Proposal first presented to the ACSF informal group for a type-approval mechanism to control for updates to software dependent systems.

OICA-CLEPA draft contribution to integrate SWTAN in UN Regulations

Vehicle manufacturer input for general brainstorming discussion on the regulation of automated driving systems and highly automated vehicles. OICA proposes a framework and has begun drafting elements of what might be included in a UN Regulation on highly automated (Levels 3-5) vehicles.

Proposal for wording regarding vehicle manufacturer responsibility for supplier cybersecurity: “The vehicle manufacturer shall demonstrate that he has processes in place with his suppliers to ensure cybersecurity.”

OICA review of the various national and regional guidelines on automated vehicle testing and development and perspectives for the development of a regulatory framework and vehicle certification procedure.

Presentation on current OICA thinking on methodologies for the certification or approval of automated vehicles and automated driving systems. This presentation supports document GRVA/2019/13.

Matrix illustrating a possible way that use of simulation, track, and real world testing might be applied to the various automated vehicle safety elements identified by WP.29 Contracting Parties.

Draft “Manufacturer’s declaration of compliance with the requirements for the Cyber Security Management System”

Amendments to para 7.3. “Requirements for vehicle types”, transitional provisions, and “high-risk vehicles”;

Proposals to clarify the draft text.

Proposal to clarify the text with regard to transitional provisions and extension of approvals.

Input concerning extensions of type approvals as revised during the session.

Comments on the proposal for amendments to the UN Regulation on Cyber Security Management.

Proposal to add para. 3.2.3.1. requiring manufacturers to provide additional information on the Cyber Security Management System at request of the Approval Authority when the Certificate of Compliance for CSMS is issued by a different Approval Authority, add para. 5.1.5. allowing the Approval Authority to refuse type approval if insufficient information on the CSMS and its implementation was provided, and add para. 7.4.1.1. requiring all granting Approval Authorities to be included in reporting when different Approval Authorities are used for the Certificate of Compliance for CSMS and type approval of the vehicle type.