Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE) reports to GRPE
Documents
29 Jul Electric Vehicles and the Environment: Agenda for the 98th (July 2026) session EVE-98-01/Rev.2 2026-07-29 The agenda for the Electric Vehicles and the Environment Informal Working Group 98th session scheduled for July 15, 2026, includes presentations on battery performance, discussions on UN GTR 21, UN GTR 22, and UN GTR 25 regulatory topics including minimum performance requirements, state of charge reference, readiness monitor and conditioning cycles, mutual recognition, fuel cell electric vehicles, highly integrated systems, energy throughput, normal usage indices, and battery replacement provisions. UN GTR 25 amendment 2 must be submitted to March 2027 GRPE with a December 2026 deadline.
14 Jul GTR 22: Light-duty vehicle data and minimum performance requirements (JRC) EVE-98-07 2026-07-14 This presentation summarizes EU-Commission JRC contributions to the EVE IWG regarding light-duty vehicle data for minimum performance requirements based on EVE-30-12, EVE-34-16, EVE-41-03, EVE-96-06, EVE-32-13e, EVE-74-21, and EVE-88-22. It compares JRC TEMA ageing predictions with real-world field data from multiple sources including Geotab analysis of over 22,700 electric vehicles showing average annual degradation of 2.3%, Tesla data indicating approximately 1% degradation per 40,000 km, Nissan Leaf data from Flip The Fleet comprising 2,311 vehicles, and experimental data from Canada on Tesla Model S and truck batteries. Key findings include that high-power DC fast charging causes degradation rates up to twice that of low-power charging, hot climates increase degradation 0.4% annually, and high mileage vehicles demonstrate cumulative calendar and cycle ageing effects while generally meeting GTR 22 battery energy retention requirements of 80% at five years and 100,000 km. JRC
14 Jul GTR 25: Next step- electric bus and coach minimum performance requirements, lifetime and metric revision (JRC) EVE-98-08 2026-07-14 JRC
29 Jul EVE informal group: Logistical information for the 99th session in Tianjin EVE-98-09 2026-07-29
8 Sep Electric Vehicles and the Environment: Report of the 98th (July 2026) session EVE-98-10/Rev.1 2026-09-08 The 98th EVE IWG session held virtually on July 15, 2026, adopted the agenda and discussed Phase 4 priorities for UN GTR 22, including Minimum Performance Requirements, State of Certified Range, conditioning cycles, and mutual recognition. Japan proposed sharing Part C verification results with all Contracting Parties. The IWG reviewed UN GTR 21 and UN GTR 25 status, covering MPRs, energy throughput, virtual distance verification, and battery replacement provisions. OICA will present their MPR position at EVE 100 and share Part C verification results at EVE 99. Japan will consult on hosting 2027 meetings targeting the week of February 15th.
8 Sep Invitation to the 99th EVE informal group session (Tianjin, China) EVE-99-00/Rev.2 2026-09-08
8 Sep Electric Vehicles and the Environment: Agenda for the 99th (September 2026) session EVE-99-01/Rev.3 2026-09-08 The agenda addresses UN GTR 22, UN GTR 21, and UN GTR 25, with discussions on fuel cell vehicle proposals, open items, verification results, alternative test methods, and battery replacement provisions. A reminder notes that UN GTR 25 amendment 2 must be submitted to GRPE-96 by December 2026.
29 Jul GTR 21: Working draft for Amendment 3 EVE-99-03 2026-07-29 Proposal to amend UN GTR No. 21 on system power determination:<ul><li>Establish a globally harmonized test procedure comparable to traditional engine power ratings for conventional vehicles,</li><li>specify TP1 based on measured electrical power and estimated internal combustion engine power with electrical conversion efficiency factors,</li><li>specify TP2 based on measured torque and speed at axle shafts or wheel hubs with mechanical conversion efficiency factors,</li><li>require manufacturers to provide verifiable K conversion factors,</li><li>remove dynamometer roller measurement options for TP2 in favor of torque and speed sensors or hub dynamometers,</li><li>mandate fuel flow rate measurement for TP1,</li><li>introduce the reference point concept to ensure comparable results across powertrain architectures,</li><li>require five test repetitions with averaging of the last four,</li><li>add applicability guidelines limiting TP1 or TP2 to specific architectures based on power flow characteristics,</li><li>establish approval criteria for system bench facilities as alternatives to chassis or hub dynamometers in a new Annex 3.</li></ul>
29 Jul GTR 22: Working draft for Amendment 3 EVE-99-04 2026-07-29 UN GTR No. 22 on In-vehicle Battery Durability for Electrified Light Duty Vehicles establishes harmonized requirements for monitoring and verifying minimum battery durability performance of pure electric vehicles and off-vehicle charging hybrid electric vehicles of categories M<sub>1</sub> and M<sub>2</sub>. Manufacturers must install State-of-Certified Energy (SOCE) and State-of-Certified Range (SOCR) monitors for the vehicle lifetime. Battery energy-based minimum performance requirements specify that vehicles of categories 1-1 and 1-2 must retain 80 per cent SOCE for 5 years or 100,000 km and 70 per cent for 8 years or 160,000 km; category 2 vehicles must retain 75 per cent and 65 per cent respectively. In-use verification comprises Part A verification of monitor accuracy using statistical methods, Part B verification of battery durability through remote data collection, and Part C verification of reported virtual distance. Manufacturers may declare higher performance requirements. Virtual distance may be reported for vehicles with Vehicle-to-Grid functionality or category 2 vehicles used for non-traction purposes.
