 4.8.1.3. to clarify photometric measurement procedures when lamps use multiple light sources.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to exclude direction indicator lamps and dipped-beam headlamps from the 700 cd maximum luminous intensity limitation on or above the HH line when used as answer-back signals, allowing these devices to operate with their original specifications, while maintaining the restriction on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to permit the direction indicator lamp to be operated with the luminous intensity of its original specification when used as an answer-back signal, notwithstanding the 700 cd limitation on or above the HH line that applies to other approved lighting and light-signalling devices and exterior courtesy lamps. The proposal removes restrictions on direction indicator lamps used for answer-back activation of already type-approved light-signalling functions, while maintaining prohibitions on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 6.24.9.2. to clarify that approved lamps emitting white light, rear position lamps, parking lamps, side-marker lamps and end-outline marker lamps may be switched ON as exterior courtesy lamps, and that paragraphs 6.24.9.3., 6.24.9.4., and the conditions of paragraphs 5.11. and 5.12. are not applicable to these approved lamps. The clarification confirms that paragraph 6.24.9.2. allows the coexistence and simultaneous operation of approved lamps without re-classifying them as exterior courtesy lamps and without subjecting them to exterior courtesy lamp-specific concealment requirements.

Proposal to amend para. 2.4.10. to expand the definition of a pair to include vehicles of categories M, N and O with one or more lamps extending from left to right; amend para. 2.4.11. and its sub-paragraphs to redefine single and multiple lamps to refer to interdependent lamps marked “Y”; amend para. 2.4.12. to redefine interdependent lamp system and add definition of interdependent lamp marked “Y”; amend para. 5.5. and its sub-paragraphs to add that a pair shall be considered as two lamps and to establish requirements for manufacturer logos; amend para. 5.7.2.2.; amend para. 5.7.2.3.; delete para. 5.7.2.4.; amend para. 5.18.2.; add new para. 4.7.3. to UN Regulation No. 148 to require that a pair containing one or more light emitting surfaces extending from left to right shall contain at least one light source on each side; and amend para. 4.8.1.3. to clarify photometric measurement procedures.

Proposal to prohibit to approval of a manufacturer logo: insert a new para. 5.12.1.4. permitting the remaining non-substituted part of a front position lamp to remain switched on when part of it is substituted with an adjacent adaptive front-lighting system lamp, provided the distance to the closest energized AFS lighting unit fulfils the requirements of para. 5.7.2.1., amend para. 5.30.1. to improve language on logos for light-signalling devices approved to UN R148, and insert a new para. 4.5.4. to clarify that the apparent surface of a lamp shall not include a manufacturer logo built by transparent or non-transparent components that influence the propagation of light emitted.

Proposal to amend para. 5.10.3. to exclude retro-reflective devices, retro-reflective markings, lighting devices fitted for interior lighting, and reversing projections from the requirements for “red light to the front” and “white light to the rear”. The proposal aims to eliminate unnecessary testing burdens on functions that never emit light by themselves and would always meet the emission requirement of less than 0.25 cd by definition. The exemption aligns with Vienna Convention provisions and reflects an original intent from over twenty years prior.

Document describes the current answer-back signal requirement in UN R48-09, which limits maximum luminous intensity to 700 cd on or above the HH line. The regulation practically prohibits use of direction indicators with filament bulb light sources as answer-back signals, despite conventional widespread use without safety issues. Japan proposes excluding direction indicators from the 700 cd limitation to allow conventional answer-back signals using direction indicators with filament light sources, while maintaining other restrictions including the 700 cd limitation for other functions and prohibition of front fog lamps, rear fog lamps and stop lamps as answer-back signals. Revision is needed before UN R48-09 mandate for new vehicles in September 2027.

Proposal to amend para. 6.7.4.1. to require minimum distance of not less than 400 mm between inner edges of two apparent surfaces for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, amend para. 6.9.4.1. to require no special requirement for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, and amend para. 6.10.4.1. to require not less than 400 mm for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, addressing concerns about continuous LED light bars affecting hazard perception and traffic safety.

