52. The expert from the Republic of Korea presented GRSG-115-14-Rev.1 to add in UN Regulation No. 121 a new symbol for “power on/power off” controls in vehicles equipped with an electric powertrain, such as electric vehicles. GRSG noted some comments. The expert from the Republic of Korea volunteered to review his proposal taking into account the comments received. GRSG agreed to resume consideration of this subject at its next session in April 2019 on the basis of an official document.

49. The expert from the Republic of Korea recalled the discussion on GRSG-115-14-Rev.1 at the previous session, to add into UN Regulation No. 121 a new symbol for “power on/power off” controls in vehicles equipped with an electric powertrain, such as electric vehicles. He thanked GRSG for the comments received, concluded that the current symbol in the UN Regulation was sufficient and that no further follow-up was necessary.

50. GRSG endorsed the request by OICA to defer discussion on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2018/6 to a further session.

51. GRSG agreed to resume consideration on this item at its next session in October 2019.

53. Further to the discussion on the transitional provisions (paras. 21, 29 and 50 above), the expert from OICA presented GRSG-115-29-Rev.1 on additional provisions for UN Regulation No. 121. GRSG adopted the proposal as reproduced below and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 as draft Supplement 4 to the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 121 for consideration at their March 2019 sessions. (See note by the secretariat under para. 21 above.)

Add a new paragraph 12.4., to read:

12.4.

Until 31 December 2019, Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments to this Regulation may not apply to extensions of approvals that were originally granted prior to the entry into force of Supplement 2.

42. The expert from the Russian Federation presented GRSG-114-17 on aligning the Russian text of UN Regulation No. 121 with the English version. GRSG adopted the proposed text as reproduced below and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1, for consideration at their November 2018 sessions, as Corrigendum 1 to Revision 2 of UN Regulation No. 121.

Russian version only, paragraph 2.4., correct to read:

2.4	«Общее пространство» означает участок, на котором могут отображаться, но не одновременно, не менее двух информационных функций (например, условных обозначений).

Russian version only, paragraph 5.5.1.4., correct to read:

5.5.1.4

если контрольный сигнал, указывающий на неисправность тормозной системы, дальнего света, указателей поворота или ремней безопасности отображается в каком-либо общем пространстве, то он должен замещать любое другое условное обозначение в данном общем пространстве, в случае возникновения базового условия для его включения;

43. Recalling discussions at the previous GRSG session on the handling of colour changes of controls, tell-tales and indicators, the expert from OICA presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2018/6 as a long-term solution. He explained that the proposal aimed to remove the references in Table 1 to footnote 18 and to only keep the reference to standard ISO 2575:2004. GRSG noted study reservations by the experts from France and the United Kingdom. GRSG agreed to resume consideration of this subject at its next session.

51. The expert from OICA recalled the discussion (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2018/6) at the previous GRSG session on the handling of colour changes of controls, tell-tales and indicators by deleting footnote ¹⁸ to table 1 and inserting only a reference to standard ISO 2575. Underlining the importance of colour for tell-tales, the expert from France preferred to keep footnote ¹⁸. The expert from OICA offered to review the proposal and to insert a new footnote for the tell-tales that impose colour. GRSG agreed to resume consideration of this subject at its next session on the basis of a revised document jointly prepared by the experts from France and OICA.

49. The expert from the Republic of Korea recalled the discussion on GRSG-115-14-Rev.1 at the previous session, to add into UN Regulation No. 121 a new symbol for “power on/power off” controls in vehicles equipped with an electric powertrain, such as electric vehicles. He thanked GRSG for the comments received, concluded that the current symbol in the UN Regulation was sufficient and that no further follow-up was necessary.

50. GRSG endorsed the request by OICA to defer discussion on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2018/6 to a further session.

51. GRSG agreed to resume consideration on this item at its next session in October 2019.

49. The expert from OICA presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/18 to clarify footnote ¹⁸ where tell-tales Nos. 1 and 19 were combined. Some experts were of the opinion that footnote ¹² already offers that possibility. Following the discussion, the expert from OICA offered an alternative proposal GRSG-113-39 that simplifies the handling of colour changes of tell-tales and to remove footnote 18 and all references to it. The expert from France preferred to keep the existing text of footnote ¹⁸ and to only insert under symbol No. 1 a reference to footnote ¹⁸, as reflected in GRSG-113-42. GRSG agreed to go forward with a two-step approach and adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/18 as reproduced below.

No.	Column 1	Column 2	Column 3	Column 4	Column 5
	Item	Symbol 2	Function	Illumination	Colour
1.	Master lighting switch Tell-tale may not act as the tell-tale for the position (side) lamps	1, 18	Control	No
			Tell-tale 12	Yes	Green

50. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposal to WP.29 and AC.1 as draft Supplement 10 to the original series of amendments and Supplement 3 to the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 121 for consideration at their March 2018 sessions, subject to the endorsement of the Working Party on Lighting and Light Signalling (GRE) at its October 2017 session. (Note by the secretariat: At its seventy-eighth session, GRE endorsed the principles for amending UN Regulation No. 121 as proposed by GRSG.)

51. As a second step, GRSG requested the secretariat to distribute GRSG-113-39 with an official symbol, for consideration at the next GRSG session and to also circulate it all WP.29 Working Parties concerned.

37. GRE was informed that the Working Party on General Safety Provisions, at its recent session, had adopted amendment proposals on colours to Regulation No. 121 (Identification of controls, tell-tales and indicators) (GRSG-113-42 and GRSG-113-39). GRE supported the short-term solution proposed in GRSG-113-42 and noted that the long-term solution (GRSG-113-39) would be published as an official GRSG document and presented to GRE.

49. The expert from OICA presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/18 to clarify footnote ¹⁸ where tell-tales Nos. 1 and 19 were combined. Some experts were of the opinion that footnote ¹² already offers that possibility. Following the discussion, the expert from OICA offered an alternative proposal GRSG-113-39 that simplifies the handling of colour changes of tell-tales and to remove footnote 18 and all references to it. The expert from France preferred to keep the existing text of footnote ¹⁸ and to only insert under symbol No. 1 a reference to footnote ¹⁸, as reflected in GRSG-113-42. GRSG agreed to go forward with a two-step approach and adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/18 as reproduced below.

No.	Column 1	Column 2	Column 3	Column 4	Column 5
	Item	Symbol 2	Function	Illumination	Colour
1.	Master lighting switch Tell-tale may not act as the tell-tale for the position (side) lamps	1, 18	Control	No
			Tell-tale 12	Yes	Green

50. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposal to WP.29 and AC.1 as draft Supplement 10 to the original series of amendments and Supplement 3 to the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 121 for consideration at their March 2018 sessions, subject to the endorsement of the Working Party on Lighting and Light Signalling (GRE) at its October 2017 session. (Note by the secretariat: At its seventy-eighth session, GRE endorsed the principles for amending UN Regulation No. 121 as proposed by GRSG.)