29 Jul GTR 25: Working draft for Amendment 2 EVE-99-05 2026-07-29 UN GTR No. 25 on In-vehicle Battery Durability for Electrified Heavy Duty Vehicles provides harmonised methods to determine battery durability performance of HD-PEVs and HD-OVC-HEVs of categories M<sub>1</sub>–M<sub>3</sub> and N<sub>1</sub>–N<sub>3</sub> exceeding 3,855 kg MPLM. The regulation requires manufacturers to install State of Certified Energy (SOCE) monitors throughout vehicle lifetime. In-use verification consists of Part A verification of monitor accuracy through measured UBE testing using Methods 1a, 1b, Method 2 (bidirectional power supply), or an alternative HDV chassis dynamometer method, with statistical pass/fail criteria. Part B verification assesses battery durability against optional Minimum Performance Requirements (MPRs) through remote SOCE data collection from sample vehicles. Part C verification, reserved for future amendment, will address reported virtual distance accuracy for V2X, PTO and non-traction purpose applications. Optional Annex 4 specifies MPRs by vehicle category and mass, ranging from 45–70% SOCE retention across specified timeframes and distances. The GTR entered into force with Phase 1 covering core durability assessment and data collection to support future refinement of MPR thresholds based on in-service field data relating to HDVs, referencing WP.29-170-31 and GRPE/2026/3.
2 Sep GTR 25: Proposals on vehicle categories and MPR requirement (China) EVE-99-06 2026-09-02 Proposal to revise the weight threshold of M<sub>3</sub> vehicle category from 7.5 tonnes to 12 tonnes, split N-type trucks into three categories with light-duty trucks below 5 tonnes, medium-duty trucks above 5 tonnes and N<sub>3</sub> below 18 tonnes, and heavy-duty trucks above 18 tonnes, adjust year and mileage limits for N<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>3</sub> medium-duty trucks to 8 years or 500,000 km, and establish energy throughput requirements: M<sub>2</sub> 120,000 kWh, M<sub>3</sub>≤12t 300,000 kWh, M<sub>3</sub>>12t 500,000 kWh, N<sub>2</sub>≤5t 200,000 kWh, N<sub>2</sub>>5t, N<sub>3</sub>≤18t 400,000 kWh, N<sub>3</sub>>18t 1,200,000 kWh. China
2 Sep GTR 25: Reasonableness of low SOCE requirements (China) EVE-99-07 2026-09-02 China introduces an assessment of low State of Charge Energy requirements for M-type vehicles using data from city buses and coaches. At low SOCE levels, available energy is reduced, requiring increased initial battery energy capacity to meet customer driving range expectations, leading to higher purchase costs and vehicle weight. China provides reasons supporting SOCE performance targets at an 8-year timeframe, including significant differences in vehicle types, operating conditions, business models, and battery specifications that vary by vehicle type, making uniform standards inefficient. China
2 Sep GTR 25: Alternative test and verification methods (China) EVE-99-08 2026-09-02 GTR 25 establishes alternative test and verification methods for heavy-duty vehicle energy consumption. China released test method GB/T 18386.2-2022 based on chassis dynamometers using continuous cycle and shortened methods. Test conditions include temperature of 25°C ± 5°C, initial battery SOC of 20%, and pre-conditioning soak and charge for minimum 6 hours and maximum 36 hours. The torque meter method measures road load without disabling regenerative braking, achieving resistance matching within 5% error. Test verification includes vehicle selection across mileage groups 0, 200,000, 400,000, and 600,000 km, with on-board data collection and sensor accuracy consistency analysis post-durability. China
2 Sep GTR 25: Feasibility of five-year MPR limit (China) EVE-99-09 2026-09-02 Under GTR 25, a feasibility assessment proposes introducing a 5-year mid-term performance requirement threshold together with corresponding mileage and energy-throughput limits as an intermediate verification checkpoint for battery degradation. Based on analysis of State-of-Health data from vehicles with 5-year life and mileage ranging from 250,000 km to 350,000 km, the MPR value is set at 75%, which can cover 98% battery-durability performance. Specific mileage and energy-throughput limits are established for vehicle categories M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>, and N<sub>3</sub>. China