Status report on the Task Force on Lamp Under Parked Conditions (TF-LUPC). The group held two meetings since the 94th GRE session and continued developing a proposal on energy status indicators and lamp test modes. Open issues require advice from GRE experts on the number and switching conditions of energy status indicators, their size and colour, and on lamp test mode categories, AFS modes and classes, test duration, and inclusion of warning lamps. The group plans to submit a final proposal to the 96th GRE session in April 2027 for integration into the 10 Series of amendments to UN R48.

TF-LUPC is established to review requirements of the current suite of lamps under parked conditions and to develop, where necessary, within the framework of UN R48 a proposal pertaining to Energy Indicator and Lamp test mode. The task force is open to all GRE participants and is managed by two Co-Chairs (Japan/Netherlands) and a Secretary (OICA). Decisions are reached by consensus. STEP 2 aims to present an informal document at GRE-95 in October 2026 and a first formal document at GRE-96 in April 2027 for submission to WP.29 as part of the 10 Series of amendments to UN R48.

Proposal to:

• Amend para. 2.5.22. to define Energy status indicator,
• Amend para. 2.7.12. to define Lamp test mode,
• Insert new para. 2.11.5. to define Indicator Blue and Indicator Green chromaticity coordinates,
• Amend paras. 3.2.10. and 3.2.11. to add statements regarding energy status indicator lamps and lamp test mode,
• Amend para. 5.9.4. to permit energy status indicator to flash and vary in luminous intensity,
• Amend para. 5.11.1. to add conditions relating to energy status indicator and lamp test mode,
• Amend para. 5.15. to add colour specifications for energy status indicator,
• Insert new para. 6.29. specifying requirements for energy status indicator including presence, number, position, electrical connections, activation conditions, intensity, pulsation, flashing, and apparent surface area,
• Insert new para. 6.30. specifying lamp test mode requirements including activation conditions, duration, and operation,
• Amend Annex 1 to add items 9.33., 9.34., and 9.34.1. for lamp test mode and energy indicator approval statements,
• Amend Annex 14 to add observing areas for energy status indicators,
• Amend Annex 20 to add technical provisions for energy status indicator intensity based on ambient light levels.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to clarify that the direction indicator lamp used for the answer-back signal may be operated with a luminous intensity not exceeding its original specification, and to restructure the paragraph into subsections (a), (b), and (c) specifying maximum luminous intensity limits, direction indicator lamp operation, and prohibited lamp types.

GTB comments on proposals to restrict lighting options such as band, strip, or illuminated logo. GTB presents findings from a 2025 study by Vrije Universiteit Brussel on daytime running light (DRL) designs, comparing dual and single DRL configurations at different speeds. At 90 km/h no significant difference was found between designs; at 50 km/h dual DRLs showed slightly earlier detection by 30–50 metres (approximately 4 seconds), which researchers considered a perceptual side effect rather than safety-critical. GTB concludes single DRLs provide comparable safety performance to dual DRLs and are viable alternatives. GTB advocates for improved provisions to ensure consistent and harmonised interpretation among Contracting Parties, referencing proposals GRE/2026/6 and GRE/2026/21.

OICA comments on proposed amendments to introduce minimum separation requirements for stop lamps and position lamps in GRE-95-11. OICA contests the justification for the proposed 400 mm separation requirement for M₁ and N₁ vehicles and 600 mm for all vehicle categories, arguing the EC has not established a causal link between continuous lighting and safety deficits, that the claimed recognition distance differences lack meaningful influence on safe driving, and that introducing divergent UN requirements would create technical barriers to international trade contrary to the 1958 Agreement. OICA references published research indicating strip-type taillights provide optimal ergonomic solutions for vehicle conspicuity.