51. As a second step, GRSG requested the secretariat to distribute GRSG-113-39 with an official symbol, for consideration at the next GRSG session and to also circulate it all WP.29 Working Parties concerned.

37. GRE was informed that the Working Party on General Safety Provisions, at its recent session, had adopted amendment proposals on colours to Regulation No. 121 (Identification of controls, tell-tales and indicators) (GRSG-113-42 and GRSG-113-39). GRE supported the short-term solution proposed in GRSG-113-42 and noted that the long-term solution (GRSG-113-39) would be published as an official GRSG document and presented to GRE.

54. The secretariat briefly introduced GRSG-113-39 to inform GRPE on activities that could be relevant. He invited delegates to consult the document and submit remarks if necessary.

49. The expert from OICA presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/18 to clarify footnote ¹⁸ where tell-tales Nos. 1 and 19 were combined. Some experts were of the opinion that footnote ¹² already offers that possibility. Following the discussion, the expert from OICA offered an alternative proposal GRSG-113-39 that simplifies the handling of colour changes of tell-tales and to remove footnote 18 and all references to it. The expert from France preferred to keep the existing text of footnote ¹⁸ and to only insert under symbol No. 1 a reference to footnote ¹⁸, as reflected in GRSG-113-42. GRSG agreed to go forward with a two-step approach and adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/18 as reproduced below.

No.	Column 1	Column 2	Column 3	Column 4	Column 5
	Item	Symbol 2	Function	Illumination	Colour
1.	Master lighting switch Tell-tale may not act as the tell-tale for the position (side) lamps	1, 18	Control	No
			Tell-tale 12	Yes	Green

50. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposal to WP.29 and AC.1 as draft Supplement 10 to the original series of amendments and Supplement 3 to the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 121 for consideration at their March 2018 sessions, subject to the endorsement of the Working Party on Lighting and Light Signalling (GRE) at its October 2017 session. (Note by the secretariat: At its seventy-eighth session, GRE endorsed the principles for amending UN Regulation No. 121 as proposed by GRSG.)

51. As a second step, GRSG requested the secretariat to distribute GRSG-113-39 with an official symbol, for consideration at the next GRSG session and to also circulate it all WP.29 Working Parties concerned.

39. The expert from OICA introduced GRSG-112-24 to clarify the application of footnote ¹⁸ in the case where tell-tales Nos. 1 and 19 were combined. Some experts were of the opinion that footnote ¹² already offers that possibility and that the proposed amendment was superfluous. GRSG agreed to take a final position on this subject at its next session and requested the secretariat to circulate GRSG-112-24 with an official symbol.

37. The expert from OICA presented GRSG-112-23 (superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/5) to align the provisions of UN Regulation No. 121 to those of the 07 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 16 on safety belts. GRSG adopted the proposal as reproduced in Annex IV to the session report and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 as part (see para. 36 above) of draft Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendment to UN Regulation No. 121 for consideration at their November 2017 sessions.

38. The expert from the Russian Federation underlined the need to correct the Russian version of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/5 in line with the English text (GRSG-112-25). GRSG requested the secretariat to take into account the correction of the Russian translation when preparing the above mentioned official document.

37. The expert from OICA presented GRSG-112-23 (superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/5) to align the provisions of UN Regulation No. 121 to those of the 07 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 16 on safety belts. GRSG adopted the proposal as reproduced in Annex IV to the session report and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 as part (see para. 36 above) of draft Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendment to UN Regulation No. 121 for consideration at their November 2017 sessions.

38. The expert from the Russian Federation underlined the need to correct the Russian version of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/5 in line with the English text (GRSG-112-25). GRSG requested the secretariat to take into account the correction of the Russian translation when preparing the above mentioned official document.

42. The expert from OICA presented GRSG-111-37 (superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2016/26) aimed at aligning the provisions of UN Regulation No. 121 to those of the 07 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 16 on safety-belts.

43. The expert from OICA suggested aligning the text of item No. 31 with that of standard ISO 2575 (GRSG-111-14). GRSG generally supported the proposal with a study reservation on GRSG-111-37 from the expert from Germany. GRSG decided to resume consideration of the proposals at its next session in April 2017 and requested the secretariat to circulate both documents (GRSG-111-14 and GRSG-111-37) with an official symbol.

42. The expert from OICA presented GRSG-111-37 (superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2016/26) aimed at aligning the provisions of UN Regulation No. 121 to those of the 07 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 16 on safety-belts.

43. The expert from OICA suggested aligning the text of item No. 31 with that of standard ISO 2575 (GRSG-111-14). GRSG generally supported the proposal with a study reservation on GRSG-111-37 from the expert from Germany. GRSG decided to resume consideration of the proposals at its next session in April 2017 and requested the secretariat to circulate both documents (GRSG-111-14 and GRSG-111-37) with an official symbol.

41. The expert from the Russian Federation recalled that the purpose of document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2016/17 was to insert into UN Regulation No. 121 a new symbol for the emergency call control and tell-tale. GRSG noted an editorial correction to footnote ²¹ (replace ‘reoriented’ by ‘re-orientated’) and agreed to submit it to WP.29 in parallel with the new draft Regulation on AECS (paras. 44-48 below).

36. The expert from the Russian Federation reminded GRSG about the purpose of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2016/17 to insert into UN Regulation No. 121 a new symbol for the emergency call control and tell-tale. GRSG recalled its decision at its previous session to submit the proposal in parallel with the new draft UN Regulation on Accident Emergency Call Systems (AECS) (paras. 40 and 41 below) and requested the secretariat was to submit document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2016/17, as amended below, to WP.29 and AC.1 as draft Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendment to UN Regulation No. 121 for consideration at their November 2017 sessions.

In Table 1, footnote 21, replace ‘reoriented’ by ‘re-orientated’.

42. The expert from OICA presented GRSG-111-37 (superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2016/26) aimed at aligning the provisions of UN Regulation No. 121 to those of the 07 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 16 on safety-belts.

43. The expert from OICA suggested aligning the text of item No. 31 with that of standard ISO 2575 (GRSG-111-14). GRSG generally supported the proposal with a study reservation on GRSG-111-37 from the expert from Germany. GRSG decided to resume consideration of the proposals at its next session in April 2017 and requested the secretariat to circulate both documents (GRSG-111-14 and GRSG-111-37) with an official symbol.

45. GRSG noted the outcome of the recent session of GRE (GRSG-110-04) and the request to align UN Regulation No. 121. In this respect, the expert from Italy presented GRSG-110-06 aimed at clarifying the provisions of UN Regulation No. 121 with respect to the indication of the failure of a light source.

46. GRSG adopted the proposal as reproduced in Annex IV to this report and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their November 2016 sessions, as draft Supplement 9 to the original version of UN Regulation No. 121 and as draft Supplement 1 to the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 121.

