Presentation of ACEA concerns over the TRL proposal to adapt the GTR No. 9 test procedures to use 45° bumper corners.

Presentation on the conclusions from the Flex-PLI impactor tests and analysis of European accident data to determine the potential benefits to the EU from extension of the bumper test area under the pedestrian safety GTR.

Results from the second round of tests using the flexible lower legform impactor (Flex-PLI) to define the bumper test area.

Agenda for the January 2014 task force on the bumper test area for the GTR on pedestrian safety.

Explanation of Japanese concerns over differences in the behaviour of the Flex-PLI lower legform impactor in an angled impact compared with a human being based on THUMS analysis in relation to the bumper beam proposal for determining the impact area of the test.

Presentation to explain Japan’s preference for using a gauge to ensure a 60° angle over the procedure based on the bumper beam to determine the target impact area for the lower legform.

JASIC view urging quick adoption of the bumper test area using a 60° threshold in line with the currently available technology (as opposed to delaying initial implementation while researching and validating further refinements).

Presentation showing relative risks of injuries within and outside the proposed bumper test area and comparing late-model (post-2006) cars against earlier models based upon GIDAS data.

VDA input concerning lower and upper bumper reference lines, the use of smaller corner gauges, and definition of the test area over the full width of the vehicle in the pedestrian protection test procedures.

Updated presentation showing relative risks of injuries within and outside the proposed bumper test area and comparing late-model (post-2006) cars against earlier models based upon GIDAS data.