Proposal to insert a new definition of ‘call for help signal’ in para. 2.6.5., add provisions to para. 6.6.7.2. permitting the call for help signal as an alternative to the hazard warning signal following a collision, and insert a new para. 6.30. establishing requirements for the call for help signal. The call for help signal operates via simultaneous flashing of all direction-indicator lamps and optionally all stop lamps at 4.0±1.0 Hz (or 4.0+0.0/−1.0 Hz for filament rear lamps), activates automatically only after activation of an Accident Emergency Call System or equivalent emergency system, deactivates automatically if the vehicle exceeds 15 km/h or if the Emergency Call System is manually deactivated, and may be manually switched off.

Document addresses the Rear-End Collision Alert Signal (RECAS) in UN R48. It identifies unclear speed thresholds for RECAS activation, noting that RECAS may not operate when vehicles are stationary or moving at low speeds depending on system design. Accident data analysis shows 59 percent of rear-end crashes involved stopped lead vehicles and 22 percent involved decelerating lead vehicles. The document requests views on whether RECAS should flash when vehicles are completely stopped, whether owner manuals should state RECAS activation limitations, and seeks information on RECAS verification during type approval.

Document presenting challenges related to headlamp aiming limits for vehicles. Addresses up-down aiming challenges including vehicle load, cut-off line definition, lamp height consideration, and vehicle inspection management. Discusses left-right aiming challenges regarding vehicle references, aiming limits, and kink point definition. Concludes that vehicle approval is key to enabling vehicle inspection to develop its full potential in glare prevention.

Proposal to amend para. 6.7.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of position lamps to be not less than 400 mm, amend para. 6.9.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of stop lamps to be not less than 600 mm for vehicles other than M₁ and N₁ category vehicles (reducible to 400 mm where overall width is less than 1,300 mm) with no special requirement for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles, and amend para. 6.10.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of rear lamps to be not less than 400 mm for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for other categories (reducible to 400 mm where overall width is less than 1,300 mm).

Proposal to insert a new paragraph 2.xx. defining ‘band or strip’ as a luminous element having a maximum horizontal dimension at least 10 times greater than its maximum vertical dimension and having a substantially straight apparent shape, with maximum deviation of the centreline from the straight line connecting the extremities not exceeding 10 per cent of the overall length.

Proposal to amend para. 5.10. and its sub-paragraphs to clarify provisions regarding light which could give rise to confusion, specifically to clarify that for red light reflected by a retro-reflector fitted on the rear or white light reflected by a retro-reflector fitted on the front, the same requirements apply as for other lamps, and to specify that when the lamp is a retro-reflector, the observer shall make use of a torch to check visibility within specified zones.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to allow an answer-back signal generated by the direction indicator lamp to be operated with a luminous intensity not exceeding its original specification, thereby excluding the direction indicator lamp from the 700 cd limitation on or above the HH line. The proposal aims to remove unnecessary restrictions on already type-approved light-signalling functions while maintaining technological neutrality and road safety.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to exclude direction indicator lamps and dipped-beam headlamps from the 700 cd luminous intensity limitation on or above the HH line when operated as answer-back signals, allowing these devices to operate with their original specifications, while maintaining prohibitions on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 2.4.10. to define a pair for vehicles of categories M, N and O as one or more lamp(s) extending from left to right-hand side, amend para. 2.4.11. and 2.4.12. to define single and multiple lamps and interdependent lamp systems marked Y, amend para. 5.5. and its sub-paragraphs to establish requirements for paired lamps including symmetry and photometric characteristics, amend para. 5.7.2.2. and 5.7.2.3. to specify installation requirements for single lamps, delete para. 5.7.2.4. concerning positioning and length requirements, amend para. 5.18.2. regarding assembly of lamps marked D, add para. 4.7.3. to UN Regulation No. 148 requiring a pair to contain at least one light source on each side, and amend para. 4.8.1.3. to clarify photometric measurement procedures when lamps use multiple light sources.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to exclude direction indicator lamps and dipped-beam headlamps from the 700 cd maximum luminous intensity limitation on or above the HH line when used as answer-back signals, allowing these devices to operate with their original specifications, while maintaining the restriction on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to permit the direction indicator lamp to be operated with the luminous intensity of its original specification when used as an answer-back signal, notwithstanding the 700 cd limitation on or above the HH line that applies to other approved lighting and light-signalling devices and exterior courtesy lamps. The proposal removes restrictions on direction indicator lamps used for answer-back activation of already type-approved light-signalling functions, while maintaining prohibitions on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 6.24.9.2. to clarify that approved lamps emitting white light, rear position lamps, parking lamps, side-marker lamps and end-outline marker lamps may be switched ON as exterior courtesy lamps, and that paragraphs 6.24.9.3., 6.24.9.4., and the conditions of paragraphs 5.11. and 5.12. are not applicable to these approved lamps. The clarification confirms that paragraph 6.24.9.2. allows the coexistence and simultaneous operation of approved lamps without re-classifying them as exterior courtesy lamps and without subjecting them to exterior courtesy lamp-specific concealment requirements.