44. The expert from the Russian Federation recalled that the purpose of documents ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2015/24 and GRSG-110-14 was to insert into UN Regulation No. 121 a new symbol for the emergency call control and tell-tale. The proposal received the full support of GRSG. However, it was agreed to submit it in parallel with the new draft Regulation on AECS (para. 47 below). Thus, GRSG preferred to keep the document on the agenda and requested the secretariat to circulate GRSG-110-14 with an official symbol.

6. The expert from Belgium presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2016/5 proposing to remove the new safety prescriptions for trolleybuses from UN Regulation No. 107 and insert them into UN Regulation No. 100 on electric power trained vehicles. The expert from UK raised concerns about the differences in the scopes of both Regulations and their application to trolleybuses. GRSG noted the comments by the Working Party on Lighting and Light-Signalling (GRE) about possible alignments of UN Regulations Nos. 107 and 116 with UN Regulation No. 10 on electromagnetic-compatibility (GRSG-110-04). The expert from OICA introduced GRSG-110-08-Rev.1 on the applicability of UN Regulation No. 100 versus Annex 12 of UN Regulation No. 107 with respect to electrical safety provisions. The expert from France explained that the origin of the current problem of trolleybuses was linked to the application of the European Union (EU) legislation on whole vehicle type approval. The expert from Japan informed GRSG about the intention of the Chair of GRE to seek the advice of WP.29 on this subject at the forthcoming session in June 2016. The GRSG Chair questioned the need to also involve the experts of the Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP) in charge of UN Regulation No. 100. A number of experts expressed their preference to keep the electric safety provisions within UN Regulation No. 107. Thus, GRSG agreed that the experts of the Working Parties concerned should work on a simple solution avoiding further burden for public transport operators. The expert from Belgium volunteered to conduct a more detailed analysis on the compatibility or incompatibility of the scopes and technical provisions for trolleybuses of UN Regulations Nos. 10, 100 and 107.

7. GRSG agreed to resume consideration of this subject at its next session in October 2016 awaiting the outcome of the analysis by Belgium. GRSG requested the secretariat to keep ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2016/5 on the agenda as a reference document.

45. GRSG noted the outcome of the recent session of GRE (GRSG-110-04) and the request to align UN Regulation No. 121. In this respect, the expert from Italy presented GRSG-110-06 aimed at clarifying the provisions of UN Regulation No. 121 with respect to the indication of the failure of a light source.

46. GRSG adopted the proposal as reproduced in Annex IV to this report and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their November 2016 sessions, as draft Supplement 9 to the original version of UN Regulation No. 121 and as draft Supplement 1 to the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 121.

42. On behalf of the IWG on Accident Emergency Call Systems (AECS), the expert from the Russian Federation introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2015/24 proposing to insert into UN Regulation No. 121 a new symbol for the emergency call control and tell-tale. The expert from OICA announced his intention to submit, for consideration at the next GRSG session, a clarification of the proposed symbol.

43. GRSG agreed to keep the document on the agenda and to have a final review of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2015/24 at the April 2016 session. It was also agreed to submit the proposal to amend UN Regulation No. 121 in parallel with the new draft Regulation on AECS (para. 50 below).

44. The expert from the Russian Federation recalled that the purpose of documents ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2015/24 and GRSG-110-14 was to insert into UN Regulation No. 121 a new symbol for the emergency call control and tell-tale. The proposal received the full support of GRSG. However, it was agreed to submit it in parallel with the new draft Regulation on AECS (para. 47 below). Thus, GRSG preferred to keep the document on the agenda and requested the secretariat to circulate GRSG-110-14 with an official symbol.

53. On behalf of the IWG on Accident Emergency Call Systems (AECS), the expert from the Russian Federation introduced GRSG-108-05 proposing to insert into UN Regulation No. 121 a new symbol for the emergency call control and tell-tale. GRSG welcomed the proposal and agreed to resume consideration of this subject at its next session on the basis of an official document.

59. GRSG recalled its discussion under agenda item 12 (para. 53 above) on a new symbol for the emergency call control and tell-tale and agreed to resume consideration of this subject at its next session.

39. Recalling the purpose of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/30 and its Corr.1 (still pending on the agenda of WP.29), the Chair informed GRSG about the adoption by GRRF of the revised transitional provisions. He expected that draft 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 121 would be considered by WP.29 and AC.1 at their June 2014 sessions.

38. The expert from OICA introduced GRSG-106-35 justifying the proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2014/12 to adapt the provisions on multi-function displays to technical progress. GRSG noted a number of comments and agreed to submit it for consideration to the next session of the Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF). GRSG also agreed to resume consideration at its next session awaiting the comments of GRRF.

14. The expert from OICA announced that ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2014/12 and GRSG‑106‑35 had been withdrawn from the agenda of the 107th GRSG session. GRRF agreed on the removal of the item from the agenda.

European Commission unable to formally consider the editorial correction proposed by the WP.29 secretariat. Therefore, the EC does not have authority to approve the combined package of proposals. Therefore, the vote on adoption must be postponed.

European Commission unable to formally consider the editorial correction proposed by the WP.29 secretariat. Therefore, the EC does not have authority to approve the combined package of proposals. Therefore, the vote on adoption must be postponed.

12. The expert from UK also reported on the outcome of the group of experts working on updated transitional provisions of UN Regulations Nos. 13-H (GRRF-76-04) and introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2014/16 as amended by GRRF-76-30. GRRF adopted this proposal as reproduced in Annex III to the session report and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2014 sessions as part of the draft Supplement 16 to UN Regulation No. 13-H.

38. The expert from OICA introduced GRSG-106-35 justifying the proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2014/12 to adapt the provisions on multi-function displays to technical progress. GRSG noted a number of comments and agreed to submit it for consideration to the next session of the Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF). GRSG also agreed to resume consideration at its next session awaiting the comments of GRRF.

14. The expert from OICA announced that ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2014/12 and GRSG‑106‑35 had been withdrawn from the agenda of the 107th GRSG session. GRRF agreed on the removal of the item from the agenda.

32. On the request of the expert from OICA, author of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2014/12, GRSG agreed to defer consideration of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2014/12 to its May 2015 session.

52. Upon the request of the expert from OICA, GRSG agreed to defer consideration of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2014/12 to its October 2015 session. The expert from OICA volunteered to prepare a detailed justification document.

12. The expert from UK also reported on the outcome of the group of experts working on updated transitional provisions of UN Regulations Nos. 13-H (GRRF-76-04) and introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2014/16 as amended by GRRF-76-30. GRRF adopted this proposal as reproduced in Annex III to the session report and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2014 sessions as part of the draft Supplement 16 to UN Regulation No. 13-H.

11. The expert from UK reported on the outcome of the group of experts working on updated transitional provisions of UN Regulations Nos. 13 (GRRF-76-02) and introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2014/7. GRRF adopted this proposal as reproduced in Annex II to the session report and requested the secretariat to submit it to World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) and the Administrative Committee of the 1958 Agreement (AC.1) for consideration at their June 2014 sessions as part of the draft Supplement 12 to the 11 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 13.

