Proposal from GRE to permit AFS passing-beam headlamps to project driver assistance symbols and patterns subject to relevant provisions of UN R149 and to align the 06 series of amendments to UN R48 with the 01 series of amendments to UN R148 and 149.

Proposal from GRE to permit AFS passing-beam headlamps to project driver assistance symbols and patterns subject to relevant provisions of UN R149 and to align the 07 series of amendments to UN R48 with the 01 series of amendments to UN R148 and 149.

Proposal from GRE to permit AFS passing-beam headlamps to project driver assistance symbols and patterns subject to relevant provisions of UN R149 and to align the 08 series of amendments to UN R48 with the 01 series of amendments to UN R148 and 149.

Proposal from GRE to permit AFS passing-beam headlamps to project driver assistance symbols and patterns and to add Driver Assistance Projections to the communication form in Annex 1 to improve transparency over whether a headlamp includes this capability.

Proposal from GRSG to align UN R43 with provisions in GTR 6 concerning the exemption of possible opaque obscuration areas from Zone I of the test area on the windscreen of M₂, M₃ and N categories of vehicles and to correct a reference in the draft Supplement 11 to the 01 series of amendments to the “Test Area B defined in Annex 18” to Annex 21.

Proposal to introduce provisions for radiant warmers.

Proposal to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:

1. There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as “+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function”.
2. The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.
3. The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.
4. The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.

Proposal to align references to UN R10 (electromagnetic compatibility) pursuant to the spin-off of UN R162 from UN R116.

Proposal to align references to UN R10 (electromagnetic compatibility) pursuant to the spin-off of UN R161 from UN R116.

Proposal to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:

1. There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as “+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function”.
2. The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.
3. The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.
4. The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.

Proposal to ensure that only safe head restraints are fitted to seats of any seating position in all vehicle categories within the scope of UN R17 and to extend the test performance of paragraph 5.7.4 (height retention of head restraints) to non-adjustable head restraint with only one position of use.

Proposal to enable approval of all vehicles and seating positions with regard to the strength of seats and their anchorages and with regard to their head restraints (in addition to M₁ and N₁) under UN R17. (Note: WP.29 deferred a decision on adoption of this proposal during the November 2023 session.)

Proposal to introduce requirements concerning post-crash safety of hydrogen-fuelled vehicles based on Amendment 1 to UN GTR No. 13 (Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Vehicles).

Proposal to:

1. define minimum safety-belt installation specifications for forward-facing seats which face a Child Restraint System in M₂ and M₃ vehicles
2. introduce definitions, requirements and a test procedure for lower tether anchorages
3. prohibit use of the Unique Identifier in place of the UN R16 approval mark, and
4. remove two exemptions for two-point belts
5. clarify the requirements for safety-belt reminder of rear seat row(s)
6. clarify:
   1. how to assess safety-belt reminder connection, in the case of removable seats and
   2. safety-belt reminder systems test procedure (first and second level warning), visual warning and requirements for safety-belt reminder of rear seat row(s).

Proposal to introduce requirements for the post-crash safety of hydrogen-fuelled vehicles based on the Amendment 1 to UN GTR No. 13 (Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Vehicles).

Proposal to:

1. Clarify the single belt route principle mentioned in paragraph 3.2.2.
2. Introduce definitions, requirements and a test procedure for lower tether anchorages
3. Restrict use of the colour green exclusively to the marking belt route indicators.

Proposal to transpose Amendment 1 to UN GTR13, Phase 2 (GTR13-PH2) into UN R134.

Proposal for a correction (corrigendum) to the French-language version of the 03 series of amendments.

Proposal for a new UN Regulation on the type approval of built-in Child Restraint Systems installed in vehicles of categories M₂ and M₃ class B and class III with regards to the securing of children from 40 – 150 cm in forward facing and rearward facing vehicle seats.

Proposal to align the text with the guidelines on UN regulatory procedures and transitional provisions in UN Regulations (document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1044/Rev.3). Under the guidelines, a UN Regulation (in this case, UN R157) making reference to the provisions of another UN Regulation (in this case, UN R10) shall not require actual approval to that UN regulation but simply refer to the provisions of that UN Regulation.

Proposal to clarify the packaging and labelling requirements for some types of brake lining assemblies, which could be fitted for various different applications and to allow the option of using a QR code (or another type of digital data carrier) to replace some information printed on or included in the packaging.

Proposal to clarify the packaging and labelling requirements for some types of brake lining assemblies, which could be fitted on various different applications and to allow the option of using a QR code (or another type of digital data carrier) to replace some information printed on or included in the packaging.

Proposal for guidelines concerning harmonised conditions for the assessment of the performance of vehicles, equipment and parts along different stages of their useful life.