Proposal to amend para. 2.4.10. to expand the definition of a pair to include vehicles of categories M, N and O with one or more lamps extending from left to right; amend para. 2.4.11. and its sub-paragraphs to redefine single and multiple lamps to refer to interdependent lamps marked “Y”; amend para. 2.4.12. to redefine interdependent lamp system and add definition of interdependent lamp marked “Y”; amend para. 5.5. and its sub-paragraphs to add that a pair shall be considered as two lamps and to establish requirements for manufacturer logos; amend para. 5.7.2.2.; amend para. 5.7.2.3.; delete para. 5.7.2.4.; amend para. 5.18.2.; add new para. 4.7.3. to UN Regulation No. 148 to require that a pair containing one or more light emitting surfaces extending from left to right shall contain at least one light source on each side; and amend para. 4.8.1.3. to clarify photometric measurement procedures.

Proposal to prohibit to approval of a manufacturer logo: insert a new para. 5.12.1.4. permitting the remaining non-substituted part of a front position lamp to remain switched on when part of it is substituted with an adjacent adaptive front-lighting system lamp, provided the distance to the closest energized AFS lighting unit fulfils the requirements of para. 5.7.2.1., amend para. 5.30.1. to improve language on logos for light-signalling devices approved to UN R148, and insert a new para. 4.5.4. to clarify that the apparent surface of a lamp shall not include a manufacturer logo built by transparent or non-transparent components that influence the propagation of light emitted.

Proposal to amend para. 5.10.3. to exclude retro-reflective devices, retro-reflective markings, lighting devices fitted for interior lighting, and reversing projections from the requirements for “red light to the front” and “white light to the rear”. The proposal aims to eliminate unnecessary testing burdens on functions that never emit light by themselves and would always meet the emission requirement of less than 0.25 cd by definition. The exemption aligns with Vienna Convention provisions and reflects an original intent from over twenty years prior.

Document describes the current answer-back signal requirement in UN R48-09, which limits maximum luminous intensity to 700 cd on or above the HH line. The regulation practically prohibits use of direction indicators with filament bulb light sources as answer-back signals, despite conventional widespread use without safety issues. Japan proposes excluding direction indicators from the 700 cd limitation to allow conventional answer-back signals using direction indicators with filament light sources, while maintaining other restrictions including the 700 cd limitation for other functions and prohibition of front fog lamps, rear fog lamps and stop lamps as answer-back signals. Revision is needed before UN R48-09 mandate for new vehicles in September 2027.

Proposal to amend para. 6.7.4.1. to require minimum distance of not less than 400 mm between inner edges of two apparent surfaces for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, amend para. 6.9.4.1. to require no special requirement for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, and amend para. 6.10.4.1. to require not less than 400 mm for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for all other categories, addressing concerns about continuous LED light bars affecting hazard perception and traffic safety.