12. The expert from UK also reported on the outcome of the group of experts working on updated transitional provisions of UN Regulations Nos. 13-H (GRRF-76-04) and introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2014/16 as amended by GRRF-76-30. GRRF adopted this proposal as reproduced in Annex III to the session report and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2014 sessions as part of the draft Supplement 16 to UN Regulation No. 13-H.

13. At the request of the expert from Japan, GRRF agreed to take note that the consolidation of the transitional provisions does not change the interpretation of the current text of the Regulation (e.g. transitional provisions for supplements). GRRF agreed that the absence of the historical dates from the latest text simplified interpretation of the requirements for the purposes of issuing type approval. GRRF also noted that references to “registration” had been removed in favour of “national or regional type approval” as recommended by the guidelines in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1044/Rev.1.

45. Recalling the purpose of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/30 (still pending on the agenda of WP.29), the Chair presented GRSG-105-30 clarifying the transitional provisions under paragraph 12.3. GRSG adopted the proposal, as reproduced in Annex IV of the session report, and requested the secretariat to submit the amendment to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2014 sessions as a Corrigendum to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/30 (draft 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 121), subject to a final review by GRSG at its next session in May 2014.

European Commission unable to formally consider the editorial corrections proposed by the WP.29 secretariat for the GRRF revisions to the two braking regulations above. Therefore, the EC does not have authority to approve the combined package of proposals. Since this proposal is part of a package, including the braking proposals considered under the review of the GRRF amendments, this proposal along with the related GRRF proposals are postponed to the November 2014 session.

44. The expert from OICA introduced GRSG-105-21 adapting the provisions on multi-function displays to technical progress. GRSG noted a study reservation by the expert from France and agreed to resume consideration at its next session on the basis of an official document.

[Proposal adopted.]

13. The expert from UK, recalling the purpose of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/30, reported on the outcome of the group of experts working on updated transitional provisions of UN Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H as reproduced in GRRF-75-40 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2013/27. GRRF noted a number of comments. GRRF agreed to reconsider ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2013/27, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2013/28 and GRRF-75-40 at its next session.

13. The expert from UK, recalling the purpose of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/30, reported on the outcome of the group of experts working on updated transitional provisions of UN Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H as reproduced in GRRF-75-40 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2013/27. GRRF noted a number of comments. GRRF agreed to reconsider ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2013/27, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2013/28 and GRRF-75-40 at its next session.

49. The expert from OICA introduced GRSG-104-21 correcting the generic provisions on automatic functions in table 1 of Supplement 7 to UN Regulation No. 121. GRSG adopted the proposal, as reproduced in Annex VIII of the meeting report [see the report addendum GRSG/83/Add.1], and requested the secretariat to submit the amendment to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their November 2013 sessions as Corrigendum 1 to Supplement 7 to UN Regulation No. 121.

50. Referring to GRSG-104-21, the expert from Canada questioned the interpretation of the generic provisions for symbols with or without the letter A. GRSG agreed to resume consideration of this subject at its next session.

Proposal unanimously adopted.

26. Recalling the discussion on UN Regulation No. 121 at its previous session, GRSG agreed to remove ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20 from the agenda. GRSG considered generic provisions for symbols of automatic systems and agreed on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2012/11. The expert from OICA introduced GRSG-102-22 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/32 and proposing to extend symbol Nos. 25 and 28 to the logics of the ISO colour coding and its hierarchy of alerts to the danger. GRSG adopted both documents, as reproduced in Annex VIII to this report, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their November 2012 sessions, as draft Supplement 8 to UN Regulation No. 121.

26. Recalling the discussion on UN Regulation No. 121 at its previous session, GRSG agreed to remove ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20 from the agenda. GRSG considered generic provisions for symbols of automatic systems and agreed on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2012/11. The expert from OICA introduced GRSG-102-22 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/32 and proposing to extend symbol Nos. 25 and 28 to the logics of the ISO colour coding and its hierarchy of alerts to the danger. GRSG adopted both documents, as reproduced in Annex VIII to this report, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their November 2012 sessions, as draft Supplement 8 to UN Regulation No. 121.

16. GRRF noted the submission by the Working Party on General Safety Provisions (GRSG) to the June session of WP.29 of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/30 proposing to remove the ESC tell-tale requirements from Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H and to insert these requirements into Regulation No. 121.

GRRF supported the text proposed in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2012/14 and agreed to take the opportunity of these amendments to clean up the transitional provisions.

The Russian Federation introduced GRRF-72-30 summarizing the transitional provisions of Regulation No. 13-H. The Chair introduced GRRF-72-29 containing additional explanations. Following the discussion, GRRF decided to establish an editorial group to review the transitional provisions in Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H. The Chair committed to ensure simultaneous adoption, by WP.29, of ECE/TRANS/2012/30 and the final amendments to the braking regulations with regard to the ESC tell-tale requirements.

GRRF agreed to resume consideration of this subject at its next session on the basis of a revised proposal.

15. GRRF had noted during its last session the submission to WP.29 by the Working Party on General Safety Provisions (GRSG) of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/30 proposing to remove the ESC tell-tale requirements from UN Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H and to insert these requirements into UN Regulation No. 121. GRRF had supported the text proposed in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2012/14. The experts from the Russian Federation and OICA proposed to clean up the transitional provisions and introduced GRRF-73-19 and GRRF-73-24, summarizing the transitional provisions of UN Regulations Nos. 13-H and 13 including explanations and useful details. The expert from OICA agreed to prepare an official document on the basis of these proposals for consideration at the next GRRF session. The Chair underlined the need for simultaneous adoption of amendments by WP.29 and AC. 1 and therefore suggested to keep ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/30 on the agenda of WP.29, awaiting the adoption by GRRF of amendments to Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H. He expressed his intention to inform WP.29.

11. The expert from Italy introduced GRRF-74-15, recalling the unintended deletion of paragraph 12.5. in Revision 2 to Regulation No. 13-H and proposing its reintroduction. GRRF agreed to this proposal and requested the secretariat to submit the proposal, as reproduced in Annex IV to this report, to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2013 sessions as draft Corrigendum 3 to the Revision 2 to Regulation No. 13-H.

12. The Chair recalled the purpose of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/30 tabled by the Working Party on General Safety Provisions (GRSG) proposing to remove the ESC tell-tale requirements from UN Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H and to insert these requirements into UN Regulation No. 121. GRRF agreed during its last session on this proposal and on cleaning up the transitional provisions of Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2012/14). The expert from OICA introduced GRRF-74-16 proposing to revise the transitional provisions taking into account the corresponding guidelines by WP.29. The expert from the Netherlands presented GRRF-74-39, proposing to revise the transitional provisions that are currently valid and to delete obsolete transitional provisions. The expert from the Russian Federation introduced GRRF-74-32 updating GRRF-74-16. The expert from the United Kingdom volunteered to organize an ad hoc meeting aimed at preparing an official document on the basis of GRRF-74-32 and GRRF-74-39 for the next session of GRRF. The expert from the Netherlands requested the presence of the secretariat to guide the work on this issue.