2 Sep GTR 25: Determination of system power and torque for HD-HDV and HD-PEV (China) EVE-99-10 2026-09-02 This document proposes establishing a unified global testing method for determining system power and torque of heavy-duty hybrid electric vehicles (HD-HEV) and heavy-duty plug-in electric vehicles (HD-PEV). The proposal addresses the lack of standardized test methods by recommending hub-coupled dynamometer testing for vehicles with central drive systems and chassis dynamometer testing for other configurations. Testing should measure 30-minute continuous maximum power and torque under thermal equilibrium conditions. The document includes technical data from battery energy distribution analysis and recommends China lead formulation of this standard using chassis dynamometer verification. China
3 Sep GTR 25: Comments for further development of the GTR (OICA) EVE-99-11 2026-09-03 The document addresses Part C verification of virtual distance for heavy-duty vehicle batteries. OICA reports pilot phase results from Volvo Group and Daimler Truck AG testing measurement procedures and accuracy under driving and stationary conditions. Key findings show measurement accuracy decreases significantly at lower power levels, with deviations of 0.3% to 4% at higher power. PTO system characteristics influence accuracy; internal PTOs performed better than bodybuilder-installed units. The document identifies challenges including formula correction needs, PTO family concept complexity, and proposes further testing before finalizing Part C requirements. OICA
5 Sep GTR 25: Comments for further development of the GTR (Japan and JASIC) EVE-99-12 2026-09-05 Japan proposes to add a specific requirement for vehicle speed measurement frequency of 20 Hz in Table A3/1 of Annex 3, consistent with UN R154; revise para. 2.4 to clarify that both constant and transient cycles test methods are permitted; delete redundant text from para. 2.4.1 regarding test cycle requirements; and delete from para. 5.1 the requirement that resolution and method for SOCE availability be determined in agreement with authorities, as these are already specified. Japan JASIC
5 Sep GTR 21: Improvement proposal for phase 4 (Japan) EVE-99-13 2026-09-05 Proposal to improve efficiency of test methods by adding a reference to SAE J1349 or applicable local regulations, in addition to UN R85 and ISO 1585, to para. 6.1.2. and para. 6.1.2.1., and delete the requirement for Current integration measurement from para. 5.2.1. The additions provide consistency throughout the regulation and clarify that test results obtained in accordance with applicable local regulations are considered valid. The deletion removes an inconsistency whereby only Current integration measurement specifies a frequency of 20 Hz, while other items specify at least 10 Hz, and eliminates inapplicable wording carried over from UN R154. Japan
5 Sep GTR 21: Proposal to introduce provisions for fuel-cell vehicles (FCV) (China) EVE-99-14 2026-09-05 Proposal to: <ul><li>Amend para. 2.1.(a) to include fuel cell electric vehicles that have more than one propulsion energy converter,</li><li>Add fuel cell electric vehicle preparation requirements to para. 6.3. requiring run-in in accordance with manufacturers recommendations and at least 300 km of fuel cell run-in with hydrogen refueled in accordance with manufacturers recommendations,</li><li>Amend para. 6.5. to include FCEVs in initial REESS charge requirements,</li><li>Amend para. 6.8.1. to include fuel cell temperature in operational metrics to be monitored and recorded throughout the test,</li><li>Retitle para. 2.6. as Fuel cell architectures, and add paras. 2.6.1., 2.6.2., and 2.6.3. specifying power determination reference points and test procedures for fuel cell architectures.</li></ul> China
8 Sep GTR 22: Proposal to revise provisions and formulas regarding UBE(certified) values (Japan) EVE-99-15 2026-09-08 Proposal to revise provisions and formulas in GTR 22 Annex 3, paras. 2.1.2. and 3.1.2., UN R154-04 Annex C1, Appendix 2, paras. 2.1.2. and 3.1.2., and UN R83-09 Appendix 5, para. 3.1.2. to make UBE<sub>certified</sub> values positive and select the maximum absolute value. The document EVE-63-11e addresses concerns that when the interpolation method is applied under GTR No. 15 / UN R154, UBE<sub>certified</sub> values become negative, contrary to regulatory intent. Revisions ensure UBE<sub>certified</sub> is determined by selecting the maximum absolute value amongst vehicle H, vehicle L, and vehicle M where applicable. Japan