Status report on the Task Force on Lamp Under Parked Conditions (TF-LUPC). The group held two meetings since the 94th GRE session and continued developing a proposal on energy status indicators and lamp test modes. Open issues require advice from GRE experts on the number and switching conditions of energy status indicators, their size and colour, and on lamp test mode categories, AFS modes and classes, test duration, and inclusion of warning lamps. The group plans to submit a final proposal to the 96th GRE session in April 2027 for integration into the 10 Series of amendments to UN R48.

TF-LUPC is established to review requirements of the current suite of lamps under parked conditions and to develop, where necessary, within the framework of UN R48 a proposal pertaining to Energy Indicator and Lamp test mode. The task force is open to all GRE participants and is managed by two Co-Chairs (Japan/Netherlands) and a Secretary (OICA). Decisions are reached by consensus. STEP 2 aims to present an informal document at GRE-95 in October 2026 and a first formal document at GRE-96 in April 2027 for submission to WP.29 as part of the 10 Series of amendments to UN R48.

Proposal to:

• Amend para. 2.5.22. to define Energy status indicator,
• Amend para. 2.7.12. to define Lamp test mode,
• Insert new para. 2.11.5. to define Indicator Blue and Indicator Green chromaticity coordinates,
• Amend paras. 3.2.10. and 3.2.11. to add statements regarding energy status indicator lamps and lamp test mode,
• Amend para. 5.9.4. to permit energy status indicator to flash and vary in luminous intensity,
• Amend para. 5.11.1. to add conditions relating to energy status indicator and lamp test mode,
• Amend para. 5.15. to add colour specifications for energy status indicator,
• Insert new para. 6.29. specifying requirements for energy status indicator including presence, number, position, electrical connections, activation conditions, intensity, pulsation, flashing, and apparent surface area,
• Insert new para. 6.30. specifying lamp test mode requirements including activation conditions, duration, and operation,
• Amend Annex 1 to add items 9.33., 9.34., and 9.34.1. for lamp test mode and energy indicator approval statements,
• Amend Annex 14 to add observing areas for energy status indicators,
• Amend Annex 20 to add technical provisions for energy status indicator intensity based on ambient light levels.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to clarify that the direction indicator lamp used for the answer-back signal may be operated with a luminous intensity not exceeding its original specification, and to restructure the paragraph into subsections (a), (b), and (c) specifying maximum luminous intensity limits, direction indicator lamp operation, and prohibited lamp types.

GTB comments on proposals to restrict lighting options such as band, strip, or illuminated logo. GTB presents findings from a 2025 study by Vrije Universiteit Brussel on daytime running light (DRL) designs, comparing dual and single DRL configurations at different speeds. At 90 km/h no significant difference was found between designs; at 50 km/h dual DRLs showed slightly earlier detection by 30–50 metres (approximately 4 seconds), which researchers considered a perceptual side effect rather than safety-critical. GTB concludes single DRLs provide comparable safety performance to dual DRLs and are viable alternatives. GTB advocates for improved provisions to ensure consistent and harmonised interpretation among Contracting Parties, referencing proposals GRE/2026/6 and GRE/2026/21.

OICA comments on proposed amendments to introduce minimum separation requirements for stop lamps and position lamps in GRE-95-11. OICA contests the justification for the proposed 400 mm separation requirement for M₁ and N₁ vehicles and 600 mm for all vehicle categories, arguing the EC has not established a causal link between continuous lighting and safety deficits, that the claimed recognition distance differences lack meaningful influence on safe driving, and that introducing divergent UN requirements would create technical barriers to international trade contrary to the 1958 Agreement. OICA references published research indicating strip-type taillights provide optimal ergonomic solutions for vehicle conspicuity.