[Adopted by AC.1.]

16. GRRF noted the submission by the Working Party on General Safety Provisions (GRSG) to the June session of WP.29 of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/30 proposing to remove the ESC tell-tale requirements from Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H and to insert these requirements into Regulation No. 121.

GRRF supported the text proposed in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2012/14 and agreed to take the opportunity of these amendments to clean up the transitional provisions.

The Russian Federation introduced GRRF-72-30 summarizing the transitional provisions of Regulation No. 13-H. The Chair introduced GRRF-72-29 containing additional explanations. Following the discussion, GRRF decided to establish an editorial group to review the transitional provisions in Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H. The Chair committed to ensure simultaneous adoption, by WP.29, of ECE/TRANS/2012/30 and the final amendments to the braking regulations with regard to the ESC tell-tale requirements.

GRRF agreed to resume consideration of this subject at its next session on the basis of a revised proposal.

[Proposal intended for consideration at the June 2012 WP.29 session.]

Postponed since the proposal concerns the addition of the ESC warning light to UN R121 while removing the provision from UN R13/13-H. GRSG has prepared the R121 amendment, but GRRF has not completed its work on R13/13-H and endorsed the GRSG amendment. The changes should be adopted in November.

Consideration postponed to allow GRRF development of companion amendments to UN R13 to be finalized and the two proposals to be voted upon together.

15. GRRF had noted during its last session the submission to WP.29 by the Working Party on General Safety Provisions (GRSG) of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/30 proposing to remove the ESC tell-tale requirements from UN Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H and to insert these requirements into UN Regulation No. 121. GRRF had supported the text proposed in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2012/14. The experts from the Russian Federation and OICA proposed to clean up the transitional provisions and introduced GRRF-73-19 and GRRF-73-24, summarizing the transitional provisions of UN Regulations Nos. 13-H and 13 including explanations and useful details. The expert from OICA agreed to prepare an official document on the basis of these proposals for consideration at the next GRRF session. The Chair underlined the need for simultaneous adoption of amendments by WP.29 and AC. 1 and therefore suggested to keep ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/30 on the agenda of WP.29, awaiting the adoption by GRRF of amendments to Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H. He expressed his intention to inform WP.29.

11. The expert from Italy introduced GRRF-74-15, recalling the unintended deletion of paragraph 12.5. in Revision 2 to Regulation No. 13-H and proposing its reintroduction. GRRF agreed to this proposal and requested the secretariat to submit the proposal, as reproduced in Annex IV to this report, to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2013 sessions as draft Corrigendum 3 to the Revision 2 to Regulation No. 13-H.

12. The Chair recalled the purpose of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/30 tabled by the Working Party on General Safety Provisions (GRSG) proposing to remove the ESC tell-tale requirements from UN Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H and to insert these requirements into UN Regulation No. 121. GRRF agreed during its last session on this proposal and on cleaning up the transitional provisions of Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2012/14). The expert from OICA introduced GRRF-74-16 proposing to revise the transitional provisions taking into account the corresponding guidelines by WP.29. The expert from the Netherlands presented GRRF-74-39, proposing to revise the transitional provisions that are currently valid and to delete obsolete transitional provisions. The expert from the Russian Federation introduced GRRF-74-32 updating GRRF-74-16. The expert from the United Kingdom volunteered to organize an ad hoc meeting aimed at preparing an official document on the basis of GRRF-74-32 and GRRF-74-39 for the next session of GRRF. The expert from the Netherlands requested the presence of the secretariat to guide the work on this issue.

68. Under agenda item 4.12.2 (Regulation No. 121), WP.29 agreed to defer this item, to its March 2014 session, and to consider it together with a concrete proposal by GRRF amending Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H.

[The World Forum agreed to keep this proposal on the agenda for consideration at its November 2013 session.]

13. The expert from UK, recalling the purpose of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/30, reported on the outcome of the group of experts working on updated transitional provisions of UN Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H as reproduced in GRRF-75-40 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2013/27. GRRF noted a number of comments. GRRF agreed to reconsider ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2013/27, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2013/28 and GRRF-75-40 at its next session.

45. Recalling the purpose of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/30 (still pending on the agenda of WP.29), the Chair presented GRSG-105-30 clarifying the transitional provisions under paragraph 12.3. GRSG adopted the proposal, as reproduced in Annex IV of the session report, and requested the secretariat to submit the amendment to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2014 sessions as a Corrigendum to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/30 (draft 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 121), subject to a final review by GRSG at its next session in May 2014.

57. The World Forum considered the proposals for amendments to existing Regulations under agenda items 4.13.1 to 4.13.5 and agreed to keep them on the agenda for consideration at its June 2014 session.

39. Recalling the purpose of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/30 and its Corr.1 (still pending on the agenda of WP.29), the Chair informed GRSG about the adoption by GRRF of the revised transitional provisions. He expected that draft 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 121 would be considered by WP.29 and AC.1 at their June 2014 sessions.

European Commission unable to formally consider the editorial corrections proposed by the WP.29 secretariat for the GRRF revisions to the two braking regulations above. Therefore, the EC does not have authority to approve the combined package of proposals. Since this proposal is part of a package, including the braking proposals considered under the review of the GRRF amendments, this proposal along with the related GRRF proposals are postponed to the November 2014 session.

22. The expert from Canada recalled ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20 proposing the addition of more symbols in Regulation No. 121. The expert from OICA proposed to amend the proposal and introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/27 and GRSG-101-

11. GRSG adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/27, as amended below, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their March 2012 session, as draft Supplement 7 to Regulation No. 121:

Table 1, column 1, symbol No. 3a, correct “Headlamp high beam” to read “Headlamp main beam” and symbol No. 3b, correct “Automatic high beam functions” to read “Automatic main beam switching”.

Footnote 18/, correct “standard ISO” to read “standard ISO 2575-2004”.

23. GRSG considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/32 (superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7) tabled by OICA and proposing to transfer the control and tell-tale requirements from Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H to Regulation No. 121. GRSG noted a number of concerns on footnote 18/ and agreed to revise its current text at the next GRSG session on the basis of a revised proposal by OICA. Referring to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20, the expert from Canada reminded GRSG on the need to also insert symbol 48 on cruise control.

24. The expert from OICA introduced GRSG-101-02-Rev.1 on symbols for electronic stability control and he suggested submitting the proposal as a new series of amendments to Regulation No. 121. GRSG endorsed that approach. Following the discussion, GRSG adopted the proposal, as reproduced in Annex IV. The secretariat was requested to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2012 sessions, as draft 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 121 together with the necessary amendments to remove the control and tell-tale provisions from Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H, subject to a detailed consideration by the Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF) at its February 2012 session.

22. The expert from Canada recalled ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20 proposing the addition of more symbols in Regulation No. 121. The expert from OICA proposed to amend the proposal and introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/27 and GRSG-101-

11. GRSG adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/27, as amended below, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their March 2012 session, as draft Supplement 7 to Regulation No. 121:

Table 1, column 1, symbol No. 3a, correct “Headlamp high beam” to read “Headlamp main beam” and symbol No. 3b, correct “Automatic high beam functions” to read “Automatic main beam switching”.

Footnote 18/, correct “standard ISO” to read “standard ISO 2575-2004”.

23. GRSG considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/32 (superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7) tabled by OICA and proposing to transfer the control and tell-tale requirements from Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H to Regulation No. 121. GRSG noted a number of concerns on footnote 18/ and agreed to revise its current text at the next GRSG session on the basis of a revised proposal by OICA. Referring to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20, the expert from Canada reminded GRSG on the need to also insert symbol 48 on cruise control.

24. The expert from OICA introduced GRSG-101-02-Rev.1 on symbols for electronic stability control and he suggested submitting the proposal as a new series of amendments to Regulation No. 121. GRSG endorsed that approach. Following the discussion, GRSG adopted the proposal, as reproduced in Annex IV. The secretariat was requested to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2012 sessions, as draft 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 121 together with the necessary amendments to remove the control and tell-tale provisions from Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H, subject to a detailed consideration by the Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF) at its February 2012 session.

22. The expert from Canada recalled ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20 proposing the addition of more symbols in Regulation No. 121. The expert from OICA proposed to amend the proposal and introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/27 and GRSG-101-

11. GRSG adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/27, as amended below, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their March 2012 session, as draft Supplement 7 to Regulation No. 121:

Table 1, column 1, symbol No. 3a, correct “Headlamp high beam” to read “Headlamp main beam” and symbol No. 3b, correct “Automatic high beam functions” to read “Automatic main beam switching”.

Footnote 18/, correct “standard ISO” to read “standard ISO 2575-2004”.

23. GRSG considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/32 (superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7) tabled by OICA and proposing to transfer the control and tell-tale requirements from Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H to Regulation No. 121. GRSG noted a number of concerns on footnote 18/ and agreed to revise its current text at the next GRSG session on the basis of a revised proposal by OICA. Referring to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20, the expert from Canada reminded GRSG on the need to also insert symbol 48 on cruise control.

24. The expert from OICA introduced GRSG-101-02-Rev.1 on symbols for electronic stability control and he suggested submitting the proposal as a new series of amendments to Regulation No. 121. GRSG endorsed that approach. Following the discussion, GRSG adopted the proposal, as reproduced in Annex IV. The secretariat was requested to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2012 sessions, as draft 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 121 together with the necessary amendments to remove the control and tell-tale provisions from Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H, subject to a detailed consideration by the Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF) at its February 2012 session.

26. Recalling the discussion on UN Regulation No. 121 at its previous session, GRSG agreed to remove ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20 from the agenda. GRSG considered generic provisions for symbols of automatic systems and agreed on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2012/11. The expert from OICA introduced GRSG-102-22 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/32 and proposing to extend symbol Nos. 25 and 28 to the logics of the ISO colour coding and its hierarchy of alerts to the danger. GRSG adopted both documents, as reproduced in Annex VIII to this report, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their November 2012 sessions, as draft Supplement 8 to UN Regulation No. 121.

22. The expert from Canada recalled ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20 proposing the addition of more symbols in Regulation No. 121. The expert from OICA proposed to amend the proposal and introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/27 and GRSG-101-

11. GRSG adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/27, as amended below, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their March 2012 session, as draft Supplement 7 to Regulation No. 121:

Table 1, column 1, symbol No. 3a, correct “Headlamp high beam” to read “Headlamp main beam” and symbol No. 3b, correct “Automatic high beam functions” to read “Automatic main beam switching”.

Footnote 18/, correct “standard ISO” to read “standard ISO 2575-2004”.

23. GRSG considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/32 (superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7) tabled by OICA and proposing to transfer the control and tell-tale requirements from Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H to Regulation No. 121. GRSG noted a number of concerns on footnote 18/ and agreed to revise its current text at the next GRSG session on the basis of a revised proposal by OICA. Referring to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20, the expert from Canada reminded GRSG on the need to also insert symbol 48 on cruise control.

24. The expert from OICA introduced GRSG-101-02-Rev.1 on symbols for electronic stability control and he suggested submitting the proposal as a new series of amendments to Regulation No. 121. GRSG endorsed that approach. Following the discussion, GRSG adopted the proposal, as reproduced in Annex IV. The secretariat was requested to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2012 sessions, as draft 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 121 together with the necessary amendments to remove the control and tell-tale provisions from Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H, subject to a detailed consideration by the Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF) at its February 2012 session.

22. The expert from Canada recalled ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20 proposing the addition of more symbols in Regulation No. 121. The expert from OICA proposed to amend the proposal and introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/27 and GRSG-101-

11. GRSG adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/27, as amended below, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their March 2012 session, as draft Supplement 7 to Regulation No. 121:

Table 1, column 1, symbol No. 3a, correct “Headlamp high beam” to read “Headlamp main beam” and symbol No. 3b, correct “Automatic high beam functions” to read “Automatic main beam switching”.

Footnote 18/, correct “standard ISO” to read “standard ISO 2575-2004”.

23. GRSG considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/32 (superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7) tabled by OICA and proposing to transfer the control and tell-tale requirements from Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H to Regulation No. 121. GRSG noted a number of concerns on footnote 18/ and agreed to revise its current text at the next GRSG session on the basis of a revised proposal by OICA. Referring to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20, the expert from Canada reminded GRSG on the need to also insert symbol 48 on cruise control.

24. The expert from OICA introduced GRSG-101-02-Rev.1 on symbols for electronic stability control and he suggested submitting the proposal as a new series of amendments to Regulation No. 121. GRSG endorsed that approach. Following the discussion, GRSG adopted the proposal, as reproduced in Annex IV. The secretariat was requested to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2012 sessions, as draft 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 121 together with the necessary amendments to remove the control and tell-tale provisions from Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H, subject to a detailed consideration by the Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF) at its February 2012 session.

22. GRRF considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2011/37, GRRF-71-14 and GRRF-101-02, proposing to move all ESC related symbols from Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H to Regulation No. 121. GRRF supported in principle ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2011/37, GRRF-71-14 and GRRF-101-02. GRRF agreed to consider the amendment to Regulation No. 13 and 13-H at its next session on the basis of a revised proposal from OICA. The expert from Canada explained the justification for ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2011/37 which aims to avoid using the ESC symbol in different colours to convey different meanings. Canada suggested that people suffering from colour blindness would have difficulty identifying the signal. Whilst there was little support for the specific amendments to Regulation No. 13-H, GRRF supported the principle of defining symbols in Regulation No. 21 and noted overlaps with wider discussions at the Working Party on General Safety (GRSG).

23. Following the request of GRSG (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/79, para. 31), GRRF considered and supported ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/32 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7 and adapting the requirements on braking symbols to technical progress.