Proposal to insert a new definition of ‘call for help signal’ in para. 2.6.5., add provisions to para. 6.6.7.2. permitting the call for help signal as an alternative to the hazard warning signal following a collision, and insert a new para. 6.30. establishing requirements for the call for help signal. The call for help signal operates via simultaneous flashing of all direction-indicator lamps and optionally all stop lamps at 4.0±1.0 Hz (or 4.0+0.0/−1.0 Hz for filament rear lamps), activates automatically only after activation of an Accident Emergency Call System or equivalent emergency system, deactivates automatically if the vehicle exceeds 15 km/h or if the Emergency Call System is manually deactivated, and may be manually switched off.

Document addresses the Rear-End Collision Alert Signal (RECAS) in UN R48. It identifies unclear speed thresholds for RECAS activation, noting that RECAS may not operate when vehicles are stationary or moving at low speeds depending on system design. Accident data analysis shows 59 percent of rear-end crashes involved stopped lead vehicles and 22 percent involved decelerating lead vehicles. The document requests views on whether RECAS should flash when vehicles are completely stopped, whether owner manuals should state RECAS activation limitations, and seeks information on RECAS verification during type approval.

Document presenting challenges related to headlamp aiming limits for vehicles. Addresses up-down aiming challenges including vehicle load, cut-off line definition, lamp height consideration, and vehicle inspection management. Discusses left-right aiming challenges regarding vehicle references, aiming limits, and kink point definition. Concludes that vehicle approval is key to enabling vehicle inspection to develop its full potential in glare prevention.

Proposal to amend para. 6.7.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of position lamps to be not less than 400 mm, amend para. 6.9.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of stop lamps to be not less than 600 mm for vehicles other than M₁ and N₁ category vehicles (reducible to 400 mm where overall width is less than 1,300 mm) with no special requirement for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles, and amend para. 6.10.4.1. to require the distance between inner edges of two apparent surfaces of rear lamps to be not less than 400 mm for M₁ and N₁ category vehicles and not less than 600 mm for other categories (reducible to 400 mm where overall width is less than 1,300 mm).

Proposal to insert a new paragraph 2.xx. defining ‘band or strip’ as a luminous element having a maximum horizontal dimension at least 10 times greater than its maximum vertical dimension and having a substantially straight apparent shape, with maximum deviation of the centreline from the straight line connecting the extremities not exceeding 10 per cent of the overall length.

Proposal to amend para. 5.10. and its sub-paragraphs to clarify provisions regarding light which could give rise to confusion, specifically to clarify that for red light reflected by a retro-reflector fitted on the rear or white light reflected by a retro-reflector fitted on the front, the same requirements apply as for other lamps, and to specify that when the lamp is a retro-reflector, the observer shall make use of a torch to check visibility within specified zones.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to allow an answer-back signal generated by the direction indicator lamp to be operated with a luminous intensity not exceeding its original specification, thereby excluding the direction indicator lamp from the 700 cd limitation on or above the HH line. The proposal aims to remove unnecessary restrictions on already type-approved light-signalling functions while maintaining technological neutrality and road safety.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to exclude direction indicator lamps and dipped-beam headlamps from the 700 cd luminous intensity limitation on or above the HH line when operated as answer-back signals, allowing these devices to operate with their original specifications, while maintaining prohibitions on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 2.4.10. to define a pair for vehicles of categories M, N and O as one or more lamp(s) extending from left to right-hand side, amend para. 2.4.11. and 2.4.12. to define single and multiple lamps and interdependent lamp systems marked Y, amend para. 5.5. and its sub-paragraphs to establish requirements for paired lamps including symmetry and photometric characteristics, amend para. 5.7.2.2. and 5.7.2.3. to specify installation requirements for single lamps, delete para. 5.7.2.4. concerning positioning and length requirements, amend para. 5.18.2. regarding assembly of lamps marked D, add para. 4.7.3. to UN Regulation No. 148 requiring a pair to contain at least one light source on each side, and amend para. 4.8.1.3. to clarify photometric measurement procedures when lamps use multiple light sources.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to exclude direction indicator lamps and dipped-beam headlamps from the 700 cd maximum luminous intensity limitation on or above the HH line when used as answer-back signals, allowing these devices to operate with their original specifications, while maintaining the restriction on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 6.27.9.1. to permit the direction indicator lamp to be operated with the luminous intensity of its original specification when used as an answer-back signal, notwithstanding the 700 cd limitation on or above the HH line that applies to other approved lighting and light-signalling devices and exterior courtesy lamps. The proposal removes restrictions on direction indicator lamps used for answer-back activation of already type-approved light-signalling functions, while maintaining prohibitions on front fog lamps, rear fog lamps, and stop lamps.