24. The secretariat was requested to inform GRSG about the outcome of the GRRF discussion.

31. The expert from Canada recalled ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20 proposing the addition of more symbols in Regulation No. 121. The expert from OICA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/6 and GRSG-100-10 commenting on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20. Noting that the input from other Working Parties on this proposal was needed, GRSG invited the expert from Canada to present this proposal to the Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF) and Working Party on Lighting and Light-Signalling (GRE). GRSG agreed to consider the matter at its October 2011 session together with the feedback from GRE and GRRF. GRSG requested the secretariat to merge ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/6 and GRSG-100-10 for consideration at its October 2011 session.

32. GRSG considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7 by OICA on the parking brake tell-tale. GRSG agreed to reconsider again this item at its October 2011 following the detailed consideration of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7 by GRRF at its September 2011 session.

33. The expert from Canada presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/8 and GRSG-100-14 clarifying the text of Regulation No. 121 and aligning the terminology used for passing and driving beams in lighting Regulations. The expert from OICA pointed out that the terminology used throughout Regulation No. 48 should also be made more consistent. GRSG adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/8, as amended by GRSG-100-14 reproduced below, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their November 2011 session, as draft Supplement 6 to Regulation No. 121.

Paragraph 2.5., amend to read:

• “2.5. ”Tell-tale" means an optical signal that, when alight, indicates the actuation or deactivation of a device, a correct or defective functioning or condition, or a failure to function."

31. The expert from Canada recalled ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20 proposing the addition of more symbols in Regulation No. 121. The expert from OICA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/6 and GRSG-100-10 commenting on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20. Noting that the input from other Working Parties on this proposal was needed, GRSG invited the expert from Canada to present this proposal to the Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF) and Working Party on Lighting and Light-Signalling (GRE). GRSG agreed to consider the matter at its October 2011 session together with the feedback from GRE and GRRF. GRSG requested the secretariat to merge ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/6 and GRSG-100-10 for consideration at its October 2011 session.

32. GRSG considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7 by OICA on the parking brake tell-tale. GRSG agreed to reconsider again this item at its October 2011 following the detailed consideration of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7 by GRRF at its September 2011 session.

33. The expert from Canada presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/8 and GRSG-100-14 clarifying the text of Regulation No. 121 and aligning the terminology used for passing and driving beams in lighting Regulations. The expert from OICA pointed out that the terminology used throughout Regulation No. 48 should also be made more consistent. GRSG adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/8, as amended by GRSG-100-14 reproduced below, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their November 2011 session, as draft Supplement 6 to Regulation No. 121.

Paragraph 2.5., amend to read:

• “2.5. ”Tell-tale" means an optical signal that, when alight, indicates the actuation or deactivation of a device, a correct or defective functioning or condition, or a failure to function."

31. The expert from Canada recalled ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20 proposing the addition of more symbols in Regulation No. 121. The expert from OICA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/6 and GRSG-100-10 commenting on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20. Noting that the input from other Working Parties on this proposal was needed, GRSG invited the expert from Canada to present this proposal to the Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF) and Working Party on Lighting and Light-Signalling (GRE). GRSG agreed to consider the matter at its October 2011 session together with the feedback from GRE and GRRF. GRSG requested the secretariat to merge ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/6 and GRSG-100-10 for consideration at its October 2011 session.

32. GRSG considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7 by OICA on the parking brake tell-tale. GRSG agreed to reconsider again this item at its October 2011 following the detailed consideration of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7 by GRRF at its September 2011 session.

33. The expert from Canada presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/8 and GRSG-100-14 clarifying the text of Regulation No. 121 and aligning the terminology used for passing and driving beams in lighting Regulations. The expert from OICA pointed out that the terminology used throughout Regulation No. 48 should also be made more consistent. GRSG adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/8, as amended by GRSG-100-14 reproduced below, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their November 2011 session, as draft Supplement 6 to Regulation No. 121.

Paragraph 2.5., amend to read:

• “2.5. ”Tell-tale" means an optical signal that, when alight, indicates the actuation or deactivation of a device, a correct or defective functioning or condition, or a failure to function."

31. The expert from Canada recalled ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20 proposing the addition of more symbols in Regulation No. 121. The expert from OICA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/6 and GRSG-100-10 commenting on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20. Noting that the input from other Working Parties on this proposal was needed, GRSG invited the expert from Canada to present this proposal to the Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF) and Working Party on Lighting and Light-Signalling (GRE). GRSG agreed to consider the matter at its October 2011 session together with the feedback from GRE and GRRF. GRSG requested the secretariat to merge ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/6 and GRSG-100-10 for consideration at its October 2011 session.

32. GRSG considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7 by OICA on the parking brake tell-tale. GRSG agreed to reconsider again this item at its October 2011 following the detailed consideration of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7 by GRRF at its September 2011 session.

33. The expert from Canada presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/8 and GRSG-100-14 clarifying the text of Regulation No. 121 and aligning the terminology used for passing and driving beams in lighting Regulations. The expert from OICA pointed out that the terminology used throughout Regulation No. 48 should also be made more consistent. GRSG adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/8, as amended by GRSG-100-14 reproduced below, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their November 2011 session, as draft Supplement 6 to Regulation No. 121.

Paragraph 2.5., amend to read:

• “2.5. ”Tell-tale" means an optical signal that, when alight, indicates the actuation or deactivation of a device, a correct or defective functioning or condition, or a failure to function."

31. The expert from Canada recalled ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20 proposing the addition of more symbols in Regulation No. 121. The expert from OICA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/6 and GRSG-100-10 commenting on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20. Noting that the input from other Working Parties on this proposal was needed, GRSG invited the expert from Canada to present this proposal to the Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF) and Working Party on Lighting and Light-Signalling (GRE). GRSG agreed to consider the matter at its October 2011 session together with the feedback from GRE and GRRF. GRSG requested the secretariat to merge ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/6 and GRSG-100-10 for consideration at its October 2011 session.

32. GRSG considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7 by OICA on the parking brake tell-tale. GRSG agreed to reconsider again this item at its October 2011 following the detailed consideration of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7 by GRRF at its September 2011 session.

33. The expert from Canada presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/8 and GRSG-100-14 clarifying the text of Regulation No. 121 and aligning the terminology used for passing and driving beams in lighting Regulations. The expert from OICA pointed out that the terminology used throughout Regulation No. 48 should also be made more consistent. GRSG adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/8, as amended by GRSG-100-14 reproduced below, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their November 2011 session, as draft Supplement 6 to Regulation No. 121.

Paragraph 2.5., amend to read:

• “2.5. ”Tell-tale" means an optical signal that, when alight, indicates the actuation or deactivation of a device, a correct or defective functioning or condition, or a failure to function."