Proposal to amend para. 6.24.9.2. to clarify that approved lamps emitting white light, rear position lamps, parking lamps, side-marker lamps and end-outline marker lamps may be switched ON as exterior courtesy lamps, and that paragraphs 6.24.9.3., 6.24.9.4., and the conditions of paragraphs 5.11. and 5.12. are not applicable to these approved lamps. The clarification confirms that paragraph 6.24.9.2. allows the coexistence and simultaneous operation of approved lamps without re-classifying them as exterior courtesy lamps and without subjecting them to exterior courtesy lamp-specific concealment requirements.

Proposal to amend para. 2.4.10. to expand the definition of a pair to include vehicles of categories M, N and O with one or more lamps extending from left to right; amend para. 2.4.11. and its sub-paragraphs to redefine single and multiple lamps to refer to interdependent lamps marked “Y”; amend para. 2.4.12. to redefine interdependent lamp system and add definition of interdependent lamp marked “Y”; amend para. 5.5. and its sub-paragraphs to add that a pair shall be considered as two lamps and to establish requirements for manufacturer logos; amend para. 5.7.2.2.; amend para. 5.7.2.3.; delete para. 5.7.2.4.; amend para. 5.18.2.; add new para. 4.7.3. to UN Regulation No. 148 to require that a pair containing one or more light emitting surfaces extending from left to right shall contain at least one light source on each side; and amend para. 4.8.1.3. to clarify photometric measurement procedures.

Proposal to prohibit to approval of a manufacturer logo: insert a new para. 5.12.1.4. permitting the remaining non-substituted part of a front position lamp to remain switched on when part of it is substituted with an adjacent adaptive front-lighting system lamp, provided the distance to the closest energized AFS lighting unit fulfils the requirements of para. 5.7.2.1., amend para. 5.30.1. to improve language on logos for light-signalling devices approved to UN R148, and insert a new para. 4.5.4. to clarify that the apparent surface of a lamp shall not include a manufacturer logo built by transparent or non-transparent components that influence the propagation of light emitted.

Proposal to amend para. 5.10.3. to exclude retro-reflective devices, retro-reflective markings, lighting devices fitted for interior lighting, and reversing projections from the requirements for “red light to the front” and “white light to the rear”. The proposal aims to eliminate unnecessary testing burdens on functions that never emit light by themselves and would always meet the emission requirement of less than 0.25 cd by definition. The exemption aligns with Vienna Convention provisions and reflects an original intent from over twenty years prior.

Document describes the current answer-back signal requirement in UN R48-09, which limits maximum luminous intensity to 700 cd on or above the HH line. The regulation practically prohibits use of direction indicators with filament bulb light sources as answer-back signals, despite conventional widespread use without safety issues. Japan proposes excluding direction indicators from the 700 cd limitation to allow conventional answer-back signals using direction indicators with filament light sources, while maintaining other restrictions including the 700 cd limitation for other functions and prohibition of front fog lamps, rear fog lamps and stop lamps as answer-back signals. Revision is needed before UN R48-09 mandate for new vehicles in September 2027.