22. GRRF considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2011/37, GRRF-71-14 and GRRF-101-02, proposing to move all ESC related symbols from Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H to Regulation No. 121. GRRF supported in principle ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2011/37, GRRF-71-14 and GRRF-101-02. GRRF agreed to consider the amendment to Regulation No. 13 and 13-H at its next session on the basis of a revised proposal from OICA. The expert from Canada explained the justification for ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2011/37 which aims to avoid using the ESC symbol in different colours to convey different meanings. Canada suggested that people suffering from colour blindness would have difficulty identifying the signal. Whilst there was little support for the specific amendments to Regulation No. 13-H, GRRF supported the principle of defining symbols in Regulation No. 21 and noted overlaps with wider discussions at the Working Party on General Safety (GRSG).

23. Following the request of GRSG (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/79, para. 31), GRRF considered and supported ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/32 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7 and adapting the requirements on braking symbols to technical progress.

24. The secretariat was requested to inform GRSG about the outcome of the GRRF discussion.

22. The expert from Canada recalled ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20 proposing the addition of more symbols in Regulation No. 121. The expert from OICA proposed to amend the proposal and introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/27 and GRSG-101-

11. GRSG adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/27, as amended below, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their March 2012 session, as draft Supplement 7 to Regulation No. 121:

Table 1, column 1, symbol No. 3a, correct “Headlamp high beam” to read “Headlamp main beam” and symbol No. 3b, correct “Automatic high beam functions” to read “Automatic main beam switching”.

Footnote 18/, correct “standard ISO” to read “standard ISO 2575-2004”.

23. GRSG considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/32 (superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7) tabled by OICA and proposing to transfer the control and tell-tale requirements from Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H to Regulation No. 121. GRSG noted a number of concerns on footnote 18/ and agreed to revise its current text at the next GRSG session on the basis of a revised proposal by OICA. Referring to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20, the expert from Canada reminded GRSG on the need to also insert symbol 48 on cruise control.

24. The expert from OICA introduced GRSG-101-02-Rev.1 on symbols for electronic stability control and he suggested submitting the proposal as a new series of amendments to Regulation No. 121. GRSG endorsed that approach. Following the discussion, GRSG adopted the proposal, as reproduced in Annex IV. The secretariat was requested to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2012 sessions, as draft 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 121 together with the necessary amendments to remove the control and tell-tale provisions from Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H, subject to a detailed consideration by the Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF) at its February 2012 session.

4. The provisional annotated agenda for the session (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1088) was adopted with the amendments noted below:

(a) Addition and amendments of agenda items:

4.2.1. Guidance requested by GRSG regarding the introduction of the concept of revisions of approvals and by GRRF regarding the interpretation of the extension of approvals in the framework of the 1958 Agreement;

4.13. Consideration of draft corrigenda to existing Regulations submitted by the secretariat;

4.13.1. Proposal for Corrigendum 2 to Revision 2 of No. Regulation 87 (Daytime running lamps) (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2011/53).

8.9. Safer vehicles as the third pillar of the Global Plan for the Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011–2020.

(b) Addition and correction of document references for items:

3.1. Add the reference to document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRB/50/Corr.1

3.4. Add the reference to document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/78/Corr.1.

4.7.6. For ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2010/68 read ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2009/68

4.7.10. Add at the end and on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2010/42, as amended by Annex IV to the report

4.10.9. Add at the end based on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2010/56, not amended

4.10.11. For Proposal for Corrigendum 4 to Revision 6 read Proposal for Corrigendum 3 to Revision 6

4.13.1. Add the reference to document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2011/53

7.3. and 23. Delete the reference to document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2011/49

8.6. Add the reference to document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2011/42/Corr.1

© Items or documents postponed for a further session:

4.12.1. and 4.12.2.

(d) Items deleted from the agenda:

4.2.3.

5. The informal documents distributed during the session are listed in Annex I to this report.

Note: For Annex I, please download the full report from the “Documentation” section of this page.

31. The expert from Canada recalled ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20 proposing the addition of more symbols in Regulation No. 121. The expert from OICA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/6 and GRSG-100-10 commenting on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20. Noting that the input from other Working Parties on this proposal was needed, GRSG invited the expert from Canada to present this proposal to the Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF) and Working Party on Lighting and Light-Signalling (GRE). GRSG agreed to consider the matter at its October 2011 session together with the feedback from GRE and GRRF. GRSG requested the secretariat to merge ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/6 and GRSG-100-10 for consideration at its October 2011 session.

32. GRSG considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7 by OICA on the parking brake tell-tale. GRSG agreed to reconsider again this item at its October 2011 following the detailed consideration of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7 by GRRF at its September 2011 session.

33. The expert from Canada presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/8 and GRSG-100-14 clarifying the text of Regulation No. 121 and aligning the terminology used for passing and driving beams in lighting Regulations. The expert from OICA pointed out that the terminology used throughout Regulation No. 48 should also be made more consistent. GRSG adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/8, as amended by GRSG-100-14 reproduced below, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their November 2011 session, as draft Supplement 6 to Regulation No. 121.

Paragraph 2.5., amend to read:

• “2.5. ”Tell-tale" means an optical signal that, when alight, indicates the actuation or deactivation of a device, a correct or defective functioning or condition, or a failure to function."

22. The expert from Canada recalled ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20 proposing the addition of more symbols in Regulation No. 121. The expert from OICA proposed to amend the proposal and introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/27 and GRSG-101-

11. GRSG adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/27, as amended below, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their March 2012 session, as draft Supplement 7 to Regulation No. 121:

Table 1, column 1, symbol No. 3a, correct “Headlamp high beam” to read “Headlamp main beam” and symbol No. 3b, correct “Automatic high beam functions” to read “Automatic main beam switching”.

Footnote 18/, correct “standard ISO” to read “standard ISO 2575-2004”.

23. GRSG considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/32 (superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/7) tabled by OICA and proposing to transfer the control and tell-tale requirements from Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H to Regulation No. 121. GRSG noted a number of concerns on footnote 18/ and agreed to revise its current text at the next GRSG session on the basis of a revised proposal by OICA. Referring to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20, the expert from Canada reminded GRSG on the need to also insert symbol 48 on cruise control.

24. The expert from OICA introduced GRSG-101-02-Rev.1 on symbols for electronic stability control and he suggested submitting the proposal as a new series of amendments to Regulation No. 121. GRSG endorsed that approach. Following the discussion, GRSG adopted the proposal, as reproduced in Annex IV. The secretariat was requested to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their June 2012 sessions, as draft 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 121 together with the necessary amendments to remove the control and tell-tale provisions from Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H, subject to a detailed consideration by the Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF) at its February 2012 session.

26. Recalling the discussion on UN Regulation No. 121 at its previous session, GRSG agreed to remove ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2010/20 from the agenda. GRSG considered generic provisions for symbols of automatic systems and agreed on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2012/11. The expert from OICA introduced GRSG-102-22 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2011/32 and proposing to extend symbol Nos. 25 and 28 to the logics of the ISO colour coding and its hierarchy of alerts to the danger. GRSG adopted both documents, as reproduced in Annex VIII to this report, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration at their November 2012 sessions, as draft Supplement 8 to UN Regulation No. 121.